Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M L McMulkin

Publications and source records attributed to M L McMulkin.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Torso loading via a harness method activates trunk muscles less than a hand loading method.

There is a need for data comparing muscle activity under equivalent moments at the torso using different loading methods. In torso biomechanics, it is often necessary to apply moments to people and then measure or predict the muscle activity in response to the external load. Alternative methods exist to generate moments including applying forces by a chest harness and loads held in the hands. The limitation of previous research has been to use only one of the loading methods, generally harness loading, assuming it produces muscle activity equal to when loads are held in the hands. The objective of the this study was to test if equivalent moments at L3/L4 applied to subjects through two loading methods resulted in the same muscle activity. Subjects maintained a static posture while attempting a combination of flexion/extension, lateral bending, and torsion to counter the external loads applied via hand and harness loading methods. Hand and harness loading did not result in equal muscle activity as measured by electromyographic techniques. The left and right latissimus dorsi had increases in activity (16-25%) when loads were held with the hands instead of applied via the harness. Increased activity for hand loading was also found for the left and right rectus abdominis (13-17%) and left external oblique (24%). The left and right erector spinae and right external oblique exhibited the same activity for both loading methods. The current findings indicate that studies of torso loading using a shoulder harness to create torso moments may be lowering activity of some torso muscles.

Adult↗

Forces applied to large hand wheels.

This is a report of a study conducted to establish the population isometric strength capabilities of subjects generating force using a hand wheel. Wheel force strength of 125 males and 125 females was measured using two different handgrip configurations: grasping the rim of the wheel and grasping the spoke. In addition, two separate procedures for generating and measuring strength were used: a 3 s average during a 6 s trial, and a ramp to maximum exertion level and then relax. The task simulated setting a handbrake on a typical railroad box car. Results indicated that grip characteristics and grip strength play an important role in isometric wheel force strength capabilities. The average tangential forces ranged from 393 to 614 N for males, and from 235 to 348 N for females, depending upon the grip configuration and the method used to measure strength. Standard whole-body strength measures for the legs, arms, torso and grip were also measured and demonstrated to be effective in predicting the wheel force strength capabilities of the subjects.

Journal Article↗

Usability of a one-hand ternary chord keyboard.

Five subjects learned to operate a one-hand ternary chord keyboard with 18 different characters, on average, in just over 30 min. Subjects practised inputting numeric-type text for an additional 60 h and attained an average peak keying speed of 170 characters/min. Because of the short learning time, high performance, and low space requirement, the one-hand ternary chord keyboard is an attractive input device for tasks with small character sets.

Journal Article↗

Correlation of static to dynamic measures of lower extremity range of motion in cerebral palsy and control populations.

The question addressed in this study was whether static measurements of hip, knee, and ankle range of motion correlate to dynamic measurements of hip and knee function during gait. Range-of-motion measures of the lower extremities taken during physical examination (static variables) were recorded on 80 adolescents with cerebral palsy and 30 adolescent normal controls. Kinematic measurements collected during gait analysis (dynamic variables) were recorded on the same patients and controls. Results indicated no correlation greater than r = 0.50 (R2 < 0.25) between any static and dynamic variable for either group--cerebral palsy patients or controls. The lack of good correlation of these measures indicates static physical examination variables such as popliteal angle and straight-leg raise are not good predictors of dynamic gait, such as knee-extension and hip-flexion variables measured during ambulation in controls or cerebral palsy populations.

Adolescent↗