Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M L Blute

Publications and source records attributed to M L Blute.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources
PubMed1996

Prostate specific antigen detected prostate cancer (clinical stage T1c): an interim analysis.

PURPOSE: The majority of impalpable prostate cancers (state T1c) are biologically significant. We report the interim results in 257 patients with stage T1c prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prostate specific antigen progression-free survival was assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate analyses were performed to determine which clinical and pathological variables independently correlated with progression. Comparisons among the various clinical substages (T1a to T2b/c) were calculated. RESULTS: Of the patients with stage T1c cancers 51% had stage pT2c or less and 91% had clinically significant tumors on the basis of pathological grade, deoxyribonucleic acid ploidy and tumor volume. High preoperative prostate specific antigen, poorly differentiated tumors and nondiploid status were strong independent predictors of progression. The 5-year survival rate free of progression was 84%. Patients with clinical stage T1c cancers had a significant progression-free survival advantage compared to those with clinical stage T2b/c disease (p = 0.0005). CONCLUSIONS: Impalpable tumors should not be regarded as insignificant or innocuous on the basis of pathological analysis. Disease-free survival in the stage T1c group was similar to that in the clinical stages T1a to T2a group but significantly better than that in the T2b/c group.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Prospective analysis of the incidence of ipsilateral adrenal metastasis in localized renal cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: The incidence of ipsilateral adrenal metastasis in renal cell carcinoma was evaluated in a prospective fashion to understand more fully the natural history of this disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During a 15-month period 128 radical nephrectomies were performed for stages T1 to T3bN0M0 renal cell carcinoma at our institution. Of these specimens 100 adrenal glands were of sufficient integrity to allow for thin sectioning. RESULTS: Among the 100 adrenal glands 4 adrenal lesions were discovered (2 metastatic renal cell carcinomas and 2 benign adrenal lesions). All 4 lesions were identified preoperatively by computerized tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. CONCLUSIONS: Our prospective investigation demonstrates that the rate of ipsilateral adrenal metastasis from renal cell carcinoma is approximately 2%, and suggests that when the ipsilateral adrenal gland is well visualized and of normal integrity on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging or computerized tomography adrenal sparing nephrectomy may be considered a viable treatment option.

Adrenal Gland Neoplasms↗
PubMed1996

Disease outcome in patients with low stage renal cell carcinoma treated with nephron sparing or radical surgery.

PURPOSE: We investigated the outcome of nephron sparing surgery in patients with low grade and low stage (Robson stage II or less) renal cell carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 185 patients treated with nephron sparing surgery and 209 matched for patient age and sex, and tumor stage and grade who were treated with radical nephrectomy. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were constructed for progression and survival end points. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine the tumor characteristics independently correlated with progression and cancer death. RESULTS: No significant difference was observed with respect to progression-free, crude or cancer specific survival between the nephron sparing surgery and radical nephrectomy groups. Less than 5% of the patients treated with conservative nephron sparing surgery had local recurrence. Tumor size was a strong independent predictor of outcome, whereas Robson stage was not. Patients treated with radical nephrectomy had a significant cancer specific and progression-free survival advantage when controlling for tumor diameter and grade. However, no difference was observed in patients with primary tumor diameters of 4 cm. or less. CONCLUSIONS: Robson staging is inaccurate in predicting tumor behavior. Patients with tumors larger than 4 cm. and a normal contralateral kidney may be best served by radical nephrectomy rather than elective nephron sparing surgery. However, nephron sparing surgery may result in an outcome similar to that of radical nephrectomy for low grade, low stage renal cell carcinomas of 4 cm. or smaller.

Carcinoma, Renal Cell↗
PubMed1996

Analysis of risk factors for progression in patients with pathologically confined prostate cancers after radical retropubic prostatectomy.

PURPOSE: Up to 26% of patients with pathologically organ confined prostate cancer will experience clinical progression after radical prostatectomy. We attempted to identify patients at greatest risk for future clinical failure despite a favorable pathological outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study group included 904 patients treated with bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy and radical retropubic prostatectomy for disease confined to the prostate gland. Preoperative serum prostate specific antigen (PSA), clinical stage, pathological grade and stage, and deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) ploidy were evaluated by multivariate analysis to determine relative value in predicting treatment failure. A prognostic scoring system was created using the regression coefficients from the Cox multivariate model to classify patients further according to risk of progression. RESULTS: Preoperative PSA concentration, clinical stage, grade and DNA ploidy were significant univariate predictors of progression (p < 0.0001), whereas pathological stage was not (p = 0.2). Multivariate analysis identified pathological grade (p < 0.0001), preoperative serum PSA concentration (p = 0.0006) and DNA ploidy (p = 0.0089) as independent predictors of progression. The prognostic scoring system separated the patients into 5 distinct groups. Patients with the lowest score had a 92% progression-free survival rate at 5 years, compared to only 39% of those with the highest scores. CONCLUSIONS: Patients believed to be at higher risk for cancer progression despite having organ confined disease might be targeted for adjuvant therapy and closer surveillance, while those at low risk may be followed less often.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Risk factors for progression in patients with prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy.

Adjuvant therapy after radical prostatectomy should ideally be limited to those patients at greatest risk for cancer recurrence, but identification of these patients remains a challenge. Although tumor volume has traditionally been regarded as the most important prognostic factor in patients with localized prostate cancer, a recent multivariate analysis has shown that tumor is not an independent predictor. Moreover, accurate measurement of tumor volume is extremely difficult. Preoperative serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels have been identified as a significant independent predictor of progression. Disease-free survival is significantly better in patients with DNA-diploid prostate cancers than in those with nondiploid tumors. Histological grade is also a powerful predictor of disease progression. As a basis for selecting candidates for adjuvant therapy, clinical staging is too inaccurate and pathological staging too subjective. A recent Mayo Clinic study assessed the value of widely available clinical and laboratory parameters in predicting treatment failure after radical prostatectomy in 904 patients with pathologically organ-confined prostate cancer. Multivariate analysis identified Gleason score, preoperative serum PSA concentration, and DNA ploidy as independent predictors for progression. These risk factors were used to develop a scoring system that allows patients to be classified according to their risk of progression. Patients in the highest risk categories might be targeted for adjuvant therapy and closer surveillance, whereas those at lower risk might be followed less frequently.

Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal↗
PubMed1996

Platinum-based chemotherapy for advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract.

OBJECTIVE: To report the results of platinum-based chemotherapy used at one medical center in patients with advanced transitional cell carcinomas (TCCs) of the upper urinary tract. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between July 1981 and February 1993, 28 patients (mean age, 59.3 years) with advanced TCC of the upper urinary tract received cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Of the 28 patients, 14 received a median of 4 cycles of cisplatin, methotrexate, and vinblastine sulfate, 8 received a median of 4.5 cycles of methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin hydrochloride, and cisplatin, 5 received a median of 5 cycles of etoposide and cisplatin, and 1 was treated with 7 cycles of only cisplatin. Overall survival estimates were constructed from nonparametric analysis with the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: The overall response rate (partial and complete) to chemotherapy was 54%. The most responsive metastatic sites were the lung and lymph nodes-78 and 47% overall response rate, respectively. The estimated median duration of survival for the entire study group was 14 months. In the study population, only three patients were long-term survivors. A significant survival advantage was noted only in the few patients (with limited metastatic tumor volume) who had a complete response to therapy. Initial dose reductions in chemotherapy because of decreased baseline renal function were necessary in 79% of the patients. CONCLUSION: Removal of the primary lesion in the presence of metastatic or locally advanced disease does not apparently improve chemotherapy response rates or patient survival. In addition, many patients do not receive optimal dosing of systemic chemotherapy after nephrectomy. Therefore, by avoiding dose modifications, the overall response rates and survival may conceivably be improved. A diagnostic biopsy or nephron-sparing surgical procedure and neoadjuvant systemic therapy may be considered in patients with advanced TCC at the time of initial assessment in order to allow optimal dosing of chemotherapy.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Primary chemotherapy for clinical stage II nonseminomatous germ cell testicular tumors: selection criteria and long-term results.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the treatment option for patients with low-volume stage II nonseminomatous germ cell testicular tumors (NSGCTT) that yields the best survival, is associated with the least morbidity, and avoids "double therapy"--that is, chemotherapy and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND). DESIGN: We reviewed our institutional experience with 28 patients with stage II NSGCTT who received primary chemotherapy between August 1983 and October 1992. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The 28 study patients (mean age, 28 years; range, 20 to 52) with low-volume stage II NSGCTT were treated with bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin. The correlation of response rates with volume of disease and predominant histologic cell type was determined. The duration of survival was measured from the initiation of chemotherapy to the appearance of progressive disease or death or the date of last follow-up visit. RESULTS: Of the 28 patients treated, 27 (96%) achieved a complete response--20 (71%) with only chemotherapy and an additional 7 (25%) with chemotherapy plus surgical treatment. Twenty-seven patients (96%) remained free of disease after a median follow-up of 72 months. The most frequent complication was cisplatin-associated paresthesias or tinnitus which was noted in 13 patients (46%). In 11 of 15 patients (73%), attempts to have children have been successful. CONCLUSION: Excellent long-term survival rates in patients with stage II NSGCTT can be achieved with primary chemotherapy. In this series, 71% of patients were spared RPLND. The need for postchemotherapy RPLND seemed to be related to the initial metastatic tumor volume and possibly the histologic features of the primary tumor. Continued refinement in surgical techniques and chemotherapeutic regimens will necessitate the comparison of these two treatment approaches in a randomized prospective trial.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Critical evaluation of salvage surgery for radio-recurrent/resistant prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: A positive post-irradiation prostatic biopsy associated with an increasing prostate specific antigen level but no palpable evidence of local progression may identify a subgroup of patients who could be cured by salvage surgical therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1967 and 1992, 132 patients underwent salvage surgery, including radical retropubic prostatectomy in 79, anterior exenteration in 38, total exenteration in 5 and bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy only in 10. RESULTS: The 10-year cancer-specific survival rate in the prostatectomy group was 72%. Local control was equivalent among the surgical groups. Radical retropubic prostatectomy patients with negative surgical margins and nonaneuploid tumors demonstrated a significant survival advantage. Adjuvant hormonal therapy improved the disease-free survival rate in patients with nonaneuploid tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Radical retropubic prostatectomy can achieve excellent survival with low morbidity in select patients. Patients with clinical stage T2 or less disease and with prostate specific antigen detected cancers (52% and 75%, respectively) had pathological stage T2 disease. Thus, by using modern diagnostic techniques patients can be identified who may be cured with salvage surgery.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Morbidity of contemporary radical retropubic prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer.

Complication rates in 1,000 consecutive patients who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer between November 1989 and January 1992 were assessed and compared to complication rates in a historical group of patients operated on by primarily the same surgeons prior to 1987. In the contemporary series, there were no operative deaths, only 22% of patients required blood transfusion, and only six (0.6%) patients suffered rectal injuries. Early complications, including myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, bacteremia, and wound infection, occurred in less than 1% of patients. Vesical neck contracture, the most common late complication, developed in 87 patients (8.7%). At 1 year post-surgery, 80% of patients were completely continent, and fewer than 1% were totally incontinent.

Aged↗
PubMed1995

Extended experience with radical prostatectomy for clinical stage T3 prostate cancer: outcome and contemporary morbidity.

PURPOSE: Radical prostatectomy for clinical stage T3 prostate cancer has not been widely accepted due to the potential for incomplete excision of the local tumor and high incidence of lymph node metastases. In addition, contemporary morbidity is unknown. We report the long-term results in 812 patients with clinical stage T3 prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1966 and 1992, 812 patients with clinical stage T3 prostate cancer underwent radical prostatectomy of whom 479 (60%) received adjuvant therapy. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 65 years (range 40 to 78). Mean followup was 4.5 years (range up to 24). Disease was stage pT2c or less in 17% of patients, pT3a to c in 49% and node-positive in 33%. Of the primary tumors pathological Gleason score was 7 or greater in 62%. Crude and cancer-specific survival rates at 5, 10 and 15 years were 86%, 70% and 51%, and 90%, 80% and 69%, respectively. Operative morbidity paralleled that of patients with clinically localized disease (T2c or less). CONCLUSIONS: An excellent survival rate with low treatment related morbidity can be achieved by performing primary radical prostatectomy with adjuvant therapy in the patient with clinical stage T3 prostate cancer.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Long-term (15 years) results after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized (stage T2c or lower) prostate cancer.

To provide information about long-term outcome after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostatic cancer (stage T2c or lower), we undertook a retrospective analysis of 3,170 consecutive patients (mean age 65.3 +/- 6.4 years, range 31 to 81) with a mean followup of 5 years. Complication rates for patients who underwent prostatectomy before 1988 were compared with those who underwent radical prostatectomy more recently. Of the patients 49 (1.5%), 178 (5.6%), 897 (28%) and 2,047 (65%) had clinical stages T1a, T1b, T2a and T2b,c disease, respectively. The Gleason score was 3 or less in 292 patients (9%) and 7 or greater in 782 (25%). Overall, 438 patients (14%) died, 159 (5%) of cancer. The crude 10 and 15-year survival rates for all patients were 75% and 60%, respectively, which is comparable to the expected survival of a control group (67% and 46%). The cause specific survival rates were 90% and 82%, respectively, metastasis-free survival rates 82% and 76%, local recurrence-free survival rates 83% and 75%, overall recurrence-free rates 72% and 61%, and overall recurrence plus prostate specific antigen progression-free (greater than 0.2 ng./ml.) rates 52% and 40%, respectively. Clinical stage did not significantly affect survival but tumor grade was associated: 10 and 15-year cause specific survival rates were 95% and 93%, respectively, for a Gleason score of 3 or less, 90% and 82%, respectively, for a score of 4 to 6, and 82% and 71%, respectively, for a score of 7 or more. Of all patients 26% received adjuvant treatment (hormonal and/or radiation) within 3 months postoperatively because of advanced local pathological stage (pT3 or higher) or margin positive disease. The 30-day mortality rate was 0.3% (0% for 1,728 patients who underwent surgery in 1988 or later). Only 1 patient in the 70 year or older age group died during hospitalization. Complications decreased with time. In a contemporary group the complications were rectal injury in 0.6% of the patients, colostomy in 0.06%, myocardial infarction in 0.4%, deep venous thrombosis in 1.1%, pulmonary embolism in 0.7% and total urinary incontinence (3 or more pads per day) in 0.8%. Recent intraoperative blood loss was a median of 600 ml., and the incidence of recent need for any transfusion was 31% and it is presently less than 5%. In this series patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer were usually healthy and, thus, had low co-morbidity. Survival rates at 10 and 15 years compare favorably with those of an age-matched control group.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Renal tumors.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Angiomyolipoma↗
PubMed1994

Radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: long-term results of 1,143 patients from a single institution.

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy and complication rate of radical prostatectomy (RP) as a treatment option for clinically localized prostate cancer (clinical stage < or = T2c). METHODS: The study was a retrospective analysis of 1,143 consecutive patients (median age, 64 years; range, 38 to 79 y) who underwent RP at one institution (mean follow-up time, 9.7 years). Complications for this study population were compared with those of a contemporary group of 1,000 consecutive patients. RESULTS: Of 1,143 patients, 83 (7%) had a low clinical stage (T1) and 160 (14%) had a low histologic grade (Gleason score < or = 3); 648 (57%) had a high clinical stage (T2b or T2c) and 204 (18%) had a high histologic grade (Gleason score > or = 7). Only 113 (10%) died of prostate cancer, and 177 (15%) developed metastasis. Adjuvant treatment (androgen deprivation or radiation therapy) was given in 197 (17%) patients (> or = pT3) and provided virtually identical results as without adjuvant treatment. The 10- and 15-year crude survival rates for 1,143 patients were 75% +/- 1.5% (SE) and 60% +/- 2.2%, respectively; the cause-specific survival rates were 90% +/- 1.1% and 83% +/- 1.9%, respectively; and the metastasis-free survival rates were 83% +/- 1.3% and 77% +/- 1.9%, respectively (398 men at risk at 10 years and 138 men at risk at 15 years). The 10-year survival rate for patients with Gleason score > or = 7 was 74% +/- 3.9%. Only tumor grade was a significant predictor for disease outcome. The hospital mortality rate decreased from 0.7% for the 1,143 study patients to 0% for the more recent 1,000 patients. Severe incontinence declined to 1.4% for the more recent 1,000 patients. Most patients who underwent RP were healthy (Charlson comorbidity index). CONCLUSION: Survival at 15 years was similar to the expected survival rate. Current morbidity and mortality rates associated with RP were extremely low. Thus, RP has been a viable management option for men with clinically localized prostate cancer who have a life expectancy of more than 10 years.

Adult↗