Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M Kuisma

Publications and source records attributed to M Kuisma.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

The incidence of out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation in Helsinki, Finland, from 1994 to 1999.

Early defibrillation by emergency medical services has been a success story in the treatment of ventricular fibrillation. This success has been followed by recommendations to allow public access to defibrillation equipment. We tracked the changes in incidence of ventricular fibrillation from prospectively collected data from the Helsinki Cardiac Arrest Register. We found that the incidence of out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation of cardiac origin fell by 48% from 1994 to 1999 (p=0.0036). The primary and secondary prevention of coronary artery disease may not be the only reasons for this change and so new public-access defibrillation programmes should be delayed until our findings are confirmed.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

Thrombolytic treatment of acute myocardial infarction after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety and efficacy of thrombolytic treatment for an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) immediately after resuscitation in the out-of-hospital setting. DESIGN: Retrospective. SETTING: A middle-sized urban city (population 540000) served by a single emergency medical system using a tiered response with physicians in field. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-eight patients with an initial diagnosis of AMI who received thrombolytic treatment in an out-of-hospital setting after cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) between January 1st 1994 and December 31st 1998. An ECG and the myocardial enzymes (CK, CK-MB, Troponin-T) were used to diagnose AMI. Myocardial reperfusion was assessed by resolution of the ST-segment elevation. Side effects and complications were studied. The quality of secondary survival was evaluated. The Utstein style was used for a uniform style of reporting the cardiac arrest data. RESULTS: The accuracy of prehospital diagnosis was found to be excellent. Retrospective analysis revealed that thrombolytic therapy had been appropriately administered in 64 (94%) of the 68 patients actually treated. Reperfusion was achieved in 71% of the patients. Haemorrhagic complications were few, and included intracranial haemorrhage (one patient), gastrointestinal bleeding (two patients), bleeding from the puncture site (one patient) and epistaxis (one patient). The incidence of hypotension during streptokinase infusion was 22%. Sixty-three (93%) of the patients were admitted alive to the hospital, with 36 subsequently surviving to discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Thrombolytic treatment is a safe and effective treatment in AMI even after out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Blood Circulation↗
PubMed2001

Optimal Response to Cardiac Arrest study: defibrillation waveform effects.

INTRODUCTION: Advances in early defibrillation access, key to the "Chain of Survival", will depend on innovations in defibrillation waveforms, because of their impact on device size and weight. This study compared standard monophasic waveform automatic external defibrillators (AEDs) to an innovative biphasic waveform AED. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Impedance-compensated biphasic truncated exponential (ICBTE) and either monophasic truncated exponential (MTE) or monophasic damped sine (MDS) AEDs were prospectively, randomly assigned by date in four emergency medical services. The study design compared ICBTE with MTE and MDS combined. This subset analysis distinguishes between the two classes of monophasic waveform, MTE and MDS, and compares their performance to each other and to the biphasic waveform, contingent on significant overall effects (ICBTE vs. MTE vs. MDS). Primary endpoint: Defibrillation efficacy with < or =3 shocks. Secondary endpoints: shock efficacy with < or =1 shock, < or =2 shocks, and survival to hospital admission and discharge. Observations included return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), refibrillation, and time to first shock and to first successful shock. RESULTS: Of 338 out-of-hospital cardiac arrests, 115 had a cardiac aetiology, presented with ventricular fibrillation, and were shocked by an AED. Defibrillation efficacy for the first "stack" of up to 3 shocks, for up to 2 shocks and for the first shock alone was superior for the ICBTE waveform than for either the MTE or the MDS waveform, while there was no difference between the efficacy of MTE and MDS. Time from the beginning of analysis by the AED to the first shock and to the first successful shock was also superior for the ICBTE devices compared to either the MTE or the MDS devices, while again there was no difference between the MTE and MDS devices. More ICBTE patients achieved ROSC pre-hospital than did MTE patients. While the rates of ROSC were identical for MTE and MDS patients, the difference between ICBTE and MDS was not significant. Rates of refibrillation and survival to hospital admission and discharge did not differ among the three populations. CONCLUSIONS: ICBTE was superior to MTE and MDS in defibrillation efficacy and speed and to MTE in ROSC. MTE and MDS did not differ in efficacy. There were no differences among the waveforms in refibrillation or survival.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Do health care professionals report sudden cardiac arrest better than laymen?

OBJECTIVE: To compare the emergency calls made by health care providers and by laymen reporting a non-traumatic cardiac arrest, and to evaluate the handling of these calls by dispatchers. METHODS: The study was conducted prospectively over a 1-year period in 1996. The callers (N=328) where divided in to three groups based on profession: I, doctors and nurses (N=33); II, other health care providers (N=19); and III, laymen (N=276). Main outcome measures where the information given by the caller, use of the dispatching protocol, recognition of the cardiac arrest, and survival to hospital. RESULTS: Doctors and nurses told the dispatcher spontaneously what had happened in 67% of the calls when total strangers to the patient told it in 72%. Group I gave no information about the vital signs in 24% of the calls, group II in 0% and group III in 6%. Of the 52 phone calls made by groups I and II, in six cases the patient was not in cardiac arrest, in four the patient had already irreversible signs of death and in four only transportation to another hospital was requested for a patient in cardiac arrest. Of the professionals calling, 49 (94%) were on duty at the time of the call. The cardiac arrest was recognized by the dispatcher in group I in 70%, in group II in 74% and in group III in 73%. There where no statistical differences between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our data do suggest that health care professionals, excluding those in emergency medicine, are not better than laymen in evaluating an emergency situation correctly, and when the caller is a doctor or a nurse the dispatcher seems to trust the evaluation of the situation to be correct and rarely asks any clarifying questions about vital signs of the patient.

Emergencies↗
PubMed2000

Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of 150-J biphasic shocks compared with 200- to 360-J monophasic shocks in the resuscitation of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest victims. Optimized Response to Cardiac Arrest (ORCA) Investigators.

BACKGROUND: In the present study, we compared an automatic external defibrillator (AED) that delivers 150-J biphasic shocks with traditional high-energy (200- to 360-J) monophasic AEDs. METHODS AND RESULTS: AEDs were prospectively randomized according to defibrillation waveform on a daily basis in 4 emergency medical services systems. Defibrillation efficacy, survival to hospital admission and discharge, return of spontaneous circulation, and neurological status at discharge (cerebral performance category) were compared. Of 338 patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, 115 had a cardiac etiology, presented with ventricular fibrillation, and were shocked with an AED. The time from the emergency call to the first shock was 8.9+/-3.0 (mean+/-SD) minutes. CONCLUSIONS: The 150-J biphasic waveform defibrillated at higher rates, resulting in more patients who achieved a return of spontaneous circulation. Although survival rates to hospital admission and discharge did not differ, discharged patients who had been resuscitated with biphasic shocks were more likely to have good cerebral performance.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Resuscitation in Europe: a tale of five European regions.

AIM: To describe cardiac arrest data from five emergency medical services (EMS) systems in Europe with regard to survival from an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. METHODS: Based on recommendations from various countries in Europe EMS systems were approached with regard to survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Five EMS systems were asked to report their cardiac arrest data according to the Utstein style. RESULTS: The five selected EMS systems were: Bonn (Germany), Göttingen (Germany), Helsinki (Finland), Reykjavik (Iceland) and Stavanger (Norway). For patients with a bystander witnessed arrest of cardiac aetiology the percentage of patients being discharged alive from hospital in these regions were: 21, 33, 23, 23 and 35. The corresponding percentages for patients fulfilling criteria as above and being found in ventricular fibrillation were: 32, 42, 32, 27 and 55. CONCLUSIONS: Many EMS systems in Europe show extremely good results in terms of survival after an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Some of the results should be interpreted with caution since they were based on relatively small sample sizes. Furthermore, the results from one of the regions (Stavanger) was unit based and not community based.

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation↗
PubMed1998

Prehospital thrombolytic treatment of massive pulmonary embolism with reteplase during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

A 52-year-old previously healthy man experienced acute severe dyspnoea after suffering from gastroenteritis for 3 days. After arrival of the ambulance, cardiac arrest with an initial rhythm of electro mechanical dissociation occurred. Circulation was restored after 10 min of cardiopulmonary resuscitation but soon cardiac arrest reoccurred. Based on a strong clinical suspicion of massive pulmonary embolism, thrombolytic treatment with heparin 5000 IU and reteplase 20 U, given as single boluses and heparin was continued as an infusion 1000 IU h(-1). After 7 min of continued resuscitation, circulation was restored and after 40 min the vital functions began to stabilize, thus indicating pulmonary reperfusion. The diagnosis of pulmonary embolism was confirmed by a ventilation-perfusion scan and by spiral computerised tomography. The patient was discharged from intensive care after 2 days with a cerebral performance category I. Based on previous calculations, the annual number of patients who present with massive pulmonary embolism leading to cardiac arrest (and thus who would theoretically be candidates for thrombolytic treatment) was estimated to be 0.7/100000 inhabitants in this emergency medical services system.

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation↗
PubMed1998

Cardiac arrests witnessed by EMS personnel in a multitiered system: epidemiology and outcome.

The purpose of the study was to determine the epidemiology and the etiology of cardiac arrests witnessed by emergency medical services (EMS) personnel and the survival from resuscitation according to the Utstein style. Consecutive prehospital cardiac arrests witnessed by EMS personnel in the Helsinki City EMS system between January 1, 1994 and December 31, 1995 were included in this prospective cohort study. A total of 809 cardiac arrests were registered during the study period, 108 (13.3%) of which were EMS-witnessed. The incidence of EMS-witnessed cardiac arrests was 1.8 per 1,000 urgent calls per year. Resuscitation was attempted in 94 patients, 45 of whom (47.9%) were hospitalized alive and 15 of whom (16.0%) were discharged. Fourteen of the survivors were discharged with overall performance category I or II. Cardiac etiology was verified in 60 (55.6%) cases. In multivariate analysis, initial rhythm of ventricular fibrillation and cardiac etiology remained independent factors of survival. These results indicate that overall survival rates in EMS-witnessed cardiac arrests have remained low but those who survive are discharged without major neurological sequelae. Noncardiac etiology accounts for 45% of cases and seems to be a major determinant of low overall survival rates.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

Family dynamics of families with cancer in Finland.

The purpose of this study was to describe family dynamics of families with cancer on the basis of Barnhill's framework for healthy family systems. The sample consisted of families in which one member had cancer. Both the patients (n = 96) and their relatives (n = 96) participated in the study (n = 192). The data for the study were collected using the Family Dynamics Questionnaire and the Family Dynamics Measure. The results indicated that the cancer of a single family member did not impair family functioning, but that family dynamics were considered quite good. There were no statistically significant differences between cancer patients and relatives on any of the family dynamics dimensions. However, an examination of sociodemographic characteristics did reveal some differences. Older relatives reported more enmeshment and rigidity than did younger relatives, whereas the latter reported more role conflict than older relatives. Older patients reported more rigidity than younger patients. Relatives who were men reported more enmeshment than women, whereas women reported more role conflict. Relatives of two-member families reported more rigidity than relatives with a larger family. Patients who reported a serious illness in the family described more mutuality, better flexibility, and clearer communication than patients who did not report such an illness. Also, relatives who mentioned a serious illness reported more mutuality and flexibility.

Adaptation, Psychological↗
PubMed1997

Unwitnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: is resuscitation worthwhile?

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the epidemiology of unwitnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and the factors associated with survival after resuscitation using the Utstein style data collection. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study in a 525,000-population city served by a single EMS system comprising a tiered response with physicians in the field. We studied consecutive unwitnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrests that occurred between January 1, 1994, and December 31, 1995. We determined survival from cardiac arrest to discharge from hospital and the factors associated with survival. RESULTS: Of the 809 patients for whom resuscitation was considered, 205 (25.3%) had sustained unwitnessed arrests. Cardiac origin of arrest was verified in 52% of cases. The most common noncardiac causes of arrest were trauma, intoxication, near-drowning, and hanging. In 150 patients (73.2%) the presenting rhythm was asystole, in 28 (13.6%) it was pulseless electrical activity, and in 27 (13.2%) it was ventricular fibrillation. Resuscitation was attempted in 162 cases, 59 (36.4%) of whom demonstrated return of spontaneous circulation; 45 (27.8%) were hospitalized alive, and 8 (4.9%) were discharged. The survivors represented 6.7% of all out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survivors during the study period. Survival was most likely if patients presented with pulseless electrical activity; none of the patients with asystole of cardiac origin survived. Sex (P = .032), age (inverse relationship, P = .0004), scene of collapse (P = .042), and interval from call receipt to arrival of first responders (P = .004) were associated with survival. In a logistic-regression model, near-drowning remained an independent factor of survival (odds ratio, 15.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.2 to 200). A routine priority dispatching protocol differentiated cardiac arrest patients with survival potential from those who already had irreversible signs of death. CONCLUSION: This survey shows that survival after unwitnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is unlikely with an initial response of basic life support alone. Withdrawal of resuscitation should be considered if an adult victim of unwitnessed cardiac arrest is found in asystole and the arrest is of obvious cardiac origin.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrests of non-cardiac origin. Epidemiology and outcome.

AIMS: The aim of the study was to determine the epidemiology of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests of non-cardiac origin and survival following resuscitation, using the Utstein method of data collection. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study was of prospective cohort design and was conducted in a middle-sized urban city (population 525000) served by a single emergency medical services system. Consecutive out-of-hospital cardiac arrests of non-cardiac origin occurring between 1 January 1994 and 31 December 1995 were included. Survival from cardiac arrest to hospital discharge, and factors associated with survival were considered as main outcome measures. Of the 809 patients, 276 (34.1%) had a cardiac arrest of non-cardiac origin. The mean (SD) age of the patients was 49.8 (20.9) years. Resuscitation was attempted in 204 cases, 82 of whom (40.2%) were hospitalized alive and 23 (11.3%) were discharged. Thirteen (56.5%) of the survivors were discharged neurologically intact or with mild disability (overall performance category I or II). The survivors, during the study period, who suffered an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of non-cardiac origin comprised 19.2% of all out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survivors. Trauma (62), non-traumatic bleeding (36), intoxication (31), near drowning (22) and pulmonary embolism (18) were the most common aetiologies, comprising 61.2% of cases. The non-cardiac aetiology was suspected pre-hospital in 176 (63.8%) cases; in the remaining cases, the aetiology was revealed only after in-hospital investigations or autopsy. In a logistic regression model, time interval to first responding unit, collapse outside the home, and aetiologies of near-drowning, airway obstruction, intoxication and convulsions were associated with survival. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that sudden out-of-hospital cardiac arrest more often has a non-cardiac cause than previously believed. Although survival is not as likely as from cardiac arrest of cardiac origin, since non-cardiac-cause survivors comprise one fifth of all out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survivors, resuscitation efforts are worthwhile.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

Family dynamics of families with mental health problems in Finland.

This study forms part of the International Family Dynamics Project. Its purpose was describe the family functioning of families with mental health problems on the basis of Barnhill's framework for healthy family systems. The sample consisted of 160 families in which one family member had mental health problems. Both the patients and their relatives took part. The data were collected by questionnaires, i.e. The Family Dynamics Measure and The Family Dynamics Questionnaire. According to the results, mental health patients described family functioning as fairly poor, while relatives described it as fairly good. However, patients' and relatives' perceptions of family functioning did not differ significantly. There were some statistically significant differences between patients' and relatives' perceptions of different family dynamics dimensions. Relatives reported more mutuality (P = 0.006) and clearer communication (P = 0.009) than patients. Older mental health patients reported more isolation than patients under 30. Relatives who mentioned some serious illness in the family reported more role conflict than those who didn't. No differences were found by gender, family structure or education. The results indicated that the mental health problems of a single family member did not impair family dynamics. The study showed that the resources and functioning of families are fairly good in spite of the illness in the family.

Adult↗