PubMedDate not supplied
PURPOSE: To assess the reliability of the size-overestimation ratio obtained from spiral CT arterial portography (CTAP) and spiral equilibrium-phase CT (EPCT) in distinguishing malignant focal hepatic lesions from benign ones. METHODS: The CTAP images and EPCT images obtained five minutes after CTAP in 39 patients with focal hepatic lesions were retrospectively analyzed. Fifty-eight lesions (hepatocellular carcinoma [HCC], 33; metastasis, 10; liver cyst, 10; cavernous hemangioma, 2; adenomatous hyperplasia [AH], 2; focal nodular hyperplasia [FNH], 1) had their sizes measured on CTAP and EPCT images using the calipers on the CT console. RESULTS: The size-overestimation ratios (CTAP/EPCT) were 1.24+/-0.15 in HCC, 1.28+/-0.26 in metastasis, 1.02+/-0.23 in liver cyst, 0.98+/-0.34 in cavernous hemangioma, 0.94+/-0.39 in AH, and 1.00 in FNH. Mean size-overestimation ratios for benign- and malignant-lesion groups were 1.00+/-0.37 and 1.25+/-0.18, respectively (p < 0.0001). When a cutoff level was set at 1.05, sensitivity and specificity for malignancy were 91% and 93%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In comparison with EPCT, CTAP significantly overestimates the size of malignant hepatic tumors. This phenomenon may be an indicator of hepatic malignancy.