Biomedical subjects

M K Woo

Publications and source records attributed to M K Woo.

22 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMedDate not supplied

The validity of the density scaling method in primary electron transport for photon and electron beams.

In the convolution/superposition method of photon beam dose calculations, inhomogeneities are usually handled by using some form of scaling involving the relative electron densities of the inhomogeneities. In this paper the accuracy of density scaling as applied to primary electrons generated in photon interactions is examined. Monte Carlo calculations are compared with density scaling calculations for air and cork slab inhomogeneities. For individual primary photon kernels as well as for photon interactions restricted to a thin layer, the results can differ significantly, by up to 50%, between the two calculations. However, for realistic photon beams where interactions occur throughout the whole irradiated volume, the discrepancies are much less severe. The discrepancies for the kernel calculation are attributed to the scattering characteristics of the electrons and the consequent oversimplified modeling used in the density scaling method. A technique called the kernel integration technique is developed to analyze the general effects of air and cork inhomogeneities. It is shown that the discrepancies become significant only under rather extreme conditions, such as immediately beyond the surface after a large air gap. In electron beams all the primary electrons originate from the surface of the phantom and the errors caused by simple density scaling can be much more significant. Various aspects relating to the accuracy of density scaling for air and cork slab inhomogeneities are discussed.

Computer Simulation↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Extending the concept of primary and scatter separation to the condition of electronic disequilibrium.

A major deficiency of current photon calculation methods that are based on the concept of primary and scatter separation is their inability to handle the condition of electronic disequilibrium. This deficiency is examined and it is shown that the limitation is not inherent in the algorithms themselves but is, at least in part, in the data which the algorithms use. A new concept of primary and scatter separation is developed to cover the condition of electronic disequilibrium. This new concept requires little change to the existing algorithms and only additional data are required, which are generated using Monte Carlo calculation methods. The new concept is tested using programs in the Theratronics Theraplan treatment-planning system, and two calculation examples illustrate the ability to model electron transport and also the improvement over the existing algorithms. Close analogy of the extended concept with the convolution/superposition method of dose calculation is also indicated.

Algorithms↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Treatment planning for asymmetric jaws on a commercial TP system.

In this work, the accuracy of the asymmetric jaws planning feature in a commercial treatment planning (TP) system is assessed. In the latest version of this software, the off-axis beam quality variation is handled by a function g(d,r), which is derived from measured horizontal beam profiles at four different depths. The calculated and measured isodoses for a 6-MV linear accelerator with asymmetric jaws agree to +/- 0.5% along the central axis and to within 2 mm at the beam edge. Formulas for treatment time calculations using the output data reported by the computer program are described, as well as formulas for manual calculations based on pregenerated data tables. Doses calculated based on these formulas are compared to measurement and the accuracy is +/- 1% and +/- 2% for the computer and manual calculations, respectively. It is concluded that this version of the treatment planning system as well as the treatment time calculation formulas can be used adequately for asymmetric jaw computerized and manual treatment planning.

Humans↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Mechanical and radiation isocenter coincidence: an experience in linear accelerator alignment.

As part of the commissioning procedure of a linear accelerator at our cancer center, the defining laser lines were aligned with the optical and radiation isocenter of the linac. When a mechanical checkout jig was set up at the same point, a discrepancy of 4 mm resulted when the gantry was moved from 0 degrees to 180 degrees. Extensive measurements, some with custom-designed devices, confirmed the observations and provided an explanation. Even though the mechanical isocenter is within the specified tolerance of 1-mm radius, the clinically observable discrepancy of 4-mm results from the noncoincidence of the mechanical and radiation isocenters. The clinical significance of the final setup is discussed and future commissioning procedures are recommended.

Particle Accelerators↗