Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M K Shrout

Publications and source records attributed to M K Shrout.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1996

Histogram-matching and histogram-flattening contrast correction methods: a comparison.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the results or two methods of histogram matching and two methods of histogram flattening for their ability to correct for contrast variations in digital dental images. METHODS: A custom-built, aluminium stepwedge with 0.1, 0.5 and 1.0 mm steps was placed over Ektaspeed films and exposed for 0.06, 0.12 and 0.25 s, respectively. Radiographs were digitized at 50 microns spatial resolution and 12-bit contrast resolution. Contrast corrections were performed using Rüttimann et al.'s algorithm (1986) for one method of matching (RM) and flattening (RF) and Castleman's algorithm (1979) for the other method of matching (CM) and flattening (CF). Mean pixel grey-scale values were determined for each step. The 0.12 s exposure was considered to be the target image exposure. Absolute differences in pixel grey-scale values between the target images and the modified images were determined. RESULTS: The median values of the absolute differences in pixel grey-scale values between the target images and the contrast corrected images were: CM = 4.3; RM = 4.1; CF = 70.2 and RF = 70.2. CONCLUSION: Castleman's and Rüttimann's matching algorithms perform equally well in correcting digital image contrast. Histogram flattening was less effective.

Algorithms↗
PubMed1996

Digital enhancement of radiographs: can it improve caries diagnosis?

Unlike traditional radiographs, digital images are electronically alterable and offer the potential for enhancing diagnostic information. The authors conducted a small-scale study to examine differences in clinicians' diagnoses of caries using traditional radiographs and digitized images vs. microscopic diagnosis. Two general dentists and one oral-maxillofacial radiologist scored the images for caries. This study suggests that digital enhancements may aid some clinicians in caries diagnosis.

Dental Caries↗
PubMed1996

Spatial resolution and angular alignment tolerance in radiometric analysis of alveolar bone change.

This pilot study was undertaken to determine the effect of x-ray beam alignment and spatial resolution on quantification of alveolar bone using radiometric techniques. Six (6) dry mandibles were radiographed at 70 kVp, 10 mA, 0.6 seconds using D-speed film, with a bone chip (2.64, 4.10, or 6.07 mg) present or absent at 7 x-ray beam alignments (0 degree, 2 degrees horizontal, 2 degrees vertical, 4 degrees horizontal, 4 degrees vertical, 6 degrees horizontal, 6 degrees vertical). This resulted in 28 radiographs per mandible. Radiographs were digitized using 50- and 200-microns pixel spatial resolution. Image gray levels were standardized using a simple look-up table shift. Regions of interest (ROIs) were positioned on the alveolar bone where the bone chips had been placed. Cumulative percent histograms (CPH) were calculated for those ROIs. Regression analysis was used to evaluate the relationships between CPH changes and bone chip size as x-ray beam angulation and spatial resolution was varied. The resulting R2 values for angulation ranges of 0 degree to 1.4 degrees, 1.5 degrees, to 2.4 degrees, and 2.5 degrees to 5.5 degrees were: 0.983, 0.941, 0.891 for 50-microns pixel images and 0.869, 0.909, and 0.774 for 200-microns pixel images. We conclude that 50-microns pixel spatial resolution is apparently superior to 200-microns pixel images if radiometric data is to be evaluated. With 50-microns pixel spatial resolution, alignment variations up to 5 degrees may be acceptable in clinical studies, depending on the magnitude of bone change that is to be detected.

Alveolar Process↗
PubMed1995

Reproducibility of beam alignment using different bite-wing radiographic techniques.

Longitudinal radiographic assessment of crestal alveolar bone plays an important role in the diagnosis and long-term evaluation of periodontal disease in patients. Because practitioners use several radiographic techniques to obtain bite-wing radiographs, horizontal and vertical alignment errors could adversely affect the diagnostic impression gained from this type of radiographic examination. The objective of this study was to determine the alignment reproducibility of three different clinical techniques used to acquire bite-wing radiographs. Patients who require bite-wing radiographs as part of a dental school screening process were radiographed with modified standard bite-wing tabs and two different intraoral positioning devices. Horizontal and vertical angular deviations were measured and alignment errors were calculated for each radiograph. The mean total angular alignment error for the standard bite-wing tab technique was 6.2 degrees, whereas the mean alignment error for both positioning devices was less than 1.8 degrees. The results of this study suggest that an intraoral positioning device for acquiring bite-wing radiographs should be used.

Alveolar Bone Loss↗
PubMed1995

Intrafilm controls to standardize grey level variations in digitized radiographs.

OBJECTIVES: Radiometric analysis can be used to identify small changes in grey levels taken from investigator-defined regions of interest (ROIs). To do this, standardization of the radiographic optical densities and image grey scales is considered essential. Rigid standardization is one of the impediments to applying existing radiometric techniques to clinical practice. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of grey-level variations from a series of intrafilm control regions of interest (ROIs) to adjust radiometric grey-level data taken from test ROIs. METHODS: After digitization, ROIs were drawn on three locations: the background, anatomical crown, and tooth root. Mean grey levels, histograms and cumulative percent histograms (CPHs) were determined for each group. With the goal of decreasing the distribution of these curves from their unadjusted grey-level positions to zero (superimposing all curves), shifts required to align the control CPHs were applied to test CPHs. Changes between the pre- and post-adjusted CPH distributions were measured. RESULTS: Intrafilm controls provided a combined decrease of 45.3% in the grey-level distribution error. CONCLUSION: While CPHs can be adjusted using intrafilm controls, these adjustments may have limited benefit.

Humans↗
PubMed1994

Bitewing-based alveolar bone densitometry: digital imaging resolution requirements.

The resolution requirements were determined for detection of incremental alveolar bone loss from digitized Ektaspeed radiographs. Ten clinical radiographs were examined with a calibrated optical microscope to measure the smallest feature of interest discernible for alveolar bone. Images of trabeculae > 100 microns in diameter could be identified, but smaller ones could not be resolved. The Nyquist Criterion requires sampling with 50 microns (or smaller) pixels to measure such features. Numerous 25 microns Ag aggregates were present. Fifty microns resolution is a practical compromise between noise level and feature resolution. In another example of 10 bitewings digitized at 8 bit grey scale, about half the available range was used for alveolar bone, resulting in uncertainty, over a range of 2 optical density (OD) units, of about 1.42% at the average OD for alveolar bone (1.1). With the same radiographs digitized at 12 bit resolution, over 2000 of 4096 grey scales were used with a corresponding uncertainty of about 0.09%. Twelve-bit precision was also able to resolve smaller increments in an aluminium stepwedge than was 8 bit precision. Twelve-bit grey scale and 50 microns spatial resolution are recommended for alveolar bone densitometry performed with Ektaspeed radiographs.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗
PubMed1993

35-mm film scanner as an intraoral dental radiograph digitizer. I: A quantitative evaluation.

A 35-mm slide scanner digital imaging system was tested for its suitability in digitizing intraoral dental radiographic film for quantitative studies. The system (Nikon model LS-3510AF Nikon Electronic Imaging, Nikon, Inc., Melville, N.Y.) uses a charge-coupled device linear photodiode array. The data content in the original film images was evaluated, and the system performance assessed objectively with the use of specially designed test films. Radiometric and geometric performances for the digitizing system were extracted from measurements and observations, and these were compared with published data for two other film digitizing systems (video camera DAGE MTI, Michigan City, Ind. and Barneyscan 35-mm film digitizer Barneyscan, Berkeley, Calif.). The techniques used to evaluate this system are easy and suitable for evaluation of any digitizing system. This scanner system (Nikon) was superior to previously evaluated systems in transforming and recording radiographic film densities across the range (0.3 to 2.0 optical density units) of clinically relevant optical densities. The scanner offers substantial advantage over the other digitizing systems for gray scale information from clinically important optical densities.

Evaluation Studies as Topic↗
PubMed1993

35-mm film scanner as an intraoral dental radiograph digitizer. II: Effects of brightness and contrast adjustments.

Typical 35-mm slide scanners use a photodiode array and software that allows for digital and analog controls that are manually adjustable. The digital controls provide brightness and contrast adjustments, whereas corresponding analog controls adjust the exposure time and black level that determines the clamping level of the charge-coupled device for the maximum black in the image. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of these controls on the radiometric data of intraoral dental radiograph images, to establish recommended settings, and to set specific standard guidelines for the digitization process. Three approaches were used. The results of this study demonstrate that brightness and contrast control alterations on the digitizer produces different optical densities and modulation transfer function values. The impact of these results is unresolved yet must be considered in analysis on quantitative radiometric studies.

Evaluation Studies as Topic↗
PubMed1993

Utilization of radiographs for a state dental board examination.

A survey of 97 dentists who had recently taken a state dental board examination was completed to document the use of radiographs for the screening and treatment of their patients. The response rate was 53%. Candidates spent on average 14.25 hours screening a mean of 18 patients to identify the dental pathoses necessary to take the examination. Candidates took a mean of 28.9 (+/- 25.8) radiographs for screening purposes and during the examination with a range of 3 radiographs to a maximum of 141 radiographs. Time in practice and specialty status did not affect the total number of radiographic exposures made. The majority of radiographs taken (53%) were unlikely to be used in the direct care of the patient's dental needs. The results of this survey indicated that efforts to minimize administrative radiographs should be increased.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Effects of region of interest outline variations on gray-scale frequency distributions for alveolar bone.

Normalized cumulative percentage gray-scale distributions from digitized radiographs of dry skulls can be used to evaluate alveolar bone health. With this method, manually defined regions of interest are used to identify the area of the image to be analyzed. The purpose of this study was to determine if variations in the dimensions of the regions of interest affect the gray-scale distributions. Two approaches were used. The effect of region of interest outline variations on (1) the ability to differentiate between various sized bone chips and (2) the ability to distinguish between two groups of skulls with the alveolar bone subjectively rates as normal or diseased were investigated. Four different regions of interest, which consisted of outline and area variations to a basic region, were used. Ninety-one percent of the cumulative histograms that represented chips were sufficiently separated from nonchip plots to be distinguished. Bone health was correctly assessed with a numeric classifier for 37 of 44 quadrants, for an accuracy of 84%, a specificity of 79%, and a sensitivity of 90%. Although ROI size and shape consistency in longitudinal studies are important in radiometric analyses, small variations had minimal impact in this study.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗
PubMed1993

Differentiation of periapical granulomas and radicular cysts by digital radiometric analysis.

It is generally accepted that two of the most commonly seen radiolucencies, the periapical granuloma and the radicular cyst, cannot be differentiated radiographically. The purpose of this investigation was to determine the feasibility of identifying radiometric differences in these two pathologic conditions by analyzing the patterns of the gray-level distributions of digitized radiographic images. Radiographs used in the study had been sent by practitioners to the School of Dentistry with tissue specimens. Radiographs of lesions identified as periapical granulomas and radicular cysts in the mandibular posterior quadrant were included in the study. The radiographs were digitized and regions of interest were drawn to include the lesions. Frequency distributions (histogram) with 256 gray-scale intervals and a cumulative percent histogram were computed. The typical histograms of the dental granulomas had narrower ranges and lower gray-scale values than did cysts. The results of this study indicate that it is feasible to radiometrically differentiate between lesions that are visually indistinguishable on radiographs.

Diagnosis, Differential↗
PubMed1993

Inter-relationships between bone mineral content measures. Dual energy radiography (DER) and bitewing radiographs (BWX).

In vitro periodontal alveolar bone mineral content (BMC) measurements obtained with dual-energy radiography (DER) were compared with assessments based on bitewing radiographs (BWX). In addition, in patients, the relationship between bitewing and several postcranial dual-energy-radiographic measures were evaluated. Dual-energy-radiographic and bitewing measurements were made on 2 cadaver mandibles initially and after 2 incremental bone reductions at 4 sites. Rank-order correlations between dual-energy-radiographic and bitewing measures for the 4 sites ranged from 0.7 to 1.00. Bitewing measures indicated true bone loss with a sensitivity of 1.00. For patients, correlations between bitewing measures and dual-energy-radiographic scans suggested the strongest relationships were in the distal sections of the radius and ulna and in the intertrochanteric and Ward's areas of the femur. Correlations, in the 0.5-0.6 range, were not statistically significant (p > 0.05), but were quite robust considering the small sample size and preliminary nature of this investigation. Results suggest that the bitewing measure is sufficiently sensitive to detect clinically meaningful (5% or greater) changes in alveolar BMC and, further, that alveolar bone mineral content may reflect postcranial BMC. The implications of postcranial bone mineral changes being reflected in alveolar bone would enhance both our understanding and treatment of alveolar bone loss. The use of bitewing measures to facilitate identification of patients with postcranial bone loss is discussed.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗
PubMed1993

Digital radiographic image-based bone level measurements: effect of film density.

Previous studies have demonstrated that accurate alveolar bone-level measurements can be made using digitally enhanced bitewing radiographs. In this study, we determined the effect of exposure variations on bone-level measurement accuracy using digital radiographic images of dry skulls. 6 direct bone-level measurements on the mandibular 1st molars of dry skulls were established by consensus of 2 expert observers. 13 bitewing radiographs were taken on each side of 11 skulls, using a specially designed positioning device. Exposure settings of 70 kVp, 10 mA, and 24 impulses were empirically chosen as the baseline. Kilovoltage and impulses times were individually varied (50 to 100 kVp in 10 kV increments and 15 to 48 impulses in 6 steps) to ensure a wide range of clinically relevant optical densities on the test images. The radiographs were digitized and alveolar bone level measurements, corresponding to those for skulls, were made on the images by 2 observers. Pearson product-moment coefficients between radiographs and criteria measurements were calculated. It was found that dry skull and digital bitewing radiographic measurements were highly correlated, within the limits of exposure parameter variations tested. Accurate measurements of alveolar bone level are possible from bitewing radiographs taken within a wide range of exposures, when digital image processing techniques are employed.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗
PubMed1993

Alignment errors in bitewing radiographs using uncoupled positioning devices.

Errors in X-ray beam alignment account for many of the exposure errors in bitewing radiography. A new method for measuring these alignment errors is described. The alignment accuracy of two different models of inexpensive plastic positioning devices, used for bitewing radiography, were quantified and compared. The technique involves documenting the alignment of an 'ideal' reference radiograph and successive exposures. It permits calculation of X-ray beam-film alignment errors in all subsequent radiographs using the 'ideal' reference. Bitewing radiographs were taken on 61 patients and 19 of these were re-radiographed at 6-month intervals over a 2-year period, providing a total of 156 radiographs for the study. Horizontal and vertical angular deviations were measured and total alignment errors calculated for each radiograph. The average angular alignment error was less than 2 degrees total angular error (1.3-2.4 degrees, 95% confidence intervals). It is concluded that these devices can be used when X-ray beam-film alignment error below 2.5 degrees is acceptable.

Humans↗
PubMed1992

Radiometric classification of alveolar bone health.

A radiograph-based classifier for discrimination between normal and diseased alveolar bone was developed. The alveolar bone health of dry mandibles was rated, by consensus of two trained observers, as normal or diseased. Bitewing radiographs of mandibular quadrants were digitized and regions of interest (ROIs) of the alveolar bone between the first and second permanent molars outlined. Gray-scale histograms for the ROIs were computed, and a classifier based on these histograms was developed. Two observers (independently) used only the classifier to rate the bone as being normal or diseased. These ratings were compared with the original ratings of trained observers who viewed and scored the actual alveolar bone. The sensitivity (the ability to detect diseased alveolar bone), specificity (the ability to detect normal alveolar bone), and accuracy were 0.90 or greater, indicating good agreement with subjective visual assessments of dry mandibles. These results suggest that this procedure may be applicable for evaluations of bone health in humans.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Digital dental image processing of alveolar bone: Macintosh II personal computer software.

Dental radiographs are amenable to digital image processing and analysis for both subjective interpretation and quantification of scene features. Four general-purpose image processing programs for the Apple Macintosh II computer (NIH Image, Enhance, IP Lab and DIP Station) were applied to digital analysis of dental radiographs. These programs can manipulate and quantitatively analyse the gray scale and spatial data of dental images and improve their subjective quality. They can interactively make geometric measurements of features. The programs were evaluated for their versatility and applicability in the quantification of alveolar bone. Overall, NIH Image was judged most suitable for current dental imaging needs. Each of the other programs offered unique features that may be valuable in specific applications.

Alveolar Process↗