Acceptability of cholestyramine and colestipol formulations in three common vehicles.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Adult↗
Biomedical subjects
M K Ito
Publications and source records attributed to M K Ito.
Treatment of intra-abdominal infections: cost comparison of ampicillin/sulbactam and clindamycin/gentamicin.
The cost of 2 g ampicillin/1 g sulbactam given IV piggyback qid was compared with 900 mg clindamycin admixed with 1.5 mg/kg gentamicin given IV piggyback tid for the treatment of perforated or gangrenous appendicitis in 116 patients. Fifty-eight ampicillin/sulbactam-receiving patients incurred greater costs for IV supplies (+104.6/patient vs +67.9/patient) and nursing administration costs (+16.5/patient vs +10.7/patient). On the other hand, pharmacist and technician preparation costs were greater for the 58 clindamycin/gentamicin-receiving patients (+15.4/patient vs +13.3/patient). The clindamycin/gentamicin-receiving patients also incurred additional changes for laboratory fees and pharmacokinetic monitoring--+18.7/patient and +36.1/patient, respectively. When incorporating all cost parameters, there were no statistically significant differences in mean total drug therapy costs between the two treatment regimens--+433.3 +/- +58.5/patient for ampicillin/sulbactam and +373.8 +/- +86.2/patient for clindamycin/gentamicin.
Ampicillin↗
Cost analysis of two clindamycin dosing regimens.
A clinical trial of clindamycin 900 mg q8h admixed with gentamicin 1.5 mg/kg (eight-hourly group) versus clindamycin 600 mg q6h with gentamicin 1.5 mg/kg given separately (six-hourly group) was analyzed for relative cost containment. Acquisition costs were significantly higher for the six-hourly group for intravenous supplies ($181.5 +/- 47.8) when compared with the eight-hourly group ($67.6 +/- 21.6) (p less than 0.05). Nursing administration costs were greater for the six-hourly group ($28.6 +/- 7.5) compared with ($10.7 +/- 3.4) for the eight-hourly group (p less than 0.05). Also, significantly higher cost (p less than 0.05) was noted for pharmacist and technician manufacturing cost for the six-hourly group ($15.4 +/- 4.0) compared with the eight-hourly group ($13.3 +/- 4.3). Incorporating all appropriate costs, the mean total drug therapy costs were significantly greater (p less than 0.05) for clindamycin 600 mg q6h ($527.4 +/- 143.0) compared with clindamycin 900 mg q8h ($433.3 +/- 99.2). The dosing of clindamycin 900 mg q8h admixed with gentamicin 1.5 mg/kg is a more cost-effective method of drug delivery with similar efficacy and safety when compared with clindamycin 600 mg q6h with gentamicin given separately.
California↗
A cost comparison of intramuscular versus intravenous imipenem.
Previously reported clinical trials of imipenem-cilastatin 500 mg given intravenously every 6 hours (intravenous group) and imipenem-cilastatin 750 mg given intramuscularly every 12 hours (intramuscular group) were analyzed for relative cost savings. Acquisition costs were significantly higher for the intravenous group for intravenous supplies (30.6 +/- 7.9 dollars) when compared to the intramuscular group (0.98 +/- 0.03 dollars) (p less than 0.05). Also, significantly higher cost (p less than 0.05) was noted for salaries of pharmacists and technicians for manufacturing in the intravenous group (5.8 +/- 1.5 dollars) as compared to the intramuscular group (2.4 +/- 0.7 dollars). Nursing administration costs were greater for the intramuscular group (15.6 +/- 4.8 dollars) when compared to the intravenous group (11.7 +/- 3.0 dollars). Incorporating all appropriate costs, the mean total drug therapy costs (TRX$) were significantly greater (p less than 0.01) for the intravenous group (458.17 +/- 175.17 dollars) as compared to the intramuscular group (298.0 +/- 114.76 dollars). Thus, the dosing of imipenem-cilastatin 750 mg intramuscularly every 12 hours is a more cost effective method of drug delivery with equal efficacy and safety when compared to imipenem-cilastatin 500 mg given intravenously every 6 hours.
Adolescent↗
Evaluation of two different dosage regimens of clindamycin and the penetration into human appendix.
The study objective was to evaluate serum, peritoneal fluid, and appendix tissue concentrations of clindamycin using two differing clindamycin regimens. Patients age 16 years and older who were about to undergo appendectomies were randomly assigned to receive gentamicin 1.5 mg/kg every 8 h admixed with clindamycin 900 mg every 8 h (8-h group) or clindamycin 600 mg every 6 h given separately (6-h group). Doses of each regimen were given preoperatively. Serum, peritoneal fluid, and appendix tissue samples were obtained intraoperatively, and frozen at -70 degrees C for gas chromatographic drug analysis. Twenty-one patients were evaluated, 11 patients in the 8-h group and 10 patients in the 6-h group. Values are reported as means +/- standard deviations. The values in the 8-h group were 12.3 +/- 14.1 micrograms/ml, 8.7 +/- 3.9 micrograms/ml, and 9.8 +/- 10.3 micrograms/g for serum, peritoneal fluid, and appendix tissue, respectively. The values in the 6-h group were 9.7 +/- 5.1 micrograms/ml, 5.8 +/- 5.3 micrograms/ml, and 6.2 +/- 4.9 micrograms/g for serum, peritoneal fluid, and appendix tissue, respectively. The 6-h group received more doses preoperatively (1.8 +/- 0.6) than the 8-h group (1.2 +/- 0.4; p less than 0.05). No differences in penetration of clindamycin into the serum, peritoneal fluid, and appendix tissue for the 8-h group and the 6-h group were noted. The study revealed a similarity in penetration of clindamycin into the serum, peritoneal fluid, and appendix tissue using either clindamycin 900 mg given by intermittent intravenous infusion every 8 h admixed with gentamicin or clindamycin 600 mg given every 6-h separately.
Adolescent↗
Intraoperative serum, bile, and gallbladder-wall concentrations of cefmetazole in patients undergoing cholecystectomy.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Adult↗
Colesevelam hydrochloride: a novel bile acid-binding resin.
OBJECTIVE: To review the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and adverse effects of colesevelam hydrochloride, a bile acid-binding resin. METHODS: MEDLINE searches (1966-June 2000) and manufacturer prescribing literature were employed to find articles on colesevelam. Additional studies and abstracts were identified from the bibliographies of reviewed literature. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: All articles identified from data sources were evaluated, and all information deemed relevant was included in this review. Priority was given to randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies. FINDINGS: Colesevelam HCl is a nonabsorbed hydrogel with bile acid sequestrant properties. Monotherapy using colesevelam in once-daily or two divided daily doses of 1.5-4.5 g has produced significant reductions in total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. Mean LDL cholesterol decreases to 20% have been noted when the patient is on 3.75-4.5 g/d. Increases in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol have been observed (up to 9%), whereas triglycerides (TG) have increased significantly to 25% in some studies. In unpublished studies, combined use of colesevelam plus hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor have produced greater reductions in LDL cholesterol than either the statin or colesevelam administered alone. The efficacy of colesevelam monotherapy is slightly less than or similar to cholestyramine or colestipol in decreasing LDL cholesterol, although colesevelam is more potent on a gram-to-gram basis. Adverse effects have been minimal with colesevelam in published studies; this suggests an advantage over cholestyramine or colestipol therapy. Colesevelam appears to be more cost-effective than the packet dosage form of the brand formulation of the older bile acid resins. Care in selection of an appropriate agent should be exercised when considering the issues of adverse effects and palatability. CONCLUSIONS: Colesevelam alone or combined with an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor is effective in the reduction of total and LDL cholesterol. Since colesevelam is formulated as a tablet, problems with palatability such as with the powder formulation of the bile acid-binding resins are likely to be eliminated.
Adult↗