Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M J Ratain

Publications and source records attributed to M J Ratain.

At least 109 records · Page 6Linked to original sources
PubMed1995

Perceptions of cancer patients and their physicians involved in phase I trials.

PURPOSE: In an attempt to understand some of the complex issues related to the participation of cancer patients in phase I trials, and the perceptions of patients toward these trials, we conducted a pilot survey study of 30 cancer patients who had given informed consent to participate in a phase I trial at our institution. Concurrently, the oncologists identified by the surveyed patients as responsible for their care were surveyed as well. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven of 30 consecutive patients agreed to and completed the survey. Patients were surveyed before they received any investigational agents. Eighteen oncologists participated in this survey study. RESULTS: Eighty-five percent of patients decided to participate in a phase I trial for reasons of possible therapeutic benefit, 11% because of advice/trust of physicians, and 4% because of family pressures. Ninety-three percent said that they understood all (33%) or most (60%) of the information provided about the trials in which they had decided to participate. Only 33% were able to state the purpose of the trial in which they were participating, with patients able to state the purpose of phase I trials being more educated (P = .01). Surveyed oncologists had wide-ranging beliefs regarding expectations of possible benefits and toxicities for their patients participating in phase I trials. CONCLUSION: Cancer patients who participate in phase I trials are strongly motivated by the hope of therapeutic benefit. Altruistic feelings appear to have a limited and inconsequential role in motivating patients to participate in these trials. Cancer patients who participate in phase I trials appear to have an adequate self-perceived knowledge of the risks of investigational agents. However, only a minority of patients appear to have an adequate understanding of the purpose of phase I trials as dose-escalation/dose-determination studies.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Phase I study of suramin given by intermittent infusion without adaptive control in patients with advanced cancer.

PURPOSE: Suramin is a promising agent for the treatment of hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer. However, questions about the relationship of severe neurotoxicity to sustained peak plasma concentrations greater than 300 micrograms/mL raised concerns that this drug could not be safely administered without adaptive control. To test the adaptive-control hypothesis, we designed a phase I study that relied on clinical end points, using a fixed dosing scheme that did not rely on adaptive control. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a phase I dose-escalation study using fixed dosing without adaptive control, gradually decreasing doses of suramin were administered to 63 patients on days 1 (loading dose), 2, 8, and 9 of a 28-day cycle. Fifty-four patients with hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer and nine patients with other solid tumors have been treated. RESULTS: Doses of 400 mg/m2 to 2,080 mg/m2 on the first day have been administered. The mean peak plasma concentration following the loading dose at a dose level of 1,730 mg/m2 was 933 micrograms/mL (26% coefficient of variation), and the mean trough concentration was 139 micrograms/mL (40% CV) on day 1 of cycle 2 [corrected]. At 1,730 mg/m2, five of 13 patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), including malaise, neurotoxicity, pericardial effusion, and coagulopathy. At 2,080 mg/m2, three of five patients experienced DLT. Two patients treated at this dose level died while on study. One of these patients died of a subdural hematoma sustained after a fall and had a prolonged prothrombin time at the time of his death. One patient developed classic suramin neurotoxicity, which led to respiratory failure, for which the patient refused intubation. No significant associations were noted between peak or trough concentrations during either cycles 1 or 2 and the occurrence of neurotoxicity. CONCLUSION: (1) Suramin can be safely administered without adaptive control, (2) suramin on this schedule may exhibit significant activity against hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer, and (3) based strictly on toxicity considerations, we recommended that a day-1 dose of 1,440 mg/m2 be used in subsequent clinical trials, with a maximum of three cycles. Further studies to establish the optimal empiric dosing regimen are needed.

Adaptation, Physiological↗
PubMed1995

Phase I study of paclitaxel and topotecan in patients with advanced tumors: a cancer and leukemia group B study.

PURPOSE: To define the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and the recommended phase II doses of paclitaxel combined with topotecan, without and with filgrastim support. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced solid tumors and a maximum of one prior chemotherapy regimen for metastatic disease were eligible if they had a performance status of 0 to 1 and normal renal, hepatic, and bone marrow function. Prior treatment with taxanes or comptothecin analogs, and prior pelvic irradiation were not allowed. Patients with a history of cardiac disease or on medications known to affect cardiac conduction were excluded. The dose of topotecan was fixed at 1.0 mg/m2/d for 5 days. The dose of paclitaxel was escalated until the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), without and with filgrastim 5 micrograms/kg subcutaneously (SC) on days 6 to 14, was reached. Paclitaxel was administered over 3 hours on day 1 before topotecan. Treatment cycles were repeated every 21 days. RESULTS: Of 46 patients entered, 45 were assessable for toxicity and 34 for response. The principal toxicity was neutropenia. Without filgrastim, the MTD of paclitaxel was 80 mg/m2 on day 1 in combination with topotecan 1.0 mg/m2/d for 5 days. With filgrastim, the dose of paclitaxel was escalated to 230 mg/m2 in combination with the same dose of topotecan. At this dose level, one patient had hematologic DLT and a second patient developed neuromuscular DLT. Three patients had a partial response (PR): one with head and neck cancer, a second with non-small-cell lung cancer, and the third with colon cancer. CONCLUSION: We conclude that paclitaxel can be given at clinically relevant doses in combination with topotecan and filgrastim. The recommended dose for phase II studies is paclitaxel 230 mg/m2 on day 1 and topotecan 1.0 mg/m2/day for 5 days with filgrastim 5 micrograms/kg on days 6 to 14.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oltipraz as a chemopreventive agent.

Oral oltipraz, as a single-dose treatment, was evaluated as a chemopreventive agent in 31 normal subjects. In a subset of subjects, the relationship between plasma oltipraz concentrations and the induction of lymphocyte glutathione (GSH) and glutathione S-transferase (GST) enzyme levels was evaluated. Pharmacokinetic analysis revealed nonlinear disposition of oltipraz with disproportionate 40-fold increase and 9.5-fold decrease in peak plasma concentrations (Cmax) and p.o. clearance, respectively, over the dose range of 100-500 mg. There was no correlation between the oltipraz dose and the absorption rate or the time to reach Cmax. Since oltipraz undergoes extensive metabolism, saturable first-pass elimination could be one of the sources of nonlinearity. Pharmacodynamic evaluation was conducted based on the percentage of elevation of GSH and GST levels over baseline in lymphocytes of subjects receiving 100 mg and 125 mg oltipraz. Induction was observed in both dose groups with a time lag between the maximum concentrations of oltipraz and that of GSH or GST. We also observed a linear correlation between oltipraz Cmax and the corresponding GSH and GST elevations. Subjects with higher Cmax values showed a greater increase over baseline in the GSH and GST levels. Mild toxicities were observed at all dose levels. The most common were flatulence, hunger, fatigue, and headache. These preliminary results indicate that oltipraz may be effective in inducing GSH and GST, an enzyme capable of carcinogen elimination.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1995

Amonafide: An active agent in the treatment of previously untreated advanced breast cancer--a cancer and leukemia group B study (CALGB 8642).

Amonafide is a new imide derivative of naphthalic acid. The drug had demonstrated significant activity in preclinical studies and some activity in Phase I trials. The drug is extensively metabolized and detected in plasma and urine. Its toxicity has previously been correlated to the formation of an active metabolite, N-acetyl-amonafide. Amonafide was chosen for inclusion in the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) master metastatic breast cancer protocol. CALGB 8642 randomizes previously untreated metastatic breast cancer patients either to one of several Phase II agents given for up to four cycles and then followed by standard cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-5-fluorouracil, or to immediate treatment with standard cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-5-fluorouracil. The end point of CALGB 8642 is to assess the difference in survival, toxicity, and overall response when limited exposure to Phase II agents precedes standard chemotherapy. This report deals only with amonafide as a Phase II agent. Comparisons with the cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-5-fluorouracil arm will not be addressed. Patients had to have histologically documented measurable breast cancer and a performance status of 0-1. Patients could not have had prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Prior adjuvant chemotherapy was permitted. Patients could not have visceral crisis. Amonafide was given at 300 mg/m2/day i.v. for 5 days, and repeated at 21-day intervals for a maximum of four cycles. Escalation and reduction in dose was mandated dependent on hematotoxicity or lack thereof. Toxicity was primarily hematological and bimodal: 32% had grade 3 or 4 leukopenia and 24% had grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia; 22% had no leukopenia and 44% had no thrombocytopenia. The response rate was 18%, including one complete response. When response was analyzed by hematological toxicity, there was a 35.7% response if patients had leukopenia grade 3/4 (versus 8.3%, P = 0.08). There was a 50% response if patients had thrombocytopenia grade 3/4 (versus 7.1%, P = <0.01). We conclude that amonafide is somewhat active in previously untreated breast cancer patients. There may be a steep dose-response curve, based on the significant correlation between myelosuppression and response. Rates of responses in patients adequately dosed (i.e., with significant hematotoxicity) with amonafide ranged from 35 to 50%. Further studies will incorporate individualized dosing based on pretreatment acetylator phenotyping.

Adenine↗
PubMed1994

Physician-determined patient risk of toxic effects: impact on enrollment and decision making in phase I cancer trials.

BACKGROUND: The conventional phase I trial design yields an estimate of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of a new drug defined from treatment toxic effects observed in a small heterogeneous cohort of patients. The MTD is specific for those patients treated in the study and may not be reproducible in another patient series, a limitation known as cohort dependency. PURPOSE: We conducted an opinion survey of phase I investigators in an attempt to characterize physician attitudes and clinical practices regarding assessment of risk of toxic effects in patients. METHODS: A physician opinion survey of scaled multiple choice and open-ended questions was distributed to oncologists (faculty and fellows) at National Cancer Institute (NCI)-funded phase I contract institutions. The target sample was narrowed to these specific institutions because of their experience in conducting various phase I trials. Each NCI-funded phase I contractor received an instruction sheet and 25 surveys and envelopes that were made available to oncologists enrolling patients in phase I trials. RESULTS: Of the 75 surveys distributed, 67 (89%) were returned. Most respondents agreed that unexplained variability in toxicity exists in phase I trials. However, opinion varied considerably among five participating institutions (two-sided P = .001). Informal scoring of patients for toxicity risk prior to treatment was a common practice (85% overall), although the prevalence of this practice varied somewhat among the institutions (two-sided P = .01). Physicians' opinions were mixed regarding the practice of becoming increasingly selective in enrolling patients as the MTD was approached, with strong disagreement noted among institutions (two-sided P = .001). Given background on a hypothetical phase I trial, respondents were asked to rank the usefulness of 27 patient factors for predicting the risk of dose-limiting leukopenia. Eight factors were perceived as strongly informative: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or worse, recent weight loss of more than 10%, multiple bone marrow metastases, two or more prior chemotherapy regimens, history of treatment toxic effects, and prior treatment with carboplatin, mitomycin, or nitrosoureas. CONCLUSIONS: Informal assessment of the risk of toxic effects in a patient was found to be common practice among oncologists who enroll patients on phase I trials, and there was strong agreement on the usefulness of several key patient factors for such assessments. Interestingly, interinstitutional variation in opinions and practices were noted, specifically regarding patient-selection bias. Follow-up studies are required to establish if physician-determined assessments of patient risk are consistent and accurate.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Prognostic factors for survival in patients treated in phase I clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Patients with advanced or metastatic cancer treated in Phase I clinical trials are considered to have a poor prognosis. Survival from first treatment in a Phase I trial was determined for 349 patients. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed to determine whether potential prognostic factors and distinct risk groups could be identified. METHODS: Patients were identified retrospectively from a large data base of patients with advanced or metastatic cancer treated in Phase I clinical trials at the University of Chicago between February 1987 and October 1991. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 29 months, 10% of patients were alive at the time of analysis. Twenty-nine percent were alive 1 year after the initiation of Phase I chemotherapy, and the median survival from first treatment in a Phase I study was 6.5 months. Multivariate analysis indicated that a better pretreatment performance status, a higher pretreatment serum albumin concentration, a lower pretreatment platelet count, no prior cisplatin chemotherapy, and a genitourinary or gynecologic cancer diagnosis were predictive of better survival. Three risk groups incorporating these five variables were identified, with median survivals of 12.7, 7.4, and 3.5 months for the good, intermediate, and poor risk groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Patients treated in Phase I clinical trials have a median survival of 6.5 months, even though some patients have been treated at early (subtoxic and potentially subtherapeutic) dose levels. The results of this study may allow the identification of patients who are likely to survive long enough to contribute information on acute and cumulative drug-related toxicities and, possibly, tumor response.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Metabolic fate of irinotecan in humans: correlation of glucuronidation with diarrhea.

Irinotecan (7-ethyl-10-[4-(1-piperidino)-1-piperidino]carbonyloxy-camptotheci n (CPT-11) is hydrolyzed by the enzyme carboxyl esterase to 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (SN-38), which further undergoes glucuronic acid conjugation to form the corresponding SN-38 glucuronide (SN-38G). SN-38 is believed to be the cause of treatment-related diarrhea, a dose-limiting toxicity of CPT-11 observed in phase I clinical trials. This study investigated the effect of glucuronidation on the concentrations of SN-38 following CPT-11 infusion in 21 patients undergoing a phase I trial. To assess the relationship between gastrointestinal toxicity and pharmacokinetics of CPT-11 and its metabolites, we defined a "biliary index" of SN-38 which was the product of the relative area ratio of SN-38 to SN-38G and the total CPT-11 area under the plasma concentration-time curve. Nine patients with grade 3-4 diarrhea had higher biliary indexes than 12 patients with grade 0-2 diarrhea (median 2228 versus 5499, P = 0.0004). The relatively higher index values, suggestive of higher biliary concentrations of SN-38, were possibly due to low glucuronidation rates. Hence, modulation of glucuronidation may be effective in increasing the therapeutic index of CPT-11.

Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic↗
PubMed1994

A phase I study of intermittent infusion cladribine in patients with solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: Cladribine (2-CdA, 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine), a chlorinated adenosine analog, is active in the treatment of hairy cell leukemia and other hematologic malignancies, but its use in treating solid tumors is still under investigation, as is the optimal schedule for administering this drug. The authors conducted a dose-finding study to define the maximal tolerated dose and toxicities of this agent when given to patients with refractory solid tumors having normal renal, hepatic, and bone marrow function. METHODS: Cladribine was given as a 1-hour intermittent infusion, repeated daily for 5 days, with a cycle length of 28 days. The initial dose was 4 mg/m2, with escalating doses by cohort. Three dosage levels (4, 6, and 8 mg/m2/day) were explored, and patients were observed to determine toxicity. The end points of the study were the definition of the maximally tolerated dose (MTD), toxicity profile, and establishment of a recommended Phase II dose (RPTD) for cladribine. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were treated; the majority were patients with non-small cell lung cancer and colorectal cancer. The median Cycle-1 leukocyte nadirs for the 4, 6, and 8 mg/m2/day dosage levels were 3100, 2300, and 950 cells/microliters (range 800-3500), respectively, and the and 950 cells/microliters (range 800-3500), respectively, and the mean nadir absolute neutrophil counts were 1500, 936, and 482 cells/microliters (range 130-2241), respectively. Minimal thrombocytopenia was seen, and no evidence for cumulative myelosuppression was observed. Two patients were hospitalized for neutropenic fevers, both of whom received the 6 mg/m2/day dose. One patient who received the 4 mg/m2/day dose had a transient episode of blindness that occurred during the infusion on Day 3 of Cycle 3. Thorough evaluation of this problem did not reveal an etiology, and it did not recur with further administration of cladribine. No other significant nonhematologic toxicity has been noted. No responses were observed. CONCLUSIONS: At the MTD (8 mg/m2/day), the dose-limiting toxicity of this agent is myelosuppression. The RPTD for further testing of this schedule is 6 mg/m2 daily x 5 days.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Phase I study of adozelesin administered by 24-hour continuous intravenous infusion.

BACKGROUND: Adozelesin, a synthetic analogue of the antitumor antibiotic CC-1065, is the first of a class of potent sequence-specific alkylating agents to be brought to clinical trial. In preclinical in vitro testing, it has demonstrated antitumor activity at picomolar concentrations. PURPOSE: We conducted a phase I study of adozelesin to (a) determine a recommended dose for phase II testing using a 24-hour intravenous infusion, (b) characterize the toxic effects of the drug using this schedule, and (c) document any antitumor activity observed. METHODS: Adozelesin was given as a 24-hour continuous intravenous infusion. Treatments were initially scheduled every 3 weeks, but the prolonged myelosuppression observed necessitated a final dosing interval of every 6 weeks. The starting dose of 30 micrograms/m2 was escalated using a modified Fibonacci scheme until dose-limiting toxicity was encountered. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients were entered in the study. Successive dose levels used were 30, 60, 100, 150, 120, and 100 micrograms/m2. Prolonged thrombocytopenia and granulocytopenia were dose limiting. No antitumor responses were observed. CONCLUSION: We recommend that the phase II dose of adozelesin given as a continuous 24-hour intravenous infusion be 100 micrograms/m2, repeated every 6 weeks. Other potentially less myelosuppressive schedules could be pursued.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of a new antineoplastic agent: pyrazine diazohydroxide (NSC 361456).

Pyrazine diazohydroxide (PZDH) is a novel antineoplastic agent that appears to form DNA adducts via the reactive pyrazine diazonium ion and produces substantial antitumor activity in preclinical models. We conducted a phase I trial to determine the maximally tolerated dose of PZDH that could be administered as a 5-min i.v. bolus for 5 consecutive days repeated every 28 days. Thirty-one patients with advanced cancer refractory to standard therapy received a total of 65 cycles of therapy at 7 sequential PZDH dose levels: 18, 36, 45, 56, 75, 100, and 133 mg/m2/day. At the maximally tolerated dose (133 mg/m2/day x 5), all 4 patients experienced grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia, and 3 of 4 had grade 3-4 neutropenia. At the recommended phase II dose (100 mg/m2/day x 5), the median WBC nadir following the first cycle was 2.5 x 10(3)/microliters (range, 0.6-7.6) occurring on day 36, and the median platelet nadir was 87 x 10(3)/microliters (range, 9-155) occurring on day 26. Nausea and vomiting occurred at all dose levels, but were well controlled with ondansetron. No evidence of hepatic, renal, pulmonary, cardiac, venous, dermatological, or neurological toxicity was observed. Pharmacokinetic evaluations were performed on 28 of the 31 patients using an analytical method including derivatization of the parent drug to 2-chloropyrazine. We report the total 2-chloropyrazine, which represents PZDH converted per method plus PZDH converted in vivo. Although the assay quantitation limit is 10 ng/ml, PZDH could only be detected at the first dose level for 30-90 min after the i.v. bolus. Compartmental modeling of the first 4 dose levels was most consistent with a 2-compartment model. Subsequent dose levels revealed a third phase to the plasma decay curve. The area under the plasma drug concentration-time curve increased proportionally with dose; there was no evidence for dose-dependent pharmacokinetics. Pharmacokinetic parameters for 12 patients analyzed by the 3-compartment model revealed an alpha-half-life (t1/2 alpha) of 2.83 +/- 1.57 (mean +/- SD), a t1/2 beta of 11.9 +/- 4.42, and a t1/2 gamma of 161 +/- 47.1 min, with a mean clearance of 1.86 +/- 0.91 liters/min. At the 100- and 133-mg/m2 dose levels, the mean areas under the plasma drug concentration-time curve were 105 and 169 micrograms min/ml, respectively. There was a moderate correlation between body surface area and clearance (r = 0.45, P = 0.015) but a better correlation between weight and clearance (r = 0.53, P = 0.004).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Pharmacodynamics and long-term toxicity of etoposide.

Etoposide has been used in the treatment of a wide variety of neoplasms, including small-cell lung cancer, Kaposi's sarcoma, testicular cancer, acute leukemia, and lymphoma. Its current therapeutic use is limited by myelosuppression, particularly neutropenia. Pharmacodynamic studies of etoposide show that this toxicity can be modeled using a modified Hill equation and that the dose intensity of etoposide can be successfully increased by adaptive control using this model. Significant influences on the degree of myelosuppression include the pretreatment leukocyte count, the performance status, the extent of prior erythrocyte transfusions, and the serum albumin level. In the past 7 years, interest has developed in a distinct subset of acute nonlymphocytic leukemia that is associated with prior exposure to etoposide. This syndrome has been described in several studies and is characterized by the lack of a preleukemic phase, M4 or M5 morphology, and distinct translocations involving the chromosome 11q23 region. In addition, secondary acute lymphocytic leukemias (involving 11q23) have also been associated with prior epipodophyllotoxin exposure.

Child↗
PubMed1994

Sequential therapy with dacarbazine and carmustine: a phase I study.

Depletion of the DNA-repair protein O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase (AGT) increases the sensitivity of cells in culture and of human tumor xenografts to chloroethylnitrosoureas such as carmustine (BCNU). We have previously demonstrated that dacarbazine (DTIC) can deplete AGT activity in cells in culture and in human tumor xenografts. A phase I trial of DTIC followed immediately by BCNU was conducted to determine the DTIC dose resulting in maximal depletion of AGT in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) of cancer patients and to determine the maximally tolerated dose of DTIC given as a 4-h infusion immediately prior to a fixed dose of BCNU. A 4-h infusion of DTIC followed by a 2-h infusion of BCNU was given to 42 patients with refractory solid tumors. Complete depletion of AGT activity was not achieved at DTIC doses of up to 750 mg/m2. The dose-limiting toxicity was hematologic, although at higher doses of BCNU (> or = 100 mg/m2) we observed significant nonhematologic toxicity. Our recommended phase II doses are 1,000 mg/m2 DTIC followed by 75 mg/m2 BCNU. AGT activity in PBMC of the 28 patients studied decreased to a mean of 62% +/- 11% (SE) of the baseline value at 4 h after initiation of the DTIC infusion. At 24 h after initiation of the DTIC infusion, AGT activity in PBMC was depleted to a mean of 65% +/- 14% of the baseline value. There was no direct correlation between the DTIC dose and the extent of AGT depletion. Baseline PBMC AGT levels varied widely among patients.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Bootstrap validation of pharmacodynamic models defined via stepwise linear regression.

When a pharmacodynamic model is to be considered as the basis for individualized drug dosing, validation of the model is clearly warranted. Rigorous validation is problematic when the training data set to be modeled has too few data points and no independent test data set exists. A simulation method known as the bootstrap lends itself particularly well to this dilemma. Bootstrap sampling allows simulation of needed test data sets that mimic the initial data set. Model validation is then undertaken by repeating the model formulation procedure on the bootstrap samples. For illustration, a pharmacodynamic model for leukopenia was constructed by stepwise linear regression from data of 41 patients with cancer treated with the drug amonafide. Stepwise regression analyses were then repeated for 100 bootstrap samples, which verified the initial selection of covariates for the model. Next the regression parameters and residual error standard deviation of the model were repeatedly estimated for 200 additional bootstrap samples. The bootstrap results confirmed the initial formulation of the pharmacodynamic model from the training data set.

Acetylation↗
PubMed1994

Phase I trial of a genetically engineered interleukin-2 fusion toxin (DAB486IL-2) as a 6 hour intravenous infusion in patients with hematologic malignancies.

DAB486IL-2 is a recombinant fusion toxin, created by replacement of the receptor binding domain sequences of the diphtheria toxin gene with the sequences for human interleukin-2 (IL-2). It selectively binds to and intoxicates cells expressing the high-affinity IL-2 receptor. A total of 17 patients with refractory hematologic malignancies were entered in a phase I study of DAB486IL-2, administered as a 6 hour continuous intravenous infusion on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16 of each 28 day cycle. Cohorts of 3 to 6 patients were treated with escalating doses. The starting dose was 0.1 mg/kg/day with increments of 0.1 mg/kg/day per dose level up to 0.3 mg/kg/day. Significant adverse effects included transient asymptomatic elevation of liver transaminases, hypersensitivity, anemia, thrombocytopenia, fever, and creatinine elevation. A partial response of approximately nine months duration was observed in a patient with small cell lymphocytic non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, previously refractory to high-dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation. The observance of antitumor activity in a patient highly refractory to chemotherapy suggests that DAB486IL-2 may have efficacy in selected patients whose malignant cells express the IL-2 receptor.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Interferon treatment for hairy cell leukemia. An update on a cohort of 69 patients treated from 1983 to 1986.

We report follow-up information on 69 hairy cell leukemia (HCL) patients treated with interferon alfa-2b (IFN) as primary treatment from 1983 to 1986. Follow-up through April, 1993 shows that only 14 patients have expired. Forty-seven of the 61 patients completing the intended 12 or more months of initial IFN treatment were eventually considered IFN failures. Forty-three required re-treatment (41 received a second course of IFN and 2 received pentostatin). Four patients died without further therapy for HCL. The median time to interferon failure was 31.3 months. Fourteen patients are alive and have not required further treatment after completing their initial 12 or more months of interferon. Fifteen patients underwent a third course of interferon therapy at a median time after completion of a second course of IFN of 1.0 year. Eighteen patients were eventually treated with pentostatin and ten with 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine (2-CdA). Thirteen patients developed a second malignancy; six of these patients developed a hematologic malignancy between 44.6 months and 99.1 months after initiation of interferon therapy. We conclude that although interferon provides excellent palliation, that most patients will eventually require further treatment with interferon or chemotherapy. Future trials in HCL must be aware of the risk of second malignancies.

Adult↗