Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M J Geyer

Publications and source records attributed to M J Geyer.

3 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

The relationship between pressure ulcer incidence and buttock-seat cushion interface pressure in at-risk elderly wheelchair users.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relation between pressure ulcer incidence and buttock-wheelchair seat cushion interface pressure measurements. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of data from a randomized clinical trial. SETTING: Skilled nursing facility. PATIENTS: Thirty-two elderly patients (age, > or = 65 yr), with Braden score < or = 18 and Braden mobility and activity subscale score < or = 5, who used wheelchairs > or = 6 hr/d, were free of existing sitting-induced pressure ulcers, and weighed < or = 250 lb. INTERVENTIONS: Generic foam seat cushion or pressure-reducing seat cushion. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The incidence of sitting-induced pressure ulcers over a 1- to 12-month period was compared with pressure measured between patients' buttocks and wheelchair seat cushions. A flexible pad with a 15 x 15 pressure sensor array was used to measure interface pressure. RESULTS: Interface pressure measured on wheelchair seat cushions was higher (p < or = .01 for both peak pressure and average of highest 4 pressures) for patients who developed sitting-acquired pressure ulcers compared with those patients who did not. CONCLUSIONS: Results indicated that higher interface pressure measurements are associated with a higher incidence of sitting-acquired pressure ulcers for high-risk elderly people who use wheelchairs.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

A randomized control trial to evaluate pressure-reducing seat cushions for elderly wheelchair users.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if the use of pressure-reducing wheelchair cushions for elderly nursing home resident wheelchair users who are at high risk for developing sitting-acquired pressure ulcers would result in a lower incidence rate of pressure ulcers, a greater number of days until ulceration, and lower peak interface pressures compared with the use of convoluted foam cushions over a 12-month period. To determine the feasibility of conducting a subsequent full-scale definitive trial to evaluate the use of pressure-reducing seat cushions for elderly nursing home resident wheelchair users. DESIGN: Randomized control trial SETTING: 2200-bed skilled nursing facilities (1 suburban and 1 urban academic medical center) PATIENTS: 32 male and female at-risk nursing home residents who were wheelchair users > or = 65 years of age. Participants had Braden Scale scores < or = 18, Braden Activity and Mobilitysubscale scores < or = 5, no sitting surface pressure ulcers, and a daily wheelchair sitting tolerance of more than 6 hours. All met criteria for using the ETAC Twin wheelchair. INTERVENTIONS: Seating evaluation with pressure-mapping and subsequent seating prescription. Subjects were assigned to either a foam (n=17) or pressure-reducing cushion (n=15) group and weekly assessments of skin and pressure ulcer risk were made. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of pressure ulcers, days to ulceration, and peak interface pressure. MAIN RESULTS: At a 95% confidence interval, a 2-tailed analysis showed no differences between the FOAM and pressure-reducing cushion groups for pressure ulcer incidence, total days to pressure ulcer, or initial peak interface pressure. Pressure-reducing cushions were more effective in preventing sitting-acquired (ischial) pressure ulcers (P<.005). Higher interface pressures were associated with a higher incidence of pressure ulcers (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: A definitive randomized control multicenter cushion trial is feasible with a sample size of 50 to 100 per study group. In the definitive trial, the definition of sitting-acquired pressure ulcers should be limited to lesions occurring over the ischial tuberosities.

Aged↗