Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M I Ross

Publications and source records attributed to M I Ross.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2001

Surgical conservation planning after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage II and operable stage III breast carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: This study was performed to investigate the extent of tumor downstaging achieved in women with operable breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and breast-conservation surgery, develop recommendations for effective surgical planning, and report local-regional recurrence rates with this approach. METHODS: One hundred nine patients with stage II or III (T3N1) breast cancer were treated in three prospective trials utilizing four cycles of 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC, n = 72) or paclitaxel (n = 37) followed by segmental resection (n = 109) and axillary node dissection (n = 94). Postoperatively, patients received 4 additional cycles of FAC followed by irradiation of the breast. The median follow-up was 53 months. RESULTS: The median tumor size was 4 cm (range 1.1 to 9 cm) at presentation and only 1 cm (range 0 to 4.5 cm) after four cycles of chemotherapy. The primary tumor could not be palpated after chemotherapy in 55% of 104 patients presenting with a palpable mass and therefore required needle localization or ultrasound guidance for surgical resection. Of the 34 patients clinically deemed to have no residual carcinoma in the breast after chemotherapy and before surgery, only 50% of these patients were found to have no residual carcinoma on pathologic examination after surgery. Patients with primary tumors < or =2 cm were significantly more likely than patients with larger tumors to have complete eradication of the primary tumor prior to surgery (P <0.001). The 5-year local-regional recurrence rate was 5%. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor downstaging is marked in patients with operable breast cancer and requires close monitoring during chemotherapy. We recommend placement of metallic tumor markers when the primary tumor is < or =2 cm to facilitate adequate resection and pathologic processing. Resection of the tumor bed remains necessary in women deemed to have a complete clinical response to ensure low rates of recurrence.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed2001

Factors that predict the presence of sentinel lymph node metastasis in patients with melanoma.

BACKGROUND: This analysis was performed to identify prognostic factors that are predictive of sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis in melanoma. METHODS: Analysis was performed of a multi-institutional, prospective, randomized trial of SLN biopsy for melanoma. Eligibility criteria included age 18 to 70 years, Breslow thickness of 1.0 mm or more, and clinically negative regional lymph nodes. SLNs were evaluated by serial sectioning and immunohistochemistry for S100. Univariate chi-square and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to assess factors predictive of the presence of a positive SLN. Probability values of less than.05 were considered significant. RESULTS: SLNs were identified in 99.7% of patients. A total of 1058 patients were evaluated; 961 patients had complete data and were included in the statistical analysis. SLNs were positive for tumor in 208 of 961 patients (22%). Breslow thickness, Clark level, ulceration, and patient age were factors that were found to be independently predictive of the presence of SLN metastasis. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing Breslow thickness, Clark level of more than III, the presence of ulceration, and patient age of 60 years or less are the most important independent prognostic factors associated with the finding of positive SLN in patients with melanoma.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Evaluation and surgical resection of adrenal masses in patients with a history of extra-adrenal malignancy.

BACKGROUND: Adrenal abnormalities are often identified on imaging studies performed during the staging of patients presenting with a new malignancy or restaging of patients with a history of a malignancy. METHODS: We reviewed the records of patients who underwent surgical resection of an adrenal mass identified in the setting of previously or newly diagnosed extra-adrenal malignancy. RESULTS: Eighty-one patients with an adrenal mass and recently diagnosed malignancy (n = 24) or history of a malignancy (n = 57) underwent adrenalectomy. In 42 patients (52%) the adrenal mass was a metastasis. In 39 patients (48%) the adrenal mass was an additional primary adrenal tumor process: 19 pheochromocytomas, (14 syndrome-associated, 5 sporadic), 13 cortical adenomas, 3 adrenocortical carcinomas, 2 ganglioneuromas, and 2 cases of nodular hyperplasia. CONCLUSIONS: In this series nearly half of the patients with cancer and an adrenal mass had adrenal pathologic condition independent of their primary malignancy. Despite the presence of a newly diagnosed malignancy or history of malignancy, all patients with an adrenal mass should undergo a standard hormone evaluation to confirm that the mass is not a functional neoplasm. An assumption that the adrenal mass is metastatic disease will be wrong in up to 50% of such patients.

Adrenal Gland Neoplasms↗
PubMed2001

Sentinel node dissection in early-stage breast cancer: ongoing prospective randomized trials in the USA.

One of the most important advances in the surgical treatment of early-stage breast cancer has been the introduction of sentinel lymph node dissection as an alternative to routine axillary node dissection. This minimally invasive procedure may reduce the morbidity of surgical treatment and improve staging of the axillary lymph node basin. Over the last 5 to 7 years, numerous institutions have published their sentinel node identification rates, false-negative events, optimal techniques, and learning curves. Many of these issues need confirmation in a prospective multicentered fashion and other issues such as survival and comparative toxicities require prospective randomized trials. Two prospective randomized trials using sentinel node biopsy have been implemented in the United States: the NSABP B-32 trial and the ACOSOG Z0010/Z0011 trials. Design, hypotheses, and rationale for these trials are discussed.

Axilla↗
PubMed2000

Sentinel lymph node biopsy is accurate after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy has proved to be an accurate method for detecting nodal micrometastases in previously untreated patients with early-stage breast cancer. We investigated the accuracy of this technique for patients with more advanced breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with stage II or III breast cancer who had undergone doxorubicin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy before breast surgery were eligible. Intraoperative lymphatic mapping was performed with peritumoral injections of blue dye alone or in combination with technetium-labeled sulfur colloid. All patients were offered axillary lymph node dissection. Negative sentinel and axillary nodes were subjected to additional processing with serial step sectioning and immunohistochemical staining with an anticytokeratin antibody to detect micrometastases. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients underwent SLN biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy from 1994 to 1999. The SLN identification rate improved from 64.7% to 94.1%. Twenty-two (51.2%) of the 43 successfully mapped patients had positive SLNs, and in 10 of those 22 patients (45.5%), the SLN was the only positive node. Three patients had false-negative SLN biopsy; that is, the sentinel node was negative, but at least one nonsentinel node contained metastases. Additional processing revealed occult micrometastases in four patients (three in sentinel nodes and one in a nonsentinel node). CONCLUSION: SLN biopsy is accurate after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The SLN identification improved with experience. False-negative findings occurred at a low rate throughout the series. This technique is a potential way to guide the axillary treatment of patients who are clinically node negative after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

The feasibility of minimally invasive surgery for stage IIA, IIB, and IIIA breast carcinoma patients after tumor downstaging with induction chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Induction chemotherapy (IC) has become the standard of care for locally advanced breast carcinoma, frequently downstaging both the primary tumor and the axilla, and making patients eligible for less invasive surgical procedures. The usefulness of IC in earlier stage operable breast carcinoma is now being considered. METHODS: This study involved a subset of 129 patients from a series of 174 with T2-3, N0-1, M0 or T1, N1, M0 breast carcinoma (Stage IIA, IIB, or IIIA ) who were registered in a prospective IC trial using paclitaxel or a combination of fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC). The subset included patients who had received no preoperative radiation therapy but had completed 3-5 cycles of induction chemotherapy and had undergone a Level I-II axillary lymph node dissection. The objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of induction chemotherapy with paclitaxel or FAC in downstaging the primary tumor and axillary metastases in these early stage breast carcinoma patients. RESULTS: The median initial tumor size was 4 cm (range, 0.6-10.0); after IC, tumor size was downstaged to 1.6 cm (range, 0.0-7.0) (P < 0.0001). Clinical response to IC was complete in 24% of patients and partial in 36%. Primary tumor shrinkage was similar with paclitaxel and FAC. Among patients clinically classified as N1, 34% became histologically negative and 38% had only 1-3 positive lymph nodes after induction chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: IC with paclitaxel or FAC resulted in effective downstaging of primary tumors and axillary metastases in patients with Stage IIA, IIB, and IIIA breast carcinoma. However, a significant proportion of patients still had residual but low volume microscopic disease; such disease status may allow minimally invasive surgical approaches to locoregional therapy.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

A new American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for cutaneous melanoma.

The Melanoma Staging Committee of the AJCC has proposed major revisions of the melanoma TNM and stage grouping criteria. The committee members represent most of the major cooperative groups and cancer centers worldwide with a special interest in melanoma; the committee also collectively has had clinical experience with over 40,000 patients. The new staging system better reflects independent prognostic factors that are used in clinical trials and in reporting the outcomes of various melanoma treatment modalities. Major revisions include 1) melanoma thickness and ulceration, but not level of invasion, to be used in the T classification; 2) the number of metastatic lymph nodes, rather than their gross dimensions, the delineation of microscopic versus macroscopic lymph node metastases, and presence of ulceration of the primary melanoma to be used in the N classification; 3) the site of distant metastases and the presence of elevated serum LDH, to be used in the M classification; 4) an upstaging of all patients with Stage I,II, and III disease when a primary melanoma is ulcerated; 5) a merging of satellite metastases around a primary melanoma and in-transit metastases into a single staging entity that is grouped into Stage III disease; and 6) a new convention for defining clinical and pathologic staging so as to take into account the new staging information gained from intraoperative lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy. The AJC Melanoma Staging Committee invites comments and suggestions regarding this proposed staging system before a final recommendation is made.

Biopsy↗
PubMed2000

Regional nodal basin control is not compromised by previous sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Regional nodal basin control is an important goal of lymphadenectomy in the management of melanoma patients with nodal disease. The purpose of this study was to determine if previous sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy compromises the ultimate regional nodal control achieved by subsequent therapeutic lymph node dissection in melanoma patients with microscopic lymph node metastases. METHODS: A surgical melanoma database and hospital records were reviewed for 602 patients with primary cutaneous melanoma who underwent successful lymphatic mapping and SLN biopsy between 1991 and 1997. RESULTS: A total of 105 (17%) of 602 patients had histologically positive SLNs and were offered therapeutic lymphadenectomy; 101 (96%) underwent this procedure. Thirty-six patients (36%) developed recurrent melanoma at one or more sites. The median follow-up period was 30 months. Recurrence in the previously dissected nodal basin was observed in 10 patients (10%); none had recurrence at only that site. Nodal basin disease appeared after local/in-transit (n = 6) or distant (n = 1) failure in seven patients and, as a component of the first site of failure, simultaneously with local/in-transit (n = 2) or distant (n = 1) recurrence in three patients. CONCLUSIONS: Nodal basin failure after lymphadenectomy in patients who underwent previous biopsy of a histologically positive SLN is primarily a function of aggressive locoregional disease rather than of contamination from previous surgery. Because regional nodal control was comparable with that in other series, we conclude that SLN biopsy with selective lymphadenectomy does not compromise regional nodal basin control.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Long-term results of a multi-institutional randomized trial comparing prognostic factors and surgical results for intermediate thickness melanomas (1.0 to 4.0 mm). Intergroup Melanoma Surgical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Ten- to 15-year survival results were analyzed from a prospective multi-institutional randomized surgical trial that involved 740 stages I and II melanoma patients with intermediate thickness melanomas (1.0 to 4.0 mm) and compared elective (immediate) lymph node dissection (ELND) with clinical observation of the lymph nodes as well as prognostic factors that independently predict outcomes. METHODS: Eligible patients were stratified according to tumor thickness, anatomical site, and ulceration, and then prerandomized to either ELND or nodal observation. By using Cox stepwise multivariate regression analysis, the independent predictors of outcome were tumor thickness (P < .001), the presence of tumor ulceration (P < .001), trunk site (P = .003), and patient age more than 60 years (P = .01). RESULTS: Overall 10-year survival was not significantly different for patients who received ELND or nodal observation (77% vs. 73%; P = .12). Among the prospectively stratified subgroups of patients, 10-year survival rates favored those patients with ELND, with a 30% reduction in mortality rate for the 543 patients with nonulcerated melanomas (84% vs. 77%; P = .03), a 30% reduction in mortality rate for the 446 patients with tumor thickness of 1.0 to 2.0 mm (86% vs. 80%; P = .03), and a 27% reduction in mortality rate for 385 patients with limb melanomas (84% vs. 78%; P = .05). Of these subgroups, the presence or absence of ulceration should be the key factor for making treatment recommendations with regard to ELND for patients with intermediate thickness melanomas. CONCLUSIONS: These long-term survival rates from patients treated at 77 institutions demonstrate that ulceration and tumor thickness are dominant predictive factors that should be used in the staging of stages I and II melanomas, and confer a survival advantage for these subgroups of prospectively defined melanoma patients.

Extremities↗
PubMed2000

Role for lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with thick (> or = 4 mm) primary melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Historically, patients with thick (> or =4 mm) primary melanoma have not been considered candidates for elective lymph node dissection, because their risk for occult distant disease is significant. Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy offers an alternative approach to assess disease in the regional nodal basin, but no studies have specifically addressed the role for this technique in patients with thick melanoma. Although adjuvant therapy benefits patients who develop nodal metastases, data that supports its routine use in all patients with thick melanoma is both limited and controversial. This study was performed to determine whether pathological status of the SLN is an important risk factor in this heterogeneous group and, thus, provides a rationale for SLN biopsy. METHODS: The records of 131 patients with primary cutaneous melanoma whose primary tumors were at least 4 mm thick and who underwent lymphatic mapping and SLN biopsy were reviewed. Several known prognostic factors, i.e., tumor thickness, ulceration, Clark level, location, sex, as well as SLN pathological status were analyzed with respect to disease-free and overall survival. RESULTS: Lymphatic mapping and SLN biopsy was successful in 126 (96%) of 131 patients who underwent the procedure. In 49 patients (39%), the SLN biopsy was positive by conventional histology, although it was negative in 77 patients (61%). The median follow-up was 3 years. Although presence of ulceration and SLN status were independent prognostic factors with respect to disease-free and overall survival, SLN status was the most powerful predictor of overall survival by univariate and multivariate analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Lymphatic mapping and SLN biopsy is a highly accurate method of staging lymph node basins at risk for regional metastases in patients with thick melanoma and identifies those patients who may benefit from earlier lymphadenectomy as well as patients with a more favorable prognosis. Pathological status of the SLN in these patients with clinically negative nodes is the most important prognostic factor for survival and is essential to establish stratification criteria for future adjuvant trials in this high-risk group.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Significance of multiple nodal basin drainage in truncal melanoma patients undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy.

BACKGROUND: Although previous studies have demonstrated that truncal site is associated with an adverse prognosis, explanations for such risk are lacking. In addition, the number of nodal basins as well as the number of lymph nodes containing regional metastases are important prognostic factors in these patients. Because the lymphatic drainage pattern of truncal melanoma often includes more than one basin, we designed a study to evaluate (1) whether patients with multiple nodal basin drainage (MNBD) were at an increased risk of lymph node metastases identified by sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy, and (2) whether the histological status of an individual basin reliably predicted the status of the other draining basins in patients with MNBD. METHODS: The records of 295 consecutive truncal melanoma patients who were managed primarily with intraoperative lymphatic mapping and SLN biopsy, between 1991 and 1997, were reviewed. All patients underwent preoperative lymphoscintigraphy, which established the number and location of draining nodal basins. Univariate and multivariate analyses of relevant clinicopathological factors were performed to assess which factors may predict the presence of a pathologically positive SLN. RESULTS: At least one SLN was identified in 281 patients. MNBD was present in 86 (31%) patients, and a pathologically positive SLN was found in 56 (20%) patients. By multivariate analysis, the presence of MNBD (relative risk = 1.9; P = .03), tumor thickness (P = .007), and tumor ulceration (relative risk = 2.4; P = .01) were significant independent risk factors for the presence of at least one pathologically positive SLN. SLN pathology in one basin did not predict the histology of other basins in 19 (22%) of 86 patients with MNBD. CONCLUSIONS: MNBD is independently associated with an increased risk of nodal metastases in truncal melanoma patients. Because the histological status of an individual basin did not reliably predict the status of the other draining basins in patients with MNBD, it is important to adequately identify and completely assess all nodal basins at risk, as defined by lymphoscintigraphy, in truncal melanoma patients.

Biopsy↗
PubMed2000

Prognostic implications of pathological lymph node status after preoperative chemotherapy for operable T3N0M0 breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Although preoperative chemotherapy has become the standard of care for inoperable locally advanced breast cancer, its role for downstaging resectable primary tumors is still evolving. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the prognostic information from an axillary node dissection in patients with clinical T3N0 breast cancer was altered by preoperative chemotherapy compared with surgery de novo. METHODS: Between 1976 and 1994, 91 patients with clinically node-negative operable T3 breast cancer received doxorubicin-based combination chemotherapy on protocol at one institution. Fifty-three patients received both preoperative and postoperative chemotherapy (PreopCT), and 38 received postoperative chemotherapy only (PostopCT). All patients underwent axillary lymph node dissection as part of their definitive surgical treatment. There were no differences between the PreopCT and PostopCT groups in median age (51 vs. 49 years), median tumor size at presentation (6 cm vs. 6 cm), tumor grade, or estrogen receptor status (estrogen receptor negative 38% vs. 32%). The median follow-up time was 7 years. RESULTS: Patients in the PreopCT group had fewer histologically positive lymph nodes (median, 0 vs. 3, P < .01), and a lower incidence of extranodal extension (19% vs. 42%, P = .02). By univariate analysis, the number of pathologically positive lymph nodes (P < .01) and extranodal extension (P < .01) were predictors of disease-specific survival in PreopCT patients. Multivariate analysis showed that extranodal extension was the only independent prognostic factor in PreopCT patients (P < .01). Overall, PreopCT and PostopCT patients had similar 5-year disease-free survival rates (66% vs. 57%); however, PreopCT patients had worse disease-free (P = .01) and disease-specific survival (P = .04) when survival was compared after adjustment for the number of positive lymph nodes. Furthermore, PreopCT patients with 4-9 positive lymph nodes had a lower 5-year disease-free survival rate than PostopCT patients with 4-9 positive nodes (17 vs. 48%, P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Axillary lymph node status remains prognostic after chemotherapy. Pathologically positive lymph nodes after preoperative chemotherapy are associated with a worse prognosis than the same nodal status before chemotherapy.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Ductal carcinoma-in-situ: long-term results of breast-conserving therapy.

BACKGROUND: The role of breast-conserving therapy (BCT) in the management of ductal carcinoma-in-situ (DCIS) is controversial because of reported high recurrence rates. We reviewed our experience to determine whether the rate and pattern of locoregional recurrence after BCT were similar in patients with DCIS and patients with early-stage (T1) invasive breast tumors and whether local recurrence affected survival. METHODS: Between 1973 and 1994, 87 patients with DCIS alone, 22 patients with DCIS with microinvasion (DCIS-M), and 646 patients with invasive breast cancer 2 cm or smaller in diameter were treated with BCT (wide local excision with radiotherapy) at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. Survival was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. The median follow-up times were 11 years for patients with DCIS alone, 12 years for patients with DCIS-M, and 8 years for patients with invasive breast cancer. RESULTS: Eleven (13%) of 87 patients with DCIS and 5 (23%) of 22 patients with DCIS-M had developed locoregional recurrences at follow-up. Two patients with DCIS with locoregional recurrence died of breast cancer. Of the 646 patients with invasive breast cancer, 56 (9%) had a locoregional recurrence, and 16 (2%) died of breast cancer. The median time to locoregional recurrence was significantly longer in patients with DCIS or DCIS-M (9-10 years) than patients with invasive tumors (5 years). CONCLUSIONS: DCIS is a favorable disease with an excellent long-term survival. The locoregional recurrence rate in patients with DCIS treated with BCT is similar to that in patients with early-stage invasive breast cancer treated with BCT, but time to locoregional recurrence is significantly longer in patients with DCIS. In patients with DCIS treated with BCT, intense surveillance for locoregional recurrence needs to be maintained for the patient's lifetime.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

The correlation of axillary ultrasonography with histologic breast cancer downstaging after induction chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to examine the role of ultrasonography in detecting axillary lymph node metastases in stage II breast cancer patients after induction chemotherapy (IC). METHODS: Of 172 consecutive patients with T1-3, N0-1, M0 breast cancer registered in a prospective IC trial, a subset of 130 evaluable patients were chosen, with (1) both physical and ultrasonographic examinations of the axilla before and after IC; (2) exactly four cycles of IC; (3) no presurgical radiation therapy; and (4) an axillary lymph node dissection. RESULTS: Before IC, 32 patients (25%) were negative for axillary involvement by both physical and ultrasonographic examinations. After IC, this number increased to 64 (49%). Of these, 31 (48%) were positive by pathology examination. In most cases, however, the residual tumor was minimal. CONCLUSIONS: Stage II breast cancer patients who were or became node negative by both ultrasonographic and physical examinations after IC had a 48% incidence of nodal metastases. Because the residual tumor was minimal, irradiation may be sufficient for adequate local control of the axilla.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Presentation, management and outcome of axillary recurrence from breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The impact of axillary node dissection on breast cancer survival is unclear. Limited axillary surgery has been proposed but may increase regional recurrence rates. Optimal management for axillary recurrence is poorly understood. METHODS: Axillary recurrences were initial treatment failure sites in 44 of 4,255 breast cancer patients (1%) seen at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1982 to 1992. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients (48%) had early stage disease (0, I, II) at diagnosis. With 70.8 months median follow-up, complete control of axillary recurrence was achieved in 31 patients (71%). Distant metastases developed in 50% and were more likely with uncontrolled axillary recurrences. Failure to receive multimodality therapy and failure to undergo surgery for the recurrence correlated with resistant axillary disease. CONCLUSIONS: Axillary recurrence from breast cancer is uncommon but may follow any stage of disease. One half of affected patients develop distant metastases. Durable disease control is best achieved with multimodality therapy including a surgery component.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Prophylactic mastectomy.

The Society of Surgical Oncology has developed a position statement54 that lists conditions warranting consideration of prophylactic mastectomy (Table 4). It must be stressed that there are no absolute indications for prophylactic mastectomy. The data are limited about the efficacy of prophylactic mastectomy in humans, but recent studies suggest that it results in up to 90% reduction in the risk for breast cancer. Total mastectomy is technically a more definitive procedure, although reported series have had a predominance of patients undergoing subcutaneous, nipple-sparing procedures. Prophylactic mastectomy may improve longevity in BRCA mutation carriers, but this must be balanced against the impact on quality of life. The benefits of prophylactic mastectomy relative to chemoprevention are unclear because there are no prospective randomized studies comparing these two strategies. Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in patients with a unilateral cancer is unlikely to improve survival, but this approach may be considered for high-risk or difficult-to-observe patients, to facilitate breast reconstruction, and for the psychologic benefits. Patients considering prophylactic mastectomy should be well informed of risk-reduction alternatives and the limitations in the efficacy and cosmetic results of the procedure.

Animals↗