Biomedical subjects

M H Pope

Publications and source records attributed to M H Pope.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2003

The effects of whole body vibration on humans: dangerous or advantageous?

The effects of whole body vibration (WBV) have been studied extensively in occupational medicine. In particular, it has been shown that when the body undergoes chronically to whole body vibrations spinal degeneration is likely to be one of the deleterious outcomes. Low back pain has been shown to be the leading major cause of industrial disability in the population under the age of 45 years and has been linked to whole body vibration exposure encountered in some industrial settings. Whole body vibration has been recently purposed as an exercise intervention suggesting its effectiveness in increasing force-generating capacity in lower limbs and low back. It has also been reported to be an effective non-pharmacological intervention for patients with low back pain. Relatively short exposure to whole body vibration has been also shown to increase the serum levels of testosterone and growth hormone. The combined effects on the neuromuscular system and endocrine system seem to suggest its effectiveness as a therapeutic approach for sarcopenia and possibly osteoporosis. Due to the danger of long-term exposure to whole body vibration, it is important to develop safe exercise protocols in order to determine exercise programs for different populations.

Exercise Therapy↗

PubMed2001

The Boeing prospective study and beyond.

STUDY DESIGN: The Boeing prospective study was reviewed. The Boeing prospective study, comprising two articles, was a large field study that explored why workers would or would not report occupational back pain problems. OBJECTIVES: The most immediate objective was to determine the extent to which conclusions drawn from the Boeing prospective study withstand critical examination. The ultimate purpose of this review was to develop guidelines for field studies of back pain in industry. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: For more than a century, researchers have noted great variability among individuals in the reporting of back pain, but the explanations posed for this variability have been inconsistent. Because findings gain credibility roughly to the extent that they bear on the world outside the laboratory, field studies in particular hold great potential for clarifying the underlying explanation for individual variability in back pain reporting. The Boeing prospective study was a large and ambitious field study that examined this issue. METHODS: The Boeing prospective study was examined through the lens of research conducted since it was published. The review used both the methodological and substantive literature. RESULTS: The Boeing prospective study, based on a minority of workers originally solicited to participate in it (33-41%), accounted for 7% of the variation in why workers would or would not report a back pain problem. A number of issues that may have biased its results toward the null are examined. CONCLUSIONS: The highlighting of the Boeing prospective study's limitations may be instructive not so much to criticize this one particular study but, rather, to anticipate problems that in general may be encountered in field studies of back pain in industry. Looking beyond the Boeing prospective study, the following guidelines for the conduct of such studies may be proposed: 1) Study designs should be based on explanations from which testable hypotheses may be derived; 2) Subgroups within the more general category of "back pain" should be delineated; 3) Both occupational exposures and psychosocial factors should be entered into the analysis; 4) Factors not apparent at the workplace should be considered; 5. Abstracts of articles should be carefully crafted.

Back Pain↗

PubMed2001

Footwear affects the behavior of low back muscles when jogging.

Use of modified shoes and insole materials has been widely advocated to treat low back symptoms from running impacts, although considerable uncertainty remains regarding the effects of these devices on the rate of shock transmission to the spine. This study investigated the effects of shoes and insole materials on a) the rate of shock transmission to the spine, b) the temporal response of spinal musculature to impact loading, and c) the time interval between peak lumbar acceleration and peak lumbar muscle response. It was hypothesised that shoes and inserts a) decrease the rate of shock transmission, b) decrease the low back muscle response time, and c) shorten the time interval between peak lumbar acceleration and peak lumbar muscle response. Twelve healthy subjects were tested while jogging barefoot (unshod) or wearing identical athletic shoes (shod). Either no material, semi-rigid (34 Shore A), or soft (9.5 Shore A) insole material covered the force plate in the barefoot conditions and was placed as insole when running shod. Ground reaction forces, acceleration at the third lumbar level, and erector spinae myoelectric activity were recorded simultaneously. The rate of shock transmission to the spine was greater (p < 0.0003) unshod (acceleration rate: Means +/- SD 127.35 +/- 87.23 g/s) than shod (49.84 +/- 33.98 g/s). The temporal response of spinal musculature following heel strike was significantly shorter (p < 0.023) unshod (0.038 +/- 0.021 s) than shod (0.047 +/- 0.036 s). The latency between acceleration peak (maximal external force) and muscle response peak (maximal internal force) was significantly (p < 0.021) longer unshod (0.0137 +/- 0.022s) than shod (0.004 +/- 0.040 s). These results suggest that one of the benefits of running shoes and insoles is improved temporal synchronization between potentially destabilizing external forces and stabilizing internal forces around the lumbar spine.

Acceleration↗

PubMed2000

Cost-effectiveness of fusion with and without instrumentation for patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis.

STUDY DESIGN: A cost-effectiveness study was performed from the societal perspective. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the costs and benefits of laminectomy alone and laminectomy with concomitant lumbar fusion for patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Costs, probabilities, and utilities were estimated from the literature. Short-term risks considered were perioperative complications, the probability of the fusion healing, and the probability that surgery will relieve symptoms. Long-term risks considered were recurrence of symptoms and reoperation. METHODS: The 10-year costs, quality-adjusted life years, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (reported as dollars per quality-adjusted year of life gained) were calculated using a Markov model. Sensitivity analysis was performed on all variables using clinically plausible ranges. RESULTS: Laminectomy with noninstrumented fusion costs $56,500 per quality-adjusted year of life versuslaminectomy without fusion. The cost-effectiveness of laminectomy with noninstrumented fusion was most sensitive to the increase in quality-of-life associated with relief of severe stenosis symptoms. The cost-effectiveness ratio of instrumented fusion compared with noninstrumented fusion was $3,112,800 per quality-adjusted year of life. However, if the proportion of patients experiencing symptom relief after instrumented fusion was 90% as compared with 80% for patients with noninstrumented fusion, then the cost-effectiveness ratio of instrumented fusion compared with noninstrumented fusion would be $82,400 per quality-adjusted year of life. CONCLUSIONS: The cost-effectiveness of laminectomy with noninstrumented fusion compares favorably with other surgical interventions, although it depends greatly on the true effectiveness of these surgeries to alleviatesymptoms and on how patients value the quality-of-life effect of relieving severe stenosis symptoms. Instrumented fusion was very expensive compared with the incremental gain in health outcome. Better data on the effectiveness of these alternative procedures are needed.

Cost-Benefit Analysis↗

PubMed2000

Evaluation of low back muscle surface EMG signals using wavelets.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the ability of observers to correctly detect the reaction time of erector spinae response to unexpected load by inspecting nonprocessed electromyographic signals versus inspection of wavelet transformed electromyographic signals and versus automatic detection on the same wavelet transformed signals. BACKGROUND: Traditionally, electromyographic signal analysis is performed using Fourier transform based methods. However, muscle response to transients such as unexpected load, have limitations when using these methods of electromyographic processing. DESIGN: A comparison was made of the three methods using the same signals attained during sudden loading of the trunk. METHODS: 11 chronic low back pain patients and eleven normal subjects were investigated in sudden loading. Surface electromyographic signals were obtained from the erector spine muscle at L3. The ability of observers to detect reaction time of erector spinae muscle responses of nonprocessed electromyographic signals versus inspection of wavelet transformed electromyographic signals versus an automatic peak detection program was determined. RESULTS: The results have shown that the spine muscle reaction time was easier and more accurately determined in the wavelet domain rather than in its original signal representation. CONCLUSION: Wavelet transform methods improved the analysis of electromyographic signals in the time domain by facilitating the determination of the time of muscle activity. RELEVANCE: Wavelet transform could be a valuable tool for electromyographic analysis in resolving the psychophysical problem of perception involved in the analysis of nonprocessed signals. In clinical environments, where the speed and the accuracy of the analysis of electromyographic signal is critical, the wavelet based signal processing could be very important.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Biomechanic evaluation of the Rola Stretcher as a passive distraction device.

INTRODUCTION: Many devices have been marketed claiming to increase the mobility of the articulations of the spine with active or passive distraction. In this study, the Rola Stretcher (Unique Relief, Inc, Davenport, Iowa) and an earlier version, the True Back II (True Back, Inc, Clearwater, Fla), were evaluated to see if they have a measurable biomechanic effect on the spine. METHODS: Two studies were conducted, each with 6 male participants and 6 female participants, using a stadiometer to accurately measure a person's sitting height. The increase in sitting height after using the True Back II or Rola Stretcher for 10 minutes was compared with that after lying supine for 10 minutes. A third intervention, a firm foam block cut to the same size and shape as the True Back II, was also used in this study. RESULTS: The Rola Stretcher had a significantly greater lengthening effect on the spine compared with supine rest (P <0050). The True Back II had a similar but lesser effect (P <.0509). Women demonstrated a greater height gain than men. CONCLUSION: The True Back II and the Rola Stretcher in particular appear to lengthen the spine after a single use of 10 minutes. The observed discrepancy between the effects in men and women may be an experimental artifact occurring as a result of less effective resetting of the posturing mechanisms in men compared with women. A trend showed the Rola Stretcher to be more effective than the foam block.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

Cervical electromyographic activity during low-speed rear impact.

Whiplash motion of the neck is characterized by having an extension-flexion motion of the neck. It has been previously assumed that muscles do not play a role in the injury. Eight healthy males were seated in a car seat mounted on a sled. The sled was accelerated by a spring mechanism. Muscle electromyographic (EMG) activity was measured by wire electrodes in semi-spinalis capitis, splenius capitis, and levator scapulae. Surface EMG activity was measured over trapezius and sternocleidomastoideus. Wavelet analysis was used to establish the onset of muscle activity with respect to sled movement. Shorter reaction times were found to be as low as 13.2 ms from head acceleration and 65.6 ms from sled acceleration. Thus the muscles could influence the injury pattern. It is of interest that clinical symptoms are often attributed to muscle tendon injuries.

Acceleration↗

PubMed1999

Is there a rational basis for post-surgical lifting restrictions? 1. Current understanding.

Lifting restrictions postoperatively are quite common, but there appears to be little scientific basis for them. Lifting restrictions are inhibitory in terms of return to work and may be a factor in chronicity. The mean functional spinal motion unit stiffness changes with in vitro or computer-simulated discectomies, facetectomies and laminectomies were reviewed from the literature. We modified the NIOSH lifting equation to include another multiplier related to stiffness change post surgery. The new recommended lifts were computed for different lifting conditions seen in industry. The reduction of rotational stiffness ranged from 21% to 41% for a discectomy, 1% to 59% for a facetectomy and 4% to 16% for a partial laminectomy. The recommended lifts based on our modified equation were adjusted accordingly. There is no rational basis for current lifting restrictions. The risk to the spine is a function of many other variables as well as weight (i.e., distance of weight from body). The adjusted NIOSH guidelines provide a reasonable way to estimate weight restrictions and accommodations such as lifting aids. Such restrictions should be as liberal as possible so as to facilitate, not prevent, return to work. Patients need more advice regarding lifting activities and clinicians should be more knowledgeable about the working conditions and constraints of a given workplace to effectively match the solution to the patient's condition.

Diskectomy↗

PubMed1999

Is there a rational basis for post-surgical lifting restrictions? 2. Possible scientific approach.

Lifting restrictions postoperatively are quite common but there appears to be little scientific basis for them. Lifting restricitions are inhibitory in terms of return to work and may be a factor in chronicity. The mean changes in functional spinal motion unit (FSU) stiffness with in vitro or computer-simulated discectomies, facetectomies and laminectomies were reviewed from the literature. We modified the NIOSH lifting equation to include another multiplier related to stiffness change post surgery. The new recommended lifts were computed for different lifting conditions seen in industry. The reduction of rotational stiffness ranged from 21% to 41% for a discectomy, 1% to 59% for a facetectomy and 4% to 16% for a partial laminectomy. The recommended lifts based on our modified equation were adjusted accordingly. There is no rational basis for current lifting resctrictions. The risk to the spine is a function of many other variables as well as weight (i.e., distance of weight from body). The adjusted NIOSH guidelines provide a reasonable way to estimate weight restrictions and accomodations such as lifting aids. Such resitrictions should be as liberal as possible so as to facilitate, not prevent, return to work. Patients need more advice regarding lifting activities and clinicians should be more knowledgeable about the working conditions and constraints of a given workplace to effectively match the solution to the patient's condition.

Diskectomy↗

PubMed1999

The clinical relevance of biomechanics.

Most neurologists are familiar with biomechanics but may be unsure of the relevance of this field to their practice. Actually those involved in musculoskeletal problems are undoubtedly using biomechanical principles. This article is limited to the spine, but the basic principles of biomechanics are applicable to other parts of the body. In this article, we describe the spine and trunk as a biomechanical organ, the biomechanical principles behind back injuries and their importance, the role of biomechanical issues in pain, the utility of clinical tests based on biomechanical principles, the effects of aging, and the future directions in spine biomechanical research.

Accidents, Occupational↗

PubMed1999

Does arch height affect impact loading at the lower back level in running?

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of the medial longitudinal arch height on the shock wave that repetitively reaches the lower back in running. Impact forces were measured simultaneously at the ground by a force plate and at the level of the low back, by means of an accelerometer, skin-mounted at the L3 spinal process. The medial longitudinal arch height was calculated as navicular height divided by foot length. Twelve healthy subjects ran barefoot and with an identical sport shoe at a constant speed. The sample size was divided equally into a low-arch and a high-arch group. Statistical analysis was performed by multivariate analysis of variance and Pearson's correlation. At low back level, there was a significantly lower acceleration amplitude and rate in the high-arch group (amplitude = mean, 1.74 g and SD, 0.94 g; rate = mean, 71.2 g/sec and SD, 58.0 g/sec) compared with the low-arch group (amplitude = mean 2.25 g and SD, 1.11 g; rate = mean, 111.5 g/sec and SD, 68.6 g/sec) (P < 0.001, each). At the ground, there was a slight negative correlation between arch height and initial loading rate in AP (-0.19; P < 0.01) and vertical (-0.22; P < 0.001) directions and a positive correlation between arch height and initial loading rate in the medial direction (0.22, P < 0.05). The results indicate that the high-arch foot is a better shock absorber with regard to the low back level than the low-arch foot.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

A review of studies on seated whole body vibration and low back pain.

The paper reviews the epidemiologic evidence linking low back pain (LBP) and exposure to whole body vibration (WBV). Particular emphasis is placed on studies where the exposure is quantified. Biomechanical studies show a resonance at 4-5 Hz. At the resonance the transmissibility exceeds 1.0, and is dependent on seat attenuation, posture and seat back inclination. Increased spinal loading is evidenced by increased muscle activity, muscle fatigue, and disc pressure, and by decreased stature. Physiologic changes also occur with WBV. The risk of LBP can be reduced by vibration damping, good ergonomic design, reducing exposure, and reducing other risks such as lifting.

Biomechanical Phenomena↗

PubMed1999

Pathomechanics and clinical relevance of disc degeneration and annular tear: a point-of-view review.

Annular tear is a major cause of intervertebral disc degeneration that results in disabling back pain. Many of the stresses resulting in this type of lesion are common in the workplace: compression, torsion, compression combined with flexion, and vibration. Age-related disc degeneration begins early in adulthood, and progresses thereafter, altering disc morphology and mechanical properties in ways that predispose to disc herniation, and should not be misconstrued as "old age." Acute trauma may produce disc herniation whether or not there are predisposing factors, such as age-related degeneration, but disc herniation in the absence of acute injury requires the presence of preexisting degenerative changes.

Biomechanical Phenomena↗

PubMed1998

Range of motion and motion patterns in patients with low back pain before and after rehabilitation.

STUDY DESIGN: Data were collected from 27 patients who were participating in a rehabilitation program for chronic low back pain. The patients were tested on day 2 and day 11 of a 2-week rehabilitation program. OBJECTIVES: To determine specific characteristics of trunk motion associated with long-term dysfunction caused by low back pain of various origin, to determine if a neural network analysis system can be effective in distinguishing between patterns, and to determine if the rehabilitation has an effect on range and pattern of motion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There is a lack of objective measures for evaluating the efficacy of rehabilitation programs. Numerous studies have established the difficulty of evaluating low back pain. Existing techniques, such as imaging methods, are in many cases either very rough and inaccurate or expensive and ineffective. A technique for evaluation of motion patterns in low back pain was developed based on analysis of dynamic motion features such as shape, velocity, and symmetry of movements. METHODS: Dynamic motion data were collected before and after rehabilitation from 27 patients with low back pain by using a triaxial goniometer. Range of motion and features of the movement, such as shape, velocity, and repetitiveness, were extracted for analysis. RESULTS: Motion features showed significant improvement after the rehabilitation program. CONCLUSIONS: A neural network based on kinematic data is an excellent model for classification of low back pain dysfunction. Such a system could markedly improve the management of low back pain for an individual patient.

Adult↗

PubMed1998

Biomechanical testing sequelae relevant to spinal fusion and instrumentation.

The increasing prevalence of spinal disorders and associated treatments has produced a dramatic increase in the number of available devices. The biomechanical evaluation leading to the design, development, and implementation of spinal instrumentation has resulted in a number of in vitro and in vivo testing methods. This article reviews some of the methods and associated results obtained by various evaluation techniques of spinal fusion hardware. Current work and future considerations also are presented.

Animals↗

PubMed1998

Evaluation of EMG signals from rehabilitated patients with lower back pain using wavelets.

This paper reports the preliminary results of an analysis of surface EMG signals obtained from rehabilitated patients with lower back problems using discrete wavelet transform techniques. In our study, 12 patients with lower back pain were tested before and after rehabilitation. The reaction time difference (before and after rehabilitation) from the erector spinae muscle caused by sudden loading was determined. The results indicated that the reaction time after rehabilitation was shorter than that before rehabilitation for about 45% of the tested cases.

Artifacts↗

PubMed1998

Kappa Delta Award. Low back pain and whole body vibration.

The investigators describe their multifaceted approach to the study of the relationship between whole body vibration and low back pain. The epidemiologic study was a two center study of drivers and sedentary workers in the United States and Sweden. The vibration exposure was measured in the vehicles. It was found that the career vibration exposure was related to low back, neck, and shoulder pain. However, disability was related to job satisfaction. In vivo experiments, using percutaneous pin mounted accelerometers have shown that the natural frequency is at 4.5 Hz. The frequency response is affected by posture, seating, and seat back inclination. The response appears to be determined largely by the rocking of the pelvis. Electromyographic studies have shown that muscle fatigue occurs under whole body vibration. After whole body vibration exposure the muscle response to a sudden load has greater latency. Vehicle driving may be a reason for low back pain or herniated nucleus pulposus. Prolonged seating exposure, coupled with the whole body vibration, should be reduced for those recovering from these problems. Vibration attenuating seats and correct ergonomic layout of the cabs may reduce the risks of recurrence.

Acceleration↗

PubMed1998

The dynamic response of human subjects while seated in car seats.

A pendulum impact method was used to establish the dynamic response of the seated subject. Threaded K wires were placed in the L3 spinous process. The gain and phase angle between the platform and the vertebra were established. The response of the subject was observed while seated on a platform and a variety of other seats. The seats were found to be very important in the attenuation of the impulse, leading to a higher transmissibility. Clinical Relevance Skeletal impact through the lower extremity is quite common in many occupations. The importance of posture and seat design in attenuation of impulses has been established.

Acceleration↗