Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M H Hastings

Publications and source records attributed to M H Hastings.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Tissue-specific abolition of Per1 expression in the pars tuberalis by pinealectomy in the Syrian hamster.

Melatonin secretion by the pineal gland transduces photoperiod into a neuroendocrine signal. In the pars tuberalis (PT), we have shown that photoperiod modifies the amplitude of the clock gene Per1. The aim of this study was to test whether the endogenous melatonin signal is required for rhythmic expression of Per1 in the PT. Male Syrian hamsters housed in long days (LD, 16:8h light:dark) were pinealectomized and Per1 mRNA expression studied by in situ hybridization. Pinealectomy abolished the rhythm of Per1 expression in the PT, but had no effect on Per1 expression in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), or the ventromedial nucleus (VMH) of the hypothalamus. Interestingly, a single night-time injection of melatonin (25 microg), given to pinealectomized animals, failed to restore Per1 expression in the PT. These data demonstrate that Per1 expression in the PT is driven by melatonin, and that the features of the endogenous signal through which the Per1 expression is achieved cannot be reproduced by a single melatonin injection.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Differential functions of mPer1, mPer2, and mPer3 in the SCN circadian clock.

The role of mPer1 and mPer2 in regulating circadian rhythms was assessed by disrupting these genes. Mice homozygous for the targeted allele of either mPer1 or mPer2 had severely disrupted locomotor activity rhythms during extended exposure to constant darkness. Clock gene RNA rhythms were blunted in the suprachiasmatic nucleus of mPer2 mutant mice, but not of mPER1-deficient mice. Peak mPER and mCRY1 protein levels were reduced in both lines. Behavioral rhythms of mPer1/mPer3 and mPer2/mPer3 double-mutant mice resembled rhythms of mice with disruption of mPer1 or mPer2 alone, respectively, confirming the placement of mPer3 outside the core circadian clockwork. In contrast, mPer1/mPer2 double-mutant mice were immediately arrhythmic. Thus, mPER1 influences rhythmicity primarily through interaction with other clock proteins, while mPER2 positively regulates rhythmic gene expression, and there is partial compensation between products of these two genes.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Impaired expression of the mPer2 circadian clock gene in the suprachiasmatic nuclei of aging mice.

The expression of circadian clock genes was investigated in the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) of young adult and old laboratory mice. Samples were taken at two time points, which corresponded to the expected maximum (circadian time 7 [CT7]) or minimum (CT21) of mPer mRNA expression. Whereas the young mice had a stable and well-synchronized circadian activity/rest cycle, the rhythms of old animals were less stable and were phase advanced. The expression of mPerl mRNA and mPer2 mRNA was rhythmic in both groups, with peak values at CT7. The levels of mClock and mCry1 mRNA were not different depending on the time of day and did not vary with age. In contrast, an age-dependent difference was found in the case of mPer2 (but not mPerl) mRNA expression, with the maximum at CT7 significantly lower in old mice. The decreased expression of mPer2 may be relevant for the observed differences in the overt activity rhythm of aged mice.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2000

Interacting molecular loops in the mammalian circadian clock.

We show that, in the mouse, the core mechanism for the master circadian clock consists of interacting positive and negative transcription and translation feedback loops. Analysis of Clock/Clock mutant mice, homozygous Period2(Brdm1) mutants, and Cryptochrome-deficient mice reveals substantially altered Bmal1 rhythms, consistent with a dominant role of PERIOD2 in the positive regulation of the Bmal1 loop. In vitro analysis of CRYPTOCHROME inhibition of CLOCK: BMAL1-mediated transcription shows that the inhibition is through direct protein:protein interactions, independent of the PERIOD and TIMELESS proteins. PERIOD2 is a positive regulator of the Bmal1 loop, and CRYPTOCHROMES are the negative regulators of the Period and Cryptochrome cycles.

ARNTL Transcription Factors↗
PubMed2000

Analysis of clock proteins in mouse SCN demonstrates phylogenetic divergence of the circadian clockwork and resetting mechanisms.

The circadian clock in the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) is comprised of a cell-autonomous, autoregulatory transcriptional/translational feedback loop. Its molecular components include three period and two cryptochrome genes. We describe circadian patterns of expression of mPER2 and mPER3 in the mouse SCN that are synchronous to those for mPER1, mCRY1, and mCRY2. Coimmunoprecipitation experiments demonstrate in vivo associations of the SCN mPER proteins with each other and with the mCRY proteins, and of mCRY proteins with mTIM, but no mPER/mTIM interactions. Examination of the effects of weak and strong resetting light pulses on SCN clock proteins highlights a central role for mPER1 in photic entrainment, with no acute light effects on either the mCRY or mTIM proteins. These clock protein interactions and photic responses in mice are divergent from those described in Drosophila.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Circadian clockwork: two loops are better than one.

The spectacularly successful race over the past three years to place our understanding of the circadian clockwork of mammals into a molecular framework is beginning to yield the cardinal example of the molecular-genetic control of behaviour. This perspective describes recent evidence for the conservation of a double-loop, autoregulatory feedback mechanism across the best understood eukaryotic circadian systems, and discusses how these findings may illuminate some long-standing puzzles concerning our subliminal sense of circadian time.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Differential adrenergic regulation of the circadian expression of the clock genes Period1 and Period2 in the rat pineal gland.

Precise temporal regulation of transcription is pivotal to the role of the mammalian pineal gland as a transducer of circadian and seasonal information. The circadian clock genes Per1 and Per2 encode factors implicated in temporally gated transcriptional programmes in brain and pituitary. Here we show that the nocturnal circadian expression of Per1 and Per2 in the rat pineal gland parallels that of serotonin N-acetyltransferase (NAT) mRNA, which encodes the rate-limiting enzyme of melatonin biosynthesis. This rhythm is dependent upon an intact sympathetic innervation. Increases in rPer1 (r indicates rat) and rPer2, as well as rNAT, expression during subjective night were blocked completely by superior cervical ganglionectomy (SCGX). In SCGX rats, the beta-adrenergic receptor agonist isoproterenol rapidly induced the rPer1 mRNA with dynamics very similar to its effect on rNAT mRNA. In contrast, isoproterenol was without effect on expression of rPer2 mRNA. These findings demonstrate that circadian pineal expression of both rPer1 and rPer2 is controlled by sympathetic afferent innervation, but whereas beta-adrenergic signalling regulates rPer1 and rNAT, an alternative route mediates sympathetic regulation over rPer2 expression.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

The circadian cycle of mPER clock gene products in the suprachiasmatic nucleus of the siberian hamster encodes both daily and seasonal time.

The circadian clock in the hypothalamic suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) regulates the pattern of melatonin secretion from the pineal gland such that the duration of release reflects the length of the night. This seasonally specific endocrine cue mediates annual timing in photoperiodic mammals. The aim of this study was to investigate how changes in photoperiod influence the cyclic expression of recently identified clock gene products (mPER and mTIM) in the SCN of a highly seasonal mammal, the Siberian hamster (Phodopus sungorus). Immunocytochemical studies indicate that the abundance of both mPER1 and mPER2 (but not mTIM) in the SCN exhibits very pronounced, synchronous daily cycles, peaking approximately 12 h after lights-on. These rhythms are circadian in nature as they continue approximately under free-running conditions. Their circadian waveform is modulated by photoperiod such that the phase of peak mPER expression is prolonged under long photoperiods. mPER1 protein is also expressed in the pars tuberalis of Siberian hamsters. In hamsters adapted to long days, the expression of mPER1 is elevated at the start of the light phase. In contrast, there is no clear elevation in mPER1 levels in the pars tuberalis of hamsters held on short photoperiods. These results indicate that core elements of the circadian clockwork are sensitive to seasonal time, and that encoding and decoding of seasonal information may be mediated by the actions of these transcriptional modulators.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

Rapid down-regulation of mammalian period genes during behavioral resetting of the circadian clock.

The pervasive role of circadian clocks in regulating physiology and behavior is widely recognized. Their adaptive value is their ability to be entrained by environmental cues such that the internal circadian phase is a reliable predictor of solar time. In mammals, both light and nonphotic behavioral cues can entrain the principal oscillator of the hypothalamic suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN). However, although light can advance or delay the clock during circadian night, behavioral events trigger phase advances during the subjective day, when the clock is insensitive to light. The recent identification of Period (Per) genes in mammals, homologues of dperiod, which encodes a core element of the circadian clockwork in Drosophila, now provides the opportunity to explain circadian timing and entrainment at a molecular level. In mice, expression of mPer1 and mPer2 in the SCN is rhythmic and acutely up-regulated by light. Moreover, the temporal relations between mRNA and protein cycles are consistent with a clock based on a transcriptional/translational feedback loop. Here we describe circadian oscillations of Per1 and Per2 in the SCN of the Syrian hamster, showing that PER1 protein and mRNA cycles again behave in a manner consistent with a negative-feedback oscillator. Furthermore, we demonstrate that nonphotic resetting has the opposite effect to light: acutely down-regulating these genes. Their sensitivity to nonphotic resetting cues supports their proposed role as core elements of the circadian oscillator. Moreover, this study provides an explanation at the molecular level for the contrasting but convergent effects of photic and nonphotic cues on the clock.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

mCRY1 and mCRY2 are essential components of the negative limb of the circadian clock feedback loop.

We determined that two mouse cryptochrome genes, mCry1 and mCry2, act in the negative limb of the clock feedback loop. In cell lines, mPER proteins (alone or in combination) have modest effects on their cellular location and ability to inhibit CLOCK:BMAL1 -mediated transcription. This suggested cryptochrome involvement in the negative limb of the feedback loop. Indeed, mCry1 and mCry2 RNA levels are reduced in the central and peripheral clocks of Clock/Clock mutant mice. mCRY1 and mCRY2 are nuclear proteins that interact with each of the mPER proteins, translocate each mPER protein from cytoplasm to nucleus, and are rhythmically expressed in the suprachiasmatic circadian clock. Luciferase reporter gene assays show that mCRY1 or mCRY2 alone abrogates CLOCK:BMAL1-E box-mediated transcription. The mPER and mCRY proteins appear to inhibit the transcriptional complex differentially.

3T3 Cells↗
PubMed1999

Differential regulation of mPER1 and mTIM proteins in the mouse suprachiasmatic nuclei: new insights into a core clock mechanism.

Recent discoveries have identified a framework for the core circadian clock mechanism in mammals. Development of this framework has been based entirely on the expression patterns of so-called "clock genes" in the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN), the principal clock of mammals. We now provide data concerning the protein expression patterns of two of these genes, mPer1 and mTim. Our studies show that mPER1 and mTIM are nuclear antigens expressed in the SCN and extensively throughout the forebrain. Expression of mPER1 in the SCN was rhythmic under entrained conditions and with clear circadian cycling under free-running conditions. Expression of mPER1 elsewhere in the mouse forebrain was not rhythmic. In contrast to mPER1, mTIM expression in the SCN did not vary with time in mice housed in either a light/dark cycle or in constant dim red light. The phase relationship between mPer1 RNA and mPER1 cycles in the SCN is consistent with a negative feedback model of the mammalian clock. The invariant nature of nuclear mTIM in the SCN suggests that its participation in negative feedback occurs only after mPER1 has entered the nucleus, and that the abundance of mTIM is not regulated by the circadian clock or the light/dark cycle.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

Rapid resetting of the mammalian circadian clock.

The suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) contain the principal circadian clock governing overt daily rhythms of physiology and behavior. The endogenous circadian cycle is entrained to the light/dark via direct glutamatergic retinal afferents to the SCN. To understand the molecular basis of entrainment, it is first necessary to define how rapidly the clock is reset by a light pulse. We used a two-pulse paradigm, in combination with cellular and behavioral analyses of SCN function, to explore the speed of resetting of the circadian oscillator in Syrian hamster and mouse. Analysis of c-fos induction and cAMP response element-binding protein phosphorylation in the retinorecipient SCN demonstrated that the SCN are able to resolve and respond to light pulses presented 1 or 2 hr apart. Analysis of the phase shifts of the circadian wheel-running activity rhythm of hamsters presented with single or double pulses demonstrated that resetting of the oscillator occurred within 2 hr. This was the case for both delaying and advancing phase shifts. Examination of delaying shifts in the mouse showed resetting within 2 hr and in addition showed that resetting is not completed within 1 hr of a light pulse. These results establish the temporal window within which to define the primary molecular mechanisms of circadian resetting in the mammal.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

Glutamatergic induction of CREB phosphorylation and Fos expression in primary cultures of the suprachiasmatic hypothalamus in vitro is mediated by co-ordinate activity of NMDA and non-NMDA receptors.

Exposure of Syrian hamsters to light 1 h after lights-off rapidly (10 min) induced nuclear immunoreactivity (-ir) to the phospho-Ser133 form of the Ca2+/cAMP response element (CRE) binding protein (pCREB) in the retinorecipient zone of the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN). Light also induced nuclear Fos-ir in the same region of the SCN after 1 h. The glutamatergic N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor blocker MK801 attenuated the photic induction of both factors. To investigate glutamatergic regulation of pCREB and Fos further, tissue blocks and primary cultures of neonatal hamster SCN were examined by Western blotting and immunocytochemistry in vitro. On Western blots of SCN tissue, the pCREB-ir signal at 45 kDa was enhanced by glutamate or a mixture of glutamatergic agonists (NMDA, amino-methyl proprionic acid (AMPA), and Kainate (KA)), whereas total CREB did not change. Glutamate or the mixture of agonists also induced a 56 kDa band identified as Fos protein in SCN tissue. In dissociated cultures of SCN, glutamate caused a rapid (15 min) induction of nuclear pCREB-ir and Fos-ir (after 60 min) exclusively in neurones, both GABA-ir and others. Treatment with NMDA alone had no effect on pCREB-ir. AMPA alone caused a slight increase in pCREB-ir. However, kainate alone or in combination with NMDA and AMPA induced nuclear pCREB-ir equal to that induced by glutamate. The effects of glutamate on pCREB-ir and Fos-ir were blocked by antagonists of both NMDA (MK801) and AMPA/KA (NBQX) receptors. In the absence of extracellular Mg2+, MK801 blocked glutamatergic induction of Fos-ir. However, the AMPA/KA receptor antagonist was no longer effective at blocking glutamatergic induction of either Fos-ir or pCREB-ir, consistent with the model that glutamate regulates gene expression in the SCN by a co-ordinate action through both NMDA and AMPA/KA receptors. Glutamatergic induction of nuclear pCREB-ir in GABA-ir neurones was blocked by KN-62 an inhibitor of Ca2+/Calmodulin (CaM)-dependent kinases, implicating Ca2+-dependent signalling pathways in the glutamatergic regulation of gene expression in the SCN.

1-(5-Isoquinolinesulfonyl)-2-Methylpiperazine↗
PubMed1998

CREB in the mouse SCN: a molecular interface coding the phase-adjusting stimuli light, glutamate, PACAP, and melatonin for clockwork access.

The suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) is a central pacemaker in mammals, driving many endogenous circadian rhythms. An important pacemaker target is the regulation of a hormonal message for darkness, the circadian rhythm in melatonin synthesis. The endogenous clock within the SCN is synchronized to environmental light/dark cycles by photic information conveyed via the retinohypothalamic tract (RHT) and by the nocturnal melatonin signal that acts within a feedback loop. We investigated how melatonin intersects with the temporally gated resetting actions of two RHT transmitters, pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) and glutamate. We analyzed immunocytochemically the inducible phosphorylation of the transcription factor Ca2+/cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB) in the SCN of a melatonin-proficient (C3H) and a melatonin-deficient (C57BL) mouse strain. In vivo, light-induced phase shifts in locomotor activity were consistently accompanied by CREB phosphorylation in the SCN of both strains. However, in the middle of subjective nighttime, light induced larger phase delays in C57BL than in C3H mice. In vitro, PACAP and glutamate induced CREB phosphorylation in the SCN of both mouse strains, with PACAP being more effective during late subjective daytime and glutamate being more effective during subjective nighttime. Melatonin suppressed PACAP- but not glutamate-induced phosphorylation of CREB. The distinct temporal domains during which glutamate and PACAP induce CREB phosphorylation imply that during the light/dark transition the SCN switches sensitivity between these two RHT transmitters. Because these temporal domains are not different between C3H and C57BL mice, the sensitivity windows are set independently of the rhythmic melatonin signal.

Animals↗
PubMed1998

Resistance of gonadotropin-releasing hormone neurons to glutamatergic neurotoxicity.

Although many studies provide evidence that glutamatergic pathways regulate the secretion of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) from the hypothalamus, it is controversial as to whether they act directly upon GnRH neurons. The aim of the current study was to determine whether GnRH neurons are susceptible to the neurotoxic actions of specific glutamate agonists (N-methyl-D-aspartate [NMDA] and kainic acid), the rationale being that neurotoxic loss of GnRH neurons would provide evidence that the perikarya possess specific classes of glutamate receptor. Unilateral 1-microl injections of NMDA (12-120 mM), kainic acid (0.5-2.5 mM), or vehicle were stereotaxically directed at the preoptic area (mPOA)/diagonal band of Broca (dbB) in the region of the organum vasculosum of the lamina terminalis (OVLT) of male adult hamsters (Phodopus sungorus). The number and appearance of GnRH neurons were determined by immunocytochemistry 3-8 days later. The morphology of GnRH neurons in the vicinity of the injection sites appeared normal after both kainic acid and NMDA treatment, and there was no significant decrease in the numbers of GnRH perikarya identified following these treatments. Both agonists caused massive cellular loss when injected directly into cortical areas and striatum. In the experimental studies, there was little neuronal loss within the mPOA or dbB after either toxin, despite clear neuronal loss in areas adjacent to the injection sites, including ventral striatum and olfactory cortex. In follow-up studies, immunocytochemical and in situ hybridisation analysis of the NMDAR1 and NMDAR2 glutamate receptor subunits confirmed their widespread distribution in regions containing GnRH perikarya, but no colocalization within GnRH neurons was observed. The susceptibility of neural areas to NMDA neurotoxicity did not correlate with any difference in the regional expression of these glutamate receptor subunits. The resistance of GnRH neurons to the neurotoxic actions of two different glutamate agonists and the failure to detect colocalisation of NMDAR1 or NMDAR2 subunits within GnRH perikarya are consistent with the notion that the effects of glutamate upon GnRH secretion are not exerted directly upon GnRH cell bodies.

Animals↗
PubMed1998

Investigation into the regulation of the circadian system by dopamine and melatonin in the adult Siberian hamster (Phodopus sungorus).

Dopamine and melatonin have both been implicated in mediating maternal influences on the developing circadian system of altricial rodents. The aim of these studies was to investigate their role in the entrainment of the circadian system of the adult Siberian hamster (Phodopus sungorus). In-situ hybridization revealed that D1-dopamine receptor (D1-R) mRNA was expressed in the adult suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) at levels comparable to neonates. As dopamine has been postulated to mimic photic stimulation during early development, experiment 1 compared the effects of a D1-R agonist and a light pulse on free-running wheel running rhythms in hamsters maintained in constant dim red light. A phase response curve to light was generated, revealing clear phase delays early in the subjective night, and large phase advances in the late subjective night. However, the D1-R agonist (SKF 81297, 2 mg/kg, s.c.) did not produce consistent phase shifts at any circadian phase. Experiment 2 tested the ability of this dopaminergic agonist to modulate photic responses of the circadian system. Free-running animals were pre-treated with SKF 81297 (2 mg/kg, s.c.) 30 min before a 15 min light pulse given early or late in the subjective night. This agonist had no effect on the magnitude of phase shifts at either circadian time. In experiment 3, light pulses at CT13-15 induced expression of the immediate early gene c-fos in the SCN, as assessed by immunocytochemistry for the protein product. In contrast, SKF 81297 (2 mg/kg, s.c.) at the same phase did not induce c-fos in the SCN, despite marked c-fos induction in the caudate-putamen, nor did it affect photic induction of c-fos in the SCN. To investigate whether dopamine might be involved in nonphotic regulation of the circadian system in adult hamsters, experiment 4 compared the response of free-running hamsters to a series of injections of SKF 81297 (2 mg/kg, s.c.) or melatonin (1 mg/kg, s.c.), since melatonin receptor expression in the SCN also persists into adulthood. Animals were treated every 23.5 h for 6 days. The serial injections of melatonin produced cumulative phase advances of up to 3 h when delivered in late subjective day, but not when presented in late subjective night. Hamsters did not respond to SKF 81297 or vehicle treatment at either circadian phase. Moreover, pre-treatment with the dopaminergic agonist did not affect the phase-advancing effects of melatonin when both were given in the serial injection protocol. These results demonstrate clear phase-dependent effects of light pulses and melatonin on circadian rhythms in Siberian hamsters, but suggest that D1-Rs in the SCN no longer modulate photic or melatonin-dependent entrainment pathways in the adult.

Activity Cycles↗
PubMed1998

Stimuli which entrain the circadian clock of the neonatal Syrian hamster in vivo regulate the phosphorylation of the transcription factor CREB in the suprachiasmatic nucleus in vitro.

Photic resetting of the adult mammalian circadian clock in vivo is associated with phosphorylation of the Ser133 residue of the calcium/cyclic AMP response-element binding-protein (CREB) in the retinorecipient region of the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). Western blotting and immunocytochemistry were used to investigate whether agonists known to reset the clock of neonatal hamsters in vivo are also able to influence the phosphorylation of CREB in the suprachiasmatic hypothalamus in vitro. Antisera raised against synthetic CREB peptide sequences were used to differentiate between total CREB and the Ser133 phosphorylated form of CREB (pCREB). Western blot analysis of proteins isolated from suprachiasmatic tissue of 1-day-old Syrian hamsters revealed bands at approximately 45 kDa corresponding to total CREB and pCREB. Treatment of the tissue with a mixture of glutamatergic agonists [N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA), amino-methyl proprionic acid (AMPA) and kainate, all at 1 microM], or native glutamate (1 microM) had no effect on the total CREB signal, but increased the pCREB signal, indicative of agonist-stimulated phosphorylation of CREB on Ser133. A similar effect was seen following treatment of the suprachiasmatic blocks with either dopamine (1 microM) or forskolin (1 microM). Simultaneous treatment with melatonin (1 microM) significantly attenuated stimulation by forskolin. The effect of the agonists on nuclear pCREB-immunoreactivity (-ir) was investigated in primary cultures which contained a mixture of cell types characteristic of the suprachiasmatic nuclei in vivo. Basal expression of nuclear total CREB-ir was high, whereas expression of pCREB-ir was low. Treatment with glutamate (1 microM) or dopamine (1 microM) had no effect on total CREB-ir, but increased pCREB-ir in approximately 50 and 30% of cells, respectively, whereas forskolin (1 microM) increased pCREB-ir in almost all cells (> 90%). The effects of all three agonists were rapid (< 15 min), and dose and time dependent. Melatonin reversed the effects of forskolin in mixed cultures, but not in pure astrocyte cultures. Dual-immunocytochemistry (ICC) revealed that glutamate (1 microM) increased nuclear pCREB-ir in cells immunoreactive for microtubule-associated protein II (MAP II-ir), but not other cells, indicating an effect predominantly on neurons. This occurred equally in gamma-amino butyric acid (GABA)-ir and non-GABA-ir neurons. Dopamine (1 microM) was more selective, increasing pCREB-ir only in GABA-ir neurons, whereas forskolin increased pCREB-ir in all cells. The specific stimulation of pCREB-ir in GABA-ir neurons by dopamine was reversed by melatonin, but melatonin had no effect on the increase in pCREB-ir induced in GABA-ir neurons by glutamate. These results demonstrate that agonists known to entrain the circadian clock in vivo modulate phosphorylation of CREB in GABA-ir neurons derived from the neonatal suprachiasmatic nuclei.

Animals↗