Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M Gottwik

Publications and source records attributed to M Gottwik.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2000

Acute myocardial infarction occurring in versus out of the hospital: patient characteristics and clinical outcome. Maximal Individual TheRapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction (MITRA) Study Group.

OBJECTIVES: We describe the baseline characteristics and clinical course of patients who had an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) during their hospital stay. BACKGROUND: In comparison with patients who had an AMI outside of the hospital (prehospital AMI), the data on patients who had an AMI in the hospital are poorly described. METHODS: Patients with an in-hospital AMI were prospectively registered in the Southwest German Maximal Individual TheRapy in Acute myocardial infarction (MITRA) study and compared with patients with prehospital AMI. RESULTS: Of 5,888 patients with AMI, 403 patients (6.8%) had an in-hospital AMI. These patients were older, more often male and sicker as compared with the patients with a prehospital AMI. They also showed a higher prevalence of concomitant diseases, such as arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, renal insufficiency and contraindications for thrombolysis. There was no significant difference regarding the use of reperfusion therapy, either thrombolysis (in-hospital AMI 44.2% vs. prehospital AMI 49.1%; odds ratio [OR] 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70 to 1.05) or primary angioplasty (9.9% vs. 8.2%; OR 1.23, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.73), or a combination of both, between the two groups. The interval from symptom onset to the start of treatment in patients receiving reperfusion therapy was 55 min for patients with an in-hospital AMI versus 180 min for patients with a prehospital AMI (p = 0.001). In-hospital death occurred in 110 (27.3%) of 403 patients with an in-hospital versus 762 (13.9%) of 5,485 patients with a prehospital AMI (OR 2.33, 95% CI 1.85 to 2.94). This was confirmed by logistic regression analysis after adjusting for other confounding variables (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.23 to 2.24). CONCLUSIONS: In-hospital AMI occurred in 6.8% of patients. Time to intervention was shorter; however, the use of reperfusion therapy for in-hospital AMI was not different from that for prehospital AMI. In particular, primary angioplasty seems to be underused in these patients. This, as well as the selection of patients, may result in the high hospital mortality rate of 27.3%.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Decreasing hospital mortality between 1994 and 1998 in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty but not in patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis. Results from the pooled data of the Maximal Individual Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction (MITRA) Registry and the Myocardial Infarction Registry (MIR).

OBJECTIVES: We investigated changes in the clinical outcome of primary angioplasty and thrombolysis for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) from 1994 to 1998. BACKGROUND: Primary angioplasty for the treatment of AMI is a sophisticated technical procedure that requires experienced personnel and optimized hospital logistics. Growing experience with primary angioplasty in clinical routine and new adjunctive therapies may have improved the outcome over the years. METHODS: The pooled data of two German AMI registries: the Maximal Individual Therapy in AMI (MITRA) study and the Myocardial Infarction Registry (MIR) were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 10,118 lytic eligible patients with AMI, 1,385 (13.7%) were treated with primary angioplasty, and 8,733 (86.3%) received intravenous thrombolysis. Patients characteristics were quite balanced between the two treatment groups, but there was a higher proportion of patients with a prehospital delay of >6 h in those treated with primary angioplasty. The proportion of an in-hospital delay of more than 90 min significantly decreased in patients treated with primary angioplasty over the years (p for trend = 0.015, multivariate odds ratio [OR] for each year of the observation period = 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.73-0.96) but did not change significantly in patients treated with thrombolysis. Hospital mortality decreased significantly in the primary angioplasty group (p = 0.003 for trend; multivariate OR for each year = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.58-0.93). However, for patients treated with thrombolysis, hospital mortality did not change significantly (p for trend 0.175, multivariate OR for each year: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.94- 1.11). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with thrombolysis the clinical results of primary angioplasty for the treatment of AMI improved from 1994 to 1998. This indicates a beneficial effect of the growing experience and optimized hospital logistics of this technique over the years.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗
PubMed1999

[30-day mortality after heart surgery: a pilot project of the Working Party of Directors of Hospital Cardiology Departments].

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: 30-day mortality after operation is generally accepted as a central standard of quality, especially in regard to cardiac operations. The Working Party of Directors of Hospital Cardiology Departments (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitender Kardiologischer Krankenhausärzte, ALKK) in Germany set up a pilot project to analyse whether by direct communication with patients by a database centre the expenditure incurred in collecting complete data can be decisively reduced and full documentation of outcome can in this way be obtained even for a large multi-centre patient cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1.6.1997 and 31.3.1998, data were consecutively collected by questionnaire on all patients registered for a cardiac operation at 85 of the 135 ALKK centres. The questionnaire included data about each patient and the indication for operation as well as the estimate of operative risk, assigned to one of five risk categories by the referring cardiologist either alone or in conjunction with the cardiac surgeon. RESULTS: Until 30.9.1998, the data were obtained on 11,349 patients who had given informed consent (response rate 99.99%), including survival figures. 824 (7.3%) patients had not undergone the planned cardiac surgery, 134 having died before the data of operation. The 30-day postoperative mortality, obtained in 99.99% of the 10,525 patients, was 3.92%. The operative mortality was lowest, at 3.73%, for aortocoronary bypass only (n = 7932), highest for aortocoronary bypass plus valvular operation (n = 785), at 8.04%. There was good agreement between the cardiologists' preoperative risk assessment and the observed mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The 30-day mortality after cardiac operation can be obtained almost completely and with reasonable expenditure even for a large patient cohort. The results confirm that hospital mortality data definitely understate the overall operative risk. The methodology used in this pilot project, namely the inclusion of information from the patients by questionnaire, can also be applied to clinical results in other areas.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction in patients not included in randomized studies. Maximal Individual Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction (MITRA) Study Group.

Patients with acute myocardial infarction included in randomized trials comparing primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (pPTCA) with thrombolysis represent a special subgroup of patients with a low event rate. Patients excluded from these trials represent a variety of different subgroups, with different patient characteristics and possibly different clinical event rates. Primary PTCA was performed in 491 consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction in the prospective multicenter observational Maximal Individual Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction trial. They were divided into the following groups: group I, patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria of the randomized trials (284 of 491, 58%); group II, patients not included in these trials (207 of 491, 42%). Of group II the following subgroups were defined: group IIa, patients in cardiogenic shock (20 of 491, 4.1%); group IIb, patients with a left bundle branch block (12 of 491, 2,4%); group IIc, patients with contraindications for thrombolysis (42 of 491, 8.6%); group IId, patients with a nondiagnostic first electrocardiogram (95 of 491, 19.3%); group IIe, patients with a prehospital delay of > 12 hours (72 of 491, 14.7%); group IIf, patients with an unknown prehospital delay (30 of 491, 6.1%). A comparison of groups I and II showed similar baseline characteristics but a higher clinical event rate during hospitalization was seen in group II: combined end point of death, reinfarction, heart failure equal to or greater than NYHA class III, any stroke or postinfarction angina, 26.6% versus 18%; p = 0.022. Hospital deaths were nearly twice as high in these patients, without reaching statistical significance (10.6% vs 6%; p = 0.06). The subgroups of group II showed quite different rates of clinical events. In-hospital death rates were: IIa, 40% (8 of 20); IIb, 8% (1 of 12); IIc, 12% (5 of 42); IId, 5% (5 of 95); IIe, 6% (4 of 72); and IIf, 13% (4 of 30). The incidence of the combined end point was 60% (12 of 20) in IIa, 33% (4 of 12) in IIb, 29% (12 of 42) in IIc, 16% (15 of 95) in IId, 26% (19 of 72) in IIe, and 33% (10 of 30) in IIf. Thus, in clinical practice, about half of the patients treated with pPTCA would not have been included in randomized trials comparing pPTCA with thrombolysis. These patients represent a population at higher risk for in hospital clinical events. However, they do represent very different nonhomogenous subgroups with different clinical event rates.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

Comparison of primary angioplasty with conservative therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction and contraindications for thrombolytic therapy. Maximal Individual Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction (MITRA) Study Group.

The benefit of primary angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and contraindications for thrombolysis compared to a conservative regimen is still unclear. Out of 5,869 patients with AMI registered by the MITRA trial, 337 (5.7%) patients had at least one strong contraindication for thrombolytic therapy. Out of these 337 patients 46 (13.6%) were treated with primary angioplasty and 276 (86.4%) were treated conservatively. Patients treated conservatively were older (70 years vs. 60 years; P=0.001), had a higher rate of a history with chronic heart failure (14.8% vs. 4.4%; P=0.053), a higher heart rate at admission (86 beats/min vs. 74 beats/min; P=0.001), and a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus (27.1% vs. 12.8%; P=0.056). Patients treated with primary angioplasty received more often aspirin (91.3% vs. 74.6%; P=0.012), beta-blockers (60.9% vs. 46.1%; P = 0.062), angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (71.7% vs. 44%; P=0.001), and the so-called optimal adjunctive medication (54.4% vs. 32.3%; P=0.004). Hospital mortality was significantly lower in patients who received primary angioplasty (univariate: 2.2% vs. 24.7%; P=0.001; multivariate: OR=0.46; P=0.0230). In patients with AMI and contraindications for thrombolytic therapy, primary angioplasty was associated with a significantly lower mortality compared to conservative treatment. Therefore, hospitals without the facilities to perform primary angioplasty should try to refer such patients to centers with the facilities for such a service, if this is possible in an acceptable time.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

Differences in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty or thrombolytic therapy. Maximal Individual Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction (MITRA) Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the differences in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) treated with primary angioplasty or intravenous thrombolysis in clinical practice. METHODS: In all, 5,906 patients with AMI were registered by the Maximal Individual Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction (MITRA) study. Of these, 491 (8.3%) patients were treated with primary angioplasty and 2,817 (47.7%) with intravenous thrombolysis. RESULTS: There were only minor differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups. Prehospital delay time (median) was longer in the angioplasty group than in the thrombolysis group (161 vs. 120, p = 0.001), as was door-to-treatment time (88 vs. 30 min; p = 0.001). Patients treated with primary angioplasty more often had contraindications for thrombolytic therapy (12.9 vs. 6%, p = 0.001) and received beta blockers (65 vs. 58.1%, p = 0.004), heparin (98.2 vs. 91.6%, p = 0.001), angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (64.8 vs. 50%, p = 0.001) and "optimal" concomitant medication (56.4 vs. 42.9%, p = 0.001) more often. Univariate analysis showed a significant lower incidence of heart failure (5.3 vs. 16.5%, p = 0.001), postinfarct angina (7.3 vs. 16.4%, p = 0.001), in-hospital death (7.9 vs. 11.7%, p = 0.015) and the combined end point (21.6 vs. 40.3%, p = 0.001) in these patients. Stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed optimal concomitant medication [odds ratio (OR) = 0.94, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.89-0.98) and the type of revascularization (OR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.58-0.73) to be associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of the combined end point. Similar results were obtained in all predefined subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: In clinical practice, patients treated with primary angioplasty are more often treated with beta blockers and ACE inhibitors than patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis. Thus, the selection of patients and the type of revascularization contributes to the reduction in mortality, overt heart failure, and postinfarct angina in these patients.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗
PubMed1999

[Primary dilatation versus thrombolysis in patients with acute myocardial infarct, not included in randomized studies. Results of the MITRA Study. Maximal Individual Optimized Therapy for Acute Myocardial Infarct].

There have been some prospective randomized studies which compared primary angioplasty with intravenous thrombolysis in patients with an acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, a substantial number of patients with AMI who would not have been included in those trials are treated with one of these two therapeutic options. To describe the proportions, characteristics, and outcome of these patients treated with primary angioplasty or thrombolysis we analyzed the data of the prospective "Maximal Individual Optimized Therapy for Acute Myocardial Infarction" (MITRA) trial. Out of 3308 patients treated with primary angioplasty or thrombolysis, 737 (22.3%) belonged to one of the following groups, not included in current randomized trials: Left bundle branch block, non-diagnostic first ECG, pre-hospital delay > 12 hours or unknown pre-hospital delay. Primary angioplasty was performed in 158/737 (21.4%) and thrombolysis received 579/737 (78.6%) of the patients. There were only minor differences regarding patients' characteristics and concomitant diseases between the two groups. Patients treated with primary angioplasty were 3 years younger (62 years median versus 65 years median (p < 0.036). They also more often showed overt heart failure at admission compared to patients treated with thrombolysis (primary angioplasty: 3.2% versus thrombolysis: 8.9%, OR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.13-0.86). In-hospital time to intervention was 1 1/2 hours longer in patients treated with primary angioplasty (156 minutes median versus 47 minutes median, p = 0.001). beta-blockers were more often used with primary angioplasty compared to thrombolysis (70.31% versus 55.9%; OR = 1.87, 95% CI: 1.28-2.72), as well as ACE inhibitors (62% versus 49.9%; OR = 1.64, 95% CI: 1.14-2.35). Hospital mortality (8.2% versus 16.4%; OR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.25-0.84), as well as a combined endpoint of death, reinfarction, postinfarction angina, advanced heart failure, and stroke (24.1% versus 42.3%, OR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.29-0.64) were lower in patients treated with primary angioplasty compared to those treated with thrombolysis. Logistic regression analysis showed primary angioplasty to be independently associated with a lower rate of the combined endpoint (OR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.59-0.91), after adjusting for confounding parameters. All subgroups showed a more favorable outcome in patients treated with primary angioplasty. In clinical practice, patients with AMI, not included in current randomized trials comparing primary angioplasty with thrombolysis, account for 22% of all patients with AMI treated with one of those two therapies. Primary angioplasty seems to be associated with a lower event rate compared to thrombolysis in these patients. This has to be confirmed by a prospective randomized trial.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

Daytime and nighttime differences in patterns of performance of primary angioplasty in the treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction. Maximal Individual Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction (MITRA) Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Concern exists regarding the results of primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction when the procedure is performed during night hours. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between June 1994 and January 1997, 491 patients with acute myocardial infarction who underwent primary angioplasty procedures were consecutive registered in the Maximal Individual Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction (MITRA) study. Three hundred seventy-eight patients (77%) were treated during the day and 113 (23%) at night. Baseline characteristics showed no major differences between the 2 groups. Prehospital delay time was 60 minutes shorter during the night (median value 180 minutes for day, 120 minutes for night, P =.005), and in-hospital time to treatment was 9 minutes longer (median value 85 minutes day, 94 minutes night, P =.037). Patients treated during the night more often received angiotensin-converting enzyme blockers (61.4% day, 76.1% night, P =.004) and the so-called optimal adjunctive therapy (54% day, 64.6% night, P =.045). There were no differences concerning clinical events between the 2 groups. Hospital mortality was 8.7% during the day and 5.3% during the night (univariate analysis P =.238; logistic regression P =.653). CONCLUSIONS: In a clinical setting, primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction can be performed safely during the night with a clinically insignificant prolongation of in-hospital time to reperfusion compared with practice during the day.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

Spectrum of reperfusion strategies and factors influencing the use of primary angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction admitted to hospitals with the facilities to perform primary angioplasty. Maximal Individual Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction (MITRA) Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of the use of primary angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction and the factors influencing its indications in hospitals with the facilities to perform this treatment. DESIGN: Data from the maximal individual therapy in acute myocardial infarction (MITRA) trial were analysed, concerning the effects of the decisions of individual hospitals, the time of admission of patients, and the effects of patient characteristics on the selection of reperfusion treatment. PATIENTS: Between June 1994 and January 1997 eight hospitals treated 1532 patients with acute myocardial infarction. 418 (27.3%) were treated conservatively, 641 (41.8%) were treated using intravenous thrombolysis, 387 (25.3%) were treated using primary angioplasty, and 86 (5.6%) received a combination of thrombolysis and angioplasty. RESULTS: The proportion of patients treated with primary angioplasty varied from 1.8% to 57.7% among the eight hospitals. The use of primary angioplasty during non-office hours also showed wide variation, ranging from 20% to 54% between centres. The use of thrombolysis was comparatively evenly distributed during the non-office hours, ranging from 50-69%. Four hospitals with a primary angioplasty use rate > 30% showed no difference in the proportion of patients with contraindications for thrombolysis, high risk patients, or a combination of both, when compared with four hospitals with a lower rate of primary angioplasty use (98/322 (30.4%) v 19/65 (29. 2%), respectively, p = 0.847). CONCLUSIONS: In hospitals with the facilities for performing primary angioplasty the most important factors influencing its use were the discretion of the individual hospital and the time of patient admission. Characteristics of patients did not influence the choice of reperfusion treatment

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗
PubMed1999

Primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction: differences between referred patients and those treated in hospitals with on-site facilities?

BACKGROUND: Primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) can only be performed in a limited number of centers. Therefore, some patients will be referred for this procedure. DESIGN: We analyzed the data of the prospective observational MITRA trial, which took place at 54 hospitals in southwest Germany, to describe current practices and outcomes in referred patients compared to patients treated on-site. RESULTS: Out of 491 patients treated with primary angioplasty, 63 (12.8%) were referred. Out of 46 hospitals without facilities to perform primary angioplasty, 29 (63%) never referred patients. Referred patients were less often male (60.3% versus 75.9%; p = 0.013), suffered more often from anterior wall infarction (62.9% versus 45.8%; p = 0.014), and more often had absolute contraindications against thrombolysis (11.1% versus 2.8%; p = 0.006). In-hospital time to treatment was 80 minutes in patients treated on-site compared to 190 minutes in referred patients (p = 0.001). There was a non-significant difference of in-hospital mortality between the two groups (11.1% for referred versus 7.5% on-site; p = 0.319). Referred patients had a higher hospital morbidity as expressed by a higher proportion of post-infarction angina (28.6% versus 4.2%; p = 0.001), a more frequent need for urgent revascularization (43.8% versus 16.4%; p = 0.001) and a higher proportion of advanced heart failure (11.1% versus 4.4%; p = 0.062). CONCLUSIONS: Referral of patients with AMI for primary angioplasty is used only in a minority of hospitals. The referred patients represent a selected, more ill subgroup, resulting in a higher hospital morbidity compared to patients treated on-site. Continuous efforts should be undertaken to decrease the time delay from admission at the initial hospital to the beginning of revascularization.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1998

[Churg-Strauss syndrome with right ventricular tumor].

HISTORY AND CLINICAL FINDINGS: A 47-year-old woman was admitted because of diarrhoea (3-5 stools daily) for 9 days, weakness for 3 weeks and painful wrist swelling, arthralgia and hyperesthesia over the medial aspect of the right thigh for 6 weeks. For 6 years she had been treated for asthma. Two operation had been performed for chronic sinusitis. ADMISSION FINDINGS AND INVESTIGATIONS: There was marked eosinophilia (5889/microliter) and thrombocytopenia (96,000/microliter), markedly increased serological inflammatory parameters and a raised total IgE level (134 IU/ml). The chest radiogram showed pulmonary infiltrates and bone marrow biopsy indicated eosinophilia. Echocardiography revealed a mass, 3 x 8 cm, in the ventral wall of the right ventricle with extension into the outflow tract. DIAGNOSIS, TREATMENT AND COURSE: These findings met the criteria of the American College of Rheumatology for Churg-Strauss syndrome (CSS). On methylprednisolone (1 mg/kg daily) the eosinophil and platelet counts became normal within 5 days and erythrocyte sedimentation rate and the level of C-reactive protein fell. Under cardiopulmonary bypass the tumour was removed, the tricuspid valve replaced, and the right ventricle reconstructed. Histology of the mass revealed it to be an organized thrombus. CONCLUSION: The relationship between the thrombus formation and CSS is unclear. Hypercoagulability connected with the inflammatory process may have played a part in the pathogenesis.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents↗
PubMed1998

The 60 Minutes Myocardial Infarction Project. Characteristics on admission and clinical outcome in patients with reinfarction compared to patients with a first infarction.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to evaluate parameters that characterize patients with myocardial reinfarction as compared to patients with a first infarction in clinical practice, and possibly to determine their clinical outcome. METHODS: The 60 minutes Myocardial Project is a German multicentre prospective observational study in which 136 hospitals are participating. Fourteen thousand, nine hundred and eighty consecutive patients with acute Q wave myocardial infarction were included from July 1992 to September 1994. RESULTS: Out of these 14,980 patients, there were 2854 (19%) with reinfarction and 12,126 (81%) with a first infarction. Patients with a reinfarction arrived at the hospital 24 min earlier than patients with a first infarction (pre-hospital delay 156 vs 180 min; P < 0.001); the door-to-needle time with reinfarction was longer (38 vs 30 min; P < 0.001); however, patients with reinfarction were older (69 vs 66 years; P < 0.001), had a lower rate of a diagnostic first ECG (54 vs 71%; P < 0.001) and received thrombolytic therapy less frequently than patients with a first infarction (46 vs 52%; P < 0.001). A low number of patients received primary PTCA ( n = 205) since only a few hospitals offered a primary PTCA service at the time the study was performed. In patients with reinfarction, there were more reasons as to why thrombolytic therapy was not given (24 vs 21%; P < 0.001). Left bundle branch block occurred more frequently in patients with reinfarction (15 vs 8%; P < 0.001). The intra-hospital course in patients with reinfarction was associated with an increase of complications and intra-hospital death (23 vs 15%; P < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: Although reinfarction patients arrived earlier at hospital than patients with a first infarction, the former received thrombolytic therapy less frequently than the latter. Patients with reinfarction were older, more frequently had a non-diagnostic ECG on admission and had a higher rate of contraindications against thrombolytic therapy.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Influence of the global utilization of streptokinase and tissue plasminogen activator for occluded coronary arteries (GUSTO-1) trial on the use of thrombolytics in Germany. ALKK Study Group. Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Leitenden Kardiologischen Krankenhausärtze.

Our results show significant and independent influence of the GUSTO-1 trial on the use of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator in acute myocardial infarction in Germany. This influence started soon after the publication of the trial and was not restricted to subgroups who benefitted most from recombinant tissue plasminogen activator.

Aged↗
PubMed1997

[Balloon dilatation in acute myocardial infarct in routine clinical practice: results of the register of the Working Society of Leading Cardiologic Hospital Physicians in 4,625 patients].

Balloon angioplasty as the treatment of first choice in the setting of an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is gaining widespread acceptance because of favourable results from specialised centres concerning high patency rates and low mortality. This study reports the results of angioplasty for AMI at large community hospitals during 1992-1995. 4625 procedures were performed at 68 centres of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitender Kardiologischer Krankenhausärzte (ALKK). The age of the patients was 60.8 +/- 11.3 years, with 75.1% men. The infarct related artery was the left anterior descendent in 43%, the right coronary artery in 37%, the circumflex artery in 16%, a bypass graft in 2.3% and the left main stem in 1.4% of patients. The success rate (residual stenosis < 50%) of the intervention was 86%. There was a wide range of procedures per centre, with a median of 40 AMI angioplasties per year and centre. The amount of angioplasties for AMI in relation to all angioplasties performed during this period rose from 5.2% in 1992 to 5.9% in 1995 (p = 0.01). Local complications at the puncture site occurred in 3.2%, with the need for a surgical intervention in 1.1% of patients. In 273 (5.9%) of the patients a second angioplasty was performed during the hospital stay. Aortocoronary bypass surgery was performed in 3% of the patients. Hospital mortality was 9.5% (438/4625 patients). The mortality rate remained constant during the years investigated (1992: 10.6%; 1993: 8.6%; 1994: 9.7%; 1995: 9.8%; p = ns). Higher mortality was observed in older patients, patients with multiple vessel disease, the left anterior descending artery or a bypass graft as infarct related artery as well as in patients with failed reperfusion (residual stenoses > 50%). Hospitals with a case load of more than 40 angioplasties for AMI per year showed a lower mortality as compared to the others. In clinical practice at large community hospitals results of angioplasty for AMI concerning mortality, complications and technical success rate are comparable to those of highly specialised centres. The absolute numbers of angioplasties for AMI increased constantly over the years.

Aged↗
PubMed1997

The 60 minutes myocardial infarction project. Treatment and clinical outcome of patients with acute myocardial infarction in Germany.

AIMS: To describe patient characteristics, pre-hospital delay, treatment, complications and outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction admitted to hospitals in Germany. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study was of prospective observational multicentre design. Those involved were consecutive patients with acute Q-wave myocardial infarction admitted within 96 h of onset of symptoms to 136 German hospitals between July 1992 and September 1994 (n = 14980, median age 66 (quartiles 57, 74) years, 68% male, 48% anterior wall infarction). Median pre-hospital delay was 170 (90, 475) min, with 17% arriving within the first hour and 61% within 4 h of onset of symptoms. The following patient groups had a short pre-hospital delay: males, those aged less than 65 years, those admitted at night or the weekend, those with a previous myocardial infarction, those in need of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and those with a diagnostic first ECG. The first ECG was diagnostic in 67.6% of cases. Reperfusion therapy was used in 53%, with thrombolytic therapy in 51.6%. Median time from admission to initiation of treatment was 30 (20, 55) min. Respective rates of treatment with aspirin, nitrates, and beta-blockers were 81%, 83%, and 16%. Major complications were cerebral bleeding (0.4%), bleeding requiring transfusions (0.9%), left ventricular rupture (0.6%) and anaphylactic shock (0.1%). Median hospital stay was 20 (13, 26) days. In-hospital death rate was 17.2%. Increased hospital mortality was observed with female gender, an unknown or long pre-hospital delay, a diagnostic first ECG, anterior wall infarction, trauma or major operation within the last 14 days, renal insufficiency and malignoma. CONCLUSIONS: 'Real-life' hospital mortality is much higher than previously reported in clinical trials. To reduce hospital mortality, the efficacy of thrombolysis should be increased by shortening the pre-hospital delay, and the use of concomitant therapy, especially beta-blockers, should be increased.

Aged↗
PubMed1995

[Measurement and analysis of monophasic action potentials using fractally coated electrodes--II].

The monophasic action potential (MAP) represents a summed signal formed by overlapping action potentials of myocardial cells close to the tip of the lead. Analysis of the MAP therefore provides detailed information about the electrophysiological effects of autonomous nervous and pharmacological influences on the myocardium, for example adrenergic or cholinergic stimulation of the heart. All known MAP recordings were obtained with Ag/AgCl electrodes, which, thanks to their low polarization properties, ensure reliable MAP measurement. Owing to their toxicity and inadequate long-term stability, however, Ag/AgCl electrodes cannot be implanted. With the aim of making MAP measurement available for implantable devices, fractally coated leads were therefore developed. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the in vivo measurement of fractally coated leads which are characterized by negligible polarization, low impedance over a wide frequency range, high biocompatibility and good long-term stability. In addition, as a result of their extremely high Helmholtz capacities (up to 50 mF/cm2), fractally coated leads permit stimulation and virtually undisturbed recording of MAP with the same pair of electrodes. For the evaluation of MAP measurements with fractally coated leads, a quadrupolar catheter enabling simultaneous MAP recordings with 2 Ag/AgCl electrodes and 2 fractally coated leads was devised. The stimulation pulses were always applied via the fractally coated leads. With both types of electrode, with spontaneous excitation and stimulation, the well-known MAP morphology, with amplitudes of between 10 and 25 mV in the ventricle, and between 5 and 10 mV in the atrium, was seen.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Atropine↗
PubMed1988

Intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) and urokinase in acute myocardial infarction: results of the German Activator Urokinase Study (GAUS).

The effects of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) and urokinase on patency and early reocclusion of infarct-related coronary arteries were investigated in a single blind, randomized multicenter trial in 246 patients with acute myocardial infarction of less than 6 h duration. Both 70 mg of single chain rt-PA with an initial bolus of 10 mg and 3 million units of urokinase with an initial bolus of 1.5 million units were given intravenously over 90 min. The first angiographic study at the end of the infusion revealed a patent infarct-related artery (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction trial [TIMI] grade 2 or 3) in 69.4% of 121 patients given rt-PA versus 65.8% of 117 patients given urokinase (p = NS). Among patients treated within 3 h from symptom onset a patent infarct-related artery was found in 63.9% of 72 patients given rt-PA versus 70% of 70 patients given urokinase (p = NS). There were five cardiac deaths in each group and one fatal intracranial hemorrhage in the rt-PA group. The in-hospital reinfarction rate was 8.9% versus 13.2% for patients treated with rt-PA and urokinase, respectively. There was no difference in left ventricular function at baseline and follow-up catheterization studies. Both drugs were well tolerated and there was no significant difference in cardiovascular or bleeding complications between the two groups. It is concluded that rt-PA and urokinase in the dosages used provide similar efficacy and safety in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction. Reocclusion during the first 24 h may be less frequent after urokinase treatment.

Adult↗