Biomedical subjects

M Gentilucci

Publications and source records attributed to M Gentilucci.

10 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1992

Temporal coupling between transport and grasp components during prehension movements: effects of visual perturbation.

The temporal coupling between the transport and grasp components of prehension movements was investigated through two experiments. In Experiment 1, six normal subjects were required to reach and grasp each of three spheres located at three different distances (Blocked trials). In Experiment 2, a visual perturbation paradigm was used in which the location of the object to be reached and grasped could change at the beginning of arm movement (Perturbed trials). The same subjects participated in both experiments. Kinematics of wrist trajectory (transport component) and of distance between thumb and index finger (grasp component) were analyzed. The results of Experiment 1 showed that the two components could be temporally coupled during their time course. In Experiment 2, the visual perturbation affected both the components, but different times were required by each component to reorganize the movement towards the new target. These different times caused the decoupling of those events that appeared synchronized in Experiment 1. Finally, evidence was found to suggest that planning of grip formation takes into account not only the perceived characteristics of the object, but also the time planned by the transport component to reach the object.

Acceleration↗

PubMed1992

Space coding by premotor cortex.

Many neurons in inferior area 6, a cortical premotor area, respond to visual stimuli presented in the space around the animal. We were interested to learn whether the receptive fields of these neurons are coded in retinotopic or in body-centered coordinates. To this purpose we recorded single neurons from inferior area 6 (F4 sector) in a monkey trained to fixate a light and detect its dimming. During fixation visual stimuli were moved towards the monkey both within and outside the neuron's receptive field. The fixation point was then moved and the neuron retested with the monkey's gaze deviated to the new location. The results showed that most inferior area 6 visual neurons code the stimulus position in spatial and not in retinal coordinates. It is proposed that these visual neurons are involved in generating the stable body-centered frame of reference necessary for programming visually guided movements.

Animals↗

PubMed1992

Motor control of voluntary arm movements. Kinematic and modelling study.

The motor control of pointing and reaching-to-grasp movements was investigated using two different approaches (kinematic and modelling) in order to establish whether the type of control varies according to modifications of arm kinematics. Kinematic analysis of arm movements was performed on subjects' hand trajectories directed to large and small stimuli located at two different distances. The subjects were required either to grasp and to point to each stimulus. The kinematics of the subsequent movement, during which subject's hand came back to the starting position, were also studied. For both movements, kinematic analysis was performed on hand linear trajectories as well as on joint angular trajectories of shoulder and elbow. The second approach consisted in the parametric identification of the black box (ARMAX) model of the controller driving the arm movement. Such controller is hypothesized to work for the correct execution of the motor act. The order of the controller ARMAX model was analyzed with respect to the different experimental conditions (distal task, stimulus size and distance). Results from kinematic analysis showed that target distance and size influenced kinematic parameters both of angular and linear displacements. Nevertheless, the structure of the motor program was found to remain constant with distance and distal task, while it varied with precision requirements due to stimulus size. The estimated model order of the controller confirmed the invariance of the control law with regard to movement amplitude, whereas it was sensitive to target size.

Adult↗

PubMed1992

Prehension movements directed to approaching objects: influence of stimulus velocity on the transport and the grasp components.

In this investigation we studied the influence of object velocity on the transport and on the grasp components of prehension movements directed to approaching objects. Three experiments were carried out. In the first experiment six subjects were required to reach and grasp a sphere that approached them with a constant velocity. The effects of four velocities were studied. The results showed that the end point of the arm movement changed with object velocity: nearer the body with higher than with lower object velocities. Transport velocity increased with movement amplitude and the deceleration phase decreased in duration with higher object velocities. On the contrary the grasp component was not affected by object velocity. The second experiment was a control experiment carried out in order to verify whether a possible influence of object velocity on the grasp could be revealed in an experimental condition in which grasp planning relies without doubt on visual computation of all object features. In this experiment object velocity and object size were randomly varied. The results showed that the grasp was not influenced by object velocity, whereas it was sensitive to changes of object size. The third experiment had the two-fold aim of establishing (1) whether transport velocity was influenced by object velocity once the location in space at which the object had to be grasped was fixed and (2) whether the grasp kinematics differed for prehension movements directed respectively to stationary or to moving objects. Results showed that the first part of the transport is affected only by distance, whereas the deceleration phase decreased with increasing object velocity. This last result suggests that subjects minimized object displacements in order to grasp the sphere correctly. The grasp component differed between the conditions of stationary and moving stimuli only in the relative timing between finger aperture and closure phases. The closure phase decreased in the condition of moving stimuli. The results of the three experiments indicate the dependence of transport parameters on object velocity, whereas grasp parameters appear to be unaffected.

Acceleration↗

PubMed1991

Influence of different types of grasping on the transport component of prehension movements.

The main aim of the present study was to clarify whether different types of grasping may affect the transport component of prehension movements. To this purpose two experiments were carried out. In the first experiment the kinematics of arm movements (transport and manipulation components) were studied in eight normal subjects instructed to reach and grasp different objects located either 20 or 30 cm from their hand. The objects employed required two different types of grip: prehension with the whole hand and prehension with the index finger and the thumb (precision grip). In the second experiment subjects were instructed to point to the same objects employed in the first experiment. This experiment served as a control for the precision requirements related to the object size. The results showed that, once the precision requirements were taken into account, the transport component remained unmodified with the different types of grip. The time course of the manipulation component and its temporal relations with the transport component changed with the type of grasping. The maximal hand aperture was reached earlier in the precision grip than in the whole hand prehension and the temporal coupling with the transport component was weaker in the former condition than in the latter. The data are interpreted as further evidence in favour of independence between the transport and the manipulation "channels".

Adolescent↗

PubMed1991

[Kinematic study of reaching-grasping movements in the monkey].

Kinematics of reaching-grasping movement towards stimuli of three different sizes located at two different distances were studied in one monkey (Macaca nemestrina). Transport and manipulation components were analyzed using the ELITE system. Transport time, peak velocity and deceleration phase of velocity were influenced by stimulus size, whilst acceleration phase remained unmodified. Peak velocity clearly increased with distance, while transport time remained constant (isochrony ). The main parameters of manipulation component were all influenced by stimulus size but they did not vary with distance. A comparison with kinematic data obtained from human subjects was made.

Animals↗

PubMed1991

[Kinematic study of the temporal coupling between the components of transport and manipulation during reaching and grasping movements].

In this study the temporal coupling between transport and manipulation components of prehension movements was tested. For this purpose two experiments were carried out. In Experiment 1 six normal subjects were required to reach and grasp one of three spheres located at three different distances (Blocked trials). In Experiment 2 a visual perturbation paradigm was used in which the location of the object to be reached and grasped could change at onset of arm movement (Perturbed trials). The results of this study exclude a temporal coupling between events of transport and manipulation components. On the contrary they suggest that manipulation component organizes its time course having information about the time required to reach the object.

Animals↗

PubMed1990

Neurons related to reaching-grasping arm movements in the rostral part of area 6 (area 6a beta).

Single neurons were recorded from the rostral part of the agranular frontal cortex (area 6a beta) in awake, partially restrained macaque monkeys. In the medialmost and mesial sectors of this area, rostral to the supplementary motor area, neurons were found which were activated during arm reaching-grasping movements. These neurons ("reaching-grasping neurons") did not appear to be influenced by how the objects were grasped nor, with some exceptions, by where they were located. Their activity changed largely prior to the arm movement and continued until the end of it. The premovement modulation (excitatory or inhibitory) could start with stimulus presentation, with the saccade triggered by the stimulus or after stimulus fixation. The distance of the stimulus from the monkey was an important variable for activating many neurons. About half of the recorded neurons showed a modulation of the same sign during movement and premovement period. The other half showed an increase/decrease in activity which was of the opposite sign during movement and premovement period or part of it. In this last case the discharge changes were of the same sign when the stimulus was close to the monkey and when the monkey moved its arm to reach the objects, whereas they were of opposite sign when the stimulus was outside the animal's reach. Microstimulation of area 6a beta and the reconstruction of the locations of eye movement and arm movement related cells showed that the arm field was located more medially (and mesially) than the eye field described by Schlag and Schlag-Rey (1987). It is suggested that, unlike inferior area 6, which is mostly involved in selection of effectors on the basis of the physical properties of the objects and their spatial location (Rizzolatti and Gentilucci 1988), area 6a beta plays a role in the preparation of reaching-grasping arm movements and in their release when the appropriate conditions are set.

Animals↗

PubMed1989

Somatotopic representation in inferior area 6 of the macaque monkey.

On the basis of its cytoarchitectonic and enzymatic properties area 6 of the macaque monkey can be subdivided into two large sectors: a superior sector lying medial to the spur of the arcuate sulcus (superior area 6 or F2) and an inferior sector lying lateral to it (inferior area 6). Inferior area 6 is constituted by two enzymatic areas: F4 and F5. In this study we investigated the somatotopic organization of inferior area 6 and the adjacent area 4 combining single-neuron recording and intracortical electrical microstimulation. We found that two separate movement representations exist in this region. The caudal one corresponds to area F1 (primary motor cortex), the rostral one to inferior area 6. The two representations are mirror images one of the other with the axioproximal movements being adjacently located. In the rostral map the proximal movements are mostly located in F4, the distal movements in F5. Neuronal properties indicate that the rostral map has characteristics that are more complex than the caudal map. We propose that the rostral map is involved in transforming visual information in motor commands. F4 should be involved in the control of arm movements based on the location of the objects in respect to the body, whereas F5 should play a role in the control of grasping movements on the basis of the size of the stimuli.

Animals↗

PubMed1989

[Kinematic study of reaching-grasping movements].

The experiment was conducted to investigate, by using kinematic parameters, the influence of the type of prehension on the transportation component in reaching-grasping movements. The main question was whether the transportation component is influenced by the type of prehension besides the distance of the object. The experiment was carried out on eight subjects who performed reaching-grasping movements toward objects located at different distances. Two types of prehension were examined: whole hand prehension and precision grip. The following kinematic parameters of the transportation component (wrist movement) were studied: movement times, profiles of velocity and accelerations. Our results have shown that the transportation component is affected by the two factors. However the kinematic parameters were influenced differently by the distance and the type of prehension. Our conclusion is that, although distance and type of prehension affect the transportation component, they are computed separately in programming this component.

Adolescent↗