Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M Gent

Publications and source records attributed to M Gent.

At least 109 records · Page 6Linked to original sources

Design and baseline results of the monosialoganglioside early stroke trial. The EST Study Group.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The Early Stroke Trial is a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-masked, multicenter study to assess the safety and efficacy of monosialoganglioside in patients who have suffered an ischemic stroke of the cerebral hemispheres. METHODS: Only patients who could be evaluated and treated within 5 hours after the onset of stroke were considered; within each center, subjects were stratified by age, sex, and clinical severity. Patients were randomly allocated to receive a specified sequence of intravenous and intramuscular doses of either monosialoganglioside or identical-appearing placebo for 21 days. Patients were followed up for 4 months after randomization. Neurological status was measured primarily by using the Canadian Neurological Scale. After assessing the effect of treatment on survival, the principal measure of efficacy will be the change in neurological status between baseline and the 4-month follow-up among survivors. RESULTS: Sixteen clinical centers, 15 in Europe and one in North America, entered a total of 792 eligible patients during a 36-month recruitment period (from May 1987 to April 1990). In our series there were more men than women, and the relative frequency of patients increased with advancing age. The most frequently associated cardiovascular conditions were hypertension, atrial fibrillation, and peripheral vascular disease. Approximately 46% of the patients were admitted to a hospital within 1 hour and 81%, within 2 hours after the onset of stroke. About 22% first received the study treatment within 3 hours and 57%, within 4 hours. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the feasibility of large-scale trials with the onset of treatment within 5 hours after an ischemic stroke.

Adult↗

How should results from completed studies influence ongoing clinical trials? The CAFA Study experience.

Seven randomized studies during the past 5 years have evaluated or are evaluating the efficacy of warfarin or aspirin or both in decreasing the risk of embolic events in patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation. By March 1990, two of the studies had been published, both of which showed a statistically significant decrease in embolic events in patients treated with warfarin and a low rate of major bleeding events. The investigators associated with the other ongoing studies were forced to consider how these results should affect the decision to recruit and continue follow-up of patients in their own studies. The Steering Committee of the Canadian Atrial Fibrillation Anticoagulation (CAFA) study thought the newly published results from other studies were valid, clinically important, and generalizable. The committee considered the following options for the CAFA study: continue patient recruitment as planned, provide the data available in CAFA to its External Safety and Efficacy Monitoring Committee for analysis to determine whether the CAFA data already showed a benefit of warfarin, stop patient recruitment but continue to follow patients in the group to which they were assigned, stop the trial immediately and perform a final analysis, and attempt to perform a meta-analysis of all data available from all trials. The Steering Committee of CAFA decided that the evidence of benefit with warfarin, from the two published studies, was sufficiently compelling as to stop recruitment into CAFA without any preliminary examination of the CAFA data.

Aspirin↗

Prevention of deep vein thrombosis after elective hip surgery. A randomized trial comparing low molecular weight heparin with standard unfractionated heparin.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relative efficacy and safety of low molecular weight (LMW) heparin (Enoxaparin) compared with standard calcium heparin for the prevention of postoperative deep vein thrombosis in patients undergoing elective hip surgery. DESIGN: A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. PATIENTS: Six hundred sixty-five consecutive patients undergoing hip replacement at five participating hospitals. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received either fixed-dose LMW heparin, 30 mg subcutaneously twice daily, or fixed-dose standard calcium heparin, 7500 units subcutaneously twice daily; both regimens were started 12 to 24 hours after surgery and continued for 14 days or until discharge if sooner. MEASUREMENTS: All patients had postoperative I-125-fibrinogen leg scanning and impedance plethysmography. If results of one or both tests were positive, then venography was done. Otherwise, venography was done between day 10 and day 14, or sooner if the patient was ready for discharge. RESULTS: Evaluable venograms were obtained in 258 of the 333 patients randomly assigned to receive LMW heparin and in 263 of the 332 patients assigned to receive calcium heparin. For patients with evaluable venograms, thrombosis was detected in 50 patients (19.4%) who received LMW heparin compared with 61 patients (23.2%) who received standard heparin (difference, -3.8%; 95% CI, -11.1% to 3.6%) (P greater than 0.2). Proximal deep vein thrombosis was detected in 5.4% of the patients receiving LMW heparin and in 6.5% of the patients receiving standard heparin (difference, -1.1%; CI, - 5.2% to 3.3%) (P greater than 0.2). For the entire group of 665 patients, venous thrombosis occurred in 17.1% given LMW heparin and in 19.0% given standard heparin. Hemorrhagic complications occurred in 31 patients (9.3%) given standard heparin and in 17 patients (5.1%) given LMW heparin (difference, 4.2%; CI, 0.3% to 8.2%) (P = 0.035). The relative risk reduction was 45%. The rate of major bleeding in the standard heparin group was 5.7% compared with 3.3% in the LMW heparin group (difference, 2.4%; CI, -1.0% to 5.4%) (P = 0.13). The relative risk reduction was 42%. CONCLUSION: Low molecular weight heparin is significantly less hemorrhagic than standard unfractionated heparin; the difference in the rate of deep vein thrombosis, although not statistically significant (P greater than 0.2), favors the use of LMW heparin.

Adult↗

Canadian Atrial Fibrillation Anticoagulation (CAFA) Study.

The Canadian Atrial Fibrillation Anticoagulation Study was a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial to assess the potential of warfarin to reduce systemic thromboembolism and its inherent risk of hemorrhage. As a result of the publication of two other "positive" studies of similar design and objective, this study was stopped early before completion of its planned recruitment of 630 patients. There were 187 patients randomized to warfarin and 191 to placebo. Permanent discontinuation of study medication occurred in 26% of warfarin-treated and 23% of placebo-treated patients. The target range of the international normalized ratio was 2 to 3. For the warfarin-treated patients, the international normalized ratio was in the target range 43.7% of the study days, above it 16.6% of the study days and below it 39.6% of the study days. Fatal or major bleeding occurred at annual rates of 2.5% in warfarin-treated and 0.5% in placebo-treated patients. Minor bleeding occurred in 16% of patients receiving warfarin and 9% receiving placebo. The primary outcome event cluster was nonlacunar stroke, noncentral nervous systemic embolism and fatal or intracranial hemorrhage. Events were included in the primary analysis of efficacy if they occurred within 28 days of permanent discontinuation of the study medication. The annual rates of the primary outcome event cluster were 3.5% in warfarin-treated and 5.2% in placebo-treated patients, with a relative risk reduction of 37% (95% confidence limits, -63.5%, 75.5%, p = 0.17).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Aged↗

Coronary patency, infarct size and left ventricular function after thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: results from the tissue plasminogen activator: Toronto (TPAT) placebo-controlled trial. TPAT Study Group.

Infarct size, left ventricular function and infarct-related coronary artery patency were examined in 108 patients who took part in a previously reported placebo-controlled trial of recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA) in acute myocardial infarction. Coronary angiography was performed 17 +/- 0.8 h after initiation of treatment in 47 patients (group A) or at 10 days in 61 patients (group B). Both groups underwent radionuclide ventriculography 3.8 +/- 0.8 h and again on day 9 after treatment and quantitative thallium scintigraphy on day 8. In group A, the infarct-related artery was patent in 53%; these patients had a smaller global (15.1 +/- 2.5% vs. 25.7 +/- 4.7%, p = 0.029) and regional (14.7 +/- 2.5% vs. 24.1 +/- 4.7%, p = 0.044) fixed thallium defect than did those with an occluded artery. Infarct regional ejection fraction improved by 10.1 +/- 2.1% between early and late studies when the infarct-related artery was patent and by 4.8 +/- 1.4% if it was occluded (p = 0.048); changes in global and noninfarct regional ejection fraction were similar irrespective of perfusion status. Infarct regional ejection fraction and fixed thallium defect were inversely related only when the infarct-related artery was occluded (r = -0.83, p less than 0.0001). In group B, 10 day patency of the infarct-related artery was 67%; there was no difference in patency by treatment assignment or in left ventricular function or infarct size between patients with and without infarct-related artery patency. There was no evidence of an effect of rt-PA therapy beyond that expressed through coronary patency alone in either group A or group B.

Coronary Vessels↗

Post-myocardial infarction mortality in patients with ventricular premature depolarizations. Canadian Amiodarone Myocardial Infarction Arrhythmia Trial Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: Among survivors of acute myocardial infarction, frequent and repetitive ventricular premature depolarizations (VPDs) detected on ambulatory monitoring contribute independently to the risk of all-cause mortality and sudden death. Apart from the beta-blockers, no antiarrhythmic drug has been reliably demonstrated to reduce mortality among patients with VPDs. A pilot study was undertaken to gather data to aid in the design of a multicenter trial of amiodarone for the reduction of mortality from cardiac arrhythmias in such patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Seventy-seven patients with acute myocardial infarction within the previous 6-30 days and 10 or more VPDs/hr or one or more runs of ventricular tachycardia on 24-hour electrocardiographic recording were randomized in a double-blind fashion in a 2:1 amiodarone-to-placebo ratio. The loading dose was 10 mg/kg/day for 3 weeks. The maintenance dose was 300-400 mg/day with reductions at 4-month intervals in response to VPD suppression, excessive plasma levels, or toxicity. VPD suppression at 1 week and 2 weeks was 63% and 85%, respectively, on amiodarone and 17% and 27%, respectively, on placebo. Apart from thyroid-stimulating hormone elevation and skin reactions, no side effects occurred more frequently with amiodarone. The study drug was stopped for side effects or noncompliance in 35% of amiodarone patients and 34% of placebo patients. Patients were followed for a maximum of 2 years (mean, 20 months). Arrhythmic death or resuscitated ventricular fibrillation occurred in two of 48 amiodarone patients (6%) and four of 29 placebo patients (14%), whereas the rates of all-cause mortality were five of 48 (10%) and six of 29 (21%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Amiodarone, in moderate loading and maintenance dosages with adjustments in response to plasma levels, VPD suppression, and side effects, results in effective VPD suppression and acceptable levels of toxicity.

Amiodarone↗

When is a prognostic factor useful? A guide for the perplexed.

Traditionally, a number of variables have been used to predict outcome in patients with early-stage breast cancer. These tests are simple to perform and relatively inexpensive. Recently, a number of new factors, eg, tumor proliferative index, nuclear DNA content, and amplification or overexpression of growth-promoting genes or oncogenes have been identified as potential predictors of outcome in patients with breast cancer. There is now increasing pressure to introduce such tests into routine clinical practice. How does a clinical practitioner identify which test, or group of tests, best predicts adverse outcome and whether any more clinically useful information is provided than with the use of more traditional factors alone? The aim of a prognostic test in breast cancer is to predict which patients are destined to develop a recurrence of cancer and those who are not. The prognostic usefulness of a test can be expressed in terms of relative risk (RR), which is the ratio of the risk of breast cancer recurrence in patients who test positive to the risk in those who test negative. Methodologic guidelines that should be satisfied by a study evaluating the predictive ability of a test include the following: (1) Was an inception cohort assembled? (2) Was the referral pattern described? (3) Were laboratory and clinical outcomes assessed in a blinded fashion? (4) Was complete follow-up achieved? (5) Was adjustment for extraneous prognostic factors carried out? (6) Were appropriate statistical methods used? An approach is suggested to help the clinician choose the test, or combination of tests, likely to discriminate between "high-" and "low-risk" patients in his/her own practice. The decision regarding what particular threshold value (risk) defined by a prognostic test (or series of tests) warrants adjuvant therapy for an individual patient is a complex one but should be based on a clear presentation of the risks and benefits to the patient.

Breast Neoplasms↗

Low-dose cyclosporin versus placebo in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

144 patients with severe rheumatoid arthritis from six centres were randomised to receive oral cyclosporin or placebo for 6 months. The initial daily dose of cyclosporin was 2.5 mg/kg, which was increased cautiously with monitoring of serum cyclosporin levels and creatinine; the mean stabilisation dose was 3.8 mg/kg. There were significant improvements in the cyclosporin-treated patients compared with the controls in the major outcomes of reduction of active joints (23% improvement), pain (24%), and functional status (16%); global improvement was 27%. In the cyclosporin group serum creatinine increased by a mean of 15.6 mumols/l and mean arterial blood pressure by 6.27 mmHg; these increases were controlled in all but 2 patients by dose adjustment without withdrawal from the study.

Activities of Daily Living↗

Effectiveness of intermittent pneumatic leg compression for preventing deep vein thrombosis after total hip replacement.

A randomized trial was performed in consecutive patients undergoing total hip replacement to evaluate the effectiveness of sequential intermittent calf and thigh compression for preventing venous thrombosis compared with a control group given no prophylaxis. Both groups underwent case finding for deep vein thrombosis using combined fibrinogen I 125 leg scanning, impedance plethysmography, and venography. Deep vein thrombosis by venography was present in 77 (49%) of 158 control patients compared with 36 (24%) of 152 patients given intermittent compression. Proximal vein thrombosis was present in 42 controls (27%) compared with 22 patients (14%) given intermittent compression. Combined impedance plethysmography and leg scanning was insensitive in this patient group (sensitivity, 46%); venography was required to detect more than half the patients with venous thrombosis. Sequential intermittent leg compression clinically and statistically significantly reduced the frequency of both proximal vein and calf vein thrombosis. Case finding resulted in early detection and treatment of patients with venous thrombosis.

Female↗

A randomized trial comparing 12 weeks versus 36 weeks of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II breast cancer.

A randomized trial has been performed in which women with axillary node-positive breast cancer were allocated to either a short intensive 12-week chemohormonal treatment consisting of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, fluorouracil, vincristine, prednisone, Adriamycin (doxorubicin; Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH), and tamoxifen (CMFVP plus AT) or 36 weeks of CMFVP. The median follow-up is 37 months. Of the 222 women randomized to the 12-week treatment, 113 (50.9%) have experienced either recurrence or death as compared with 90 patients (41.9%) in the 36-week treatment group. The corresponding 3-year relapse-free survivals are 55% and 64%, respectively, P = .003. Fifty-nine (26.6%) of the patients in the 12-week group have died compared with 46 (21.4%) of the 36-week group. The corresponding 3-year survival rates are 78% and 85%, respectively, P = .04. A Cox regression analysis showed an associated increased risk ratio for recurrence or death of 1.7, P = .003, and for death of 1.8, P = .017 in the 12-week treatment group compared with the 36-week group. Thus, this 12-week regimen of adjuvant chemohormonal therapy is inadequate treatment for women with axillary node-positive breast cancer; possible explanations for this inferiority are its shorter duration and/or a negative interaction of tamoxifen on the chemotherapy.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗

A randomized trial of a single bolus dosage regimen of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator in patients with acute pulmonary embolism.

Experiments in animals have demonstrated that recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) produces continuing thrombolysis after it is cleared from the circulation and that thrombolysis is both increased and accelerated, and bleeding is reduced when rt-PA is administered over a short period. In previous studies in patients with thrombotic disease, rt-PA has been shown to be an effective thrombolytic agent when administered by continuous infusion over a period between 90 minutes and 8 hours. To determine whether a short course regimen of rt-PA can achieve thrombolysis, a double-blind randomized trial has been conducted in which patients with objectively established acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism who were receiving heparin were allocated to either a 2-minute infusion of rt-PA at a dose of 0.6 mg/kg (33 patients) or saline placebo (25 patients). Perfusion lung scanning was used to assess the change in pulmonary perfusion at 24 hours and seven days post-study drug administration. Thirty-four percent of the rt-PA patients had a greater than 50 percent resolution in the perfusion defect at 24 hours compared to 12 percent of placebo patients (p = 0.026). At 24 hours, the mean relative improvement in the perfusion defect was 37.0 percent in rt-PA treated patients compared to 18.8 percent in the placebo group (p = 0.017). By day 7, no difference in lung scan resolution was detected between the groups. There were no major bleeds in either group nor were there any differences in transfusion requirements between groups. Minor bleeding occurred in 15 of the rt-PA patients mainly at angiogram-catheter insertion and venipuncture sites. These results suggest that a bolus regimen of rt-PA produces accelerated thrombolysis and provides an alternative and convenient approach to thrombolytic therapy in patients with pulmonary embolism.

Acute Disease↗

Tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) vs heparin in deep vein thrombosis. Results of a randomized trial.

We performed a randomized trial comparing two dosing regimens of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) plus heparin vs heparin alone in the treatment of acute proximal deep vein thrombosis in 83 patients. Of 12 patients who received 0.5 mg/kg rt-PA plus heparin over 4 h, seven (58 percent) had greater than 50 percent lysis of the thrombus, compared with none of 12 who received placebo plus heparin (p = 0.002). Of 28 patients who received 0.5 mg/kg rt-PA over 8 h, repeated in 24 h, six (21 percent) had greater than 50 percent lysis, compared with two (7 percent) of 30 patients who received placebo plus heparin (p = 0.11). The 4-h infusion of rt-PA produced a 40 percent reduction and the 8-h infusion an 11 percent reduction in plasma fibrinogen concentration. At long-term follow-up, three (25 percent) of 12 patients in whom greater than 50 percent lysis was achieved had symptoms of the postphlebitic syndrome, compared with 19 (56 percent) of 34 patients in whom lysis was less than 50 percent (p = 0.07).

Double-Blind Method↗

The relationship between anti-factor Xa level and clinical outcome in patients receiving enoxaparine low molecular weight heparin to prevent deep vein thrombosis after hip replacement.

Studies in experimental animals have demonstrated that there is a relationship between levels of low molecular weight (LMW) heparin and both bleeding and inhibition of thrombosis. The relationship between these outcomes and ex vivo anti-factor Xa levels has been examined in 163 patients undergoing total hip replacement who were given prophylaxis once daily with a LMW heparin (enoxaparine). Fifty patients received 60 mg of enoxaparine and 113 received 40 mg, both regimens being administered subcutaneously once daily. Blood samples for anti-factor Xa levels were collected 12 hours after the injection on the day of surgery and on days 1, 3 and 6, postoperatively. The incidence of wound hematoma was 5.3% when the maximum anti-factor Xa level was less than or equal to 0.2 units per ml, but increased to 24.5% when the anti-factor Xa level exceeded 0.2 units per ml, P = 0.0008. The incidence of postoperative thrombosis was low (6.3%) if the minimum anti-factor Xa level exceeded 0.1 units per ml, but increased to 14.6% when less than or equal to 0.1 units per ml, and to 18.8% if the anti-factor Xa level was less than or equal to 0.05 units per ml. Regression analysis revealed that there was a statistically significant relationship between anti-factor Xa level and wound hematoma, P = 0.002 and anti-factor Xa level and thrombosis, P = 0.03. These findings suggest that when enoxaparine is administered as a once daily subcutaneous injection, the 12 hour anti-factor Xa level should not exceed 0.2 units per ml to minimize bleeding and levels greater than 0.05 units per ml should be obtained to optimize efficacy.

Factor Xa Inhibitors↗

An evaluation of impedance plethysmography and 125I-fibrinogen leg scanning in patients following hip surgery.

Venous thromboembolism is a common post-operative complication in patients following hip surgery. 125I-fibrinogen leg scanning and impedance plethysmography (IPG), are often used in the detection of venous thrombi in such patients. Information on the sensitivity and specificity of these non-invasive tests for the diagnosis of venous thrombosis following hip surgery is relevant for both patient management and for choosing the appropriate outcome measure for clinical trials evaluating new prophylactic regimens. We determined the sensitivity and specificity of the IPG alone, the 125I-fibrinogen leg scan alone, as well as the combined use of the two tests from a retrospective analysis of 685 hip surgery patients who participated in clinical trials of anti-thrombotic prophylaxis. These patients were followed prospectively with non-invasive tests. Bilateral venography was attempted either when one or both screening tests became positive or on day 10-14 post-operatively if both screening tests remained negative. Adequate venography was obtained in 1,010 (73.7%) legs and thrombi were identified in 198 (19.6%) legs. The sensitivities of the IPG and leg scanning were 12.9% and 44.6% respectively; the corresponding specificities were 98.1% and 95.0%. The sensitivity of a positive result on one or both screening tests was 49.6% with a specificity of 93.9%. Therefore, leg scanning and IPG, even in combination, are not sufficiently accurate to be recommended as the only strategy for the diagnosis of venous thrombosis following hip surgery. Venography should be considered in all patients undergoing surveillance testing either when one or both of the screening tests become positive or on day 10-14 if the screening tests remain negative.

Fibrinogen↗

The Canadian American Ticlopidine Study (CATS) in thromboembolic stroke.

The Canadian American Ticlopidine Study (CATS) is a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to assess the effect of ticlopidine (250 mg twice daily) in reducing the rate of subsequent occurrence of stroke, myocardial infarction, or vascular death in patients who have had a recent thromboembolic stroke. Twenty-five centres entered 1072 patients into the study between 1 week and 4 months after their qualifying stroke. The patients were treated and followed for up to 3 years (mean 24 months). In the efficacy analysis, the event rate per year for stroke, myocardial infarction or vascular death, considered together, was 15.3% in the placebo group and 10.8% in the ticlopidine group, representing a relative risk reduction with ticlopidine of 30.2% (95% confidence interval 7.5-48.3%; p = 0.006). Ticlopidine was beneficial for both men and women (relative risk reductions 28.1%, p = 0.037, and 34.2%, p = 0.045, respectively). Analysis by intention-to-treat gave a smaller estimate of risk reduction (23.3%, p = 0.020) for stroke, myocardial infarction, or vascular death. Adverse experiences associated with ticlopidine included neutropenia (severe in about 1% of cases) and skin rash and diarrhoea (severe in 2% of cases each); all were reversible. This study provides evidence of a beneficial effect of ticlopidine in both men and women with a recent thromboembolic stroke.

Aged↗