Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M Galeazzi

Publications and source records attributed to M Galeazzi.

86 records · Page 5Linked to original sources

[Prognostic factors in Raynaud's phenomenon: usefulness of antinuclear antibodies and of periungual capillaroscopy].

Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) and nailfold capillary microscopy have been evaluated as prognostic markers in patients with apparently idiopathic Raynaud's phenomenon. Results have shown that either ANA and peculiar alterations in nailfold capillaries are important risk factors as regard to the evolution into a connective tissue disease; furthermore, when both these markers are present in a patient with Raynaud's phenomenon, the risk of evolution is even greater. When sensibility and specificity have been compared, ANA appeared to be a more sensible test but nailfold capillary microscopy seemed to be more specific. Our data suggest that ANA and capillary microscopy are important tests in patients with Raynaud's phenomenon; they should be performed in order to identify those patients who are at greater risk of evolving to overt connective tissue disease.

Adolescent↗

HLA antigens and adult rheumatoid arthritis: a study with a monoclonal antibody.

Adult rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a very heterogeneous disease that is associated with HLA-antigens, although no absolute association has been found with any particular HLA type. Forty-one seropositive RA patients have been studied with a local monoclonal antibody named X1 21.4 (9w940), strongly associated with HLA-DRI, DR4, Drw10 antigens, to verify a possible correlation with the disease. The results obtained have also been compared with the data reported on MC1, a serologically defined determinant correlated with RA. X1 21.4 monoclonal antibody appears to be associated with the disease and it could identify one epitope involved in the susceptibility to RA.

Adult↗

An immunochemical study of the synovial fluid can contribute to the distinction between rheumatoid and non rheumatoid arthritis.

Synovial fluids from 102 patients affected by various joint diseases have been analyzed for their protein, immunoglobulin and beta 2-microglobulin contents, for the total and alternative pathway hemolytic activities of the complement components, for the presence of rheumatoid factors and Clq binding materials. The aim of this study was to verify whether an immunochemical analysis of the synovial fluid could help to distinguish rheumatoid arthritis from other arthropathies. With regard to this, we emphasize that the latex test, the Clq binding assay, as well as the measurement of C3d and beta 2-microglobulin concentrations in synovial fluids, were the most helpful assays. An immunochemical synovial score was calculated summing the results of these four tests, thus making the recognition of rheumatoid arthritis, among the various inflammatory joint diseases, easier.

Arthritis↗

[Allelic variations of DPB1, DQA1, DQB1 and DRB1 and rheumatoid arthritis: further genetic and statistical considerations].

We used polymerase chain reaction amplification and hybridization with specific oligonucleotides to analyze the distribution of DPB1, DQA1, DQB1, and DRB1 allelic variants in 48 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and compared our results with those from 109 randomly chosen, healthy control subjects. Our work confirms a previously reported increase in DR4 specificity in RA: in particular, we found a statistically significant positive association of the DRB1*0401 and DRB1*0404 alleles with RA. When we compared the DR4 groups, however, none of the DRB1*04 alleles were increased in the RA group. Molecular analysis of the other DRB1 polymorphic variants disclosed the trend of a positive association of DRB1*0101 (DR1) in DR4 negative patients vs DR4 negative healthy control subjects, and an increase in DRw6 (DRB1*13,*14) in the DR4 and/or DR1 negative patient group. Moreover, analysis of the association between RA and a heptapeptide motif (positions 67-74) in the third hypervariable region confirmed that this epitope confers enhanced risk for the development of RA with respect to the allele DRB1*0404 (etiologic fraction = 0.53 vs 0.12). We also observed a statistically significant increase in DQA1*0301 and DQB1*0302 accompanied by a significant decrease in DQA1*0202, DQA1*0501 and DQB1*0201 in RA patients. Analysis of DPB1 alleles disclosed no significant differences between RA patients and healthy control subjects.

Adult↗

[Absence of correlation between HLA antigens and fibromyalgia syndrome in Italian patients].

Fibromyalgia syndrome (FS) is a frequently seen extra-articular rheumatism of unknown etiology. Some authors have suggested a direct role of the immune system in the pathogenesis of the disease while others have found an increased prevalence of some HLA DR and B antigens. The aim of our study was to verify the possible association between HLA and FS in Italian patients with no clinical or immunological evidence of chronic rheumatic inflammatory diseases. Ninety-two consecutive Italian patients were evaluated: 86 were typed for HLA A-B-C antigens and 74 for HLA DR antigens. The study was performed by standard NIH microlymphocytotoxicity technique and by NIH prolonged technique on B lymphocyte purified preparations. There was no statistically significant difference between any HLA A-B-C and DR antigens in the patients compared with the controls. We conclude that in the pathogenesis of FS there is no clear cut evidence of immunologic or genetic involvement.

Adult↗

Long-term i.v. Ig treatment in systemic lupus erythematosus.

OBJECTIVE: Treatment of SLE exacerbations with intravenous gammaglobulins has been shown to be safe and effective, leading to both clinical and serological improvement. In this study we test the hypothesis that intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg), administered over a long period, would also be effective in patients with chronically active SLE. DESIGN AND PATIENTS: An open trial was carried out on 12 patients with SLE refractory to conventional treatments, administering monthly infusions of intravenous immunoglobulins at a dose of 400 mg/kg/day for 5 consecutive days. The therapy (400 mg/kg for 5 days) lasted from 6 up to 24 months. RESULTS: Progressive clinical improvement was observed in 11 patients during the entire treatment course. This improvement was associated with an increase in hemoglobin, total serum hemolytic complement activity and C3 and C4 components, and in 2 thrombocytopenic patients in the platelet count, as well as a progressive reduction of ESR, serum immunocomplexes and antinuclear antibodies. A marked improvement in serum urea, creatinine clearance and proteinuria was also observed in those patients with renal involvement. We did not observe any adverse effects. CONCLUSION: The results obtained suggest that IVIg therapy may be a promising option in the treatment of chronically active SLE; however, further evaluation of this therapy is essential.

Adolescent↗

International survey on the management of patients with SLE. I. General data on the participating centers and the results of a questionnaire regarding mucocutaneous involvement.

OBJECTIVE: The diagnosis and treatment of the mucocutaneous (MC), neuropsychiatric (NP), and renal (RN) manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) remain unsolved issues. To shed light on these issues, a questionnaire was prepared and sent to 153 lupus centres around the world, in order to determine the level of agreement between experts in their approach to these complex aspects of the disease. METHODS: The first section of the questionnaire was designed to collect information on the characteristics of the responding lupus centres. The second section was dedicated to MC manifestations, with questions focusing on: (i) the frequency of MC manifestations as a whole and of the single clinical MC entities; (ii) clinical features, outcome and therapy of subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE); (iii) the utility of the lupus band test (LBT); and (iv) the use of various therapeutic protocols to treat MC manifestations. RESULTS: Sixty-one questionnaires from 19 countries were analysed. Out of these, 37 were completed by Departments of Rheumatology, 21 by Departments of Internal Medicine or Clinical Immunology, and 3 by Departments of Nephrology. About 66% of these centres stated that they were currently following more than 100 lupus cases, 95% had an in-patient ward and 82% had their own laboratory. The American College of Rheumatology classification criteria and various scales for disease activity assessment were regularly used by 87% and 57% of centres respectively. The overall prevalence of MC manifestations was judged to be over 30% by 82% of the respondents (Rs), and over 60% by 36% of the Rs. Among the different MC manifestations, malar rash was reported to be the most frequent (40%), followed by alopecia (24.1%) and oral ulcers (18.6%). In reporting the prevalence of each MC manifestation, the Rs showed a low level of agreement, the coefficient of variation (CV) being > 0.75 for all of the manifestations listed with the exception of malar rash (CV = 0.54). Poor agreement among centers was also found for the reported association of various MC manifestations with SCLE (15 different answers), and on the prognostic factors for SCLE (17 different answers). There was agreement on the best procedure (up to 70% of the Rs preferred a non-UV exposed skin area) and on the utility of the LBT (83% using it only for diagnostic purpose). Hydroxychloroquine was the most popular therapeutic protocol, being used by 85% of the Rs for a wide variety of MC manifestations. Among other therapies, azathioprine was used by 59%, dapsone by 41%, and thalidomide by 35% of the Rs, all to treat a wide spectrum of MC manifestations. Pulse steroid, cyclosporin A and pulse cyclophosphamide were less commonly employed (by 27%, 22% and 13% of the Rs, respectively), and were reserved for the most severe MC manifestations, particularly vasculitis. CONCLUSION: The present survey indicates that, although most of the participating centres had extensive experience in the management of SLE, their approach to the MC manifestations was not homogeneous, and collaborative studies are clearly needed, particularly to optimise the therapeutic protocols.

Alopecia↗

International survey on the management of patients with SLE. II. The results of a questionnaire regarding neuropsychiatric manifestations.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the diagnostic and therapeutic approach used in clinical practice for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients with primary SLE-mediated neuropsychiatric (NP) manifestations. METHODS: A questionnaire was drawn up to assess how clinicians manage various clinical manifestations of SLE. A portion of this questionnaire was designed to assess how clinicians diagnose and treat primary NP-SLE. Most of the questions in the NP-SLE section consisted of lists of different clinical manifestations and laboratory or radiological studies that participants were asked to rate on a scale of importance [from 1 (extremely important) to 5 (not important)] to the diagnosis of primary NP-SLE. The questionnaire also assessed how different NP manifestations are treated in clinical practice. The relative importance of each clinical manifestation was determined through its mean score, and the agreement among participants on each issue was determined using the coefficient of variation (CV). Fifty-nine lupus centers participated in the NP-SLE portion of the survey. RESULTS: The clinical manifestations which were considered to be of extreme or major importance for the diagnosis of primary NP-SLE were seizures, psychosis, transverse myelitis, stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA) and aseptic meningitis. Among the radiological and laboratory studies, only brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) achieved "extremely important" mean scores (between 1 and 2). aPL testing was used routinely in the majority of patients (mean 96.8%; CV = 0.1), while brain MRI was used less frequently (mean 56.5%; CV = 0.61). Only brain MRI and cerebral angiography were considered to be helpful in differentiating cerebral vasculopathy from multi-infarct (mean score = 1.6 and 1.9, respectively), whereas a prompt response to treatment with increased doses of steroids was considered helpful in differentiating SLE-related psychosis from steroid-induced psychosis (mean score = 1.58). The results of aPL testing, coagulation tests for the lupus anticoagulant, an brain MRI were considered to be of extreme or major importance in decisions involving treatment with anticoagulant or anti-platelet therapy. Symptomatic therapies, such as heparin, or anti-convulsant, anti-platelet, oral anticoagulant, and antipsychotic therapy were the most widely used. Corticosteroids were the most frequently used immunosuppressive therapy. The administration of other immunosuppressive agents as specific treatment for NP-SLE was uncommon. CONCLUSIONS: Our survey found that in clinical practice, the NP manifestations currently considered to be diagnostic of primary SLE-mediated CNS involvement are not limited to those included in the American Rheumatism Association (ARA) criteria, e.g. seizures and psychosis. Antiphospholipid antibodies appeared to be the laboratory parameter most frequently relied upon in the diagnosis of NP-SLE, and in decisions regarding treatment. Apart from that, only brain MRI and, in selected cases, cerebral angiography seemed to be of real help in diagnosis. The lack of consensus regarding the treatment of primary NP-SLE manifestations most probably reflects both the complex nature of neurological illness in SLE patients and the lack of clear diagnostic criteria.

Adrenal Cortex Hormones↗

International survey on the management of patients with SLE. III. The results of a questionnaire regarding renal involvement.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the practice patterns in the management of lupus nephritis (LN) of physicians dealing with systemic lupus erythematosus. METHODS: A multiple choice questionnaire was sent to 135 lupus centers, mainly in Europe. It was divided into 4 sections, one of which regarded LN. Sixty-one centers (40%) sent the questionnaire back before the meeting; however two of them did not fill out the LN section. Therefore, 59 valid LN questionnaires were collected and analyzed. Statistical evaluation was performed using frequency analysis and the chi-square test. RESULTS: In 50 centers (85%), renal biopsy is performed in all patients with clinically evident renal involvement, and in most of them it is repeated in cases of relapse and/or ineffectiveness of treatment. Oral steroid alone is the therapy preferred by 67% of responding physicians in patients with WHO class II LN. Multi-drug therapy is favoured by 57% in patients with class III LN, by 79% for mild-to-moderate forms of class IV LN (IVm), by 84% for moderate-to-severe forms of class IV LN (IVs), by 47% for mild-to-moderate forms of class V LN (Vm), and by 65% for moderate-to-severe forms of class V LN (Vs). Steroids plus cyclophosphamide (CYPH) is the association most commonly used for class III, IVm and IVs LN, having been indicated by 70%, 80% and 88% of the centers, respectively. Furthermore, pulse CYPH is largely preferred to oral CYPH by the majority of centers. It is worth noting that 41 centers (70%, p < 0.01) utilise the same drugs in the treatment of both WHO class IVm and IVs LN. No clear trends in the use of multi-drug associations were identifiable in the treatment of class V LN. Moreover, most of the centers (64%) said that they rely on histologic parameters in order to define renal prognosis and that they consider the chronicity index to be the best predictor of poor renal outcome (74% of the centers). CONCLUSIONS: It was possible to identify some clear trends in the behaviour of physicians who are "expert" in lupus patients: (i) they perform a renal biopsy in order to charaterize the LN and repeat it when they are faced with relapse or ineffective therapy; (ii) they treat WHO class II LN with oral steroids alone and class III and IV LN with steroids associated with CYPH (CYPH, generally in a pulse regimen); and (iii) they define renal prognosis by means of histologic predictors, especially the chronicity index. However, no trend seemed to exist for the treatment of class V LN, particularly Vm.

Biopsy↗

Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies in 566 European patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: prevalence, clinical associations and correlation with other autoantibodies. European Concerted Action on the Immunogenetics of SLE.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate, in a cohort of 566 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) drawn from 11 European centres: (i) the prevalence of ANCAs and their subspecificities in a large series of European SLE patients; (ii) the possible associations of ANCA with the most common clinical manifestations of the disease; and (iii) whether ANCAs correlate with some of the autoantibodies commonly found in SLE. METHODS: ANCA detection was performed by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF), and by ELISA for lactoferrin (LF), myeloperoxydase (MPO), proteinase3 (PR3) and lysozyme (LZ) subspecificities. RESULTS: The prevalence of ANCA was 16.4% (IIF). The prevalence of LF was 14.3%, LZ 4.6%, MPO 9.3%, and PR3 1.7%. Our results show that ANCA is associated with certain clinical manifestations of SLE. In particular, positive correlations were found between IIF ANCA and serositis (p = 0.026), livedo reticularis (p = 0.01), venous thrombosis (p = 0.03) and arthritis (p = 0.04), while anti-LF antibodies were associated with serositis (p = 0.05) and livedo reticularis (p < 10(-3). Nevertheless, multivariate analysis demonstrated that other autoantibodies, such as aCL and SSA/Ro, are more closely correlated than ANCA with some of the aforementioned clinical features. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that ANCA are detectable in SLE sera and that some of them are associated with particular clinical manifestations. Whether ANCA plays a direct pathogenetic role in the vascular damage of SLE or only represents an epiphenomenon or a marker of disease activity remains to be elucidated.

Adolescent↗

Association of 16/6 and SA1 anti-DNA idiotypes with anticardiolipin antibodies and clinical manifestations in a large cohort of SLE patients. European Concerted Action on the Immunogenetics of SLE.

OBJECTIVE: The SA1 and 16/6 idiotypes can be found in some patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) or anti-phospholipid syndrome (APS). The aim of this study was to ascertain the prevalence of these idiotypes in a large cohort of SLE patients, and to determine whether their presence is correlated with the anticardiolipin (aCL) and anti-dsDNA antibodies or with the clinical manifestations of SLE. METHODS: 492 SLE patients were evaluated for clinical manifestations of SLE and were assigned a disease severity score. ds-DNA autoantibodies, aCL autoantibodies of the IgM, IgG and IgA isotypes, and SA1 and 16/6 idiotypes were also determined in these patients. RESULTS: The prevalence of the SA1 and 16/6 idiotypes in the 492 SLE patients was found to be 11% and 5.1%, respectively, and these idiotypes were significantly more prevalent in the patients who had aCL antibodies of either the IgG, IgM or IgA isotypes. Moreover, while the 16/6 idiotype was not associated with the clinical manifestation of either SLE or APS, the SA1 idiotype was found significantly more frequently in patients who had vascular events Raynaud's phenomenon or hemolytic anemia (p = 0.016, 0.01, 0.01, respectively). CONCLUSION: SLE patients with the SA1 idiotype may run a higher risk of developing vascular events, Raynaud's phenomenon or hemolytic anemia. These clinical manifestations can be attributed to both SLE and secondary APS when aCL autoantibodies are also found. These results indicate that the possible pathogenicity of certain idiotypes in SLE cannot be excluded.

Adolescent↗