Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M G Katze

Publications and source records attributed to M G Katze.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1998

Interferon inhibits the replication of HIV-1, SIV, and SHIV chimeric viruses by distinct mechanisms.

Interferon (IFN) treatment of lentivirus-infected cells substantially reduces virus replication in vitro. Although the replication of both HIV-1 and simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) is inhibited, IFN blocks the replication of these viruses at different stages of the viral life cycle. We previously demonstrated that in HIV-1-infected cells, IFN blocks a late step in viral replication, leading to a decrease in viral protein stability and a deregulation of polyprotein processing. In contrast, in SIV-infected cells, IFN blocks an early step in viral replication, between virus binding and reverse transcription. Thus, the viral gene products targeted by IFN may be different for each of these viruses. To attempt to define which viral proteins are targeted by the IFN response, we examined the effects of IFN on the replication of two SIV/HIV-1 (SHIV) chimeric viruses, SHIV-4(vpu+) and SHIV-4(vpu-) in 174 x CEM cells. These viruses were grown from constructs in which the SIVmac239 env, tat, and rev genes have been replaced with those HIV-1. The use of SHIV-4(vpu+) allowed us to examine whether vpu, which is unique to HIV-1, might contribute to the differential effects of IFN on HIV-1 and SIV replication. Surprisingly, we found that IFN inhibited SHIV replication differently than the replication of either HIV-1 or SIV. IFN treatment of SHIV-infected cells resulted in a decrease in the level of viral RNA expression but had no apparent effect on the integration of proviral DNA. Nuclear runoff transcription assays indicated that the reduction of SHIV RNA expression in IFN-treated cells was not due to alterations in RNA polymerase II-mediated transcription, suggesting that IFN may block SHIV replication by promoting the increased degradation of viral RNA. The presence of absence of the vpu gene did not alter the effects of IFN on SHIV replication, indicating that Vpu is not responsible for the differential effect of IFN on HIV-1 and SIV replication. Thus the response of SHIVs to antiviral agents such as IFN may be unique from either HIV-1 or SIV. This may be an important consideration when using SHIVs to evaluate anti-HIV-1 therapies in animal models of AIDS.

Antiviral Agents↗
PubMed1998

Repression of the PKR protein kinase by the hepatitis C virus NS5A protein: a potential mechanism of interferon resistance.

BACKGROUND: Chronic infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) is associated with progressive liver damage, including the development of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma, and HCV is a leading cause of liver dysfunction worldwide. The current therapy for chronic HCV infection, interferon-alpha (IFN), is effective in a minority of HCV-infected patients. Several studies have demonstrated a correlation between therapeutic outcome and the amino acid sequence of a small region of the HCV non-structural 5A (NS5A) gene product. It has been suggested that this region, termed the interferon sensitivity-determining region (ISDR), may mediate IFN resistance by directly interacting with one or more cellular proteins associated with the IFN-mediated antiviral response. OBJECTIVES: In an attempt to define the molecular mechanism by which the NS5A protein and the ISDR might contribute to HCV resistance to IFN, we examined whether NS5A could regulate the IFN-induced protein kinase, PKR, a primary mediator of the IFN-induced antiviral response. STUDY DESIGN: Multiple approaches, including in vitro assays using recombinant proteins, the transfection of recombinant clones into cultured cells, and in vivo studies in yeast, were used to examine the interaction of NS5A with PKR, as well as the functional significance of the interaction. An ISDR deletion mutant was prepared to evaluate the importance of the ISDR in mediating the NS5A-PKR interaction and the requirement of this region for PKR inhibition. RESULTS: NS5A repressed PKR activity through a direct interaction with the protein kinase catalytic domain. Both PKR repression and interaction required the presence of the ISDR. CONCLUSIONS: Inactivation of PKR may be one mechanism by which HCV avoids the antiviral effects of IFN. Thus,therapeutic strategies designed to block the NS5A-PKR interaction may increase the efficacy of IFN therapy in HCV-infected individuals.

Antiviral Agents↗
PubMed1998

Interferon treatment inhibits the replication of simian immunodeficiency virus at an early stage: evidence for a block between attachment and reverse transcription.

Interferon (IFN) dramatically reduces both SIV and HIV-1 replication in vitro. However, we previously found that whereas IFN treatment of SIV-infected cells results in a decrease in the level of viral RNA, IFN treatment of HIV-1-infected cells has no effect on viral RNA expression but rather leads to a decrease in viral protein stability and a deregulation of polyprotein processing (M. B. Agy, R. L. Acker, C. H. Sherbert, and M.G. Katze, Virology 214, 379-386, 1995). To more closely define the stage of SIV replication adversely affected by IFN, we used several approaches, including PCR amplification, to examine the effects of IFN on viral DNA synthesis and integration in MT4 and 174 x CEM cells synchronously infected with SIV. Unexpectedly, we found that IFN blocked the synthesis of viral DNA in SIV-infected cells but appeared to have no effect on HIV-1 DNA synthesis. Using a p27 ELISA, we demonstrated that IFN had no effect on the attachment of SIV to MT4 cells. Thus, our results indicate that IFN blocks an early stage of SIV replication, at a step between attachment and reverse transcription. To our knowledge this is the first report to examine the effects of IFN on discrete stages of the SIV life cycle.

Animals↗
PubMed1998

Using genetic means to dissect homologous and heterologous protein-protein interactions of PKR, the interferon-induced protein kinase.

The interferon-induced protein kinase, PKR, is a pivotal component of interferon (IFN)-induced cellular antiviral and antiproliferative response. The identification and characterization of proteins, of both viral and cellular origins, that interact with PKR have proven to be a valuable probe for unraveling the cellular regulation and function of PKR. Several studies have demonstrated that PKR forms dimers and that dimerization is likely to be required for activation and/or catalytic function. It is therefore important to elucidate the mechanism of PKR dimer formation and the role of PKR effectors in modulating kinase dimerization. Herein we describe the use of the two genetic approaches, the lambda repressor fusion and the yeast two-hybrid systems, to detect and analyze homo- and heterotypic interactions with PKR. We also describe several biochemical methodologies commonly used in our laboratory to validate the genetic results. Although the examples in this article focus on PKR, the techniques can easily be adapted to investigate protein-protein associations in a variety of experimental systems. Finally, given the important role of PKR as a mediator of IFN-induced antiviral and antiproliferative effects, these studies may provide clues to the development of reagents that target PKR to enhance the therapeutic use of IFN in the treatment of disease.

Bacteriophage lambda↗
PubMed1998

Molecular mechanisms of interferon resistance mediated by viral-directed inhibition of PKR, the interferon-induced protein kinase.

The interferon (IFN)-induced cellular antiviral response is the first line of defense against viral infection within an animal host. In order to establish a productive infection, eukaryotic viruses must first overcome the IFN-induced blocks imposed on viral replication. The double-stranded RNA-activated protein kinase (PKR) is a key component mediating the antiviral actions of IFN. This IFN-induced protein kinase can restrict viral replication through its ability to phosphorylate the protein synthesis initiation factor eukaryotic initiation factor-2 alpha-subunit and reduce levels of viral protein synthesis. Viruses, therefore, must block the function of PKR in order to avoid these deleterious antiviral effects associated with PKR activity. Indeed, many viruses have developed effective measures to repress PKR activity during infection. This review will focus primarily on an overview of the different molecular mechanisms employed by these viruses to meet a common goal: the inhibition of PKR function, uncompromised viral protein synthesis, and unrestricted virus replication. The past few years have seen exciting new advances in this area. Rather unexpectedly, this area of research has benefited from the use of the yeast system to study PKR. Other recent advances include studies on PKR regulation by the herpes simplex viruses and data from our laboratory on the medically important hepatitis C viruses. We speculate that IFN is ineffective as a therapeutic agent against hepatitis C virus because the virus can effectively repress PKR function. Finally, we will discuss briefly the future directions of this PKR field.

Animals↗
PubMed1998

Biochemical and genetic evidence for complex formation between the influenza A virus NS1 protein and the interferon-induced PKR protein kinase.

The interferon (IFN)-induced protein kinase (PKR) functions as a gatekeeper of mRNA translation initiation and is, therefore, a key mediator of the host IFN-induced antiviral defense system. Many viruses have invested countermeasures against PKR. Some apparently use more than one mechanism. The influenza virus can repress PKR activity through the use of at least two factors, the cellular P58IPK protein and the viral NS1 protein. The exact mode of action of the latter has not been established. Here, using a coprecipitation assay, we found that PKR could form a complex with NS1 in crude cell extracts prepared from influenza virus-infected HeLa cells. The NS1-PKR interaction was verified by using the yeast two-hybrid system and an in vitro binding assay. Deletion analysis mapped the NS1 binding site to the N-terminal 98 residues of PKR regulatory region. Furthermore, an NS1 mutant, which lacks PKR inhibitory activity, did not bind PKR. Finally, the functional role of NS1 in PKR inhibition was substantiated using an in vivo assay for PKR activity. These results support the role of NS1 in PKR modulation during viral infection that is mediated through a complex formation between the two proteins.

Antiviral Agents↗
PubMed1998

Inhibition of double-stranded RNA-dependent protein kinase PKR by vaccinia virus E3: role of complex formation and the E3 N-terminal domain.

The human double-stranded RNA (dsRNA)-dependent protein kinase PKR inhibits protein synthesis by phosphorylating translation initiation factor 2alpha (eIF2alpha). Vaccinia virus E3L encodes a dsRNA binding protein that inhibits PKR in virus-infected cells, presumably by sequestering dsRNA activators. Expression of PKR in Saccharomyces cerevisiae inhibits protein synthesis by phosphorylation of eIF2alpha, dependent on its two dsRNA binding motifs (DRBMs). We found that expression of E3 in yeast overcomes the lethal effect of PKR in a manner requiring key residues (Lys-167 and Arg-168) needed for dsRNA binding by E3 in vitro. Unexpectedly, the N-terminal half of E3, and residue Trp-66 in particular, also is required for anti-PKR function. Because the E3 N-terminal region does not contribute to dsRNA binding in vitro, it appears that sequestering dsRNA is not the sole function of E3 needed for inhibition of PKR. This conclusion was supported by the fact that E3 activity was antagonized, not augmented, by overexpressing the catalytically defective PKR-K296R protein containing functional DRBMs. Coimmunoprecipitation experiments showed that a majority of PKR in yeast extracts was in a complex with E3, whose formation was completely dependent on the dsRNA binding activity of E3 and enhanced by the N-terminal half of E3. In yeast two-hybrid assays and in vitro protein binding experiments, segments of E3 and PKR containing their respective DRBMs interacted in a manner requiring E3 residues Lys-167 and Arg-168. We also detected interactions between PKR and the N-terminal half of E3 in the yeast two-hybrid and lambda repressor dimerization assays. In the latter case, the N-terminal half of E3 interacted with the kinase domain of PKR, dependent on E3 residue Trp-66. We propose that effective inhibition of PKR in yeast requires formation of an E3-PKR-dsRNA complex, in which the N-terminal half of E3 physically interacts with the protein kinase domain of PKR.

Cell Division↗
PubMed1998

Regulation of interferon-induced protein kinase PKR: modulation of P58IPK inhibitory function by a novel protein, P52rIPK.

The cellular response to environmental signals is largely dependent upon the induction of responsive protein kinase signaling pathways. Within these pathways, distinct protein-protein interactions play a role in determining the specificity of the response through regulation of kinase function. The interferon-induced serine/threonine protein kinase, PKR, is activated in response to various environmental stimuli. Like many protein kinases, PKR is regulated through direct interactions with activator and inhibitory molecules, including P58IPK, a cellular PKR inhibitor. P58IPK functions to represses PKR-mediated phosphorylation of the eukaryotic initiation factor 2alpha subunit (eIF-2alpha) through a direct interaction, thereby relieving the PKR-imposed block on mRNA translation and cell growth. To further define the molecular mechanism underlying regulation of PKR, we have utilized an interaction cloning strategy to identify a novel cDNA encoding a P58IPK-interacting protein. This protein, designated P52rIPK, possesses limited homology to the charged domain of Hsp90 and is expressed in a wide range of cell lines. P52rIPK and P58IPK interacted in a yeast two-hybrid assay and were recovered as a complex from mammalian cell extracts. When coexpressed with PKR in yeast, P58IPK repressed PKR-mediated eIF-2alpha phosphorylation, inhibiting the normally toxic and growth-suppressive effects associated with PKR function. Conversely, introduction of P52rIPK into these strains resulted in restoration of both PKR activity and eIF-2alpha phosphorylation, concomitant with growth suppression due to inhibition of P58IPK function. Furthermore, P52rIPK inhibited P58IPK function in a reconstituted in vitro PKR-regulatory assay. Our results demonstrate that P58IPK is inhibited through a direct interaction with P52rIPK which, in turn, results in upregulation of PKR activity. Taken together, our data describe a novel protein kinase-regulatory system which encompasses an intersection of interferon-, stress-, and growth-regulatory pathways.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗
PubMed1998

Double-stranded RNA-independent dimerization of interferon-induced protein kinase PKR and inhibition of dimerization by the cellular P58IPK inhibitor.

The interferon (IFN)-induced, double-stranded RNA-activated protein kinase (PKR) mediates the antiviral and antiproliferative actions of IFN, in part, via its translational inhibitory properties. Previous studies have demonstrated that PKR forms dimers and that dimerization is likely to be required for activation and/or function. In the present study we used multiple approaches to examine the modulation of PKR dimerization. Deletion analysis with the lambda repressor fusion system identified a previously unrecognized site involved in PKR dimerization. This site comprised amino acids (aa) 244 to 296, which span part of the third basic region of PKR and the catalytic subdomains I and II. Using the yeast two-hybrid system and far-Western analysis, we verified the importance of this region for dimerization. Furthermore, coexpression of the 52-aa region alone inhibited the formation of full-length PKR dimers in the lambda repressor fusion and two-hybrid systems. Importantly, coexpression of aa 244 to 296 exerted a dominant-negative effect on wild-type kinase activity in a functional assay. Due to its role as a mediator of IFN-induced antiviral resistance, PKR is a target of viral and cellular inhibitors. Curiously, PKR aa 244 to 296 contain the binding site for a select group of specific inhibitors, including the cellular protein P58IPK. We demonstrated, utilizing both the yeast and lambda systems, that P58IPK, a member of the tetratricopeptide repeat protein family, can block kinase activity by preventing PKR dimerization. In contrast, a nonfunctional form of P58IPK lacking a TPR motif did not inhibit kinase activity or perturb PKR dimers. These results highlight a potential mechanism of PKR inhibition and define a novel class of PKR inhibitors. Finally, the data document the first known example of inhibition of protein kinase dimerization by a cellular protein inhibitor. On the basis of these results we propose a model for the regulation of PKR dimerization.

Binding Sites↗
PubMed1998

Control of PKR protein kinase by hepatitis C virus nonstructural 5A protein: molecular mechanisms of kinase regulation.

The PKR protein kinase is a critical component of the cellular antiviral and antiproliferative responses induced by interferons. Recent evidence indicates that the nonstructural 5A (NS5A) protein of hepatitis C virus (HCV) can repress PKR function in vivo, possibly allowing HCV to escape the antiviral effects of interferon. NS5A presents a unique tool by which to study the molecular mechanisms of PKR regulation in that mutations within a region of NS5A, termed the interferon sensitivity-determining region (ISDR), are associated with sensitivity of HCV to the antiviral effects of interferon. In this study, we investigated the mechanisms of NS5A-mediated PKR regulation and the effect of ISDR mutations on this regulatory process. We observed that the NS5A ISDR, though necessary, was not sufficient for PKR interactions; we found that an additional 26 amino acids (aa) carboxyl to the ISDR were required for NS5A-PKR complex formation. Conversely, we localized NS5A binding to within PKR aa 244 to 296, recently recognized as a PKR dimerization domain. Consistent with this observation, we found that NS5A from interferon-resistant HCV genotype 1b disrupted kinase dimerization in vivo. NS5A-mediated disruption of PKR dimerization resulted in repression of PKR function and inhibition of PKR-mediated eIF-2alpha phosphorylation. Introduction of multiple ISDR mutations abrogated the ability of NS5A to bind to PKR in mammalian cells and to inhibit PKR in a yeast functional assay. These results indicate that mutations within the PKR-binding region of NS5A, including those within the ISDR, can disrupt the NS5A-PKR interaction, possibly rendering HCV sensitive to the antiviral effects of interferon. We propose a model of PKR regulation by NS5A which may have implications for therapeutic strategies against HCV.

Animals↗
PubMed1997

Serial in vivo passage of HIV-1 infection in Macaca nemestrina.

In an earlier study we found that pigtailed macaques (Macaca nemestrina) that were experimentally infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) initially became viremic and seroconverted, but HIV-1 replication diminished markedly over time. In an attempt to develop a longer term pathogenic model, blood from HIV-1-infected macaques was serially transfused into three groups of naive macaques. Transfer was successful through two transfusions as shown by repeated virus isolations and confirmed by the development of cell-free plasma viremia and by seroconversion. Three to five weeks after transfusion, plasma levels of HIV-1 RNA from several macaques in the first two groups exceeded those of the initially inoculated macaques. However, animals in the third group had diminished RNA levels, were virus culture negative, and did not seroconvert. Sequence analyses of env-region clones from infected animals revealed only minimal changes over the course of the passages. These results confirm HIV-1 replication in M. nemestrina during the acute phase of infection. However, adaptation of HIV-1 to a macaque-pathogenic variant did not occur during serial passage, possibly because the animals were able to restrict HIV-1 replication below a level required for a pathogenic variant to emerge. Whether such containment is a function of the host's immune response or a virus cell incompatibility remains to be determined.

Adaptation, Physiological↗
PubMed1997

Evidence that hepatitis C virus resistance to interferon is mediated through repression of the PKR protein kinase by the nonstructural 5A protein.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is the major cause of non-A non-B hepatitis and a leading cause of liver dysfunction worldwide. While the current therapy for chronic HCV infection is parenteral administration of type 1 interferon (IFN), only a fraction of HCV-infected individuals completely respond to treatment. Previous studies have correlated the IFN sensitivity of strain HCV-1b with mutations within a discrete region of the viral nonstructural 5A protein (NS5A), termed the interferon sensitivity determining region (ISDR), suggesting that NS5A may contribute to the IFN-resistant phenotype of HCV. To determine the importance of HCV NS5A and the NS5A ISDR in mediating HCV IFN resistance, we tested whether the NS5A protein could regulate the IFN-induced protein kinase, PKR, a mediator of IFN-induced antiviral resistance and a target of viral and cellular inhibitors. Using multiple approaches, including biochemical, transfection, and yeast genetics analyses, we can now report that NS5A represses PKR through a direct interaction with the protein kinase catalytic domain and that both PKR repression and interaction requires the ISDR. Thus, inactivation of PKR may be one mechanism by which HCV avoids the antiviral effects of IFN. Finally the inhibition of the PKR protein kinase, by NS5A is the first described function for this HCV protein.

Antiviral Agents↗
PubMed1997

The molecular chaperone hsp40 regulates the activity of P58IPK, the cellular inhibitor of PKR.

The interferon-induced double-stranded RNA-activated protein kinase, PKR, likely contributes to both the antiviral and the antiproliferative effects of interferon. We previously found that influenza virus avoids the translational inhibitory effects of activated PKR by activating a cellular inhibitory protein, termed P58IPK, based on its Mr of 58,000. P58IPK is a member of the tetratricopeptide family of proteins and possesses significant homology to the conserved J region of the DnaJ family of heat shock proteins. We earlier hypothesized that P58IPK was kept in an inactive state with its own inhibitor (termed I-P58IPK) in uninfected cells. We therefore attempted the purification and characterization of I-P58IPK. The following data suggest that we have identified the molecular chaperone, hsp40, as 1-P58IPK. (i) The MonoP-purified I-P58IPK protein reacted with hsp40 antibody. (ii) This preparation demonstrated high specific activity in an in vitro functional assay containing only purified recombinant and native components. (iii) Purified, recombinant hsp40 protein inhibited P58IPK in an identical in vitro assay. (iv) Finally, we demonstrate that hsp40 directly complexes with P58IPK, in vitro, suggesting the inhibition occurs through a direct interaction. Our data, taken together, provide evidence for a novel intersection between the heat shock and interferon pathways, and suggest that influenza virus regulates PKR activity through the recruitment of a cellular stress pathway.

HSP40 Heat-Shock Proteins↗
PubMed1997

What happens inside lentivirus or influenza virus infected cells: insights into regulation of cellular and viral protein synthesis.

Efficient manipulation of the regulatory mechanisms controlling host cell gene expression provides the means for productive infection by animal viruses. Upon infecting the host cell, viruses must: (i) bypass the cellular antiviral defense mechanisms to prevent the translational blocks imposed by the interferon pathway; and (ii) effectively "hijack" the host protein synthetic machinery into mass production of virion protein components. The multicomponent regulatory nature of cellular gene expression has provided the means of selecting for a diverse range of mechanisms utilized by animal viruses to ensure that replication efficiency is maintained throughout the virus life cycle. One important research component of the careful examination of gene regulation is those studies that focus on elucidating the mechanisms by which viruses control mRNA translation during host cell infection. Much of the work in our laboratory has focused on elucidating the strategies by which human immunodeficiency virus type 1 and influenza virus regulate protein synthesis during infection. Here we describe the ways in which these two distinctly different RNA viruses ensure the selective and efficient translation of their viral mRNAs in infected cells. These strategies include circumvention of the deleterious effects associated with activation of the interferon-induced protein kinase, PKR. Herein we describe our methodologies designed to elucidate the translational regulation in cells infected by these viruses. We conclude with a brief summary of new directions, utilizing these methods, taken toward understanding the translational control mechanisms imposed by these viral systems, and how our studies of virally infected cells have allowed us to identify growth-regulating components of normal, uninfected cells.

Cell Division↗
PubMed1996

The 58-kDa cellular inhibitor of the double stranded RNA-dependent protein kinase requires the tetratricopeptide repeat 6 and DnaJ motifs to stimulate protein synthesis in vivo.

Double stranded RNA-dependent protein kinase (PKR) is a double stranded RNA-activated, interferon-induced serine-threonine kinase that participates in both the antiviral and antiproliferative properties of interferon. We previously found that influenza virus inhibited PKR function by recruiting or activating a cellular inhibitor termed P58(IPK). The present study was undertaken to complement our earlier analyses, which demonstrated that P58(IPK) efficiently inhibited PKR autophosphorylation and activity in vitro. We now report that P58(IPK) down-regulates PKR and, in turn, stimulates protein synthetic rates inside the cell. Using transfection analysis, we show that P58(IPK) stimulates translation of secreted embryonic alkaline phosphatase reporter gene mRNA. Furthermore, we found that at least two regions of the P58(IPK) molecule were required for PKR inhibitory activity in COS-1 cells: (i) the DnaJ similarity region at the carboxyl terminus (amino acids 391-504); and (ii) the tetratricopeptide repeat 6 (TPR6) domain (amino acids 222-255) located in the middle of the P58(IPK) protein and within the eukaryotic protein synthesis initiation factor 2alpha homology region. P58(IPK) variants lacking either one of these regions were unable to stimulate secreted embryonic alkaline phosphatase protein synthetic rates. Consistent with this data is the observation that the DeltaTPR6 mutant (the P58(IPK) variant lacking the TPR6 motif) failed to block PKR activity in vitro. Based on these data and our earlier in vitro functional and PKR-P58(IPK) binding analyses, a revised model of PKR regulation by P58(IPK) is presented.

Alkaline Phosphatase↗
PubMed1996

Cloning, expression, and cellular localization of the oncogenic 58-kDa inhibitor of the RNA-activated human and mouse protein kinase.

The 58-kDa inhibitor of the interferon-induced double-stranded RNA-activated protein kinase (PKR) is a cellular protein that is activated during influenza virus infection to down-regulate the activity of PKR. This study was initiated to further our understanding of the inhibitor which, when overproduced, has the capacity to malignantly transform cells. We report here the isolation and characterization of cDNA clones encoding the inhibitor, designated p58, from human HeLa and mouse NIH 3T3 cells. The human and mouse p58 cDNAs were 6.5 and 1.6 kb in length, respectively. Surprisingly, the deduced amino acid sequences of the human and mouse p58 were 96% identical, indicating a remarkably high degree of conservation between species. An examination of p58 mRNA expression in human tissues revealed a 6.5-kb transcript in all tissues examined, with a particularly high level of expression present in the pancreas and liver, and also in certain leukemic cell lines. Similarly, p58 expression was detected in all mouse tissues examined, with the highest level of expression found in liver. In contrast to human tissues, three p58 transcripts of approximately 1.7, 3.3 and 5.4 kb were observed in mouse tissues, suggesting that p58 expression may be regulated differently in human and mouse cells. Western blot analysis of subcellular fractions and indirect immunofluorescence analysis of intact cells revealed that p58 was found predominantly in the cytoplasm, consistent with its function as an inhibitor of PKR, which is also a predominantly cytoplasmic protein.

3T3 Cells↗
PubMed1996

Development of an in vitro mRNA degradation assay utilizing extracts from HIV-1- and SIV-infected cells.

We previously demonstrated that cellular mRNAs are degraded in CD4 positive lymphocytes infected by the human immunodeficiency virus, HIV-1, but not in cells infected by the simian lentivirus, SIV. To begin to define the molecular mechanisms underlying this RNA degradation, we have established an in vitro RNA degradation assay utilizing extracts from both infected and uninfected cells. We found that in vitro transcribed, 32P-radiolabeled actin RNA was degraded in extracts prepared from CEM, CEMx174, and C8166 cells which were infected with HIV-1. Minimal actin RNA degradation was observed in extracts prepared from uninfected cells. Similarly little degradation was observed in cell-free extracts prepared from SIV-infected cells. To determine if viral RNA sequences could impart enhanced stability to cellular RNAs in our in vitro assay, we prepared radiolabeled RNAs that contained selected viral RNA determinants. One such RNA contained the HIV-1 specific TAR (transactivating region) sequence (nucleotides 1-111) appended to a reporter CAT RNA. Like the cellular actin RNA, these TARCAT RNAs were degraded in HIV-1-infected cell extracts, but not in extracts from uninfected cells or extracts prepared from SIV-infected cells. In contrast, an RNA containing only authentic HIV-1 sequences comprising TAR and gag sequences was more stable than actin RNA in HIV-1-infected extracts. These results, taken together, suggest that the in vitro assay reproduces events that occur in vivo and provide a starting point for identifying the factor responsible for cellular RNA degradation in HIV-1-infected cells.

Actins↗