Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M F Riley

Publications and source records attributed to M F Riley.

18 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1992

Remnant of the common pulmonary vein mistaken for a left atrial mass: clarification by transoesophageal echocardiography.

Faulty incorporation of the common pulmonary vein leaves it as a distinct structure posteriorly, into which the pulmonary veins empty. This "chamber" is separated from the anterior "fetal" left atrium (containing the left atrial appendage and communicating with the mitral valve) by a diaphragm, and is known as cor triatriatum, one of the rarest of cardiac malformations. Less pronounced but still incomplete regression of this vein would result in the persistence of a portion of the common pulmonary vein appearing as a mass along the lateral wall of the left atrium at the junction of the left atrial appendage and left upper pulmonary vein. In two patients, both referred for evaluation of a left atrial mass, transoesophageal echocardiography identified the "mass" as a remnant of the common pulmonary vein. Cardiologists need to be aware of this structural remnant and its possible variants so as to avoid misdiagnosis of this prominence as an atrial tumour or mass.

Aged↗
PubMed1989

Serial assessment of mitral regurgitation by pulsed Doppler echocardiography in patients undergoing balloon aortic valvuloplasty.

Mitral regurgitation was serially assessed by pulsed Doppler echocardiography in 144 patients undergoing balloon aortic valvuloplasty for symptomatic aortic stenosis. Regurgitant scores of 0, 1, 2 and 3 were assigned to pulsed Doppler patterns corresponding to no, mild, moderate and severe mitral regurgitation, respectively. Before balloon aortic valvuloplasty, mitral regurgitant score correlated significantly (p less than 0.005) but weakly with aortic valve area (r = -0.24), left ventricular ejection fraction (r = -0.34) and left ventricular systolic pressure (r = 0.23). There was no significant correlation between mitral regurgitation and either mean catheterization or mean Doppler aortic valve gradient. Balloon aortic valvuloplasty produced significant decreases in both catheterization and Doppler mean transvalvular aortic valve gradients (56 +/- 19 to 31 +/- 12 and 60 +/- 19 to 48 +/- 16 mm Hg, respectively; both p less than 0.0001) and a significant increase (p less than 0.0001) in aortic valve area assessed by catheterization (0.6 +/- 0.2 to 0.9 +/- 0.3 cm2). Left ventricular ejection fraction did not change, but cardiac output increased (p less than 0.001) and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure decreased (p less than 0.0001). Pulsed Doppler findings of mitral regurgitation were present in 102 of the 144 patients. Eighty-eight patients had a score compatible with mild or more severe degrees of mitral regurgitation, and 49 had a score indicative of moderate or severe valvular insufficiency. In the entire group of 144 patients, mitral regurgitant score decreased significantly from 1.1 +/- 1.0 to 1.0 +/- 1.0 (p less than 0.001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1988

Balloon aortic valvuloplasty in 170 consecutive patients.

Between October 1, 1985, and April 1, 1988, we performed balloon aortic valvuloplasty in 170 patients (mean age [+/- SD], 77 +/- 5 years) who had symptomatic aortic stenosis. The procedure was completed successfully in 168 patients and resulted in significant increases in the mean (+/- SD) aortic-valve area (from 0.6 +/- 0.2 to 0.9 +/- 0.3 cm2) and cardiac output (from 4.6 +/- 3.4 to 4.8 +/- 1.4 liters per minute) and decreases in the peak aortic-valve pressure gradient (from 71 +/- 20 to 36 +/- 14 mm Hg) (P less than 0.01 for all three comparisons). There were six in-hospital deaths, and five patients required early aortic-valve replacement. Follow-up data were available for all patients, for a period averaging 9.1 months. In addition to the 6 patients who died in the hospital, 25 patients died an average of 6.4 +/- 5.3 months after discharge. Symptoms recurred in 44 patients; they were managed by repeat valvuloplasty in 16 patients, by aortic-valve replacement in 17, and by medical therapy in 11. At the most recent follow-up examination, the symptoms of 103 patients had improved after valvuloplasty; this number includes 15 patients with restenosis who successfully underwent redilation. Life-table analysis indicates that the probability of survival 12 months after the procedure was 74 percent. We conclude that balloon aortic valvuloplasty is an effective palliative therapy for some elderly patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Symptoms improve in the majority of patients; although restenosis is common, it can be managed in some patients by repeat balloon dilation.

Adult↗
PubMed1988

Usefulness of noninvasive assessment of aortic stenosis before and after percutaneous aortic valvuloplasty.

Noninvasive and catheterization studies were performed in 40 patients (mean age 76 +/- 12 years) before and after percutaneous aortic valvuloplasty. Measurements included time to 1/2 carotid upstroke, left ventricular ejection time, aortic valve excursion, mean aortic valve gradient and aortic valve area assessed using the continuity equation: aortic valve area = A X V/V1, where A = left ventricular outflow tract area, V = maximal left ventricular outflow tract velocity assessed by pulsed Doppler echocardiography and V1 = peak velocity in the aortic stenotic jet assessed using continuous-wave echocardiography. In addition, mitral regurgitation was assessed by pulsed Doppler mapping techniques. Mean aortic valve gradient, cardiac output and aortic valve area, calculated using the Gorlin formula, were determined at cardiac catheterization. There were significant correlations between Doppler and catheterization measurements of aortic valve area both before (r = 0.71, p less than 0.001) and after (r = 0.85, p less than 0.0001) valvuloplasty. The relations were demonstrated to be linear by F test and met criteria for identity. There were significant increases (all p less than 0.0005) after valvuloplasty in catheterization valve area (0.60 +/- 0.21 to 0.95 +/- 0.39 cm2), Doppler valve area (0.64 +/- 0.22 to 0.91 +/- 0.37 cm2), valve excursion (0.5 +/- 0.3 to 0.8 +/- 0.3 cm) and cardiac output (4.5 +/- 1.6 to 4.9 +/- 1.7 liter/min).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1988

Noninvasive assessment of mitral stenosis before and after percutaneous balloon mitral valvuloplasty.

Thirty-seven patients with symptomatic mitral stenosis underwent balloon dilatation of the mitral valve. Significant increases (p less than 0.001) were noted in both catheterization- and Doppler-determined valve area (0.9 +/- 0.3 to 1.8 +/- 0.8 and 0.9 +/- 0.2 to 1.7 +/- 0.5 cm2). However, catheterization and Doppler areas before and after valvuloplasty correlated less well (r = 0.51, p less than 0.002 and r = 0.47, p less than 0.005, respectively) than the catheterization-Doppler area correlation in a previous study of 59 consecutive patients with varying degrees of mitral stenosis (r = 0.84, p less than 0.001). Mitral valve area increases were independent of valve thickness estimated using 2-dimensional echocardiography. Flail mitral leaflet movement was not observed and the degree of mitral regurgitation qualitatively assessed using pulsed Doppler mapping techniques increased by greater than 1 of 4 grades in only 1 patient. The lateral mitral valve orifice diameter increased more than the anteroposterior diameter, suggesting commissural splitting as the mechanism of successful valvuloplasty. Increases (all p less than 0.0001) were noted in mitral valve EF slope (7 +/- 5 to 18 +/- 10 mm/s), excursion (11 +/- 5 to 13 +/- 4 mm), S20S interval (0.07 +/- 0.02 to 0.08 +/- 0.02 s) and cardiac output (4.2 +/- 1.3 to 5.3 +/- 2.0 liters/min). There were significant decreases (all p less than 0.001) in left atrial diameter (5.4 +/- 1.0 to 5.1 +/- 1.0 cm), mean catheterization gradient (15 +/- 5 to 8 +/- 4 mm Hg) and mean Doppler gradient (10 +/- 4 to 6 +/- 3 mm Hg).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Catheterization↗
PubMed1988

Doppler evidence that true left ventricular-to-aortic pressure gradients exist in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

The etiology of systolic left ventricular-to-aortic pressure gradients in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is still controversial. While cavity obliteration has been proposed by some investigators as the cause for recording of a high left ventricular systolic pressure, the concept of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction has received more experimental support. To investigate further whether left ventricular pressure truly exceeds aortic pressure and implies obstruction, we studied, with imaging and Doppler echocardiographic techniques, five patients with asymmetric septal hypertrophy and systolic anterior movement of the mitral valve occasionally causing it to abut upon the septum. All had outflow tract pressure gradients (peak 85 +/- 10 mm Hg) and trace to mild mitral regurgitation. Continuous wave Doppler study recorded peak flow velocities in the outflow tract (4.6 +/- 0.3 m/sec), and mitral regurgitant (mean 6.6 +/- 0.3 m/sec) jets. Aortic systolic and diastolic blood pressures were measured by cuff sphygmomanometry, and simultaneous carotid pulse tracings were recorded. The magnitude of systolic aortic pressure was determined at the time of peak velocity in the mitral regurgitant jet. Since the peak systolic pressure gradient across the mitral valve (left ventricular minus left atrial pressure) should equal 4 times the square of the peak velocity (V) in the mitral regurgitant jet, peak left ventricular systolic pressure should equal 4 x V2 plus the height of left atrial pressure at the time of peak mitral regurgitant velocity. In each case, calculations were made assuming an upper normal left atrial pressure of 10 mm Hg.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic↗
PubMed1988

Prediction of severity of aortic stenosis: accuracy of multiple noninvasive parameters.

PURPOSE: As newer non-medical techniques are developed to treat older patients with severe aortic stenosis, reliable noninvasive diagnosis of the condition will become increasingly important. For this reason, the accuracy of multiple noninvasive indexes for quantitation of the severity of aortic stenosis was evaluated, relative to catheterization-determined aortic valve area. PATIENTS AND METHODS: To evaluate the accuracy of multiple noninvasive parameters in assessing the presence and extent of aortic valve narrowing, noninvasive and catheterization correlations of the severity of aortic stenosis were obtained on 121 occasions in 81 patients (mean age, 76 +/- 11 years). Forty patients had studies performed before and after valvuloplasty. Noninvasive studies included the time to one-half carotid upstroke and carotid ejection time, corrected for heart rate, measured from a carotid pulse tracing; M-mode echocardiographic aortic valve excursion; mean pressure gradient across the aortic valve assessed by Doppler technique; the ratio of the peak to mean pressure gradient by Doppler; and Doppler aortic valve area assessed using the following continuity equation: aortic valve area = A X V/V1, where A = left ventricular outflow tract area, V = peak left ventricular outflow tract velocity, and V1 = peak velocity in the aortic stenotic jet. Mean aortic valve gradients and area (calculated using the Gorlin formula) were also assessed at cardiac catheterization. RESULTS: The correlations between the catheterization measurement of aortic valve area and the various noninvasive measurements were as follows: time to one-half carotid upstroke (r = -0.32, p less than 0.001); corrected left ventricular ejection time (r = -0.24, p less than 0.05); aortic valve excursion (r = 0.51, p less than 0.001); mean gradient by Doppler study (r = -0.44, p less than 0.001); mean gradient by catheterization analysis (r = -0.55, p less than 0.001); peak to mean gradient ratio measured by continuous wave Doppler (r = 0.38, p less than 0.001); and aortic valve area assessed using the Doppler continuity equation (r = 0.85, p less than 0.001). CONCLUSION: Noninvasive determination of aortic valve area using the continuity equation is an accurate means of assessing the severity of aortic stenosis. Although multiple other noninvasive parameters also correlate with aortic valve area measured at catheterization, there is too much scatter of data points to permit accurate prediction of catheterization aortic valve area in any given patient.

Aged↗
PubMed1987

Dynamic left ventricular outflow tract obstruction when the anterior leaflet is retained at prosthetic mitral valve replacement.

Dynamic left ventricular outflow tract obstruction developed in a patient in whom the anterior leaflet was retained at mitral valve replacement. It was caused by systolic anterior movement of the native anterior leaflet. Reduced outflow tract diameter, resulting from both posterior displacement of the septum and anterior displacement of the native anterior leaflet by porcine stents, was likely instrumental in promoting dynamic obstruction.

Adult↗
PubMed1987

Two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiographic diagnosis of an aortic to right atrial fistula complicating aortic dissection.

A 60 year old woman presented with massive aortic root dilation and sudden cardiovascular collapse 10 years after aortic valve replacement. An aortic to right atrial fistula was diagnosed by echocardiographic imaging and Doppler ultrasound. At operation, the patient was found to have chronic aortic dissection with aneurysm formation. Rupture of the aneurysm into the right atrium was confirmed.

Aortic Dissection↗
PubMed1987

Echocardiographic assessment of aortic valve area in elderly patients with aortic stenosis and of changes in valve area after percutaneous balloon valvuloplasty.

Echocardiographic studies, adequate for analysis of aortic valve area using the continuity equation, were obtained in 31 patients aged greater than or equal to 60 years who were undergoing catheterization for assessment of suspected aortic stenosis. Catheterization-determined aortic valve area was 0.74 +/- 0.30 cm2 (mean +/- SD) and Doppler-determined aortic valve areas were 0.68 +/- 0.27 and 0.65 +/- 0.27 cm2, depending on whether peak or mean velocities, respectively, were entered into the continuity equation. There were significant correlations between both of the Doppler-derived and the catheterization-determined aortic valve areas (r = 0.86, p less than 0.001 for both the continuity equation employing peak velocities and the continuity equation employing mean velocities) which were demonstrated to be linear by F test (catheterization area = -0.03 + 1.13 X Doppler area determined using peak velocities, SEE = 0.163 cm2, p less than 0.001; and catheterization area = -0.02 + 1.16 X Doppler area determined using mean velocities, SEE = 0.165 cm2, p less than 0.001). Both sets of correlations had linear regression parameters meeting the conditions for identity. Significant linear correlations were also noted between the non-invasive measurements of aortic valve excursion, ventricular ejection time, time to one-half carotid upstroke, maximal Doppler velocity and maximal Doppler gradient and catheterization aortic valve area, but the correlations were less tight than those between valve areas determined by catheterization and by Doppler continuity equation. Ten of the patients underwent percutaneous balloon aortic valvuloplasty. There were significant linear correlations between aortic valve areas determined by Doppler and catheterization methods both before valvuloplasty (r = 0.77, p = 0.01; p less than 0.001 by F test, SEE = 0.134 cm2) and after valvuloplasty (r = 0.85, p less than 0.01; p = 0.0001 by F test, SEE = 0.161 cm2). Linear regression parameters met the conditions for identity. There was also a significant linear correlation between catheterization and Doppler measurements of absolute change in aortic valve area (r = 0.79, p less than 0.01; p less than 0.001 by F test, SEE = 0.11 cm2). Aortic valve area can be determined reliably by continuity equation in elderly patients. In addition, results of balloon valvuloplasty, measured by changes in catheterization-determined aortic valve area, are accurately reflected by changes in aortic valve area determined using the continuity equation.

Aged↗
PubMed1986

Pulsed Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of valvular regurgitation in patients with mitral valve prolapse: comparison with normal subjects.

Pulsed Doppler echocardiography was used to determine prospectively the prevalence of mitral, aortic, tricuspid and pulmonary regurgitation in 80 consecutive patients with mitral valve prolapse and 85 normal subjects with similar age and sex distribution. Mitral valve prolapse was defined by posterior systolic displacement of the mitral valve on M-mode echocardiography of 3 mm or more (40 patients), the presence of one or more mid- or late systolic clicks (61 patients), or both. Mitral regurgitation, detected by pulsed Doppler techniques in 53 patients with prolapse, was holosystolic in 24, early to mid-systolic in 6, late systolic in 15 and both holosystolic and late systolic behind different portions of the valve in 8. Definitive M-mode findings were present in only 27 of the 53 patients, and only 21 had mitral regurgitation audible on physical examination. Tricuspid regurgitation was evident by pulsed Doppler echocardiography in 15 patients (holosystolic in 9, early to mid-systolic in 1, late systolic in 4 and both holosystolic and late systolic in 1); 12 of these 15 patients, including all with an isolated late systolic pattern, had an echocardiographic pattern of tricuspid prolapse, but none had audible tricuspid regurgitation. A Doppler pattern compatible with aortic regurgitation was recorded in seven patients, all without echocardiographic aortic valve prolapse and only two with audible aortic insufficiency. A Doppler shift in the right ventricular outflow tract in diastole, suggestive of pulmonary regurgitation, was recorded in 16 of the 78 patients with an adequate Doppler examination: only 1 of the 16 had audible pulmonary insufficiency. Of the 85 normal subjects without audible regurgitation, pulsed Doppler examination detected mitral regurgitation in 3 subjects (holosystolic in 1 and early to mid-systolic in 2), aortic regurgitation in none, tricuspid regurgitation in 9 (holosystolic alone in 8 and both holosystolic and late systolic in 1) and right ventricular outflow tract turbulence compatible with pulmonary insufficiency in 15. The prevalence of valvular regurgitation, detected by pulsed Doppler echocardiography, is high in patients with mitral valve prolapse. Regurgitation may involve any of the four cardiac valves and is clinically silent in the majority of patients. The prevalence rates of mitral and aortic regurgitation are significantly higher in patients with mitral prolapse than in normal subjects, suggesting that alterations in underlying valve structure in the prolapse syndrome may indeed be responsible for this regurgitation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Adolescent↗
PubMed1985

Laser scanning phase modulation microscope.

We describe the concept and first implementation of an innovative new instrument for quantitative light microscopy. Currently, it provides selective imaging of optical path differences due to birefringence; with further development, it is also possible to selectively image several optical properties, including refractive path differences, optical rotation, and linear and circular dichroism, all with diffraction-limited resolution. An image consists of a 512 X 512 element array, with each pixel displaying one of 256 grey levels, linearly proportional to the specific optical property being observed. Additionally, conventional brightfield and polarized light microscopy are available, with the accompanying advantages of laser scanning and digital image processing. The microscope consists of three subsystems, representing three distinct technologies. The laser scanning subsystem moves a focused microspot across the specimen; the output of a photodetector is an electric signal corresponding to a scanned image. The image display subsystem digitizes this signal and displays it as an image on a video monitor. When used in conjunction with a phase modulation feedback loop, the image formed is of the specimen's birefringent retardation or other selected optical property. The digitized images are also available for computer enhancement.

Animals↗