Biomedical subjects

M F Alpendurada

Publications and source records attributed to M F Alpendurada.

10 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Optimisation and validation of a solid-phase microextraction method for simultaneous determination of different types of pesticides in water by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.

A solid-phase microextraction (SPME) method for the simultaneous determination of a large number of pesticides (46) with a wide range of polarities and chemical structures (organochlorine, organophosphorous, triazines, pyrethroids and others) in water samples by GC-MS has been developed. Three different fibres and parameters that influence the extraction and desorption efficiency were studied. The selected conditions were: a 60 microm polydimethylsiloxane/divinylbenzene (PDMS/DVB) fibre, 45 min of extraction time, sample agitation and temperature control at 60 degrees C; neither pH adjustment nor ionic strength correction were applied. Good detection limits, linearity and repeatability were obtained with this method for the 46 pesticides studied. The method was validated for 29 pesticides following the recommendations of the international norm ISO/IEC 17025 including the calculation of the uncertainties. The detection limits ranged from 4 to 17 ng l(-1). Furthermore, repeatability (6.9-20.5%) and intermediate precision (4.5-19.7%) were shown to be satisfactory. To validate matrix effects for drinking and surface water analytical recoveries were calculated for these matrices. The accuracy of the method was also evaluated by participating in a proficiency inter-laboratory test.

Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry↗

PubMed2006

Photolytic degradation of quinalphos in natural waters and on soil matrices under simulated solar irradiation.

The photochemical persistence of quinalphos, one of the most widely used organophosphorous insecticides, was investigated in a variety of environmental matrices such as natural waters and soils of different composition. Simulated solar irradiation was obtained using a xenon arc lamp (Suntest CPS+ apparatus) giving an irradiation intensity of 750 W m(-2) equivalent to a light dose per hour of irradiation of 2,700 kJ m(-2). The phototransformation rates were determined using solid-phase microextraction (SPME) and ultrasonic extraction (USE) coupled to GC-FTD, while the identification of photoproducts was carried out by GC-MS. In water samples, the degradation kinetics followed a pseudo-first-order reaction and photolysis half-lives ranged between 11.6 and 19.0 h depending on the constitution of the irradiated media. Dissolved organic matter (DOM) has a predominant retarding effect, while nitrate ions accelerated the photodegradation kinetics. In soil samples, the degradation kinetics was monitored on 1mm soil layer prepared on glass TLC plates. The kinetic behaviour of quinalphos was complex and characterized by a double step photoreaction, fast in the first 4h of irradiation followed by a slow degradation rate up to 64 h. The photolysis half-life of quinalphos was shorter in sandy soil compared to the rest of the soil samples, varying between 16.9 and 47.5 h, and showing a strong dependence on the composition of the irradiated media. Among the transformation products formed mainly through photohydrolysis and photoisomerization processes, some photoproduct structures were proposed according to their mass spectral information.

Chromatography, Gas↗

PubMed2006

Optimization of supercritical fluid extraction of pesticide residues in soil by means of central composite design and analysis by gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

An environmentally friendly methodology is proposed for the analysis of pesticides in soil samples based on supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) and analysis at high selectivity and sensitivity, by gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (GC-MS-MS). The pesticides investigated are among the most commonly used in intensive horticulture activities comprising organochlorine and organophosphorous insecticides, triazine and acetanilide herbicides, amongst others. An experimental design approach was used for modelling SFE and optimised extraction conditions were derived for the total pesticides extraction or for specific sub-groups of interest. Pesticide residues could be detected in soils in the sub-ppb range (0.1-3.7microgkg(-1)), with quite good precision (4.2-15.7%) and extraction efficiency (80.4-106.5%). The analysis of soil samples from an intensive horticulture area in Póvoa de Varzim, north of Portugal, revealed the presence of persistent pesticides, parent compounds and degradation products among the following: endosulfan, endosulfan sulfate, dieldrin, 4,4'-DDE, 4,4'-DDD, atrazine, alachlor, metolachlor, chlorpyrifos, pendimethalin and lindane. The important features to point out are the easy interpretation of chromatograms and straightforward confirmation of analytes that greatly facilitates the analyst judgement on the contamination of the sample.

Acetanilides↗

PubMed2004

Solid-phase micro-extraction-gas chromatography-(tandem) mass spectrometry as a tool for pesticide residue analysis in water samples at high sensitivity and selectivity with confirmation capabilities.

Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) has been widely applied for pesticide monitoring because of its high sensitivity and specificity and for the potential of multi-residue and multi-class analysis. An analytical procedure was developed for the determination of pesticide multi-residues in water samples combining solid-phase micro-extraction (SPME) and gas chromatography-ion trap mass spectrometry. For SPME extraction a poly(dimethylsiloxane)-divinylbenzene coated fibre was selected whereas the mass spectrometer was operated under full scan, selected ion storage (SIS), microSIS (SIM) and MS-MS and the figures of merit compared. Quantitative and qualitative (confirmatory) capabilities of each operation mode are discussed. Using MS-MS, precision was typically below 10% and limits of detection (LODs) were improved by 1.3 to 20 times (to low- or sub-ppt levels) compared to microSIS, with the advantage of maintaining identification capabilities. The combination of selective extraction by SPME and highly selective determination by GC-MS-MS made possible ultra-selective and essentially error-free determination of pesticides in complex environmental samples. This aspect will be highlighted in the paper.

Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry↗

PubMed2002

Multiresidue method for the simultaneous determination of four groups of pesticides in ground and drinking waters, using solid-phase microextraction-gas chromatography with electron-capture and thermionic specific detection.

A common sample preparation procedure capable of efficiently concentrating various groups of pesticides, taking advantage of universal detectors like the mass spectrometer or combined techniques of group selective detectors like gas chromatography-electron capture detection (ECD)/thermionic specific detection (TSD), is desirable in environmental analysis. Six solid-phase microextraction fibres available for analysis of semi-volatiles (7, 30 and 100 microm poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS), 85 microm polyacrylate, 60 microm PDMS-divinylbenzene (PDMS-DVB) and 65 microm Carbowax-DVB) were evaluated and the 60 microm PDMS-DVB was selected for the simultaneous extraction of 34 compounds, included in the organochlorine (OCPs), organophosphorous (OPPs), pyrethroid and triazine pesticide groups. All parameters affecting the extraction efficiency from water samples, namely fibre coating, sample agitation, pH and ionic strength, extraction temperature and time, were optimised. The analytical procedure involves solid-phase microextraction extraction, gas chromatographic separation and subsequent ECD and TSD via a post-column splitter adjusted to a split ratio of 1:10, respectively. Detection limits in the range of 1-10 ng l(-1) for OCPs, 1-30 ng l(-1) for OPPs, 20-30 ng l(-1) for pyrethroids and 8-50 ng l(-1) for triazines are easily attainable with the optimised procedure. The method validated for ground and drinking waters has low cost of implementation and operation although it requires careful maintenance.

Chromatography, Gas↗

PubMed2002

Comparison of three different poly(dimethylsiloxane)-divinylbenzene fibres for the analysis of pesticide multiresidues in water samples: structure and efficiency.

Despite the continuing development of SPME (solid-phase microextraction) fibre coatings, their selection presents some difficulties for analysts in choosing the appropriate fibre for a certain application. There are two distinct types of SPME coatings available commercially. The most widely used are poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) and poly(acrylate) (PA). Supelco has developed new mixed phases consisting of porous polymer particles, either poly(divinylbenzene) (DVB) or Carboxen suspended in a matrix of PDMS or Carbowax for extracting analytes via adsorption. In addition to the nature of the extracting phase, the thickness of the polymeric film must be taken into account and, surprisingly, the construction of the fibres when apparently they bear the same coating, as it is the case of the three PDMS-DVB fibres available. Other fibre structure properties not well explored were identified and must be taken into consideration. To elucidate their extraction efficiency, three PDMS-DVB fibres, namely 60 microm for HPLC use, 65 microm for GC use and 65 microm StableFlex for GC use, were compared with regard to the extraction of 36 compounds included in four pesticide groups. The first was particularly suited for the extraction of organophosphorus pesticides and triazines whereas the StableFlex exhibited advantages in the analysis of organochlorine pesticides and pyrethroids. An explanation for the extraction differences is suggested based on the different structure of the fibres. Detection limits in the range of 1-10 ng/l for organochlorine pesticides, 1-30 ng/l for organophosphorus pesticides, 8-50 ng/l for triazines and 10-20 ng/l for pyrethroids were attained in a method using the 60 microm PDMS-DVB fibre. The fibre maintains its performance at well above 100 extractions with between-day precision below 10%.

Chromatography, Gas↗

PubMed2002

Pesticide toxicity assessment using an electrochemical biosensor with Pseudomonas putida and a bioluminescence inhibition assay with Vibrio fischeri.

Two different toxicity tests, an electrochemical biosensor Cellsense and a bioluminescence inhibition assay ToxAlert were performed in order to establish and compare the acute toxicity responses of different types of raw and spiked water for a selected group of pesticides. The selected compounds were endosulfan, chlorfenvinphos, dimethoate, fenamiphos, ametryn, deltamethrin and alpha-cypermethrin; all of them are used in large quantities for agricultural purposes. In the first step, the study of the toxicity responses for each individual pesticide with Milli-Q water was carried out. Next, the toxic responses of different mixtures of these pesticides in different water matrices, i.e., Milli-Q water, surface water, groundwater and wastewater were studied in order to evaluate (i) device advantages and limitations for the toxicity evaluation of real environmental samples, (ii) antagonistic or synergistic effects and (iii) the influence of the water matrices. The survey of pesticides in real samples was carried out using a combined method involving both chemical analysis and toxicity bioassays. Chemical analysis involved the use of solid-phase micro-extraction (SPME) followed by gas chromatography with electron capture detection (GC/ECD) or thermoionic specific detection (GC/TSD) with mass spectrometric confirmation (GC/MS).

Biosensing Techniques↗

PubMed2001

Solid-phase microextraction coupled to liquid chromatography for the analysis of phenolic compounds in water.

Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) coupled to high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) has been applied to the analysis of priority pollutant phenolic compounds in water samples. Two types of polar fibers [50 microm Carbowax-templated resin (CW-TPR) and 60 microm polydimethylsiloxane-divinylbenzene (PDMS-DVB)] were evaluated. The effects of equilibration time and ionic strength of samples on the adsorption step were studied. The parameters affecting the desorption process, such as desorption mode, solvent composition and desorption time, were optimized. The developed method was used to determine the phenols in spiked river water samples collected in the Douro River, Portugal. Detection limits of 1-10 microg l(-1) were achieved under the optimized conditions.

Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid↗

PubMed2000

Solid-phase microextraction: a promising technique for sample preparation in environmental analysis.

Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) is a simple and effective adsorption and desorption technique, which eliminates the need for solvents or complicated apparatus, for concentrating volatile or nonvolatile compounds in liquid samples or headspace. SPME is compatible with analyte separation and detection by gas chromatography and high-performance liquid chromatography, and provides linear results for wide concentrations of analytes. By controlling the polarity and thickness of the coating on the fibre, maintaining consistent sampling time, and adjusting other extraction parameters, an analyst can ensure highly consistent, quantifiable results for low concentration analytes. To date, about 400 articles on SPME have been published in different fields, including environment (water, soil, air), food, natural products, pharmaceuticals, biology, toxicology, forensics and theory. As the scope of SPME grew, new improvements were made with the appearance of new coatings that allowed an increase in the specificity of this extraction technique. The key part of the SPME fibre is of course the fibre coating. At the moment, 27 variations of fibre coating and size are available. Among the newest are a fibre assembly with a dual coating of divinylbenzene and Carboxen suspended in poly(dimethylsiloxane), and a series of 23 gauge fibres intended for specific septumless injection system. The growth of SPME is also reflected in the expanding number of the accessories that make the technology even easier to use Also available is a portable field sampler which is a self-contained unit that stores the SPME fibre after sampling and during the shipment to the laboratory. Several scientific publications show the results obtained in inter-laboratory validation studies in which SPME was applied to determine the presence of different organic compounds at ppt levels, which demonstrates the reliability of this extraction technique for quantitative analysis.

Chromatography, Gas↗

PubMed1998

Solvent-free method for the determination of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons in waste water by solid-phase microextraction-high-performance liquid chromatography with photodiode-array detection.

Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) has rapidly been established among the practical alternatives for sample preparation for gas chromatography. Nevertheless polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are more effectively monitored by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), but initially, there was no simple way to introduce analytes extracted by SPME into an HPLC system. A SPME-HPLC interface was developed by Supelco, which enables one to take advantages of the time and solvent savings offered by SPME. In the present work six PAHs from the European Union directives: fluoranthene, benzo[b]fluoranthene, benzo[k]fluoranthene benzo[a]pyrene, benzo[ghi]perylene, indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene were evaluated after optimization of a sample preparation method with a 100-micron poly(dimethylsiloxane) fiber. Repeatability, reproducibility, correlation coefficients, linearity, recoveries and limits of detection where determined and are indicated.

Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid↗