Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M E Thase

Publications and source records attributed to M E Thase.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2001

Efficacy of mirtazapine for prevention of depressive relapse: a placebo-controlled double-blind trial of recently remitted high-risk patients.

BACKGROUND: The necessity of antidepressant continuation-phase therapy following acute-phase response has resulted in the need to characterize the longer-term efficacy and safety of all new medications. Previous studies using "extension" protocols suggest that mirtazapine has sustained antidepressant effects. The current study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of up to 1 year of mirtazapine therapy, using a more rigorous, randomized, placebo-controlled discontinuation design. METHOD: An intent-to-treat sample of 410 patients meeting DSM-IV criteria for moderate-to-severe recurrent or chronic major depressive episodes began 8 to 12 weeks of open-label therapy with mirtazapine (flexibly titrated, 15-45 mg/day). Thereafter, 156 fully remitted patients (according to Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression and Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement scores) were randomly assigned to receive 40 weeks of double-blind continuation-phase therapy with either mirtazapine or placebo. RESULTS: Mirtazapine therapy reduced the rate of depressive relapse by more than half, with 43.8% of patients relapsing on treatment with placebo as compared with 19.7% of the mirtazapine-treated patients. The discontinuation rate due to adverse events was 11.8% for active mirtazapine therapy versus 2.5% for placebo. Although weight gain was significantly greater in the group receiving active medication during the double-blind phase (p = .001), patients taking mirtazapine gained only 1.4 kg (3.1 lb) across the 40 weeks of continuation therapy, and there was no difference in the rates of weight gain as a newonset adverse event. CONCLUSION: Continuation-phase therapy with mirtazapine is effective and well tolerated.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Response and remission rates in different subpopulations with major depressive disorder administered venlafaxine, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, or placebo.

BACKGROUND: Most examinations of the clinical efficacy of drugs used to treat depression pool subjects across gender and age groups. This investigation compared these patient subpopulations on the basis of remission and response rates associated with venlafaxine and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) treatment. METHOD: A meta-analysis of original data from 8 comparable double-blind, active-controlled, randomized clinical trials (4 also placebo-controlled) was conducted. Antidepressant efficacy was assessed for patients (N = 2,045) aged 18 to 83 years (subgroups: < or = 40, 41-54, 55-64, and > or = 65 years) who met DSM-III-R criteria for major depression or DSM-IV criteria for major depressive disorder and were randomly assigned to receive venlafaxine (immediate release, N = 474; extended release, N = 377), one of several SSRIs (N = 748), or placebo (N = 446) for up to 8 weeks. Symptoms of depression were assessed using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D). Remission was defined as a HAM-D-17 score < or = 7, response was defined as > or = 50% decrease in HAM-D-21 score, and absence of depressed mood was defined as a HAM-D depressed mood item score of 0. RESULTS: We detected no significant age-by-treatment, gender-by-treatment, or age-by-gender-by-treatment interactions; men and women of different ages within a given antidepressant treatment group exhibited similar rates of remission, response, and absence of depressed mood. Regardless of age or gender, remission rates during venlafaxine therapy were significantly higher than during SSRI therapy (remission rates at week 8: venlafaxine, 40%-55% vs. SSRI, 31%-37%; p < .05). Regardless of patient age or gender, onset of remission was more rapid with venlafaxine than with SSRI treatment. By contrast, rates of absence of depressed mood with venlafaxine (34%-42%) and SSRIs (31%-37%) did not differ significantly and tended to be similar for all patient subgroups. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that men and women have comparable responses to SSRIs and venlafaxine across various age groups. Moreover, patients exhibited a more rapid onset and a greater likelihood of remission with venlafaxine therapy than with SSRI therapy regardless of age or gender.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Methodology to measure onset of action.

Onset of action has become one of the most topical issues in antidepressant therapy. In general, the speed of onset of action of antidepressants is regarded as too slow. Most patients who benefit from treatment require 2 or more weeks of therapy to show signs of response. Since the onset of therapeutic efficacy is of current interest to physicians and health authorities, the question arises of how to measure the onset of therapeutic efficacy. There are many different proposals for the statistical analysis of data to determine early onset of action. One of the most important considerations in analyzing early onset of action is the definition of criteria. Conventional approaches, such as the De Paula and Omer approach and the Huitfeldt and Montgomery approach, can provide useful information, although they do not take into account whether the early response is sustained. The use of pattern analyses does overcome the problem, but the generalizability of their findings is somewhat limited by their use of stringent exclusion criteria. Survival analyses can provide a more sensitive measure of early changes. Moreover, this method can easily be adapted to take into account sustained response and be used to restrict attention only to those subjects who achieve onset. In this article, the above-mentioned approaches will be explained with the help of some clinical examples to achieve a further understanding of the methodology of measuring onset of action.

Antidepressive Agents↗
PubMed2001

The clinical, psychosocial, and pharmacoeconomic ramifications of remission.

At an estimated cost of almost $50 billion a year, the socioeconomic burden of major depressive disorder is enormous. Although remission has been identified as the key goal of treatment, such treatment must be highly acceptable to patients, predictably effective, and carry minimal adverse effects. The cornerstone of depression management, remission can improve clinical status, functional ability, and quality of life for the patient while lowering utilization costs related to the disease and its comorbidities. Initially, the goals of therapy are to: (1) reduce and ultimately remove all signs and symptoms of the depressive syndrome; (2) restore occupational and psychosocial function to the asymptomatic state; and (3) achieve and maintain remission. Most patients can achieve these goals with the help of antidepressant medications, problem-focused psychotherapy, or a combination of the 2 methods. Following an initial assessment of the patient, treatment of depression has 3 phases: acute, continuation, and maintenance. Although adherence to treatment is crucial to successful treatment of depression, only about 25% to 35% of patients will achieve remission after 6 to 8 weeks of treatment; another 15% to 20% may remain depressed for months or years. Patients who achieve remission are much less likely to relapse than those who do not. Much debate has focused on the relative merits of prescribing selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors or venlafaxine. Results of a pooled analysis of 8 such comparative studies are presented.

Antidepressive Agents↗
PubMed2001

Management of treatment-resistant depression: psychotherapeutic perspectives.

Treatment-resistant depression is a heterogeneous condition that occurs within a psychosocial milieu. The impact of prior pharmacologic interventions may have been adversely affected by a poor therapeutic alliance, low social support, life stress, or chronic adversity and cognitive or personality factors such as neuroticism or pessimism. This article considers the psychosocial factors that predispose to treatment-resistant depression and the psychotherapeutic principles thought to be helpful in both shorter- and longer-term treatment plans. We focus on the interpersonal, cognitive, and behavioral forms of treatment that constitute the depression-focused psychotherapies, which have been studied in major depressive disorder. Also discussed are modifications in treatment planning necessary to take into account the complexity of treatment-resistant depression.

Antidepressive Agents↗
PubMed2001

Comorbid alcoholism and depression: treatment issues.

Unless there is decisive professional intervention, people who suffer from both a depressive disorder and alcoholism are at great risk of chronic impairment, both at home and in the workplace; persistent symptomatic misery; and premature death. Untreated alcoholism intensifies depressive states, decreases responsiveness to conventional therapeutics, and increases the likelihood of suicide, suicide attempts, and other self-destructive behavior. During the past decade, evidence has emerged from placebo-controlled studies supporting the utility of tricyclic antidepressants and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) for treatment of depressed alcoholics. The superior safety and tolerability of SSRIs provide strong justification for their first-line use despite higher drug acquisition costs. Evidence has similarly emerged concerning the use of several novel pharmacotherapies and focused psychotherapies for people with alcoholism. These newer therapeutic options complement more traditional intervention such as chemical dependence counseling, disulfiram, and Alcoholics Anonymous so that it is now possible for a majority of depressed alcoholics to be treated effectively. The availability of effective treatments provides further impetus for health care professionals to improve recognition of comorbid alcoholism and depressive disorders. Improved recognition and treatment will save lives, and the benefits are likely to extend across generations.

Alcohol Deterrents↗
PubMed2001

Risperidone: review of its therapeutic utility in depression.

There is extensive evidence to implicate dysregulation of noradrenergic, serotonergic, and dopaminergic neurotransmission in the pathophysiology of mood disorders. The receptor profile for risperidone, an atypical antipsychotic with demonstrated efficacy in schizophrenia, is consistent with possible antidepressant activity. Specifically, risperidone is a potent antagonist of central 5-HT2A receptors, addressing symptoms such as insomnia, agitation, and weight loss and may indirectly enhance 5-HT1A-mediated neurotransmission. A search of the worldwide medical literature published through December 2000 revealed 24 publications pertinent to the clinical use of risperidone in the treatment of patients with depressive symptomatology. In schizophrenia, in which depression is a common comorbid condition, the results of eight randomized, blinded, and controlled trials consistently demonstrated that treatment with risperidone significantly reduced scores on various measures of depressive symptoms. Moreover, these effects were distinct from improvements in negative and positive symptoms. Antidepressant effects also were observed in two large meta-analyses of trials in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Observations from uncontrolled studies and case reports of risperidone therapy of other psychiatric disorders were similarly suggestive of antidepressant activity. Collectively, the evidence we present in this review indicates that risperidone's therapeutic benefits in psychiatric medicine extend beyond potent and effective antipsychotic activity and may include effectiveness in treating depression and related affective disorders. Systematic studies are now needed to evaluate the utility of concomitant therapy with an atypical antipsychotic in psychotic, bipolar, and treatment-resistant depressive syndromes.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Bipolar depression: pharmacotherapy and related therapeutic strategies.

The depressed phase of bipolar affective disorder is a significant cause of suffering, disability, and mortality and represents a major challenge to treating clinicians. This article first briefly reviews the phenomenology and clinical correlates of bipolar depression and then focuses on the major pharmacological treatment options. We strongly recommend use of mood stabilizers as the first-line treatment for the type I form of bipolar depression, largely because longer-term preventative therapy with these agents almost certainly will be indicated. Depressive episodes that do not respond to lithium, divalproex, or another mood stabilizer, or episodes that "breakthrough" despite preventive treatment, often warrant treatment with an antidepressant or electroconvulsive therapy. The necessity of mood stabilizers in the type II form of bipolar depression is less certain, aside from the rapid cycling presentation. Both experts and practicing clinicians recommend bupropion and the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors as coequal initial choices, with venlafaxine and monoamine oxidase inhibitors, such as tranylcypromine, preferred for more resistant cases. The risk of antidepressant-induced hypomania or mania with concomitant mood stabilizer therapy is low, on the order of 5% to 10% during acute phase therapy. Additional therapeutic options and optimal durations of therapy also are discussed.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2000

Bipolar disorder therapeutics: maintenance treatment.

Although most of the care received by bipolar patients occurs during the maintenance phase, relatively little empirical data is available to guide long-term treatment decisions. We review literature pertaining to key questions related to use of pharmacotherapy in the maintenance phase of bipolar disorder. The few double-blind trials with a reasonable sample size are restricted to bipolar I patients and address a modest range of questions mostly related to use of lithium. One rigorous multicenter trial found valproate to have prophylactic benefit. Other studies with valproate alone and in combination suggest efficacy equivalent to lithium and perhaps greater than carbamazepine. Data available for combination treatment are sparse but moderately encouraging. Maintenance treatment with standard antidepressant medications appears destabilizing for some bipolar patients, particularly following a mixed episode. Although some bipolar patients may benefit from combined treatment with a mood stabilizer and a standard antidepressant medication, current knowledge does not allow confident selection of the bipolar patients who might benefit. Clozapine and perhaps other atypical antipsychotics are promising options for maintenance treatment but have not been evaluated in double-blind trials. The numerous other agents used in maintenance treatment are primarily adjuncts to lithium, valproate, or carbamazepine, and information about them is largely anecdotal and uncontrolled. Study design for maintenance trials remains an imperfect art. Conclusions must be drawn cautiously, given the limited generalizability of study designs that accession samples enriched with presumed treatment responders, randomize patients after brief periods of partial remission, abruptly taper prior treatment, make no attempt to distinguish relapse from recurrence, use no formal outcome assessments, or report hospitalization as the only outcome criterion.

Antidepressive Agents↗
PubMed2000

A comparison of nefazodone, the cognitive behavioral-analysis system of psychotherapy, and their combination for the treatment of chronic depression.

BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic forms of major depression are difficult to treat, and the relative efficacy of medications and psychotherapy is uncertain. METHODS: We randomly assigned 681 adults with a chronic nonpsychotic major depressive disorder to 12 weeks of outpatient treatment with nefazodone (maximal dose, 600 mg per day), the cognitive behavioral-analysis system of psychotherapy (16 to 20 sessions), or both. At base line, all patients had scores of at least 20 on the 24-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (indicating clinically significant depression). Remission was defined as a score of 8 or less at weeks 10 and 12. For patients who did not have remission, a satisfactory response was defined as a reduction in the score by at least 50 percent from base line and a score of 15 or less. Raters were unaware of the patients' treatment assignments. RESULTS: Of the 681 patients, 662 attended at least one treatment session and were included in the analysis of response. The overall rate of response (both remission and satisfactory response) was 48 percent in both the nefazodone group and in the psychotherapy group, as compared with 73 percent in the combined-treatment group. (P<0.001 for both comparisons). Among the 519 subjects who completed the study, the rates of response were 55 percent in the nefazodone group and 52 percent in the psychotherapy group, as compared with 85 percent in the combined-treatment group (P<0.001 for both comparisons). The rates of withdrawal were similar in the three groups. Adverse events in the nefazodone group were consistent with the known side effects of the drug (e.g., headache, somnolence, dry mouth, nausea, and dizziness). CONCLUSIONS: Although about half of patients with chronic forms of major depression have a response to short-term treatment with either nefazodone or a cognitive behavioral-analysis system of psychotherapy, the combination of the two is significantly more efficacious than either treatment alone.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Venlafaxine and treatment-resistant depression.

Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) is an important clinical problem. This paper briefly reviews the definition of TRD and summarizes methodological issues that pertain to treatment research. Recent studies of venlafaxine treatment for TRD also are reviewed. It is concluded that venlafaxine at higher doses is a reasonably well-tolerated and an effective alternative for patients with TRD and typically should be used before tricyclic antidepressants or monoamine oxidase inhibitors. Further research is needed to confirm the prediction that switching a SSRI nonresponder to venlafaxine is a more effective strategy than switching to a second SSRI. The relative merits of switching from a SSRI to venlafaxine versus adding a norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor also warrant careful study.

Cyclohexanols↗
PubMed2000

Gender differences in chronic major and double depression.

BACKGROUND: While the sex difference in prevalence rates of unipolar depression is well established, few studies have examined gender differences in clinical features of depression. Even less is known about gender differences in chronic forms of depression. METHODS: 235 male and 400 female outpatients with DSM-III-R chronic major depression or double depression (i.e., major depression superimposed on dysthymia) were administered an extensive battery of clinician-rated and self-report measures. RESULTS: Women were less likely to be married and had a younger age at onset and greater family history of affective disorder compared to men. Symptom profile was similar in men and women, with the exception of more sleep changes, psychomotor retardation and anxiety/somatization in women. Women reported greater severity of illness and were more likely to have received previous treatment for depression with medications and/or psychotherapy. Greater functional impairment was noted by women in the area of marital adjustment, while men showed more work impairment. LIMITATIONS: Since our population consisted of patients enrolling in a clinical trial, study exclusion criteria may have affected gender-related differences found. CONCLUSIONS: Chronicity of depression appears to affect women more seriously than men, as manifested by an earlier age of onset, greater family history of affective disorders, greater symptom reporting, poorer social adjustment and poorer quality of life. These findings represent the largest study to date of gender differences in a population with chronic depressive conditions.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Response to placebo among bipolar I disorder patients experiencing their first manic episode.

BACKGROUND: The first episode of an illness may respond differently to any treatment compared to multiple episodes of the same illness. This study details the treatment response of six first-episode manic patients who participated in a previously reported study of 139 subjects comparing olanzapine to placebo in bipolar I mania (Tohen M, Sanger TM, McElroy SL, Tollefson GD, Chengappa KNR, Daniel DG. Olanzapine versus placebo in the treatment of acute mania. Am J Psychiatry 1999; 156: 702-709). METHODS: Six first-episode subjects participated in a 3-week double-blind, random assignment, parallel group, placebo-controlled study of olanzapine for bipolar mania. The Young Mania Rating Scale (Y-MRS), Clinical Global Impression, and Hamilton Depression ratings were administered weekly. Lorazepam as rescue medication was permitted for the first 10 days. RESULTS: Five subjects were randomized to placebo and one to olanzapine. Two subjects (40%) with psychotic mania (who also had their first-illness episode) were assigned to placebo and responded with greater than 50% reduction in the Y-MRS score and also remitted in 3 weeks. Another placebo-assigned subject had a 46% reduction in the Y-MRS scores, and two placebo-assigned subjects worsened. The olanzapine-assigned subject had a 44% reduction in the Y-MRS score. In contrast, 34 of 69 (48.6%) multiple-episode olanzapine subjects responded and 14 of 61 (23.0%) of placebo-treated subjects did. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary data set suggest there may be differences in treatment response between first-illness episode versus multi-episode bipolar manic subjects. Larger numbers of subjects with these illness characteristics are needed to either confirm or refute this suggestion.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2000

Impact of substance abuse on the course and treatment of bipolar disorder.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this article are to review the prevalence, natural history, pathophysiology, and treatment of comorbid bipolar disorder with alcoholism and other psychoactive substance use disorders (PSUDs). METHODS: All identified bibliographies through a literature search of all Medline files and bibliographies of selected articles focusing on the prevalence, natural history, course, prognosis, inter-relationship, and treatment of bipolar disorder with comorbid alcoholism and other PSUDs were reviewed. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Comorbidity of bipolar disorder and alcoholism and other PSUDs is highly prevalent. The presence of this so called 'dual diagnoses' creates a serious challenge in terms of establishing an accurate diagnosis and providing appropriate treatment interventions. The inter-relationship between these disorders appears to be mutually detrimental. The course, manifestation, and treatment of each condition are significantly compounded by the presence of the other condition. Substance abuse and alcoholism appear to significantly complicate the course and prognosis of bipolar disorder resulting in increased suffering, disability, and costs. On the other hand, bipolar disorder may be a risk factor for developing PSUDs. Although, there are a number of hypotheses explaining the pathophysiological mechanism involved in such comorbidities, our understanding of the exact nature of such neurobiological mechanisms is still limited. While the antikindling agents and targeted psychotherapeutic techniques may be useful intervention strategies, there is still a significant lack of empirically based treatment options for these patients.

Alcoholism↗
PubMed2000

Lost human capital from early-onset chronic depression.

OBJECTIVE: Chronic depression starts at an early age for many individuals and could affect their accumulation of "human capital" (i.e., education, higher amounts of which can broaden occupational choice and increase earnings potential). The authors examined the impact, by gender, of early- (before age 22) versus late-onset major depressive disorder on educational attainment. They also determined whether the efficacy and sustainability of antidepressant treatments and psychosocial outcomes vary by age at onset and quantified the impact of early- versus late-onset, as well as never-occurring, major depressive disorder on expected lifetime earnings. METHOD: The authors used logistic and multivariate regression methods to analyze data from a three-phase, multicenter, double-blind, randomized trial that compared sertraline and imipramine treatment of 531 patients with chronic depression aged 30 years and older. These data were integrated with U.S. Census Bureau data on 1995 earnings by age, educational attainment, and gender. RESULTS: Early-onset major depressive disorder adversely affected the educational attainment of women but not of men. No significant difference in treatment responsiveness by age at onset was observed after 12 weeks of acute treatment or, for subjects rated as having responded, after 76 weeks of maintenance treatment. A randomly selected 21-year-old woman with early-onset major depressive disorder in 1995 could expect future annual earnings that were 12%-18% lower than those of a randomly selected 21-year-old woman whose onset of major depressive disorder occurred after age 21 or not at all. CONCLUSIONS: Early-onset major depressive disorder causes substantial human capital loss, particularly for women. Detection and effective treatment of early-onset major depressive disorder may have substantial economic benefits.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Gender differences in treatment response to sertraline versus imipramine in chronic depression.

OBJECTIVE: The authors examined gender differences in treatment response to sertraline, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), and to imipramine, a tricyclic antidepressant, in chronic depression. METHOD: A total of 235 male and 400 female outpatients with DSM-III-R chronic major depression or double depression (i.e., major depression superimposed on dysthymia) were randomly assigned to 12 weeks of double-blind treatment with sertraline or with imipramine after placebo washout. RESULTS: Women were significantly more likely to show a favorable response to sertraline than to imipramine, and men were significantly more likely to show a favorable response to imipramine than to sertraline. Gender and type of medication were also significantly related to dropout rates; women who were taking imipramine and men who were taking sertraline were more likely to withdraw from the study. Gender differences in time to response were seen with imipramine, with women responding significantly more slowly than men. Comparison of treatment response rates by menopausal status showed that premenopausal women responded significantly better to sertraline than to imipramine and that postmenopausal women had similar rates of response to the two medications. CONCLUSIONS: Men and women with chronic depression show differential responsivity to and tolerability of SSRIs and tricyclic antidepressants. The differing response rates between the drug classes in women was observed primarily in premenopausal women. Thus, female sex hormones may enhance response to SSRIs or inhibit response to tricyclics. Both gender and menopausal status should be considered when choosing an appropriate antidepressant for a depressed patient.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Bupropion SR reduces periodic limb movements associated with arousals from sleep in depressed patients with periodic limb movement disorder.

BACKGROUND: Antidepressant-induced periodic limb movement disorder (PLMD) may limit the tolerability of some antidepressant medications and interfere with treatment response. Given the role of dopamine in PLMD and the effects of bupropion sustained-release (SR) on central dopaminergic function, we hypothesized that bupropion SR would not be associated with antidepressant-induced PLMD. METHOD: In an expanded case-series design, we compared the effects of bupropion SR, after about 10 weeks of treatment, on measures of PLMD, depression, and sleep in 5 depressed (Research Diagnostic Criteria) patients who also met criteria for having pretreatment PLMD. Depression was measured using the Beck Depression Inventory and the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. Patients were considered to have PLMD if polysomnographic recordings showed > 5 periodic limb movements/hour of sleep that were associated with arousals from sleep. RESULTS: Bupropion SR treatment was associated with a reduction in measures of PLMD and an improvement in depression. CONCLUSION: These results show that bupropion SR is not associated with antidepressant-induced PLMD. Rather, bupropion SR treatment reduces objective measures of PLMD in depressed patients with the disorder.

Adult↗