Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M E Bitterman

Publications and source records attributed to M E Bitterman.

49 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Puromycin and retention in the goldfish.

A first experiment compared the behavior of goldfish injected with puromycin immediately after each of a weekly series of brief discriminative training sessions in the shuttlebox to that of appropriate controls. Discrimination was not prevented, nor was escape from shock impaired, but probability of response to the conditioned stimuli, both positive and negative, was reduced substantially. These results suggest that puromycin interferes with the consolidation of conditioned fear. The null outcome of a second experiment, in which all training was given in a single long session instead of a series of short sessions, suggests (contrary to recent indications) that consolidation begins in the training session. The conditioned-fear hypothesis is supported by the results of a third experiment in which the animals were shocked upon entering a goalbox to which they had previously learned to swim for food; animals injected with puromycin, immediately after the shock, entered the goalbox more readily 1 week later than did appropriate controls.

Animals↗

Reversal learning and forgetting in bird and fish.

Pigeons and goldfish were trained in red-green discrimination in daily sessions, with the rewarded color changed every 2 days. Improvement in the performance of the pigeons could be traced to decrements in retention from each day to the next. The goldfish showed no improvement and no decrements in retention. The results suggest that progressive improvement in habit reversal is a product of proactive interference, and that the absence of improvement in the fish is due, not to the lack of some higher-order process which operates to produce improvement in higher vertebrates, but to a difference in learning-retention mechanisms.

Animals↗

Reward and learning in the goldfish.

An experiment with goldfish showed the effects of change in amount of reward that are predicted from reinforcement theory. The performance of animals shifted from small to large reward improved gradually to the level of unshifted large-reward controls, while the performance of animals shifted from large to small reward remained at the large-reward level. The difference between these results and those obtained in analogous experiments with the rat suggests that reward functions differently in the instrumental learning of the two animals.

Animals↗