Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M Doody

Publications and source records attributed to M Doody.

13 recordsLinked to original sources

Mortality among radiologic technologists in the united states (1926-1997). 2(nd) Follow up.

PURPOSE: To evaluate risk for all-cause and cause-specific mortality in a large, primarily female (73%) cohort of radiologic technologists.METHODS: The study consists of 145,915 radiation technologists, certified in the American Registry of Radiologic Technologists (1926-1982) and followed through 1997. Causes of death were obtained from death certificates or, more recently, through NDI Plus. Standardized Mortality Ratios (SMR) were computed and tests of homogeneity were performed to detect differences in mortality among causes. Poisson models were used to estimate risks using an internal comparison group.RESULTS: Significantly low SMRs were observed for all causes (0.76), all cancers (0.82), and diseases of circulatory system (0.69). Compared to U.S. women, the risk for breast cancer mortality bordered around unity (SMR 1.01, 95% CI 0.94-1.09). However, relative to all other cancers, breast cancer mortality was significantly increased (RSMR 1.24, p < 0.01). Elevated risk for breast cancer was associated with certification before 1940 (SMR 1.55, 95% CI 1.24-1.91), and duration of certification of 20-29 (SMR 1.21, 95% CI 1.06-1.37) and 30+ years (SMR 1.77, 95% CI 1.54-2.02). A 35% increase in leukemia risk was evident for women certified for a duration of 20-29 years and a 36% increase among women certified for 30+ years. Poisson analysis revealed a significant increase in breast cancer risk with increasing number of years certified among women first certified before 1940 (p < 0.001) and during 1940-49 (p = 0.05) compared to women first certified in 1950 or later.CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary findings of this study suggest increased breast cancer risk associated with occupational radiation exposures prior to 1950 and with long-term cumulative exposures. However, potential confounding by reproductive and other risk factors needs to be evaluated.

Journal Article↗

Trends in reproductive, smoking, and other chronic disease risk factors by birth cohort in a large occupational study.

PURPOSE: To illustrate the value of using large cohort studies to identify birth cohort trends in several chronic disease risk factors.METHODS: In collaboration with the American Registry of Radiologic Technologists (ARRT) and the University of Minnesota, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) initiated a cohort study of radiologic technologists who were certified by ARRT for at least two years between 1926 and 1982. Over 90,000 technologists (nearly four-fifths female) from all 50 states responded to a mailed questionnaire on reproductive, medical, work, and lifestyle factors. Ten, mostly five-year, birth cohorts, from before 1920 through 1960 and later, were evaluated.RESULTS: In this population, the mean height of both men and women generally rose in each subsequent birth cohort. The proportion of men who smoked before age 18 fell among those born since the late 1920s. In contrast, the proportion of women smoking before age 18 rose among those born since the early 1950s, reaching 14.2% among those born in 1960 and later. The mean age at menarche fell, until leveling off at 12.5, among those born after 1940. Recent birth cohorts (since 1950) show among the highest mean ages at birth of first child (>26 yeras), highest rates of nulliparity at age 25 (>/=63%), and lowest mean parity levels (</=1.7), compared with earlier birth cohorts. The proportion of women ever using oral contraceptives rose steadily by birth cohort, reaching 86 percent in the most recent birth cohort.CONCLUSIONS: Some of the trends observed may help explain historic chronic disease incidence patterns and predict future disease burdens.

Journal Article↗

An explosive issue.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Capital Expenditures↗

Working with an executive search firm: Part I--The candidate's perspective.

This article is the first in a two-part series on how to work with executive search firms. Part one describes how the physician executive can build an effective relationship with an executive search firm as a candidate or potential candidate. Part two will cover how the physician executive can work with an executive search firm--either as a client or as a member of an executive search committee--to attract high-quality management talent.

Career Mobility↗

Working with an executive search firm: Part II--The hiring organization's perspective.

This article is the second part in a two-part series on how to work with an executive search firm. The first article, which appeared in the September-October 1992 issue of Physician Executive, focused on executive search from the candidate's perspective. This article focuses on how organizations can work with an executive search firm to recruit and retain top management talent.

Consultants↗