Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M Dettenkofer

Publications and source records attributed to M Dettenkofer.

34 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2002

Effect of skin disinfection with octenidine dihydrochloride on insertion site colonization of intravascular catheters.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the efficacy of two commercially available, alcohol-based antiseptic solutions in decontaminating the insertion site of central lines. One solution contained the bispyridine octenidine dihydrochloride. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Inpatients receiving either a central venous catheter (CVC) or a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) were alternately assigned to different skin disinfection regimens at the insertion site: (A) 0.1% octendine dihydrochloride with 30% 1-propanol and 45% 2-propanol, (B) 74% ethanol with 10% 2-propanol. Quantitative skin cultures were obtained from the insertion site at predetermined intervals. RESULTS: A total of 60 patients received 12 CVCs and 47 PICCs (no significant difference with respect to gender, age and catheter type). In total, 90 cultures were assessed in each group. The median colony-forming unit (cfu) counts per 24 cm(2) (group A vs B) were 2,270 vs 2,950 before, 20 vs 40 following and 860 vs 1,210 24 h after catheter insertion, respectively. A statistically significant difference in the efficacy of skin decontamination was seen between groups in culture set (3) and in the difference between culture sets (2) and (3) (Wilcoxon rank sum test). CONCLUSION: Octenidine/propanol appears to be more effective than alcohol (ethanol/propanol) alone in reducing microflora of the skin at the PICC/CVC insertion site over a 24-h period.

1-Propanol↗
PubMed2001

Surveillance of nosocomial infections in a neurology intensive care unit.

To identify overall and site-specific nosocomial infection (NI) rates in patients receiving neurological intensive care therapy, a prospective study was started in 1997 in the ten-bed neurological intensive-care unit (NICU) of the University Hospital of Freiburg, Germany. Case records and microbiology reports were reviewed twice a week, and ward staff were consulted. NI were defined according to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) criteria and were categorised by specific infection site. Within 30 months, 505 patients with a total of 4,873 patient days were studied (mean length of stay: 9.6 days). 122 NI were identified in 96 patients (74 patients with one, 18 with two and 4 with three infections. An incidence of 24.2/100 patients and incidence density of 25.0/1,000 patient days of NI in the neurological ICU were documented. Site-specific incidence rates and incidence densities were: 1.4 bloodstream infections per 100 patients (1.9 central line-associated BSIs per 1,000 central line-days), 11.7 pneumonias per 100 patients (20.4 ventilator-associated pneumonias per 1,000 ventilator-days), 8.7 urinary tract infections per 100 patients (10.0 urinary catheter-associated urinary track infections (UTIs) per 1,000 urinary catheter-days). Additionally, 0.4 cases of meningitis, 0.8 ventriculitis, and 1.2 other infections (catheter-related local infection, diarrhea) were documented per 1,000 patient days. 15% of nosocomial pathogens were A. baumannii (due to a outbreak of an nosocomial pneumonia with A. baumannii), 13% S. aureus, 10% E. coli, 7% CNS,7% Bacteroides spp., 7% Enterobacter spp., 6,5% Klebsiella spp.,5.9% enterococci, 5.9% streptococci, and 4.7% Pseudomonas spp. In eight cases of NI no pathogen could be isolated. In future, data on NI in NICUs should be assessed in greater detail, both to improve the quality of care and serve as a basis for identification and implementation of the most effective measures by which to prevent these infections in patients receiving intensive neurological care.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

[Current challenges on hospital hygiene].

Although microorganisms are the main cause of nosocomial infections, they are by no means their only determinants. Patient-associated factors play a major role (especially immune status), the therapeutic conditions (personnel behaviour, 'devices') and the patient's environment. The hospital infection control team is responsible for implementing and operating an efficient and cost-effective infection control and prevention system. Scientific data must be evaluated and every effort made to continuously improve recommendations. In order to implement an efficient and cost-effective infection control and prevention system, the infection control team must formulate sound, evidence-based recommendations and question established 'rituals'. Inappropriate measures, e. g. the routine disinfection of floors in wards and hallways place a burden on staff, patients and the environment, and distract staff from other critical measures such as proper hand hygiene. Nosocomial pneumonia, urinary tract infections, surgical wound infections and catheter-associated sepsis are the commonest hospital-acquired infections, and Intensive Care Units have become the foci of antibiotic resistance. Although the antimicrobial resistance situation is better in Germany than in other countries, e. g. Eastern and Southern European countries and the USA, substantial regional differences exist. The increase in methicillin (oxacillin) resistant S. aureus (MRSA) is particularly worrying. Building up an effective surveillance system for nosocomial infections, as demanded by the new German infection control act has far-reaching implications and entails recording risk-adjusted infection rates (KISS project = Hospital Infection Surveillance System of the National Reference Center for Hospital Hygiene in cooperation with the Robert Koch-institute). Proper collaboration between hospital staff in implementing infection control measures, and especially hand hygiene is of paramount importance.

Communicable Disease Control↗
PubMed2000

ENVIRONMENTAL AUDITING: Environmental Auditing in Hospitals: First Results in a University Hospital.

/ While medical audit in infection control today is one important element in the quality assurance of health care, environmental auditing, approved in 1993 by the Council of the European Communities for the industrial sector, so far has not been used as a tool to control and reduce environmental pollution caused by medical care. The aim of this study was to investigate whether environmental auditing according to the European Eco-Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS) can be implemented in hospitals as a process of improvement in protection of the environment. In a prior publication the methodological issues and the organizational steps that had to be taken were described. An environmental review of the activities of the Freiburg University Hospital and an ecoanalysis of the input and output were performed. The results of this analysis, published in an environmental report, provide a fundamental data set for the consumption of energy, water, materials, and the burdens of major pollutants and waste. Regarding the organizational structure of the hospital, the first steps towards an integrating environmental management system as demanded by EMAS could be taken. Beside supporting advantages, e.g., improvement of environmental safety, public image and staff contentment, and potential economic benefits such as less cost to be paid for energy and water consumption, there are important restrictions of environmental auditing in hospitals. Examples are the lack of basic environmental data, staff motivation (especially of physicians), cooperation of the organizational substructures, and funds for prefinancing urgently needed improvements in ecology. Based on the study findings, a textbook on environmental auditing in hospitals, including checklists covering all important environmental objectives, has been published to support hospitals in their efforts to achieve an optimized and sustainable practice of providing health care.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1999

[Life-cycle assessment of single-use versus reusable surgical drapes (cellulose/polyethylene-mixed cotton system)].

Surgical drapes made of cotton are under increasing competition with various disposable products and reusable draping systems (e.g., made of synthetic fabrics like polyester). When making a choice to use one of these medical devices in practical surgery, major aspects like handling, hygienic safety and costs, but also environmental effects have to be taken into account. In this study a mixed system for patient drapes (reusable cotton drapes combined with a reduced set of impermeable single-use drapes made of cellulose/polyethylene) was compared to a system that is only based on single-use drapes with regard to ecology [life-cycle assessment (LCA)]. The medical literature was reviewed to assess important medical aspects of the use of patient drapes, resulting in the statement that there are no conclusive arguments to support a clear hygienic superiority of one of these alternatives. Based on the conditions assumed and stated, the results of the LCA indicate that the mixed draping system is associated with two times more total energy consumption. In addition, more water is needed and more CO2 emissions are produced. However, draping with the single-use product results in more clinical waste. Regarding water pollution no system proved superior. It is difficult to compare and weigh various environmental aspects like the polluting cultivation of cotton in distant countries (reusable drapes) and the higher figure of transportation necessary to deliver the single-use product within Germany. It is an important disadvantage of the mixed system that it combines the ecological burden of both cotton drapes and the single-use alternative.

Cellulose↗
PubMed1999

Nosocomial infections in a neurosurgery intensive care unit.

In order to identify overall and site-specific nosocomial infection (NI) rates in patients receiving neurosurgical intensive care therapy, a prospective study was started in February 1997 in the eight-bed neurosurgical ICU of the University Hospital of Freiburg, Germany. Case records were reviewed twice a week, all microbiology reports were reviewed and ward staff was consulted. NI were defined according to the CDC-criteria and were categorised into specific infection sites. Within 20 months, 545 patients with a total of 5,117 patient days were investigated (mean length of stay: 9.4 days). 113 NI were identified in 90 patients (72 pts. with one, 13 with two and 5 with three infections, respectively). A moderate to high overall incidence (20.7/100 pts.) and a moderate incidence density (22.1/1,000 patient days) of NI in the neurosurgical ICU could be documented; these figures are well within the range of published data. Site specific incidence rates and incidence densities were: 1 bloodstream infection per 100 patients (0.9 central line-associated BSIs per 1,000 central line-days), 9 pneumonias per 100 patients (15.1 ventilator-associated pneumonias per 1,000 ventilator-days), 7.3 urinary tract infections per 100 patients (8.5 urinary catheter-associated UTIs per 1,000 urinary catheter-days). Additionally, 1.1 cases of meningitis, 0.7 brain abscesses/ventriculitis, and 1.7 other infections (surgical site infection, bronchitis, catheter related local infection, diarrhoea) were documented per 100 patients, respectively. 14.6% of isolated pathogens were E. coli, 10.2% enterococci, 9.6% S. aureus, 6.4% CNS, 6.4% Klebsiella spp., 5% Enterobacter spp. and 5% Pseudomonas spp. In 11 cases of NI no pathogen could be isolated.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Infection control and changes in management of hospitals: the European experience.

The general setting for the management of many European hospitals has undergone enormous changes during the last five to 10 years, especially with respect to economic, personnel and technical resources. This change has had a serious influence on the practice of infection control. To get an insight of the problems infection control practitioners in Europe today have to face, hospital epidemiologists representing nine European countries were asked to answer a questionnaire. In most countries, new laws on communicable disease prevention and infection control in hospitals have been implemented during the last few years. In conjunction with the widespread introduction of quality assurance and the accreditation of hospitals, organizational aspects of infection control have gained importance. However, budget restrictions and the growing competition between institutions are major challenges. In general, there has been a remarkable influence of the documented changes on the practice of infection control in European hospitals. Facing this situation, infection control practitioners should abandon unproven measures and implement those that are evidence-based, to prevent hospital acquired infection (HAI). Cost reducing initiatives, like the use of well designed multi-use devices and the reuse of disposables should be considered and scientifically assessed.

Cross Infection↗
PubMed1999

Comparison of effectiveness and required time of two surveillance methods in intensive care patients.

The intensive care unit (ICU) standardized protocol of the NNIS (National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance) system is a surveillance method of hospital acquired infections (HAI), which provides device-associated infection rates. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and the required time for data collection and analysis of a selective surveillance method (SSM) derived from the NNIS ICU surveillance protocol, and to compare its data with that of a reference surveillance method (RSM). The sensitivity, specificity and the positive predictive value (PPV) of the RSM were 87.5, 100 and 100%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity and the PPV of the SSM were 59.4 97.6 and 79.2%, respectively. Considering device-related infections only (ventilator-related pneumonia, catheter-related urinary tract infections, central line-related sepsis), the sensitivities of the RSM and the SSM were 80.9 and 90.5%, respectively. The SSM required only one third of the time of the RSM (1.1 h and 3.4 h per 10 beds per week with the SSM and the RSM, respectively). We conclude that the SSM has a very high sensitivity for detecting device associated infections, but is not sensitive enough for surveying all types of HAI.

Cross Infection↗
PubMed1997

Protecting the patient and the environment--new aspects and challenges in hospital infection control.

Environmental pollution has become a major concern for the future of life on our planet; medical care, especially in hospitals, contributes significantly to this pollution. The increasing usage of highly-developed medical devices, drugs and disposable products are a drain on natural resources as well as financial ones. In this situation, it is a major task for hospital epidemiologists to maintain high standards of hygiene while reducing environmental pollution, reducing consumption of limited natural resources, and minimizing costs. The reduction of hospital waste, the control of polluting and toxic emissions, the avoidance of unnecessary disinfection procedures and disposables, the implementation of energy and water saving technologies are practicable measures in hospital ecology. To realize a sustainable development within hospitals, it is necessary that the need to maintain a balance between effective infection control and a good ecological environment is recognized and supported by health-care workers and the hospital management.

Conservation of Energy Resources↗
PubMed1997

Environmental auditing in hospitals: approach and implementation in an university hospital.

Medical audit in infection control today is accepted as an important element in the quality assurance of health care. In contrast, environmental auditing, which was approved in 1993 by the Council of the European Communities for industry ("Eco-Management and Audit Scheme-EMAS), has not so far been used as a tool to control and reduce environmental pollution caused by medical care in hospitals. The aim of this study was to investigate, whether environmental auditing in hospitals is useful. This process should also be cost effective. In this paper, methodological and organizational issues are described. Initially an environmental review of activities at the University Hospital, Freiburg and an eco-analysis of the input and output were performed. The first results of the study and a critical discussion will be presented in another paper.

Conservation of Energy Resources↗