Biomedical subjects

M Desmurget

Publications and source records attributed to M Desmurget.

24 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed1997

Constrained and unconstrained movements involve different control strategies.

This experiment was carried out to test whether or not the rules governing the execution of compliant and unconstrained movements are different (a compliant motion is defined as a motion constrained by external contact). To answer this question we examined the characteristics of visually directed movements performed with either the index fingertip (unconstrained) or a hand-held cursor (compliant). For each of these categories of movements, two experimental conditions were investigated: no instruction about hand path, and instruction to move the fingertip along a straight-line path. The results of the experiment were as follows: 1) The spatiotemporal characteristics of the compliant and unconstrained movements were fundamentally different when the subjects were not required to follow a specific hand path. 2) The instruction to perform straight movements modified the characteristics of the unconstrained movements, but not those of the compliant movements. 3) The target eccentricity influenced selectively the curvature of the "unconstrained-no path instruction" movements. Taken together, these results suggest that compliant and unconstrained movements involve different control strategies. Our data support the hypothesis that unconstrained motions are, unlike compliant motions, not programmed to follow a straight-line path in the task space. These observations provide a theoretical reference frame within which some apparently contradictory results reported in the movement generation literature may be explained.

Data Interpretation, Statistical↗

PubMed1996

Integrated control of hand transport and orientation during prehension movements.

At a descriptive level, prehension movements can be partitioned into three components ensuring, respectively, the transport of the arm to the vicinity of the target, the orientation of the hand according to object tilt, and the grasp itself. Several authors have suggested that this analytic description may be an operational principle for the organization of the motor system. This hypothesis, called "visuomotor channels hypothesis," is in particular supported by experiments showing a parallelism between the reach and grasp components of prehension movements. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether or not the generalization of the visuomotor channels hypothesis, from its initial form, restricted to the grasp and transport components, to its actual form, including the reach orientation and grasp components, may be well founded. Six subjects were required to reach and grasp cylindrical objects presented at a given location, with different orientations. During the movements, object orientation was either kept constant (unperturbed trials) or modified at movement onset (perturbed trials). Results showed that both wrist path (sequence of positions that the hand follows in space), and wrist trajectory (time sequence of the successive positions of the hand) were strongly affected by object orientation and by the occurrence of perturbations. These observations suggested strongly that arm transport and hand orientation were neither planned nor controlled independently. The significant linear regressions observed, with respect to the time, between arm displacement (integral of the magnitude of the velocity vector) and forearm rotation also supported this view. Interestingly, hand orientation was not implemented at only the distal level, demonstrating that all the redundant degrees of freedom available were used by the motor system to achieve the task. The final configuration reached by the arm was very stable for a given final orientation of the object to grasp. In particular, when object tilt was suddenly modified at movement onset, the correction brought the upper limb into the same posture as that obtained when the object was initially presented along the final orientation reached after perturbation. Taken together, the results described in the present study suggest that arm transport and hand orientation do not constitute independent visuomotor channels. They also further suggest that prehension movements are programmed, from an initial configuration, to reach smoothly a final posture that corresponds to a given "location and orientation" as a whole.

Adult↗

PubMed1995

Representation of hand position prior to movement and motor variability.

Pointing accuracy of six human subjects was measured in two blocked conditions where the hand was either never visible (T: target only) or only visible in static position prior to movement onset (H+T: hand+target). It was shown in condition H+T that, viewing the hand prior to movement greatly decreased end-point variability compared with condition T. This effect was associated with a significant modification of the movement kinematics: the H+T condition induced a shortened acceleration phase with a corresponding lengthened deceleration phase, compared with the T condition. These results led us to the hypothesis that viewing the hand prior to movement onset allowed a decrease of pointing variability through a feedback process. This hypothesis was further tested by turning the target off during the deceleration phase of the movement at half peak velocity. It was shown that turning the target off had no effect upon the T condition but induced a significant increase of pointing variability in the H+T condition. This result suggests that vision of the static hand enhances the proprioceptive localization of the limb and allows for a better visual to kinesthesic feedback.

Adult↗

PubMed1995

Vectorial coding of movement: vision, proprioception, or both?

1. Subjects were asked to point toward visual targets without visual reafference from the moving hand in two conditions. In both conditions the pointing fingertip was viewed only before movement onset. 2. In one condition, the pointing fingertip was viewed through prisms that created a visual displacement without altering the view of the target. In another experimental condition, vision of the fingertip was not displaced. Comparison of these two conditions showed that virtually shifting finger position before movement through prisms induced a pointing bias in the direction opposite to the shift. The extent of this pointing bias was about one third of the prismatic shift applied to the fingertip. 3. Analysis of movement initial direction demonstrated that it was also less deviated than predicted from the prismatic shift. In addition, the reaction time and movement time of the reaching movement were increased. 4. This result is interpreted in the framework of the vectorial coding of reaching movement. Proprioception and vision provide two possible sources of information about initial hand position, i.e., the origin of the movement vector. The question remains as to how these two sources of information interact in specifying initial hand position when they are simultaneously available. 5. Our results are thus discussed with respect to a visual-to-visual movement vector hypothesis and a proprioceptive-to-visual vector hypothesis. It is argued that the origin of the putative movement vector is encoded by weighted fusion of the visual and the proprioceptive information about hand initial position.

Adult↗

PubMed1995

Postural and synergic control for three-dimensional movements of reaching and grasping.

1. A fundamental question about motor control is related to the nature of the representations used by the nervous system to program the movement. Theoretically, arm displacement can be encoded either in task (extrinsic) or in joint (intrinsic) space. 2. The present study investigated the organization of complex movements consisting of reaching and grasping a cylindrical object presented along different orientations in space. In some trials, object orientation was suddenly modified at movement onset. 3. At a static level, the final limb angles were highly predictable despite the wide range of possible postures allowed by articular redundancy. Moreover, when object orientation was unexpectedly modified at movement onset, the final angular configuration of the limb was identical to that obtained when the object was initially presented along the orientation reached after the perturbation. 4. At a dynamical level, a generalized synergy was observed, and tight correlations were noted between all joint angles implicated in the movement with the exception of elbow flexion. For this joint angle, which did not vary monotonically, strong partial correlations were however observed before and after movement reversal. 5. These results suggest that natural movements are mostly carried out in joint space by postural transitions.

Arm↗

PubMed1994

The effect of viewing the static hand prior to movement onset on pointing kinematics and variability.

Pointing accuracy and arm movement kinematics of six human subjects were measured in three conditions where the hand was never visible during the ongoing movement: (1) in the dark; (2) the static hand was seen in peripheral vision prior to target presentation, but not during the reaction time (H-T); (3) the static hand was seen in peripheral vision until movement onset (H+T). It was shown that: (1) viewing the hand prior to movement decreased pointing variability as compared to the dark condition. (2) Viewing simultaneously hand and target (H+T) and further decreased pointing variability as compared to the H-T condition. This effect was proportional to the reaction time. (3) A lengthening of the deceleration phase was observed for movements performed in the H+T condition, as compared to the other two conditions. (4) A negative correlation between variability and the first part of the deceleration phase was observed in the H+T condition, but neither in the H-T condition nor in the dark. These results suggest that the decrease in pointing variability observed in the H+T condition is due to a feedback based on kinesthetic reafference. Better encoding of the initial position of the hand relative to the target (as in H+T) would allow a calibration of arm position sense, which is used to drive the hand toward the target during the deceleration phase.

Adult↗