Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M De Pauw

Publications and source records attributed to M De Pauw.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1993

Short-term versus long-term addition of cyproterone acetate to buserelin therapy in comparison with orchidectomy in the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer--Genitourinary Group.

In an open, multicenter, three-armed, randomized study, we compared the effects of short-term (2 weeks) and continuous addition of the antiandrogen cyproterone acetate to the luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist buserelin to those of orchidectomy in patients with advanced prostate cancer. No significant differences among the three treatment arms with respect to response rate, subjective response, time-to-progression, overall survival, and cancer deaths were observed. It was concluded that the short-term or continuous addition of cyproterone acetate to buserelin administered intranasally did not improve treatment results compared to orchidectomy only.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Orchidectomy versus goserelin plus flutamide in patients with metastatic prostate cancer (EORTC 30853). European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer--Genitourinary Group.

A total of 327 patients with metastatic prostate cancer were randomized to receive bilateral orchiectomy or treatment with Zoladex and flutamide. The trial aimed to evaluate subjective and objective time to progression, survival, and incidence and duration of response. Strict quality control and evaluation by independent ad hoc committees were organized. Progression was assessed for each of 13 parameters. The time to subjective and objective progression was in favor of the combination treatment, with statistical significances of P = 0.009 and P = 0.008, respectively. This delay in objective progression resulted in increased survival in favor of the combination treatment for death by cancer (P = 0.02) or overall survival (P = 0.05). Survival differences were more marked in the patients with better prognostic factors. The clinical significance of these differences for the individual patient requires detailed assessment.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Direct comparison of [13N]ammonia and [15O]water estimates of perfusion with quantification of regional myocardial blood flow by microspheres.

BACKGROUND: Both [13N]ammonia and [15O]water have been used to quantify myocardial blood flow with positron emission tomography using appropriate tracer kinetic models. A direct comparison of the two tracers with radioactive microspheres has not been performed in the same experimental preparation. METHODS AND RESULTS: The two tracers have been tested for myocardial blood flow quantification in closed-chest dogs with circumflex coronary stenosis or permanent occlusion at rest and during adenosine-induced hyperemia. [13N]ammonia- and [15O]water-derived myocardial blood flow values have been compared with radiolabeled microspheres. Validation studies consisted of simultaneous measurements of blood flow with positron emission tomography and microspheres over a wide range of flow values. Blood pool and regional tissue activity curves were fitted with a three-compartment model for [13N]ammonia with and without arterial metabolite correction and with a single-tissue-compartment model for [15O]water. A correction for finite-resolution effect before the fit was also applied. In large regions of interest (5 cm3), a good correlation between the microsphere method and [13N]ammonia (with metabolite correction) was obtained (y = 3 + 0.78x, r = 0.94). The correlation with microspheres was slightly better with [15O]water (y = -3 + 0.89x, r = 0.97). Similar correlations were achieved in smaller regions of interest (1 cm3) as well as in akinetic segments and in central infarct regions. CONCLUSIONS: Positron emission tomography with appropriate tracer kinetic models using [13N]ammonia and [15O]water provides an accurate quantitative method for measuring regional myocardial blood flow over a wide range of flow values in normally contracting or akinetic canine myocardium in the absence and in the presence of infarction.

Ammonia↗
PubMed1992

Adjuvant chemotherapy of recurrent superficial transitional cell carcinoma: results of a European organization for research on treatment of cancer randomized trial comparing intravesical instillation of thiotepa, doxorubicin and cisplatin. The European Organization for Research on Treatment of Cancer Genitourinary Group.

A total of 356 patients with recurrent superficial transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder was entered in a randomized clinical trial to compare intravesical thiotepa, doxorubicin and cisplatin with respect to the recurrence rate and disease-free interval. After complete transurethral resection of all visible lesions, the drugs were administered weekly for 4 weeks and monthly for 11 months. The recurrence rates per year were 0.50 for thiotepa, 0.54 for doxorubicin and 0.58 for cisplatin. Of 266 patients (mean followup 41 months) 35 reported an increase in T category and 19 of them had distant metastases. No association between treatment and progression was noted. Thus, there is no difference among treatments with respect to efficacy. However, severe anaphylactic reactions were observed in the cisplatin arm and chemical cystitis was more frequently reported in patients who received doxorubicin.

Administration, Intravesical↗
PubMed1992

Arcuate ligament syndrome mimicking celiac occlusion.

In a patient with weight loss and a systolic epigastric murmur, aortography demonstrated positional celiac axis occlusion. Color Doppler imaging of the celiac axis showed occlusion in the supine position, but patency was documented during deep inspiration and with the patient in the upright position. This report documents a rare example of extreme celiac axis compression with position-dependent celiac patency.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

Total androgen ablation: European experience. The EORTC GU Group.

Zoladex plus flutamide significantly delays the time to progression (subjective, objective, first progression) compared with orchiectomy, but no difference in survival (death from all causes or from malignant disease) could be detected. Thus, a delay in the appearance of progression has not improved survival. In fact, the duration of survival after progression tends to be shorter on Zoladex plus flutamide. There is thus no evidence to suggest any survival benefit with Zoladex plus flutamide. The quality control of our data revealed acknowledged problems in defining responses in patients with advanced prostate cancer. The review of the Bone Scan Committee provided the data for Tables 5 to 7. These data must provoke some reflections and emphasize once again the heterogeneity of the studied patient population. Table 4 on pain response after 4 weeks is just one of the many items to be analyzed by the committees for response criteria and quality of life. We expect that the other trials face similar problems. More work and patience are needed to obtain a firm answer to this clinical problem. These efforts will never be wasted, however, because the combined results of these trials will increase our knowledge of the treated history of prostate cancer and will, we hope, indicate a net treatment benefit in some subsets of patients. An individually tailored treatment for each patient selected from the anonymous mass of cases of advanced prostate cancer would be the highest reward of our continued collaboration with all the study groups.

Aged↗
PubMed1990

Orchidectomy versus Zoladex plus Eulexin in patients with metastatic prostate cancer (EORTC 30853).

A total of 327 patients with metastatic prostate cancer have been randomized to either orchidectomy or treatment with goserelin (Zoladez) 3.6 mg depot preparation combined with flutamide (Eulexin) 250 mg t.i.d. in a phase III study (EORTC 30853). A small but statistically significant difference in time to subjective and objective progression of disease was found in favour of the combination treatment. However, time from objective progression to death was longer in the group initially allocated to orchidectomy. Thus no difference was found in overall survival between the two treatment groups. The clinical significance of these differences requires further follow up and analysis.

Aged↗
PubMed1990

Orchidectomy versus Buserelin in combination with cyproterone acetate, for 2 weeks or continuously, in the treatment of metastatic prostatic cancer. Preliminary results of EORTC-trial 30843.

This prospective randomized phase III trial compares orchidectomy as standard androgen-deprivative therapy of advanced (metastatic) prostatic cancer with treatment using the LHRH agonist Buserelin administered as nasal spray 3 daily doses of 400 micrograms, and combined with cyproterone acetate (CPA) 3 daily doses of 50 mg orally for 2 weeks initially to prevent flare-up of the disease, or continuously as complete androgen blockade. The trial was closed to entry in September 1989 when 367 patients were recruited. Patients were stratified for performance status (WHO) and metastatic status prior to randomization. According to patient and disease characteristics spreading of patients over the 3 arms was without statistical significant differences. Ineligibility was 5 and 4% of the patients were only partly evaluable. In March 1990 a first, preliminary analysis was performed. At that time 207 patients were off-study for progression or death and median follow-up was 1 yr. As to time-to-progression and survival there were no significant differences between the 3 arms. The meaning of this in regard to results of other trials with complete androgen blockade is discussed.

Aged↗
PubMed1990

Comparison of the effects of high dose Estramustine phosphate and mitomycin C on the time to progression and length of survival of patients with progressive, advanced endocrine-independent prostatic cancer: an interim analysis of EORTC-GU Group study no. 30865.

Patients with hormone escaped advanced progressive prostate cancer were randomized either to receive either high-dose Estramustine phosphate orally or Mitomycin C by i.v. injection every 6 weeks until signs of progression or death supervened. Patients on both arms progressed rapidly, with a median time to progression of 5 months and a median length of survival of only 10 months. Toxicity was very considerable in both arms.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed1990

EORTC protocol 30853: orchidectomy versus zoladex plus flutamide in the management of metastatic carcinoma of the prostate. Interim statistical analysis of the side effects of treatment.

The toxicity and side effects of combination therapy with zoladex and flutamide have not been excessive compared with those due to orchidectomy. Pain due to the flare phenomenon has not been observed with zoladex and flutamide. Treatment modification has been necessary in 12 of the 149 patients receiving the combination therapy, compared with one of 148 patients who had surgical castration. Only one patient had flutamide withdrawn because of diarrhea and only five patients had treatment modification because of liver toxicity.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed1990

Zoladex and flutamide versus bilateral orchiectomy. A randomized phase III EORTC 30853 study. The EORTC GU Group.

A total of 327 patients with metastatic prostatic cancer were randomized to either bilateral orchiectomy or treatment with zoladex depot supplemented by flutamide 250 mg 3 qid. Statistically significant increases in time to subjective and objective progression were recorded in favor of the combination treatment. No differences in time to death by cancer or overall death were recorded. The clinical significance of these differences will be reassessed once additional follow-up is available and further analysis of the overall clinical material has been carried out.

Aged↗
PubMed1990

Orchidectomy vs. Zoladex plus flutamide in patients with metastatic prostate cancer. The EORTC GU Group.

Treatment with bilateral orchidectomy was compared with Zoladex, 3.6 mg depot, plus flutamide, 250 mg t.i.d., in a randomized prospective study by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). Small but statistically significant differences in time to subjective and objective progression of disease were found in favor of Zoladex plus flutamide. However, time from objective progression to death was longer in the orchidectomy group. The clinical significance of these differences requires further follow-up and analysis. No difference was found in overall survival between the 2 treatment groups.

Aged↗
PubMed1988

Potential advances in combination chemotherapy for advanced testicular cancer.

An interim analysis of the current EORTC studies in advanced testicular cancer indicates that (a) for low volume metastatic disease the addition of bleomycin (B) to etoposide (E) and cisplatinum (P) may not be necessary, and (b) for high volume metastatic disease the alternating schedule of PVB/BEP is not superior to treatment with BEP. Future studies will subdivide patients into 3 groups. Those with low volume metastatic disease will receive EP using 2 dose schedules for cisplatin. Those with high volume metastases will receive either BEP or etoposide, ifosfamide and cisplatinum (VIP). Those with ultra-high volume metastases will receive BOP/VIP, possibly randomised against another intensive chemotherapy schedule.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed1988

[Which intravesical chemotherapy for what tumor of the bladder?].

The rationale for adjuvant chemoprophylaxis in superficial bladder cancer treated by transurethral resection is discussed. Many questions remain unsolved as far as chemoprophylaxis in concerned. The authors try to answer them through an analysis of the results of prospective and randomized studies undertaken by the EORTC genito-urinary group for 12 years. Advantages and disadvantages of the most common agents (Adriamycin, Epodyl, Mitomycin, Thiotepa, BCG) are analyzed; an attempt is done to define instillations regimens; indications and results of these adjuvant treatments are studied.

Administration, Intravesical↗