Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M D Taylor

Publications and source records attributed to M D Taylor.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed1998

The management of acid-related dyspepsia in general practice: a comparison of an omeprazole versus an antacid-alginate/ranitidine management strategy. Compete Research Group [corrected].

BACKGROUND: There is need for an evidence-based comparison of clinical management strategies to provide the rationale for selection of a particular therapeutic approach to treatment. Ideal dyspepsia treatment should quickly and conveniently alleviate patient symptoms whilst also minimizing the use of healthcare resources. AIM: To examine dyspepsia symptom relief over 16 weeks and compare an omeprazole clinical management strategy with a commonly used combination of antacid-alginate followed by H2-antagonist. METHODS: Seven hundred and twenty-five patients participated in this randomized, open, parallel group comparison over 16 weeks. Patients were randomized to receive either an omeprazole treatment strategy (363) consisting of omeprazole 10 mg stepping up to 20 mg and 40 mg as required, or an antacid-alginate/ranitidine treatment strategy (362) consisting of antacid-alginate 10 mL q.d.s. stepping up to ranitidine 150 mg b.d. and 150 mg q.d.s. as required. RESULTS: A greater proportion of patients receiving the omeprazole clinical management strategy had achieved the stringent health target of complete symptom relief (61 vs. 40%, P < 0.0001) at 16 weeks. Forty-six per cent of omeprazole-treated patients were symptom free after the first 10 mg step compared to only 17% in the antacid-alginate treated group (P = 0.0001). Total relief of heartburn, the most common symptom at entry, was achieved by more patients in the omeprazole treatment group than the antacid-alginate/ranitidine treatment group, 62 vs. 36%, respectively, at 4 weeks, and 81 vs. 60% at 16 weeks (P = 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Treatment with the omeprazole clinical management strategy was superior to the antacid-alginate/ranitidine management strategy in providing relief of acid-related dyspepsia symptoms after 16 weeks. In addition, the omeprazole treatment strategy involved fewer GP consultations and thus minimized the use of other healthcare resources.

Abdominal Pain↗
PubMed1998

Maintenance of remission of ulcerative colitis: a comparison between balsalazide 3 g daily and mesalazine 1.2 g daily over 12 months. ABACUS Investigator group.

BACKGROUND: Despite widespread use of aminosalicylates as maintenance treatment for ulcerative colitis (UC), patients still report troublesome symptoms, often nocturnally. AIM: To compare the efficacy and safety of balsalazide (Colazide) with mesalazine (Asacol) in maintaining UC remission. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind comparison of balsalazide 3 g daily (1.04 g 5-ASA) and mesalazine 1.2 g daily for 12 months, in 99 (95 evaluable) patients in UC remission. RESULTS: Balsalazide patients experienced more asymptomatic nights (90% vs. 77%, P=0.0011) and days (58% vs. 50%, N.S.) during the first 3 months. Balsalazide patients experienced more symptom-free nights per week (6.4+/-1.7 vs. 4.7+/-2.8; P=0.0006) and fewer nights per week with blood on their stools or on the toilet paper, mucus with their stools or with sleep disturbance resulting from symptoms or lavatory visits (each P < 0.05). Fewer balsalazide patients relapsed within 3 months (10% vs. 28%; P=0.0354). Remission at 12 months was 58%, in both groups. Similar proportions of patients reported adverse events (61% balsalazide vs. 65% mesalazine). There were five serious adverse events (two balsalazide, three mesalazine) and four withdrawals due to unacceptable adverse events (three balsalazide, one mesalazine), of which one in each group was also a serious adverse event. CONCLUSIONS: Balsalazide 3 g/day and mesalazine 1.2 g/ day effectively maintain UC remission and are equally well tolerated over 12 months. At this dose balsalazide prevents more relapses during the first 3 months of treatment and controls nocturnal symptoms more effectively.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

First line treatment with omeprazole provides an effective and superior alternative strategy in the management of dyspepsia compared to antacid/alginate liquid: a multicentre study in general practice.

BACKGROUND: Many patients who present with dyspepsia are prescribed antacid/alginates as their first line and often mainstay therapy. This multicentre study was designed to assess whether early introduction of acid inhibition is an effective strategy in dyspepsia management. METHODS: Dyspeptic patients (n = 674) were randomized to receive either omeprazole 10 mg o.m. or antacid/alginate liquid 10 mL q.d.s. for 4 weeks in an open, parallel group study. RESULTS: Complete relief of the most common symptom at entry, heartburn, was greater in the omeprazole-treated group compared with the antacid/alginate-treated group (64 vs. 30%, respectively, at 4 weeks; P < 0.0001). The percentage of patients who met the stringent health target of complete relief of overall symptoms was higher in the omeprazole-treated group (41% at 4 weeks) compared with the antacid/alginate group (16% at 4 weeks; P < 0.0001). Comparisons of quality of life scores between treatments favoured the omeprazole group at 2 and 4 weeks for both the Psychological General Well-Being Index and the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (each P < or = 0.0009). In addition, a greater proportion of patients rated omeprazole to be more effective in symptom relief and more convenient to use (each P = 0.0001) than antacid/alginate. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that, compared to antacid/alginate liquid 10 mL q.d.s., omeprazole 10 mg o.m. is more effective in the management of dyspepsia symptoms and is the patients' preferred treatment.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Therapeutic digoxin level in chylous drainage with no detectable plasma digoxin level.

A patient receiving digoxin for long-standing congestive heart failure developed a chylothorax following removal of an infected aortic graft. Drainage of the chylothorax resulted in plasma digoxin concentrations which were near zero while the digoxin levels in the chylous drainage fluid were therapeutic. The sequestration of even low lipid-soluble drugs, such as digoxin, in chyle should be recognized to prevent subtherapeutic plasma levels in patients undergoing chylothorax drainage.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

Fluorine-18-fluoro-L-DOPA dosimetry with carbidopa pretreatment.

UNLABELLED: This article presents dosimetry based on the measurement of fluoro-DOPA activity in major tissues and in the bladder contents in humans after oral pretreatment with 100 mg carbidopa. METHODS: Bladder activity was measured continuously by external probe and calibrated using complete urine collections. Quantitative dynamic PET scans provided time-activity curves for the major organs. Bladder wall dosimetry was calculated using the methods of MIRD Pamphlet No. 14. Effective dose was calculated as described in ICRP Publication 60. RESULTS: Mean absorbed dose to the bladder wall surface per unit administered activity was 0.150 mGy/MBq (0.556 rad/mCi) with the realistic void schedule used in our studies. The dose was 0.027 mGy/MBq (0.101 rad/mCi) to the kidneys, 0.0197 mGy/MBq (0.0728 rad/mCi) to the pancreas, and 0.0186 mGy/MBq (0.0688 rad/mCi) to the uterus. Absorbed doses to other organs were an order of magnitude or more lower than the bladder, 0.009-0.015 mGy/MBq. The effective dose per unit administered activity was 0.0199 mSv/MBq (0.0735 rem/mCi.) CONCLUSION: Urinary excretion of fluoro-DOPA was altered significantly by pretreatment with carbidopa. In general, any manipulation of tracer metabolism in the body should be expected to produce changes in biodistribution and dosimetry. The largest radiation dose was to the bladder wall, for which our estimate was one-fifth of that from the original report. The methods used reflect realistic urinary physiology and typical use of this tracer. The principles of MIRD Pamphlet No. 14 should be used in planning studies using tracers excreted in the urine to minimize the absorbed dose.

Aromatic Amino Acid Decarboxylase Inhibitors↗
PubMed1997

Accumulation of cadmium derived from fertilisers in New Zealand soils.

Accumulation of cadmium was assessed by comparing 58 soil samples archived up to 50 years ago with present-day soils from the same sites. Mean levels of acid-extractable Cd have increased from 0.39 mg kg-1 to 0.85 mg kg-1 closely matching the amount of Cd applied in phosphate fertiliser. CaCl2-extractable Cd has increased from 0.02 mg kg-1 to 0.11 mg kg-1, a greater percentage increase than for acid-extractable Cd. This may be attributed to added Cd being more mobile than native Cd. Cadmium levels have increased in Allophanic Soils, Brown Soils, Gley Soils, Organic Soils, Oxidic Soils, Pallic Soils, Pumice Soils, and Hydrothermal Recent Soils but not in Fluvial Recent Soils, which appear to have a lower Cd retention capacity.

Agriculture↗
PubMed1997

Omeprazole is more effective than cimetidine for the relief of all grades of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease-associated heartburn, irrespective of the presence or absence of endoscopic oesophagitis.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have demonstrated greater efficacy for omeprazole compared with cimetidine in patients with endoscopically verified oesophagitis, but excluded the substantial group of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients with reflux symptoms but without endoscopic abnormality. This prospective, randomized, double-blind study compared omeprazole and cimetidine in the treatment of GERD-associated heartburn both in patients with symptomatic non-ulcerative oesophagitis and in those with heartburn but without oesophagitis. METHODS: A total of 221 patients with heartburn and oesophageal mucosa grade 0 (normal, n = 51), 1 (no macroscopic erosions, n = 52), 2 (isolated erosions, n = 97) or 3 (confluent erosions, n = 21) were randomized to receive double-blind either omeprazole 20 mg daily or cimetidine 400 mg q.d.s. for a period of 4 weeks. Those still symptomatic after 4 weeks of treatment received omeprazole 20 mg daily for a further 4 weeks. RESULTS: There was no correlation between severity of heartburn and endoscopic grade at entry (correlation coefficient = 0.196). After 4 weeks of treatment, the proportion of patients in whom heartburn was controlled (no more than mild symptoms on no more than 1 day in the previous 7) on omeprazole (66%; 74/112) was more than double that on cimetidine (31%; 34/109) (P < 0.0001). There was no significant difference between the relief of heartburn in the 47% of patients without unequivocal oesophagitis (endoscopic grade 0 or 1) and in the 53% of patients with erosive oesophagitis (grade 2 or 3) (P = 0.31). Only treatment with omeprazole (P < 0.0001) and lower severity of heartburn at entry (P < 0.01) were significant in predicting heartburn relief. Amongst those patients requiring an additional 4 weeks of treatment with omeprazole, 67% (54/81) reported that their heartburn was controlled after 8 weeks of treatment. CONCLUSION: We conclude that omeprazole is superior to cimetidine for the relief of all grades of heartburn in GERD, whether or not the patient has unequivocal endoscopic oesophagitis.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1996

Improving the yield of 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxyglucose using a microwave cavity.

We have investigated the use of a microwave cavity (Labwell AB, Sweden) to improve the radiochemical yield of 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (2-[18F]FDG). After characterizing the heating properties of the cavity, three steps of the Hamacher 2-[18F]FDG synthesis which require heating--azeotropic distillation of the target water, nucleophilic substitution, and hydrolysis of the product--were investigated separately. The average radiochemical yield of 2-[18F]FDG for the microwave synthesis, using the phase transfer reagent tetrabutylammonium bicarbonate, was 62 +/- 4% (72 +/- 5%, decay corrected, synthesis time = 31 min).

Deoxyglucose↗
PubMed1996

Symptomatic and endoscopic duodenal ulcer relapse rates 12 months following Helicobacter pylori eradication treatment with omeprazole and amoxycillin with or without metronidazole.

AIM: To determine the effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication with omeprazole and amoxycillin, with or without metronidazole, on the 12-month course of duodenal ulcer disease. METHODS: In a randomized; double-blind study, conducted in 19 hospitals, 105 H. pylori positive duodenal ulcer patients were healed and symptom-free following either omeprazole dual therapy (omeprazole 40 mg o.m.+amoxycillin 500 mg t.d.s., OA, eradication rate 46%, n = 52) or omeprazole triple therapy (omeprazole 40 mg o.m.+amoxycillin 500 mg t.d.s.+metronidazole 400 mg t.d.s., OAM, eradication rate 92%, n = 53) for 2 weeks, followed by 2 weeks of omeprazole 20 mg o.m. and a 12-month untreated follow-up period, after which time all patients were endoscoped. Endoscopic and symptomatic relapse rates, and effect on H. pylori status measured using 13C-urea breath test, were determined. RESULTS: During the 12-month untreated follow-up period, the life-table endoscopic relapse rates were 12% (95% CI: 2-22%) and 2% (95% CI: 0-6%) for OA and OAM patients, respectively. By 12 months, life-table symptomatic relapse rates were 22% (95% CI: 13-37%) and 19% (95% CI: 8-30%) for OA and OAM, respectively. In the 12 months untreated follow-up period, 2/69 (3%, 95% CI: 0-7%) patients rendered H. pylori negative had an endoscopic relapse at the end of the 12-month follow-up period, compared with 5/31 (16%, 95% CI: 3-29%) patients remaining H. pylori positive (P = 0.03 between H. pylori positive and negative groups). Twelve of 69 (17%, 95% CI: 8-26%) patients rendered H. pylori negative relapsed symptomatically, compared with 9/31 (29%, 95% CI: 13-45%) patients remaining H. pylori positive (P = N.S. between groups). There was a significant improvement in epigastric pain (P = 0.0001), nausea and vomiting (P < 0.05) between entry to the study and 1, 6 and 12 months post-treatment for both treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: OAM eradicates H. pylori in significantly more patients than OA, but successful H. pylori eradication with either OAM or OA predisposes to low endoscopic and symptomatic relapse rates for duodenal ulcer patients when followed up for 12 months.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Reflux symptom relief with omeprazole in patients without unequivocal oesophagitis.

BACKGROUND: As many as 50% of patients with reflux symptoms have no endoscopic evidence of oesophagitis. This multicentre study was designed to assess symptom relief after omeprazole 20 mg once daily in patients with symptoms typical of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease but without endoscopic evidence of oesophagitis. METHODS: Patients (n = 209) were randomized in a double-blind study to receive either omeprazole 20 mg once daily (n = 98) or placebo (n = 111) for 4 weeks. Symptoms were assessed at clinic visits and using daily diary cards, with patient-completed questionnaires providing additional data on symptoms and on psychological disturbance. RESULTS: On completion, symptom relief favoured omeprazole: 57% of patients on omeprazole were free of heartburn (vs. 19% on placebo), 75% were free of regurgitation (47%) and 43% were completely asymptomatic (14%), each with P < 0.0001. Fewer patients in the omeprazole group required alginate/antacid relief medication (P < 0.05). Symptom relief (time to first heartburn-free day) was more rapid with omeprazole (2 vs. 5 days on placebo; P < 0.01). A greater reduction in anxiety occurred in the omeprazole group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Omeprazole 20 mg once daily is effective in providing relief of the symptoms typical of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in patients with essentially normal oesophageal mucosa.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

The McKenzie method: a general practice interpretation: the lumbar spine.

The McKenzie method is a widely used method of physiotherapy that clinically divides traumatic back pain into three fundamental groups. The author attempts to translate some of the arcane terminology into a medical context. An attempt is made to give some indication of the utility of the approach in general practice.

Adult↗