Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M D Prados

Publications and source records attributed to M D Prados.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1999

Late radiation injury following hyperfractionated craniospinal radiotherapy for primitive neuroectodermal tumor.

PURPOSE: To document the late radiographic change following hyperfractionated craniospinal radiotherapy for primitive neuroectodermal tumor. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We reviewed long-term MRI scans on 21 patients with standard risk and high risk primitive neuroectodermal tumor treated with hyperfractionated radiotherapy following surgical resection. High risk patients also received adjuvant chemotherapy. Long-term scans were defined as scan obtained at least 1 year from diagnosis. Clinical follow-up data was available on all patients. RESULTS: Twelve of 21 patients had MRI evidence of necrosis, telangiectasia, white matter changes, basal ganglia change, or cerebral atrophy consistent with radiation injury. No patient required treatment for the radiographic change. CONCLUSIONS: Slightly over half of the patients had evidence of long-term radiation effect following craniospinal axis radiotherapy. However, no patient had frank clinical symptoms related to the radiographic findings.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Final report on the University of California-San Francisco experience with bromodeoxyuridine labeling index as a prognostic factor for the survival of glioma patients.

BACKGROUND: At the University of California-San Francisco (UCSF), a labeling index (LI) based on in vivo administration of bromodeoxyuridine (BUdR) was routinely determined in tumors from patients with infiltrating gliomas for the 10-year period, 1984-1994. Considered an indicator of tumor proliferative potential, it was anticipated that the BUdR LI would aid in determining patient prognosis. The data have now matured, and a final report on the extensive UCSF experience is appropriate. METHODS: Patients were grouped separately based on tumor grade and whether LI was determined at the time of primary diagnosis or at recurrence. To assure data quality and consistent follow-up, only adult patients entered on clinical trials were included. Patients with primary Grade 2 gliomas could not be included because most of these patients did not enter clinical trials. Each patient LI was categorized as low (lowest quartile), moderate (between the 25th and 75th percentiles), or high (highest quartile). Statistical analyses included log rank and multivariate proportional hazards models. RESULTS: One hundred ninety patients with primary tumors (69 Grade 3, 121 Grade 4) and 149 patients with recurrent tumors (24 Grade 2, 37 Grade 3, and 88 Grade 4) were included. LI score was predictive of survival (P < or = 0.02 for univariate or multivariate analyses) in all but the primary Grade 4 patients. For that group, it was a significant predictor (P = 0.03) only among those surviving > or = 1.5 years. CONCLUSIONS: BUdR LI improved the predictability of long term patient outcome both initially and at the time of recurrence. Further research on measures of tumor proliferative potential as markers of outcome is warranted.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Hyperfractionated craniospinal radiation therapy for primitive neuroectodermal tumors: results of a Phase II study.

PURPOSE: To report the results of a Phase II study of hyperfractionated craniospinal radiation therapy, with and without adjuvant chemotherapy for primitive neuroectodermal brain tumors (PNETs) and malignant ependymomas. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Newly diagnosed PNET or malignant ependymomas were treated with hyperfractionated craniospinal radiation therapy. The primary tumor site was treated to a dose of 72 Gy, with 30 Gy given to the rest of the craniospinal axis. The fraction size was 1.0 Gy, given twice a day. Patients with poor risk factors also received adjuvant chemotherapy with CCNU, cisplatin, and vincristine. Patients had follow-up for survival, time to tumor progression, and patterns of relapse. RESULTS: A total of 39 patients (21 males/18 females) were treated between March 12, 1990 and October 29, 1992. The median age was 16 years (range 3-59 years). Tumor types included 25 medulloblastomas, 5 pineoblastomas, 5 cerebral PNETs, 1 spinal cord PNET, and 3 malignant ependymomas. Twenty cases were staged as poor-risk and received adjuvant chemotherapy following radiation. Three-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 60% and 63% for poor-risk and good-risk patients, respectively. Overall 3-year survival for these groups was 70% and 79%, respectively. For the 25 patients with medulloblastoma, there were 16 good-risk and 9 poor-risk patients. Three-year PFSs were 63% and 56%, respectively. The 5-year survival for good-risk medulloblastoma was 69% with 43.7% of these patients having failures outside the primary site. CONCLUSIONS: Survival in patients with good-risk medulloblastoma was no better than that seen in previous studies with single-fraction radiation, and the rate of failure outside the primary site is excessive. Those with poor-risk features had comparable survival to that seen in patients with good risk factors, but these patients were treated with chemotherapy, and the role that hyperfractionated radiation played in their outcome is uncertain.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Response and progression in recurrent malignant glioma.

In this article we report the results of a study of the relationship between response and progression in 375 patients with recurrent glioma enrolled in phase II chemotherapy trials. We reviewed the records of patients from 8 consecutive phase II trials, including 225 patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme and 150 with recurrent anaplastic astrocytoma. Median age was 45 years (range, 15-82) and median Karnofsky performance score was 80 (range, 60-100). Forty-one patients (11%) had more than two prior resections and/or more than two prior chemotherapy regimens. Best response was complete (n = 1) or partial (n = 33) in 34 patients (9%). Median time to response was 14 weeks, and median response duration was 44 weeks. Simon-Makuch estimates for 52-week progression-free survival for patients progression-free at 13 weeks were 48% for response and 28% for nonresponse. When response was treated as a time-dependent covariate in a Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, response was associated with significantly lower failure rates (hazard ratio 0.5; 95% confidence interval 0.3-0.8; P = 0.0016). This study showed that response in recurrent glioma is associated with a significant reduction in progression rates.

Actuarial Analysis↗
PubMed1999

Procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine (PCV) chemotherapy for anaplastic astrocytoma: A retrospective review of radiation therapy oncology group protocols comparing survival with carmustine or PCV adjuvant chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: To determine any differences in outcome for patients with anaplastic astrocytoma (AA) treated with adjuvant carmustine (BCNU) versus procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine (PCV) chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) database was reviewed for patients with newly diagnosed AA treated according to protocols that included either BCNU or PCV adjuvant chemotherapy. All patients were treated with radiation therapy. The outcome analysis included overall survival, taking into account patient age, extent of resection, Karnofsky performance status (KPS), and treatment group (BCNU v PCV). Stratified and nonstratified Cox proportional hazards models were used, as well as an analysis using matched cases between the groups. RESULTS: A total of 257 patients were treated with BCNU according to RTOG protocols 70-18, 83-02, and 90-06; 175 patients were treated with PCV according to RTOG protocol 94-04. All pretreatment characteristics except KPS were well balanced by treatment group; 61% of the BCNU group had a KPS of 90 to 100 compared with 73% of the PCV group (P =.0075). No statistically significant difference in survival was observed in any age group or by KPS or extent of surgery. The stratified analysis also showed no trends for improved survival by treatment group (P =. 40). The Cox model identified only age, KPS, and extent of surgery as important variables influencing survival, not treatment group. Matching cases between groups using age, KPS, and surgery resulted in 133 matched pairs. No difference in survival was observed (P =. 41). In a Cox model in which each matched pair is a strata, there was no difference between groups (P =.20). CONCLUSION: Using this retrospective analysis, there does not seem to be any survival benefit to PCV chemotherapy. Future phase III studies for patients with AA may need to consider whether BCNU or PCV is used in the control arm.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Phase II study of phenylacetate in patients with recurrent malignant glioma: a North American Brain Tumor Consortium report.

PURPOSE: To determine the response rate, time to treatment failure, and toxicity of phenylacetate in patients with recurrent malignant glioma and to identify plasma concentrations achieved during repeated continuous infusion of this agent. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adult patients with recurrent malignant glioma were treated with phenylacetate. The schedule consisted of a 2-week continuous, intravenous infusion followed by a 2-week rest period (14 days on, 14 days off). A starting dose of 400 mg/kg total body weight per day of phenylacetate was initially used and subsequently changed to 400 mg/kg/d based on ideal body weight. Intrapatient dose escalations were allowed to a maximum of 450 mg/kg ideal body weight/d. Tumor response was assessed every 8 weeks. The National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria were used to assess toxicity. Plasma concentrations achieved during the patients' first two 14-day infusions were assessed. RESULTS: Forty-three patients were enrolled between December 1994 and December 1996. Of these, 40 patients were assessable for toxicity and response to therapy. Reversible symptoms of fatigue and somnolence were the primary toxicities, with only mild hematologic toxicity. Thirty (75%) of the 40 patients failed treatment within 2 months, seven (17.5%) had stable disease, and three (7.5%) had a response defined as more than 50% reduction in the tumor. Median time to treatment failure was 2 months. Thirty-five patients have died, with a median survival of 8 months. Pharmacokinetic data for this dose schedule showed no difference in the mean plasma concentrations of phenylacetate between weeks 1 and 2 or between weeks 5 and 6. CONCLUSION: Phenylacetate has little activity at this dose schedule in patients with recurrent malignant glioma. Further studies with this drug would necessitate an evaluation of a different dose schedule.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Outcomes and prognostic factors in recurrent glioma patients enrolled onto phase II clinical trials.

PURPOSE: To determine aggregate outcomes and prognostic covariates in patients with recurrent glioma enrolled onto phase II chemotherapy trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients from eight consecutive phase II trials included 225 with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and 150 with recurrent anaplastic astrocytoma (AA). Their median age was 45 years (range, 15 to 82 years) and their median Karnofsky performance score was 80 (range, 60 to 100). Prognostic covariates were analyzed with respect to tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) by multivariate logistic and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses. RESULTS: Overall, 34 (9%) had complete or partial response, whereas 80 (21%) were alive and progression-free at 6 months (APF6). The median PFS was 10 weeks and median OS was 30 weeks. Histology was a robust prognostic factor across all outcomes. GBM patients had significantly poorer outcomes than AA patients. The APF6 proportion was 15% for GBM and 31% for AA, whereas the median PFS was 9 weeks for GBM and 13 weeks for AA. Results were also significantly poorer for patients with more than two prior surgeries or chemotherapy regimens. CONCLUSION: Histology is a dominant factor in determining outcome in patients with recurrent glioma enrolled onto phase II trials. Future trials should be designed with separate histology strata.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Multicenter phase II trial of temozolomide in patients with anaplastic astrocytoma or anaplastic oligoastrocytoma at first relapse. Temodal Brain Tumor Group.

PURPOSE: To determine the antitumor efficacy and safety profile of temozolomide in patients with malignant astrocytoma at first relapse. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This open-label, multicenter, phase II trial enrolled 162 patients (intent-to-treat [ITT] population). After central histologic review, 111 patients were confirmed to have had an anaplastic astrocytoma (AA) or anaplastic mixed oligoastrocytoma. Chemotherapy-naive patients were treated with temozolomide 200 mg/m(2)/d. Patients previously treated with chemotherapy received temozolomide 150 mg/m(2)/d; the dose could be increased to 200 mg/m(2)/d in the absence of grade 3/4 toxicity. Therapy was administered orally on the first 5 days of a 28-day cycle. RESULTS: Progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months, the primary protocol end point, was 46% (95% confidence interval, 38% to 54%). The median PFS was 5.4 months, and PFS at 12 months was 24%. The median overall survival was 13.6 months, and the 6- and 12-month survival rates were 75% and 56%, respectively. The objective response rate determined by independent central review of gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging scans of the ITT population was 35% (8% complete response [CR], 27% partial response [PR]), with an additional 26% of patients with stable disease (SD). The median PFS for patients with SD was 4.4 months, with 33% progression-free at 6 months. Maintenance of progression-free status and objectively assessed response (CR/PR/SD) were both associated with health-related quality-of-life (HQL) benefits. Adverse events were mild to moderate, with hematologic side effects occurring in less than 10% of patients. CONCLUSION: Temozolomide demonstrated good single-agent activity, an acceptable safety profile, and documented HQL benefits in patients with recurrent AA.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

The role of paclitaxel in the treatment of primary and metastatic brain tumors.

The rationale for the use of paclitaxel to treat brain tumors includes impressive activity in a wide array of chemotherapy-resistant solid tumors, in vitro and in vivo evidence of cytotoxicity against primary brain tumors, and a paucity of effective alternative agents. A review of published studies evaluating paclitaxel alone or in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents suggests that paclitaxel alone is not highly active against newly diagnosed or recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. However, additional prospective trials are warranted to evaluate the efficacy of paclitaxel plus conventional cranial irradiation or stereotactic radiosurgery. Single-agent paclitaxel appears to be active against gliomas with an oligodendroglial component and may prove useful both as a component of initial therapy and for recurrent disease. Activity against anaplastic gliomas and brain metastases also should be explored. With radiation, a weekly paclitaxel administration schedule is particularly appealing from pharmacologic, safety, and dose-intensity perspectives. In addition, the dose of paclitaxel must be increased in patients who are concurrently receiving medications that induce the P-450 drug metabolizing system. Primary and metastatic brain tumors constitute a very difficult problem in oncology. Future investigations should be directed at evaluating paclitaxel-based chemotherapy regimens in selected brain tumor types, combining paclitaxel with stereotactic radiosurgery, and determining the importance of other proposed mechanisms of action of paclitaxel (eg, inhibition of angiogenesis and tumor invasion).

Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic↗
PubMed1999

Chromosomal abnormalities in glioblastoma multiforme by comparative genomic hybridization: correlation with radiation treatment outcome.

Glioblastoma multiforme (GM) is the most common and most malignant astrocytoma in adults. After surgery, radiation therapy extends patient survival; however, in vivo response to radiation therapy is variable. The purpose of this investigation was to determine whether the cytogenetic abnormalities of GM differ according to patient response to radiation therapy. Radiation response was defined by either progression [radiation-resistant (RR)] or resolution [radiation-sensitive (RS)] of tumor at the first postradiation radiographic imaging evaluation. Twenty RR and 10 RS frozen tissue specimens were subjected to cytogenetic analysis by comparative genomic hybridization. RS and RR specimens had different cytogenetic aberrations that mapped predominantly to chromosomes 7, 9, 10, 13, and 19. Relative gain of 7 occurred in 70% of the RR and 30% of the RS cases and was the most significant difference involving a single change between the two groups (P = 0.06). RR and RS specimens also differed in their patterns of simultaneous cytogenetic aberrations. A simultaneous gain of chromosomes 7 and 19 was found in 30% of the RR cases but was absent in the RS group. Concurrent loss of 9p23-24 and 13q14 regions was absent in the RS cohort but occurred in 30% of the RR series. This latter cytogenetic pattern was also associated with older age. Amplifications were more common in the RR series, but the difference did not reach statistical significance. The data suggest that GM with different in vivo responses to radiation therapy also differ cytogenetically.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Influence of bromodeoxyuridine radiosensitization on malignant glioma patient survival: a retrospective comparison of survival data from the Northern California Oncology Group (NCOG) and Radiation Therapy Oncology Group trials (RTOG) for glioblastoma multiforme and anaplastic astrocytoma.

PURPOSE: To examine the effect of treatment using Bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) during radiation therapy on malignant glioma patient survival by comparing historical survival data from several large clinical trials. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patient data from Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) trials 74-01, 79-18, and 83-02 and the Northern California Oncology Group (NCOG) study 6G-82-1 was conducted. Patient data was supplied by both groups, and analyzed by the RTOG. Pretreatment characteristics including age, extent of surgery, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), and histopathology were collected; the only treatment variable evaluated was the use of BrdU during radiation therapy. Radiation dose, dose-fractionation schedule, use of chemotherapy, and/or type of chemotherapy was not controlled for in the analyses. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to examine the potential treatment effect of BrdU on patient survival. RESULTS: Data from 334 patients treated with BrdU on NCOG 6G-82-1 and 1743 patients treated without BrdU on 3 RTOG studies was received. Patients were excluded from the review if confirmation of eligibility could not be obtained, if the patient was ineligible for the study they entered, if central pathology review was not done, or if radiotherapy data was not available. Patients treated according to the RTOG studies had to start radiotherapy within 4 weeks of surgery; no such restriction existed for the NCOG studies. To ensure comparability between the studies, patients from the NCOG studies who began treatment longer than 40 days from surgery were also excluded. The final data set included 296 cases from the NCOG studies (89%) and 1478 cases from the RTOG studies (85%). For patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) the median survival was 9.8 months in the RTOG studies and 13.0 months in the NCOG trial (p < 0.0001). For patients with AA the median survival was 35.1 months for the RTOG studies and 42.8 months in the NCOG trial (p = 0.126). Univariate results showed consistent results favoring BrdU among patients over 30 years of age, across the extent of surgery, and for GBM patients. A proportional hazards regression model that included treatment, histopathology, KPS, age, and extent of surgery demonstrated that treatment with BrdU was included in the best model only for the GBM group of patients (risk ratio 0.83). CONCLUSIONS: Because of the heterogeneity of the treatment groups, including potentially important differences in pathology reviewers assessment of nonglioblastoma cases, differences in radiation dose and schedules, and chemotherapy during or after radiation, these analyses cannot provide the definitive answer as to whether BrdU given during radiation therapy improves survival in patients with malignant glioma. There does appear to be a favorable treatment effect seen in patients with GBM, with a lesser effect in patients with AA.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Survival benefit of hyperthermia in a prospective randomized trial of brachytherapy boost +/- hyperthermia for glioblastoma multiforme.

PURPOSE: To determine if adjuvant interstitial hyperthermia (HT) significantly improves survival of patients with glioblastoma undergoing brachytherapy boost after conventional radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Adults with newly-diagnosed, focal, supratentorial glioblastoma < or = 5 cm in diameter were registered postoperatively on a Phase II/III randomized trial and treated with partial brain radiotherapy to 59.4 Gy with oral hydroxyurea. Those patients whose tumor was still implantable after teletherapy were randomized to brachytherapy boost (60 Gy at 0.40-0.60 Gy/h) +/- HT for 30 min immediately before and after brachytherapy. Time to progression (TTP) and survival from date of diagnosis were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: From 1990 to 1995, 112 eligible patients were entered in the trial. Patient ages ranged from 21-78 years (median, 54 years) and KPS ranged from 70-100 (median, 90). Most commonly due to tumor progression or patient refusal, 33 patients were never randomized. Of the patients, 39 were randomized to brachytherapy ("no heat") and 40 to brachytherapy + HT ("heat"). By intent to treat, TTP and survival were significantly longer for "heat" than "no heat" (p = 0.04 and p = 0.04). For the 33 "no heat" patients and 35 "heat" patients who underwent brachytherapy boost, TTP and survival were significantly longer for "heat" than "no heat" (p = 0.045 and p = 0.02, respectively; median survival 85 weeks vs. 76 weeks; 2-year survival 31% vs. 15%). A multivariate analysis for these 68 patients adjusting for age and KPS showed that improved survival was significantly associated with randomization to "heat" (p = 0.008; hazard ratio 0.51). There were no Grade 5 toxicities, 2 Grade 4 toxicities (1 on each arm), and 7 Grade 3 toxicities (1 on "no heat" and 6 on the "heat" arm). CONCLUSION: Adjuvant interstitial brain HT, given before and after brachytherapy boost, after conventional radiotherapy significantly improves survival of patients with focal glioblastoma, with acceptable toxicity.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Radiation therapy and hydroxyurea followed by the combination of 6-thioguanine and BCNU for the treatment of primary malignant brain tumors.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to evaluate a combined modality treatment for malignant gliomas using radiation therapy with a radiosensitizer and an adjuvant chemotherapy regimen designed to modify resistance to BNCU. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients were eligible if they were 15 years of age or older, and had newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), or anaplastic glioma (AG). Treatment consisted of external beam radiotherapy given to a dose of 60 Gy using a single daily fraction Monday to Friday. Concurrent hydroxyurea at a dose of 300 mg/m2 every 6 h every other day was given during radiation. Following radiotherapy, patients were then treated with BCNU and 6-Thioguanine (6TG). The 6-TG was given by mouth every 6 h for 12 doses prior to BCNU. Patients were initially treated with 60 mg/m2/dose of 6TG, with escalation to a maximum dose of 100 mg/m2/dose. The primary study end points were time to tumor progression and survival. RESULTS: A total of 245 eligible patients were enrolled from 1/18/88 to 12/26/91. The histologic subtypes included 135 GBM, and 110 with AG (103 with anaplastic astrocytoma, 7 with high-grade mixed oligoastrocytoma). For the GBM group, the median time to tumor progression (TTP) and median survival were 33 (95% CI 26, 39) and 56 (95% CI 49, 69) weeks, respectively. For the AG group the median TTP was 282 weeks (95% lower confidence bound = 155 weeks). Median survival for this group has not been reached (95% lower confidence bound = 284 weeks) with a median follow-up for surviving patients of 298 weeks. A proportional hazards model was used to look at potential prognostic factors for survival, including initial Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS), age, and extent of surgery, as well as dose of 6TG. Higher KPS, and lower age, predicted for longer survival (p < 0.01, < 0.001) in GBM patients; lower age was significant (p = 0.05) for AG cases. A higher (greater than 95 mg/m2) or lower dose of 6TG was not statistically significant in this model. CONCLUSIONS: This therapy was no more effective in patients with GBM than other reported series. In patients with malignant gliomas other than GBM, prolonged progression-free and overall survival is noted, without a median survival reached at the time of this report. In this subset of AG patients, survival is comparable to recent studies using halogenated prymidines during radiation and Procarbazine, CCNU, and Vincristine (PCV) as adjuvant chemotherapy.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

High dose oral tamoxifen and subcutaneous interferon alpha-2a for recurrent glioma.

Chemotherapeutic regimens in present use for recurrent glioma have substantial toxicity. Activity against recurrent gliomas has been reported for both tamoxifen and interferon alpha, agents that have more acceptable toxicity profiles and that can be administered in an outpatient setting. We tested the efficacy and toxicity of the combination of high-dose tamoxifen and interferon alpha in adults with recurrent glioma in a phase II trial. Eligible patients had radiographically measurable recurrent gliomas of any grade after initial radiation therapy. Interferon-alpha [6 x 10(6) U subcutaneously three times per week] and tamoxifen (240 mg/m2/day orally) were administered continuously. Treatment response was assessed at 6 week intervals using clinical and radiographic criteria. Eighteen patients (11 males and 7 females) were enrolled. Median age was 41 years (range 23-61 years). All patients had gliomas that progressed after radiation therapy and nitrosourea chemotherapy. The histologic diagnosis of the original tumor was glioblastoma multiforme in 8 patients, anaplastic astrocytoma in 5 patients, astrocytoma in 4 patients and mixed malignant glioma in 1 patient. Reversible moderate to severe neurological toxicity manifested by dizziness and unsteady gait was seen at tamoxifen doses of 240 mg/m2/day. Although the initial tamoxifen dose was reduced to 120 mg/m2/day, moderate neurotoxicity was noted at this dose as well and the trial was closed early. The combination of oral tamoxifen (120 to 240 mg/m2/day) and subcutaneous interferon-alpha [6 x 10(6) U three times per week] was associated with significant neurotoxicity in this group of recurrent glioma patients, resulting in early study closure. Of 16 evaluable patients, 12 had progressive disease after one cycle of treatment, 3 had stable disease, and there was one minor response. Gradual dose escalation may be required if similar patients are to be treated with high dose tamoxifen in conjunction with interferon.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1998

Survival and functional status after resection of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the selection factors for and results of second resections performed to treat recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GM), we studied 301 patients with GM who were treated from the time of diagnosis using two prospective clinical protocols. METHODS: The patients were prospectively followed from the time of diagnosis, using clinical and radiographic criteria after maximal surgical resection and external beam radiotherapy with or without adjuvant chemotherapy. Resection of recurrent GM was performed at the recommendation of the treating clinicians. The results of the second resections were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed using multivariate logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier-Turnbull survival analysis, Cox regression, and propensity score stratification. RESULTS: Forty-six patients underwent second resections during the study period. The actuarial rate of the second resections was 15% of the patients 1 year after diagnosis and 31% 2 years after diagnosis. Younger age (P = 0.01) and more extensive initial resection (P = 0.02), but not Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) score at the time of diagnosis or recurrence, predicted a higher chance of selection for reoperation after initial tumor recurrence. Twenty-eight percent of the patients had improved KPS scores after undergoing reoperation, 49% were stable, and 23% had declines in KPS scores of 10 to 30 points. There was no operative mortality. After reoperation, 85% of the patients received chemotherapy, 11% received brachytherapy or underwent stereotactic radiosurgery, and 17% underwent third resections. The median survival period after reoperation was 36 weeks. Higher preoperative KPS scores predicted longer survival periods after reoperation (P = 0.03). Age and interval since diagnosis were not significant prognostic factors. The median high-quality survival period (KPS score, > or =70) was 18 weeks. The median survival period after first tumor progression was 23 weeks for 130 patients treated using the same protocols who did not undergo reoperations. Patients who did undergo reoperations experienced clinically and statistically significantly longer survival periods. However, this was determined to be partially because of selection bias. CONCLUSION: Survival after resection of recurrent GM remains poor despite advances in imaging, operative technique, and adjuvant therapies. High-quality survival after resection of recurrence to treat GM seems to have increased significantly since an earlier report from our institution.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Phase I study of paclitaxel in patients with recurrent malignant glioma: a North American Brain Tumor Consortium report.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of paclitaxel administered as a 3-hour infusion in patients with recurrent malignant glioma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were stratified by starting dose of paclitaxel and concurrent anticonvulsant (AC) use and were treated in cohorts of three patients. The starting dose was 240 mg/m2 administered intravenously with escalations of 30 mg/m2 until the MTD was established. Pharmacokinetic data were obtained for each patient for the first infusion. Tumor response was assessed at 6-week intervals and treatment was continued until documented tumor progression, unacceptable toxicity, or a total of 12 paclitaxel infusions. RESULTS: From April 1995 to December 1996, 34 patients were treated; 27 patients in the AC group and seven patients in the non-AC group. The MTD for patients who received ACs was established at 360 mg/m2 and the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was central neurotoxicity, characterized as transient encephalopathy and seizures. In contrast, the MTD for patients who did not receive ACs was 240 mg/m2, and myelosuppression, gastrointestinal toxicity, and fatigue were the DLTs. Pharmacokinetic data confirmed that the plasma drug levels and clearance rates were similar for patients in both groups at the respective dose levels that produced DLTs. CONCLUSION: The pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel are altered by ACs, and significantly larger doses of the drug can be administered to patients with brain tumors on AC therapy. The toxicity profile is different for patients on AC therapy treated at these higher doses. A phase II study has been initiated that uses a dose of 330 mg/m2 for patients on AC therapy and 210 mg/m2 for patients not on AC therapy.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Genetic analysis of glioblastoma multiforme provides evidence for subgroups within the grade.

We analyzed 72 primary and 25 recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) samples for DNA sequence copy number abnormalities (CNAs) by comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). The number of aberrations per tumor ranged from 2 to 23 in primary GBM and 5 to 25 in recurrent GBM. There were 26 chromosome regions with CNAs in more than 20% of tumors. 7q22-36 was the most common gain and 10q25-26 was the most common loss; each occurred in more than 70% of tumors. Of 27 amplification sites, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) was the most common; it was observed in 25% of primary GBMs. Statistical analysis based on pairwise correlation of CNAs indicated that there is more than one class of primary GBM.

Adolescent↗