Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M D Palmer

Publications and source records attributed to M D Palmer.

10 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Lethal consequences.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Antibiotic Prophylaxis↗
PubMed2001

Enteral versus parenteral nutrition: a pragmatic study.

Controversy persists as to the optimal means of providing adjuvant nutritional support. The aim of this study was to compare enteral nutrition (EN) and parenteral nutrition (TPN) in terms of adequacy of nutritional intake, septic and nonseptic morbidity, and mortality. This was a prospective pragmatic study, whereby the route of delivery of nutritional support was determined by the attending clinician's assessment of gastrointestinal function. Patients considered to have inadequate gastrointestinal function were given TPN (group 1), while those deemed to have a functioning gastrointestinal tract received EN (group 2). Patients in whom there was reasonable doubt as to the adequacy of intestinal function were randomized to receive either TPN (group 3) or EN (group 4). The trial setting was a large district general hospital with a dedicated nutrition team. A total of 562 patients were included in the study (331 males; median age 67 y). Gastrointestinal function on entry into the study was considered inadequate in 267 patients who were given TPN (group 1) and adequate in 231 whom received EN (group 2). There was clinical uncertainty about the adequacy of gut function in 64 patients (11.4%) who were randomized to receive either TPN (group 3, 32 patients) or EN (group 4, 32 patients). The incidence of inadequate nutritional intake was significantly higher in group 4 compared with group 3 (78.1% versus 25%, P < 0.001). Complications related to the delivery system and other feed-related morbidity were significantly more frequent in both EN groups compared with the respective TPN groups. EN was associated with a higher overall mortality in both nonrandomized and randomized patients. There were no significant differences observed in the incidences of septic morbidity between patients receiving TPN and those given EN. EN is associated with a higher incidence of inadequate nutritional intake, complications related to the delivery system, and other feed-related morbidity than TPN. There is no evidence from this study to support a difference between the two modalities in terms of septic morbidity. Patients in whom there is reasonable doubt as to the adequacy of gastrointestinal function should be fed by the parenteral route.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Oral dietary supplements in pre- and postoperative surgical patients: a prospective and randomized clinical trial.

It has been suggested that the routine provision of oral dietary supplements (ODS) in postoperative surgical patients is of benefit in terms of morbidity and length of hospital stay. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of both pre- and postoperative ODS in patients undergoing an elective laparotomy. Patients requiring elective major gastrointestinal surgery were prospectively randomized into one of four groups: Group I received ODS in addition to normal diet both pre- and postoperatively, Group II were given ODS in the preoperative period only, Group III received ODS only in the postoperative period, and Group IV did not receive any supplements. Assessments of nutritional status, voluntary food intake, weight loss, serum albumin, morbidity and mortality, anxiety and depression, and postoperative activity levels were performed, and comparisons made between the groups. One hundred patients were included in the study. The mean daily energy intake from preoperative ODS was 507 +/- 140 kcal, significantly more than the 252 +/- 195 kcal in the postoperative period (P < 0.001). The postoperative voluntary food intake in patients receiving ODS was not significantly different from that in patients receiving normal diet alone (1090 versus 1268 kcal, 46.2 versus 49.1 g protein, P > 0. 05). All groups demonstrated an overall weight loss, with no significant differences between the groups, and there was no demonstrable effect on clinical outcome. At 6 mo postoperatively there were no differences between the study groups in terms of levels of activity. These results suggest that the routine use of perioperative ODS in well-nourished patients undergoing major gastrointestinal surgery confers no clinical or functional benefit.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Preoperative total parenteral nutrition is not associated with mucosal atrophy or bacterial translocation in humans.

Concerns have recently been expressed at suggestions that postoperative sepsis may be more common in patients who have received preoperative total parenteral nutrition (TPN). The mechanism suggested for this is that TPN causes intestinal mucosal atrophy leading to increased bacterial translocation from the gut as a source of systemic sepsis. This hypothesis was examined in 203 patients who had an elective laparotomy, 28 of whom required at least 10 days of preoperative TPN. Neither mucosal atrophy nor bacterial translocation was more common in parenterally fed patients than in enterally fed controls. In humans theoretical concerns about the adverse effects of TPN on intestinal integrity are unfounded.

Atrophy↗
PubMed1993

Microbial colonization of Blom-Singer prostheses in postlaryngectomy patients.

The microbial colonization of 44 Blom-Singer valves obtained from 16 patients over an 11-month period was investigated both by standard microbial culture methods and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The valves were all removed from the patients after failure to function correctly. The microbiology cultures revealed that Candida species and Staphylococcus aureus were present either individually or in combination on 43 valves. SEM showed yeast hyphae attached to and penetrating the surfaces of the 5 valves examined. Colonies of staphylococci were also seen on 2 of these 5 valves. Unlike similar investigations on other voice prostheses, S aureus colonization was associated with Candida colonization and valve failure.

Candida↗
PubMed1986

Effects of preoperative medications on gastric pH, volume, and flora.

Aspiration of acid gastric juice poses a potential threat during operations. Many anesthesiologists use a variety of agents aimed at decreasing gastric volume and/or acidity. The effect of three agents on gastric volume, pH, and flora, and the effect of cefazolin on gastric flora in morbidly obese patients were studied. Cefazolin did not sterilize the gastric lumen. Almost one-half of patients not treated with an H2 blocker had a pH below 2.5 and a gastric volume of 20 ml or more. Five had both a low pH and significant volume and, thus, the potential for lethal aspiration. Two doses of cimetidine, 300 mgm orally, or of ranitidine, 150 orally, the evening before and the morning of operation decreased gastric volume and raised pH reliably to a level that should be protective from fatal aspiration. However, gastric cultures after these drugs were positive 86% of the time with a larger variety of organisms than in the untreated stomachs. Metoclopramide failed to decrease gastric volume or raise pH. Transoperative cefazolin was used in all patients. Clinical infection was not a problem.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗