Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M Czonstkowsky

Publications and source records attributed to M Czonstkowsky.

8 recordsLinked to original sources

The smear layer in endodontics.

With the cascade of new restorative products being unveiled almost monthly, dentists incorporating endodontics into their practices must be able to evaluate the potential of these products for successful integration into their procedures. This evaluation should be based on a knowledge of how the new products relate to the smear layer formed along the root canal walls. Rather than relying on information supplied by the dental manufacturers, the aware dentist should regularly resort to the most current research reports available in journal or abstract form. With the use of certain products in some clinical situations, other branches of restorative dentistry may suggest retention of the smear layer. Although pulpally infected teeth have been successfully treated for generations in the presence of the smear layer, it has become accepted practice now in endodontics to remove the smear layer. Different quantities and qualities of smear layer can be produced by various techniques of instrumentation. However, they all present a barrier to intimate contact between obturating materials and the canal wall. Various types of solvents will produce different results in smear layer removal. One ideal endodontic irrigant follows the use of the antimicrobial 5.25 per cent sodium hypochlorite solution with the equally antimicrobial 6 per cent citric acid solution or 17 per cent EDTA. Chelating agents are effective in that they remove the smear layer, open the dentinal tubules, and produce a clean surface for closer obturation. Removal of the smear layer encourages the creation of a good apical plug to prevent over filling, post-filling sensitivity, and possible microleakage. The use of glass ionomer cements and unfilled resin as a cementing medium following smear layer removal shows promising results in both strength of cementation and the possibility of reducing post lengths. Controversies will always arise in dentistry with the advent of new information and the discovery of new clinical techniques. But a total awareness of both sides of a controversy will enable the practitioner to find a way through the confusion.

Chelating Agents↗

Clinical evaluation of low-temperature thermoplasticized injectable gutta-percha: a preliminary report.

An injectable thermoplasticized gutta-percha system (Ultrafil) was used to fill 50 teeth which were monitored radiographically over a period of 24 months. An equal number of teeth were filled with the lateral condensation technique and used as controls. Radiographic evidence of success was determined at a 24-month recall. The results were subjected to a 2 x 2 analysis of variance (control versus experimental/before and after treatment. There was a significant amount of repair irrespective of obturation procedure (p greater than 0.0001). Thirteen teeth in the experimental group randomly filled with sealer showed that the sealer did not influence repair.

Follow-Up Studies↗

A comparative study between injectable low-temperature (70 degrees C) gutta-percha and silver amalgam as a retroseal.

This study compared two different dental materials used in endodontic retrosealing procedures. One of these materials was a new low-temperature gutta-percha product, manufactured by the Hygenic Corporation, that involved an injection technique. The second of these materials was silver amalgam. Silver amalgam was selected because it has been recognized by many clinicians as the most effective apical sealing material. Two groups of ten recently extracted teeth were endodontically prepared with one of each of the materials being tested, and the effectiveness of these materials as sealants was determined by their ability to inhibit the penetration of methylene blue dye for a predetermined period of time through the apically sealed root tips. Preliminary results obtained indicated that, although these materials were not 100% effective in inhibiting the dye penetration, each was as effective as the other when evaluated by two observers following completion of the study as determined by its experimental design. No significant difference was exhibited between the amalgam group and the gutta-percha group. The leakage of the dye that was observed in each of the groups might have been caused by the ineffectiveness of, or the ineffective use of, the nail polish or cyanoacrylate used to coat all but the apically sealed tips of the endodonticalled prepared teeth. The function of these coating materials was to prevent penetration of the dye through the surface of the body of the root.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Dental Amalgam↗

Replantation.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Adult↗