Evaluation of drug-induced photosensitivity by UVB photopatch testing.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to M C Marguery.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
INTRODUCTION: A case of photosensitive prurigo during AIDs is reported. This is the second case in the literature. We discuss the relations between HIV infection and photodermatoses. OBSERVATIONS: A woman, known to be HIV seropositive from 1990, developed during the spring 1990 a prurigo on light exposed areas who received the next year. A photobiological investigation was performed, showing a polymorphic light eruption induced by UVB. DISCUSSION: Patients infected with HIV have a high prevalence of UV radiation responsive skin diseases. On the other hand, UVA radiations, UVB and UVC have been shown to induce activation and replication of HIV. PUVA therapy and UVB therapy have shown their efficacity in the treatment of many photodermatoses associated with HIV infection, without any worsening of the illness. Many questions are not yet solved in the relationship between HIV and photosensitivity and the photobiological investigation should be more frequently done.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Fenofibrate and ketoprofen (KP) are two drugs of similar structure derived from that of benzophenone. Both are photoallergic and promote cross reactions in patients. However, the cutaneous photosensitizing properties of KP also include phototoxic effects and are more frequently mentioned. To account for this difference in their in vivo properties, their in vitro photosensitizing properties on DNA were compared. First, it was shown that under irradiation at 313 nm, fenofibric acid (FB), the main metabolite of fenofibrate, photosensitized DNA cleavage by a radical mechanism similar to that proposed for KP but with a 50 times lower efficiency. Furthermore, FB did not photosensitize the formation of pyrimidine dimers into DNA in contrast to KP, which did promote this type of DNA damage. Their difference in efficiency as DNA breakers was compared to their relative photochemical reactivity and the quantum yield of FB photolysis was found to be eightfold lower than that of KP. The reactivity of these drugs cannot explain alone the difference in their photosensitizing properties. Other factors such as the magnitude of the ionic character of the photodecarboxylation pathway of these benzophenone-like drugs are considered in the discussion.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Photo patch tests (Standard battery of the SFPD) were made on 45 patients who were suspected of exogenous photosensitization during 1996. Certain suspected topicals or drugs completed the battery. The results obtained are analysed and compared with those in the literature.
BACKGROUND: Several diagnoses, including syphilis, can be entertained in patients with leukokeratosis of the buccal mucosa. We report a case of labial leucokeratosis which revealed latent syphilis. CASE REPORT: A 36-year-old man with a past history of genital syphilis chancre which have been treated 12 years earlier, developed buccal leucokeratosis with no other clinical manifestation. Histology showed dermal infiltration containing plasma cells, polynuclears and lymphocytes. Blood tests were positive for syphilis. Complementary examinations were unable to detect another localization. Leucokeratosis regressed completely after one injection of Extencilline. There has been no recurrence at one year. DISCUSSION: The clinical and histological presentations of syphilis can mimic different skin diseases. Serodiagnosis alone is significant. Isolated buccal lesions are rarely described in syphilis suggesting serodiagnosis should always be ordered. Whatever the clinical stage of the diseases, serological surveillance after treatment for syphilis is essential.
Tuberculosis is reappearing, due to diminished surveillance, illegal immigration, the HIV epidemic and certainly also due to emerging resistance. The clinical expression of cutaneous tuberculosis depends on the stage of development, the clinical background and the virulence of the germ. Diagnosis is predominantly clinical, but laboratory results also play a role. Treatment involves the quadruple antibiotic treatment prescribed for any tubercular infection. Atypical mycobacteria are widespread throughout the environment and are pathogenic, but also saprophytic, comensal and opportunistic, figure a favourable setting in the immunodeficient individual. Following entry by penetrance, the early lesion is papulonodulary, nodulary, keratoid, crusted, ulcerated, sporotrichoid, generally without peripheral adenopathy. Histological examination discloses a granulomatous reaction limiting the development of the infection; such development is absent in the immunodeficient patient, thus explaining the spread. The most common mycobacterial infection in France, generally in the immunocompetent individual, is "aquarium disease" which follows a benign course; the most common in tropical areas is Mycobacterium ulcerans; whereas Mycobacterium avium intracellulare, fortuitum and chelonae cause, in the immunodeficient patient, severe and extensive infection. Treatment should start as soon as diagnosis is made and the germ identified.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
INTRODUCTION: Transdermal administration of drugs to obtain a systemic effect may lead to allergic sensitization and compromise subsequent use via another administration route. OBSERVATION: A 52-year-old woman presented contact eczema with the transdermal therapeutic system Estraderm TTS50. Generalized eczema developed later after oral administration of an oestrogen derivative. Skin tests demonstrated allergic sensitization to 17 beta-oestradiol. DISCUSSION: Contact eczema due to transdermal therapeutic systems are usually caused by agents other than the active drug. Sensitization to the active drug raises the risk of generalized eczema and subsequent systemic complications. This risk must be taken into account when prescribing substitution hormone therapy for menopause.
The number of skin cancers is doubled every ten years. The responsibility of excessive sun exposure is incontestable as much for what concerns spino and baso cellular epitheliomas as for malignant melanomas. Over-exposure to ultraviolet B rays was considered as the determining cause of skin cancer and the entire prevention campaign was limited to the safeguard from these rays only. In reality, ultraviolet B rays are not uniquely responsible. Recent studies show that ultraviolet A rays, previously considered innocuous, are on the contrary aggressive as well and in a very deceiving way: it appears that it is the exposure to these rays in weak but repeated doses which are the most dangerous. It appeared that the visually determined value of MED was unchanged but the minimal dose responsible for color changes detectable with chromameter was decreased in the presence of UV.A for 3 subjects out of 4. This decrease was about 50% of the value obtained with UV.B alone. The strategy of protection needs to be completely reconsidered, particularly because today's lifestyle favors the exposition to ultraviolet A rays. There is an increase in exposure to UV.A rays when protection is limited only against ultraviolet B rays, giving a false sense of security especially to those who frequent tanning salons. It is therefore necessary to limit exposure time, use sunscreens protecting against not only UV.B, but also UV.A rays, and prohibit tanning salons. Public educational measures are inexistant, but should be introduced hastily in all public services.
OBJECTIVE: Provocative phototests are used regularly to explore photobiology in patients with photodermatoses. Our objective was to determine the reliability of the phototest in the diagnosis of idiopathic and exogenous light eruption in order to identify the ideal date for the histological examination by correlation between the histological aspects of light- triggered and spontaneous lesions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Among 66 patients, there were 48 with polymorphous light eruptions, 13 with exogenous eruptions and 5 with chronic actinodermatitis. The histological findings of the provocative phototests were correlated with the clinical aspect, the date of biopsy and the histological aspect of the spontaneous lesions. RESULTS: In polymorphous light eruptions (48 cases) this test triggered a photoallergic reaction in 48% of the patients. There was a good correlation between the histological findings and clinical features in 96% of the cases. The histological image of the light-triggered lesion on day 6 was the closest to that of the spontaneous lesion. In exogenous eruptions and chronic actinodermatitis (18 cases), only 33% of the clinically positive phototests were also positive at histological examination. The histological image was the same for the provocative tests whether they were clinically positive or negative, with signs of epidermal phototoxicity, regeneration acanthosis and moderate perivascular lymphocyte infiltration of the superficial dermal layer. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings confirmed that the phototest provides a good correlation between histological findings and clinical presentation in idiopathic polymorphous light eruptions, justifying simple clinical interpretation, but did not demonstrate a rate of positive results as high as reported in the literature. Day 6 is the ideal date for a phototest biopsy. In exogenous light eruptions, the phototest is less reliable since the correlation between histology and clinical presentation is weaker. It is difficult to reproduce spontaneous lesions with the phototest, but if used, the phototest biopsy should be done on day 18.
UNLABELLED: INTRODUCTION This case report of benign summer light eruption emphasizes the importance of phototests in the diagnosis of photosensitive dermatoses. CASE REPORT: A 25-year-old man, phototype II, had experienced a pruriginous papulovesicular erythematous eruption of the axillary and inguinal regions each summer for 12 years. A high-dose UV phototest (40 J/cm2 x 3 days) directed on the right posterior axillary area and a whole body exposure test (4 J/cm2 UVA, 20 mJ/cm2 UVB x 3 days) were positive both clinically and histologically on day 4. DEM B was normal at 26 mJ/cm2. Iterative polychromatic phototest (DEM x 3 days) in the area usually involved (left posterior axillary region) was negative. The simple UVA (13 J/cm2) and iterative phototests performed on the back were negative. The results of the phototests led to the diagnosis of benign light eruption despite the unusual localization. DISCUSSION: The diagnosis of benign light eruption is generally clinical. Phototests are unnecessary in most cases. Benign light eruption can be triggered by high-dose iterative UVA exposure of the susceptible area or whole body phototests (UVA-UVB). These specific phototests are indicated in atypical forms or localizations in order to determine the course of benign light eruption and to uncover simulations.
Localized elastolysis refers to a group of heterogeneous conditions which includes cutis laxa. We report a form of localized and non-inflammatory elastolysis evocative of cutis laxa, localized to the anteromedial aspect of the left thigh and knee, acquired at the age of 8 years and associated with unilateral adjacent venous dilatations appearing at the age of 39 years. Our case is clinically and ultrastructurally compatible with cutis laxa. Localized forms of cutis laxa not preceded by inflammation are exceptional; localization on the leg has never been described. This clinical form of elastolysis calls into question the classification of acquired elastolysis. The adjacent varicose veins also raise the question of the risk of subcutaneous damage in this condition.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.