Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M C Ellerington

Publications and source records attributed to M C Ellerington.

8 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1996

Intranasal salmon calcitonin for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we have studied the effects of intranasal salmon calcitonin (SCT) on bone mineral density (BMD) and biochemical markers of bone turnover over a period of 2 years. Our study comprised 117 Caucasian postmenopausal women, otherwise healthy apart from reduced bone density. They received either intranasal synthetic SCT (200 IU either three times weekly or daily) or placebo. Compared with placebo, daily intranasal calcitonin resulted in no significant bone loss in the lumbar spine, as assessed by dual photon absorptiometry, over the 2-year study period (P < 0.02). In this group, women more than 5 years postmenopause, with the lowest baseline bone mass, showed the greatest response to this treatment, with a total increase placebo in lumbar spine BMD of 3.1%. Significant spinal bone loss (P < 0.005) occurred in women receiving either placebo or thrice-weekly calcitonin. Although the rates of bone loss in the proximal femur were not significantly different in the three groups, there were differences over time. Whereas bone loss in the daily calcitonin group was insignificant, women who received placebo or thrice-weekly calcitonin experienced significant bone loss (P < 0. 001). No significant changes in biochemical markers were observed in any group. Therapy was well tolerated and there were no significant treatment-related adverse events. We conclude that intranasal SCT 200 IU daily is effective and safe for the prevention of bone loss in postmenopausal women with reduced bone mass.

Administration, Intranasal↗
PubMed1994

Long-term effects of transdermal and oral hormone replacement therapy on postmenopausal bone loss.

Transdermal hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is now an accepted form of treatment, but the long-term skeletal effects have not been assessed. Sixty-six early postmenopausal women were randomized to receive either transdermal HRT (continuous 17 beta-oestradiol 0.05 mg/day, with 0.25 mg/day of norethisterone acetate added for 14 days of each 28-day cycle) or oral HRT (continuous conjugated equine oestrogens 0.625 mg/day, with 0.15 mg/day dl-norgestrel added for 12 days of each 28-day cycle). Treatment was given for 3 years and 30 matched untreated women were studied concurrently as a control group. Bone density was measured in the lumbar spine and proximal femur by dual-photon absorptiometry at 6-monthly intervals. Bone turnover was assessed by measurement of biochemical markers. At 3 years bone density had declined by 4% in the lumbar spine and by more than 5% in the femoral neck in the untreated group. By comparison bone density increased in both treatment groups at both sites (p < 0.001 vs. untreated) and biochemical measurements indicated a significant reduction in bone turnover. There were no significant differences between the treatment groups. Twelve per cent of women on transdermal or oral treatments lost a significant amount of bone from the femoral neck by 3 years despite adequate compliance. Women taking therapy primarily for hip fracture prevention may require a follow-up bone density measurement to establish the efficacy of treatment.

Administration, Cutaneous↗
PubMed1994

Long-term effects of oral and transdermal hormone replacement therapies on serum lipid and lipoprotein concentrations.

OBJECTIVE: To see whether the short-term changes in serum lipid and lipoprotein concentrations induced by postmenopausal estrogen-progestin therapy are maintained in the long term. METHODS: Sixty-one healthy postmenopausal women were randomized to either oral therapy (continuous conjugated equine estrogens at 0.625 mg/day with sequential dl-norgestrel at 0.15 mg/day for 12 days each cycle) or transdermal therapy (patches delivering continuous 17 beta-estradiol [E2] at 0.05 mg/day with sequential norethindrone acetate at 0.25 mg/day for 14 days each cycle). Twenty-nine healthy postmenopausal women who did not request therapy served as a reference group. Fasting serum lipid and lipoprotein concentrations were monitored for 3 years. RESULTS: Studied in the estrogen-progestin phase, oral and transdermal therapies reduced serum total cholesterol concentrations by 12.1% (P < .001) and 8.4% (P < .001), respectively, and those of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) by 14.2% (P < .001) and 6.6% (P < .01), respectively. These changes, apparent at 3 months, were maintained over 3 years. Serum triglyceride concentrations fell by 2.5% (P < .05) and 16.4% (P < .01), respectively. These decreases were evident after 6 months in both groups but were maintained over 3 years only in the transdermal group. High-density lipoprotein (HDL) concentrations fell in women given oral therapy (7.8%, P < .05) and transdermal therapy (10.7%, P < .001), as well as in untreated women (7.0%, P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The potentially beneficial effects of estrogen-progestin therapy on serum total and LDL cholesterol and on triglycerides were maintained over 3 years. Interpretation of the potentially detrimental effects on HDL concentrations was hindered by the changes seen in untreated women.

Administration, Cutaneous↗
PubMed1993

Postmenopausal bone loss: does HRT always work?

In a 3-year study comparing oral and transdermal HRT, we measured bone density in the spine and proximal femur by dual-photon absorptiometry. Sixty-six women were randomly allocated to receive either oral conjugated equine oestrogens, 0.625 mg daily, together with cyclical oral dl-norgestrel, 0.15 mg daily, or transdermal 17 beta-oestradiol, 0.05 mg daily, together with cyclical transdermal norethisterone acetate, 0.25 mg daily. We found that only 2% showed significant vertebral bone loss on either treatment, whilst approximately 12% lost from the proximal femur. Compliance was demonstrated by monitoring all used patches and pill packets, recording all side effects and bleeding patterns, and by the demonstration of appropriate changes in levels of gonadal steroids and lipoproteins. Comparing the bone losers with the ten highest gainers, lowers were closer to their menopause but were not different in body mass or life style. Serum oestradiol levels were similar, and both groups showed a similar response in terms of changes in bone biochemical markers and lipoproteins in response to HRT. In thus seems that a small proportion of women do not conserve bone density in the proximal femur with standard doses of HRT. It remains to be determined whether they could be identified by more specific biochemical markers of bone turnover, and whether they would maintain with a higher dose of oestrogen.

Administration, Cutaneous↗
PubMed1992

HRT: developments in therapy.

Various forms of oestrogen have been available for use as Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) for approximately 50 years. However, there has been little change in the mode of administration until the last 10-15 years. Although the oral route has remained the mainstay of therapy, non-oral routes of administration have been developed. During the 1970s it became clear that use of unopposed oestrogens in women with an intact uterus resulted in an increase in risk of endometrial carcinoma and thus the current practice of adding a sequential progestogen each month, to prevent endometrial hyperplasia, was introduced. However, certain progestogens can cause side-effects and some of the metabolic changes which they induce are potentially undesirable. Thus the search continues for new oral progestogens which are more 'metabolically friendly' than those in current use. Additionally, non-oral delivery systems for progestogens have been studied, such as the transdermal route (patches) and local administration within the uterine cavity (progestogen-containing intra-uterine devices). Both these strategies may minimise their symptomatic, psychological and metabolic effects. Continuous (every day) administration of progestogens in combination with the oestrogen, or the use of new compounds (e.g. tibolone) may overcome the problem of regular withdrawal bleeding which some women find unacceptable. However, it remains to be determined whether such therapies are as efficacious as conventional oestrogen/sequential progesterone regimens.

Administration, Cutaneous↗
PubMed1991

The long-term risks and benefits of hormone replacement therapy.

There is increasing awareness that the long-term consequences of ovarian failure can be prevented or reduced with appropriate hormone replacement therapy (HRT). After the menopause, there is a rapid loss of trabecular bone resulting in a one in two lifetime risk of osteoporotic fracture. HRT prevents this bone loss and decreases the incidence of fracture. A minimum of 5 years treatment is recommended for significant benefit. Epidemiological evidence is accumulating that post-menopausal oestrogen therapy reduces the risk of cardiovascular disease and stroke by between 30 and 70% even in the presence of established risk factors. Given the prevalence of cardiovascular disease, this is likely to be one of the principle benefits of HRT in the next decade. Concerns about the long-term safety of HRT have focused on endometrial and breast cancer. The increase in risk of endometrial cancer associated with oestrogen only therapy is abolished with the sequential addition of a progestogen for 10-12 days each cycle. The possible effect of HRT on breast cancer risk has to be considered against the background of a one in 12 lifetime risk of developing this disease. The epidemiological studies investigating this relationship are reviewed in this paper. There is a broad consensus that 5-6 years duration of HRT does not increase breast cancer risk. Longer durations of therapy (10-15 years) have been reported to increase this risk although not all the data are in agreement. Other factors, such as family history and benign breast disease, may also influence the risk of breast cancer. The potential benefits of HRT on mortality and morbidity are enormous. Against this is a possible small increase in breast cancer risk with long-term usage. Greater awareness of the long term consequences of the menopause and the potential benefits of HRT should be encouraged so that women can make informed decisions about their need for HRT.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Prevention of osteoporosis. Current recommendations.

Osteoporosis and its treatment have attracted much attention in recent years, especially since the widespread recognition of its association with the menopause. The resulting fractures are a cause of considerable morbidity and mortality in the elderly, and current costs of treating these patients has been estimated to be in excess of pounds 500 million per annum in the UK. As the causes of osteoporosis are now recognised the condition may be largely preventable, especially in women, and significant savings in health expenditure could be made if preventive methods are applied to those most at risk. The most well researched preventive treatment for osteoporosis is hormone replacement therapy (HRT) which offers additional benefits to those who choose it. Alternative methods currently under investigation for those who cannot or will not use HRT include those agents which inhibit the resorption of bone and those that stimulate the production of new bone. Treatment of established disease, i.e. attempts at increasing bone density in those with significant loss, is more difficult and methods so far investigated are not without risks and adverse effects. Furthermore, whether an increase in bone mineral density results in a reduced rate of fracture incidence has yet to be confirmed.

Female↗