Biomedical subjects

M Buri

Publications and source records attributed to M Buri.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1996

Anterior rectocele and anorectal dysfunction.

The two types of anterior rectocele, "distension" of Type 1 rectocele (T1R) and "displacement" or Type 2 rectocele (T2R), have different anatomical, clinical and therapeutic profiles. The aim of this study was to assess anorectal function in patients with distension or displacement rectocele. Three groups of female patients and one group of healthy female subjects were studied. Both the 10 Group 1 subjects, who had been diagnosed as having T1R, and 10 Group 2 women who had been diagnosed as having T2R, were symptomatic for digital evacuation of the rectum. The 10 Group 3 females had complained of sever idiopathic constipation but had no defecatory disorders. The control group was made up to 10 healthy volunteers. All patients and controls underwent clinical evaluation, colonic transit time (CTT), computerized anorectal manometry (CAM), and defecography. Bowel movements and clinical evaluation were similar for both rectocele groups. In Group 1, CAM detected significantly higher anal pressure (P < 0.05) and more impaired rectoanal inhibitory reflex (RAIR) (P < 0.01) in comparison to the other patients and controls. In Group 2, the lowest anal pressure (P < 0.001) was noted but RAIR was normal. Defecographic results, at rest and during evacuation, showed a significantly (P < 0.001) higher anorectal angle and a more abnormal pelvic floor descent in Group 2 than in the other study groups and controls. Therefore, peculiar anorectal function was present in patients with anterior rectocele. A pelvic floor dyssynergia was noted in the distension rectocele group, while a fall of the pelvic floor was noted in the displacement rectocele group.

Adult↗

PubMed1988

Task performance with base-in and base-out prism.

The effects of base-in (BI) and base-out (BO) prism upon performance of four occupational-like tasks were measured on a group of 10 subjects who had normal binocular vision. Performance on tasks which required depth perception was significantly poorer when subjects wore prism glasses with 8 and 12 delta BI and BO, whereas 4 delta BI and BO did not significantly affect performance. The performance decrements with prism (3.0 to 6.7%) were considerably less than those induced by denial of binocularity (20 to 30%) as measured in a previous study. Thus, vergence-inducing prism does impair task performance but not as much as does the denial of binocularity. The reading and counting tasks did not require critical depth judgement and were much less affected by the prism than the needle-threading and pointers-and-straws tasks.

Adult↗

PubMed1987

Optics of progressive addition lenses.

The optical characteristics of the major progressive addition lenses were measured using an automated lensometer with a specially designed lens holder to simulate eye rotation. Measurements were made every 3 degrees (about 1.5 mm) and graphs of isospherical equivalent lines and isocylinder lines were developed. Generally the near zone of these lenses is narrower and lower than in bifocal or trifocal lenses. Distinct differences exist between the various progressive lenses. The width of the near zone, rate of power progression, amount of unwanted cylinder (level with the distance center), and clarity of the distance zone are compared for the various lenses. The optical measurements demonstrate an apparent trade-off between the size of the cylinder-free area of the lens and the amount of the cylinder.

Humans↗

PubMed1986

Binocular vs. monocular task performance.

Functional advantages of binocularity were investigated by having 13 subjects perform a group of occupational-type tasks under monocular and binocular conditions. Significant binocular advantages ranging from 29.5% (pointers in straws) to 3.7% (reading speed) were measured. Tasks with many disparity cues showed the greatest binocular advantage. This shows that patients with normal binocular vision use binocular cues, most likely stereopsis, to enhance performance. In a second experiment, three subjects with normal binocular vision underwent monocular occlusion for 5 days to investigate whether monocular skills improved to compensate for the loss of binocular vision. During that period binocular performance was consistently better than monocular performance, and both monocular and binocular performance improved, even though the subjects were only gaining monocular experience. Although the 5 day occlusion period does not simulate the long-term denial of normal binocularity that strabismics or monocular patients experience, it shows that binocular superiority remains after short-term loss of binocularity.

Functional Laterality↗