[Spinal injuries--many questions still open!].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to M Blauth.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
For posttraumatic atlantoaxial instabilities posterior transarticular screw fixation according to Magerl represents the treatment of choice. In order to be able to insert the screws steep enough the soft tissues of the neck have to be dissected down to C7. Several authors therefore described a percutaneous technique. We analysed 30 patients with a sagittal atlantoaxial instability treated with one of both methods between the years 1995 and 1998 to detect any differences of either technique. In 19 cases we used a modified percutaneous technique with special instruments as has been published by McGuire and Harkey. On lateral plain films the angle between the screws and the lower endplate of C2 was measured. 6 to 24 months after the accident 26 patients could be seen clinically and controlled radiologically, 4 patients had died in the meanwhile. The angle of the screws were significantly different with 10 degrees (percutaneous group 73.9 degrees, open group 63.9 degrees, p = 0.001). Time needed for the operative procedure averaged 35 minutes shorter with the cannulated technique (93 to 128 minutes, p = 0.05). All posterior fusions had healed radiologically. Active motion of the c-spine was restricted in both groups equally. We checked subjective criteria concerning pain and function with a visual analog scale and a special score. With these instruments advantages for the percutaneous procedure could be found (freedom of pain 43 points (percutaneous) versus 39 points (open), p = 0.05). We conclude that the soft tissue preserving percutaneous technique of screw application for C1/C2 posterior fusion allows for a better and easier placement of screws. It also leads to a shorter operating time and better subjective results. The method offers particularly advantages in cases where only a temporary stabilization of the C1/C2 complex without a regular fusion is needed.
The purpose of a fracture classification is to help the surgeon to choose an appropriate method of treatment for each and every fracture occurring in a particular anatomical region. The classification tool should not only suggest a method of treatment, it should also provide the surgeon with a reasonably precise estimation of the outcome of that treatment. But to use a classification before its workability has been proved is inappropriate and can lead to confusion and more conflicting results. Any classification system should be proved to be a workable tool before it is used in a discriminatory or predictive manner. The radiographs of fourteen fractures of the lumbar spine were used to assess the interobserver reliability of the AO classification system. The radiographs and CT scans were reviewed in twenty-two hospitals experienced with spinal trauma. The mean interobserver agreement for all fourteen cases was found to be 67% (41-91%), when only the three main types (A, B, C) were used. The corresponding kappa value of the interobserver reliability showed a coefficient of 0.33 (range, 0.30 to 0.35). The reliability decreased by increasing the categories. For some injuries the interobserver reliability was found to be over 90% and also for the recommended therapeutic procedure there was an acceptable agreement. But the decision between an posterior approach alone or an additionally anterior procedure seems to be the most important question in treatment of spinal injuries at that time.
Pedicular fixation has found great acceptance as a modality for spinal fusions. Being a "blind technique" it is associated with a potential high risk of neural and vascular morbidity. In an attempt to evaluate and/or establish a uniformly accepted concept of surgical management we designed a questionnaire composed of seventeen questions dealing with different pre-, intra- and postoperative procedures in transpedicular fixation. This was sent to 31 experienced surgeons organized in the working group "spine" of the german trauma association. Half of the answers to each question were similar. The other half however, showed a wide variation of thought. It is thus deduced that although some concepts are frequently applied there is no general agreement to an optimal method of surgical handling. Most surgeons use conventional operative cushions for positioning the patients (22/31). Access is usually proceeded by sharp dissection of the lumbodorsal fascia using a scalpel instead of catheterization (21/31), consciously avoiding traumatisation of paravertebral muscle insertion to the transverse processes (22/31), as well as sparing the dorsal branch of segmental arteries (25/31). Intraoperative orientation is attained by inspection coronary and fluoroscopy sagittal (15/31). Most surgeons remove cortical bone using a Rongeur (22/31), transpedicular drill hole is prepared by means of a k-wire (11/31), for orientation again the fluoroscope is made use of (15/31). On perforating the medial boundary of the pedicle thirteen operators correct the direction on drilling, on perforating the lateral boundary twelve medialise the screws on fixation, and eleven surgeons would leave the screws in place if firm holding is warranted. Half of the questioned surgeons simply lateralise the screws if cerebrospinal fluid leaked from the drill holes. If a malposition of the pedicle screws is not suspected no control computer tomography is performed (21/31). Regarding these facts a comparative evaluation of the different techniques used in transpedicular fixation is lacking. In our opinion further multicenter evaluation is necessary to establish a unified method and thus optimize postoperative results.
The aim of this retrospective study was to determine the late result after operative treatment of acute thoracolumbar fractures and fracture dislocations. 29 patients, treated between 1988 and 1995 at the Department of Trauma Surgery, Hannover Medical School with posterior stabilization and interbody fusion with transpedicular cancellous bone grafting, were reexamined 3 1/2 years after surgery. The incorporation and effect on the fusion was analyzed with spiral CT scan after implant removal and the patients were seen for clinical and conventional radiologic examination. We treated 24 type A, 4 type B and 1 type C lesion according to the Magerl classification. 27 patients were stabilized with an internal fixator, 2 with a plate system. The mean operative time totalled 2:50 hours, the intraoperative fluoroscopy time averaged 4:07 minutes and a mean blood loss counted 376 ml. 4 patients out of 6 with an incomplete neurologic lesion (Frankel/ASIA D) improved to Frankel/ASIA grade E. 2 complications were observed: 1 delayed wound healing and 1 venous thrombosis with secondary pulmonary embolism. Compared to the preoperative status our follow-up examinations demonstrated permanent social sequelae: The percentage of individuals able to do physical labor was reduced (15 to 5 patients; p < 0.01) whereas the share of unemployed or retired patients increased (2 to 12 patients; p < 0.01). The assessment of complaints and functional outcome with the "Hannover Spinal Trauma Score" reflected a significant difference (p < 0.001) between the status before injury (96.6/100 points) and at the time of follow-up (64.4/100 points). The correlation between the "Hannover Spinal Trauma Score" and the finger-ground-distance was found to be significant (Coefficient Spearman = -0.71; p < 0.01). The radiographic assessment of the segmental kyphosis (Cobb technique) demonstrated a significant (p < 0.001) mean restoration from an initial angle of -15.2 degrees (kyphosis) to -3.4 degrees (kyphosis). Serial postoperative radiographic follow-up showed progressive loss of correction; at follow-up examination we found a mean of 7.8 degrees (p < 0.005). In 16 patients with an additional posterior fusion with autogenous bone grafting an analogous loss of correction was noted. CT scans after implant removal demonstrated an interbody fusion and incorporation of the transpedicular bone graft in 10 (34%) patients. In another 10 (34%) patients the CT scans proved the interbody fusion at the anterior and posterior wall of the vertebral body via direct contact due to collapse of the disc space. In these patients the bone graft was not incorporated and no central interbody fusion could be found. In 9 (31%) patients neither interbody fusion nor incorporation of the transpedicular graft was achieved. A frequent interbody fusion could not be achieved with the technique of transpedicular bone grafting. In case of incomplete or complete thoracolumbar burst fractures the authors recommend a combined operation with restoration of the anterior column with a strut graft or body replacement.
The analysis of 1,176 whiplash-type neck distortions was sought from a total of 3,838 restrained car driver incident reports. The percentage of these injuries increased from less than 10% in 1985 to over 30% in 1997. These occurred mostly with head-on or with multiple collisions, and only in 15% with pure rear-end collisions. In 23.2%, delta v amounted 10 km/h or less, which corresponds to a very minor crash. The average delta v was the highest in the cases of head-on collisions. Letters were sent to the injured to find out about the duration and type of complaints caused by a cervical spine injury. Of the 138 patients who returned the questionnaires, 121 (88%) indicated that they had or were still suffering from their symptoms. Percentage of various complaints were as follows: pain (74%), tension (6%) and stiffness (5%) in the head (27%), neck (55%) and shoulder (8%). The duration of the complaints was longest after multiple collisions and when the onset of complaints was later than 24 hours after trauma. Women and elderly persons predominated slightly in the group with longer duration of complaints. A correlation between the severity of the accompanying injuries and duration of complaints occurred. Also, with this retrospective study there was considerable difficulties in the lack of adequate follow-up for these patients with less severe injuries. In order to better evaluate this problem, prospective studies are necessary which include documentation of diagnosis, treatment protocols, duration and type of complaints.
This study was performed to evaluate the effect of a cerclage or a crosslink on internal fixator mechanical stability in an unstable spine injury model. Nine human thoracolumbar spine specimens were instrumented either with an internal fixator alone (T12-L2) or together with a cerclage or a crosslink. Four modes of loading were used: flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. Moments itself were generated using a specially designed loading jig and loading system. The maximum moment applied was 10 Nm, three load-unload cycles were performed. The flexibility was measured by a motion tracker and range of motion (ROM), elastic zone (EZ) and neutral zone (NZ) were calculated. Statistical analysis was performed using the paired t-test (p < 0.05). For flexion, extension and lateral bending all devices were significantly more stable (p < 0.01), for axial rotation all devices were significantly less stable compared to the intact specimen (p < 0.01). But the crosslink provided significantly more stability compared to the internal fixator alone (p < 0.001). The complete device, i.e. internal fixator + crosslink, was significantly more stable compared to internal fixator + cerclage (p < 0.05). In this study the use of a cerclage had no additional effect in stabilizing the internal fixator. The operative and financial expenditure using a crosslink seems to be justified in fractures with a high rotationally instability, i.e. in type A-3-, B-, and C-injuries according to Magerl et al. [18].
3 different types of complex spinal trauma are defined: Type I means a multilevel contiguous or non contiguous unstable injury, type II is described as a spinal injury with concomitant thoracic or abdominal lesion, type III stands for the coincidence of spinal injury and polytrauma. Overlapping of different types occurs. Type I: The incidence amounts according a german multicenter study to about 2.5%. Multilevel injuries need to be stabilized for a long distance from posterior. With a thorough analysis the segments to be fused are determined. Type II: The leading thoracic injury is a lung contusion which occurs in up to 50% of the cases. A CT scan of the thorax during the first diagnostic screening is recommended. Early reduction and stabilization from posterior should be aimed at. During the first two weeks anterior procedures are contraindicated. Abdominal injuries are to be found in 3-4% of all spinal injuries. All organs could be affected. A typical constallation is the "seat-belt syndrome" with lesions of the upper abdominal organs and a flexiondistraction injury of the upper lumbar spine. The main problem is to make the diagnosis of both components initially. Most of the patients may be treated in one operation by first taking care of the abdominal injury and than stabilizing the spine. The prognosis of this combination is favorable. Type III: In 17-18% of all polytraumatized patients lesions of the spine are to be diagnosed. From these only one third need surgical care. From 680 patients with operatively treated fractures of the thoracolumbar junction 6.2% were polytraumatized according to the multicenter study mentioned above. The risk of missing a spinal injury in polytrauma totals approximately 20%. Surgical stabilization should be performed in the primary phase (day-1-surgery). Additional injuries, potentially time consuming operations with a high blood loss sometimes necessitate a different approach. Non stabilized spinal injuries apparently do not have the same negative effect on the whole organism as long bone fractures. In the early phase of treatment on the C-spine only anterior procedures and on the thoracolumbar spine only posterior techniques should be applied.
Non-unions in the proximity of the elbow are very rare and in most cases caused by mistakes in initial treatment. Reconstruction after pseudarthrosis of the elbow continues to pose a challenge for any surgeon. The aim of our study was to analyze the initial mistakes and to underline the most important aspects of reconstructive surgery. In a retrospective study over a defined period of 10 years (1/1985 to 12/1994) we were able to treat altogether 27 non-unions in the proximity of the elbow. These patients were transferred to our hospital at an average of 44 weeks after initial therapy elsewhere. The main symptoms were in 17 cases pain and in all other patients functional deficit. Reconstructive surgery was performed an average 54 weeks after the primary injury. In 24 out of 27 cases a re-osteosynthesis, in 12 an arthrolysis, in 7 a neurolysis and in 2 cases an arthroplasty was needed. The patient could return to work an average 18 weeks after the operation and 53 weeks after injury. The initial complaints were reduced in 24 of 27 cases, with a significant improvement in the ROM and functional outcome according to the Mayo Elbow Performance Index.
OBJECTIVE: Recent literature suggests that patients who undergo emergent tube thoracostomy in the field are at increased risks for complications. This study evaluates indications, complications, and effectiveness of field placement of chest tubes by an aeromedical service. METHODS: In a prospective study, 624 consecutive patients with chest injuries (Abbreviated Injury Scale score 1-6) were included. All patients were treated at the scene by a physician-staffed aeromedical service and transported by air to a Level I trauma center. Indications, clinical findings before and after chest tube insertion, and subsequent radiologic diagnosis by chest roentgenography were documented prospectively. RESULTS: Seventy-six chest tubes (50 unilateral, 13 bilateral) were inserted laterally in 63 patients (10%) by blunt dissection. Clinical findings included pneumothorax in 30 patients and hemothorax in 18 patients. In 15 patients receiving field chest tubes, neither pneumothorax nor hemothorax was confirmed. Six patients (<1%) arrived at the trauma center with unsuspected pneumothoraces and required chest tube insertion. No tension pneumothoraces escaped field detection and treatment. Four chest tubes placed in the field required repositioning in the hospital because of malfunction or malpositioning. Radiologic findings excluded intraparenchymal tube placements in all patients. No pleural infections were observed in these 63 patients during their hospital stay. No antibiotics were administered as a result of prehospital chest tube placement. CONCLUSION: Prehospital chest tube thoracostomy is safe, effective, and associated with low morbidity. Nontherapeutic chest tube placements occurred in 15 of 624 patients (2.4%); missed pneumothoraces occurred in 6 of 624 patients (<1%). Aggressive prehospital physician management of blunt chest trauma leads to an earlier treatment of potentially life-threatening injuries. Significant morbidity can be avoided by prompt pleural decompression using proper techniques.
Prerequisites for successful reduction of cervical spine injuries are an exact analysis and classification of every lesion. In locked dislocations disc protrusion should be excluded prior to reduction by MRI or CT-scan. For manual reduction and closed manipulation by the trauma surgeon we use a halo-ring which is applied in local anaesthesia and fluoroscopic control. The anatomic position is maintained by a halo-fixator until surgery. Skeletal traction is used mainly for locked dislocations and late malalignements. Traction is provided by a halo-ring and weights up to 20 kg. Repeated clinical and neurological examinations are necessary to rule out overdistraction of the spine or neurologic deterioration. The weight may be reduced after reduction to 2 kg. For intraoperative positioning and reduction of cervical spine injuries we designed a special device which is connected to the halo ring and allows to fix the head and spine in any desired position. It may be used in prone or supine position of the patient. Operative reductions are rarely necessary on the cervical spine. Typical indication are fractures of posterior elements of the spine preventing closed reduction. Reduction manoeuvers depend on the kind of injury and are mainly composed of traction and a reversal of the trauma mechanism. The most severe complication is a neurologic deterioration. Reports in literature about 13 patients having sustained such a fate are showing the following: In most cases disc material dislocated in the spinal canal during reduction could be made responsible for the catastrophic course. Especially at risk are patients with open reduction from a posterior approach.
Lower cervical spine injuries with instability of the anterior and/or posterior column can be treated by anterior interbody fusion and plate fixation. Plates available for anterior instrumentation of the lower cervical spine can be divided into locking or non-locking systems with uni- or bicortical screw purchase. Our biomechanical comparative testing of different screw fixation systems demonstrates improved stability with the use of bicortical purchase. Clinical studies, however, have proven high fusion rates without loss of correction and a low implant related morbidity with the use of unicortical as well of bicortical plate systems. Correct reduction and intraoperative positioning of the unstable cervical spine is crucial to avoid implant related complications. Also, limitations of anterior instrumentation for the treatment of specific lesions of the lower cervical spine have to be considered, e.g. in complex lesions with axial instability or in fracture dislocations with ankylosing spondylitis. Changes or alterations of adjacent segments can be reduced by the use of plates with correct lengths, contact of uninjured adjacent discs with implants should be avoided. A comparative analysis of two patient collectives--89 patients (1972-1983) and 102 patients (1987-1994), all of them treated with bicortical plate fixation--revealed different results in terms of implant failure, operative reduction and loss of correction. All but one surgical fusions had healed radiologically. Implant related complications during the first 3 months after the initial operation were lower in the latter group, only 3 out of 102 patients (3%) with implant loosening versus 7 our of 89 patients (8%) with implant breakage or loosening required surgical revision. In all cases technical errors could be detected. Clinical follow-ups with personal examination was performed in 144 patients: 57 of 72 survivors of series I (79%) after an average time of 11 years 9 months and 87 out of 94 survivors of series II (85%). The radiologic examination revealed 2 patients with screw breakage in series I, one patient with an asymptomatic implant loosening in series II. Only one case was observed with a loss of correction after loosened and early removed hardware. In all other patients there was no difference of radiologic angles between postoperative X-ray and follow-up. 16 patients, 12 of series I, 4 of series II, were fused in a kyphotic position after insufficient preoperative reduction. Radiologic alterations of adjacent segments, i.e. spondylophyts or "spontaneous" fusions, were observed in more than 50% of all patients of both series. However, complaints or persistent pain did not correlate with radiologic findings. Also in both series there was a high percentage of patients with mild, residual neck pain in spite of a very good radiologic result. Only in a very few cases the complaints had to be treated by drugs.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Injuries of the spine in children rarely occur. They amount to about 0.2% of all fractures and dislocation and to 1.5 to 3% of all lesions of the spine. The younger an injured child is, the more likely it has sustained a lesion of the upper cervical spine. This spinal segment in comparison to adults is concerned more often and accounts for 50% of all C-spine injuries. Important differences between the adult spine and the spine in the child disappear with the age of 10 years. Later diagnostics, classification and treatment correspond widely with the principles valid in adults. The knowledge of the normal shape and development of the spine are crucial in avoiding misinterpretations of X-ray films. Typical examples include the confusion of synchondrosis with fractures or of subluxations of the atlas and the C2/C3 segment with "true" instabilities. Relevant lesions always are accompanied by clear clinical symptoms. Specific injuries of the growing axial skeleton are lesions of the cartilaginous endplates and "fractures" of the synchondrosis. Atlantooccipital dislocations (AOD) occur typically in children. According to our experiences with 16 AOD we propose--dependent on the direction of dislocation of the occipital condyles--a simplified classification in anterior, posterior and completely unstable AOD. In one boy in our series we treated the lesion successfully by temporary internal fixation. He presented a massive improvement of initially subtotal neurologic symptoms. Injuries to the synchondrosis of the dens represent another typical lesion in childhood. Four out of 5 children treated in our clinic were involved as back seat passengers in head-on motor vehicle accidents. Three of them were restrained by 4 point children's seat harnesses. For conservative treatment we prefer a halo and plaster-vest for 12 weeks after closed reduction. We recommend operative treatment in cases of major dislocation with greater instability where it may be impossible to maintain alignment with halo fixation. Surgical equipment and techniques correspond in detail to those used in adults. Three of the five children mentioned have been stabilized successfully by anterior screw fixation. Atlantoaxial dislocations (AAD) are divided into translatory and rotatory instabilities. Sagittal dislocations of the atlas in children also need to be fixed by a fusion between C1 and C2. Rotatory instabilities in the acute phase are easy to reduce and are treated with a halo-fixator. According to our experiences in two delayed cases anatomical reduction is also possible after months partly by open, partly by closed means. For the lower C-spine lesion with encroachment of the spinal canal and above all ligamentous injuries represent a clear indication for operative treatment because, similar to the adult spine, they do not become stable after close management.
The therapy for spontaneous or artificial perforation of the esophagus remains a controversial matter. The following case report deals with the medical history of an artificial esophageal perforation after operative treatment of cervical disc disease. A 68-year-old male patient underwent a C4/C5 and C5/C6 discectomy with interbody fusion of C7-T1 vertebral body, according to Smith-Robinson. During this operation, a 3-cm-long lesion was made in the posterior wall of the esophagus, which was treated 24 h later with a primary suture. The clinical follow-up was complicated by mediastinitis with subsequent multiorgan failure. After recovery from this critical condition the patient dysphagia, which was related to a persistent lesion in the posterior esophageal wall with endoscopically demonstrated dislocation of a screw. After removal of the screw, the lesion was covered by means of sternocleidomastoid myoplasty. Moderate postoperative dysphagia was successfully treated by bougienage.
Fractures of the elbow joint are quite rare compared with the total incidence of injuries to the extremities. However, elbow fractures often result in significant disability. Therefore in a retrospective study, we have evaluated criteria that are of prognostic value for late functional outcome. Sixty-four (10.3%) of 622 patients with closed elbow fractures and 107 (89%) of 119 patients with open elbow fractures underwent a physical examination. The mean follow-up time was 8.2 years. The functional outcome was recorded by a modified score (0-max. 15) according to Morrey. Epidemiological data from both groups revealed a greater severity and higher degree of injury in open fractures than in closed fractures. In contrast, both groups presented a comparably good functional result. The most significant factor for poor outcome (score < 5) was identified as nerve lesions. Among all nerve lesions in open fractures, 45% resulted in a functional score of < 5; in 42% of closed fractures combined with a nerve lesion a similarly poor result was also noted. A second major factor appeared to be the method of primary therapy. An external joint transfixation resulted in a score of < 5 in 32% of patients that were treated primarily by transfixation. In cases initially treated with open reduction and internal fixation, only 18.5% of open fractures and 3.1% of closed fractures presented a similar low score. According to our results the late functional outcome of elbow fractures depends less on the type of fracture than on the presence of a nerve lesion and the method of primary treatment, which should facilitate early mobilization.
Between January 1989 and July 1992, 76 patients with thoracolumbar fractures were operatively treated at the Department of Trauma Surgery, Hannover Medical School. After a mean of more than 3 years, 56 of 62 patients (90%) still alive who had their implants removed were examined. According to the ASIF classification 33 patients sustained type A fractures, 13 type B and 10 type C. Three patients with incomplete paraplegia returned to normal; in one case of complete paraplegia no change occurred. In 40 cases the dorsal instrumentation was combined with transpedicular cancellous bone grafting. The mean operative time totaled 3 h. In this series, two complications (3.6%) were observed: one iatrogenic vertebral arch fracture without consequences and one deep infection. Compared to the preoperative status, our follow-up examinations demonstrated permanent physical and social sequelae; the percentage of individuals able to do physical labor was reduced by half (22 to 11 patients) whereas the share of unemployed or retired patients doubled (4 to 8 patients). At the time of follow-up examination only 21 of 42 patients continued in sports. The assessment of complaints and functional outcome with the "Hannover Spinal Trauma Score" reflected a significant difference (P < 0.001) between the status before injury (96.6/100 points) and at the time of follow-up (71.4/100 points). The radiographic assessment in the lateral plane (Cobb technique) demonstrated a significant (P < 0.001) mean restoration from an initial angle of -15.6 degrees (kyphosis) to +0.4 degree (lordosis). Serial postoperative radiographic follow-up showed progressive loss of correction; at follow-up examination we found a mean of 10.1 degrees (P < 0.001). Compared to the preoperative deformity a mean improvement of 6.1 degrees to an average of -9.7 degrees at follow-up examination was noted. The addition of transpedicular cancellous bone grafting did not decrease the loss of correction. CT scans after implant removal were performed in 9 cases: only 3 of 9 patients showed evidence of intervertebral fusion. No correlation could be found between ASIF classification and radiographic outcome. However, the preoperative wedge angle of the vertebral body correlated significantly with the postoperative loss of reduction. Due to disappointing results after dorsal stabilization with transpedicular cancellous bone grafting we recommend a combined procedure with dorsal stabilization and ventral fusion in cases of complete or incomplete burst injury of the vertebral body.