Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M Bienz

Publications and source records attributed to M Bienz.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

A new Drosophila APC homologue associated with adhesive zones of epithelial cells.

Adenomatous polyposis coli protein (APC) is an important tumour suppressor in the human colon epithelium. In a complex with glycogen synthase kinase-3 (GSK-3), APC binds to and destabilizes cytoplasmic ('free') beta-catenin. Here, using a yeast two-hybrid screen for proteins that bind to the Drosophila beta-catenin homologue, Armadillo, we identify a new Drosophila APC homologue, E-APC. E-APC also binds to Shaggy, the Drosophila GSK-3 homologue. Interference with E-APC function produces embryonic phenotypes like those of shaggy mutants. Interestingly, E-APC is concentrated in apicolateral adhesive zones of epithelial cells, along with Armadillo and E-cadherin, which are both integral components of the adherens junctions in these zones. Various mutant conditions that cause dissociation of E-APC from these zones also obliterate the segmental modulation of free Armadillo levels that is normally induced by Wingless signalling. We propose that the Armadillo-destabilizing protein complex, consisting of E-APC, Shaggy, and a third protein, Axin, is anchored in adhesive zones, and that Wingless signalling may inhibit the activity of this complex by causing dissociation of E-APC from these zones.

Adenomatous Polyposis Coli Protein↗

dMi-2, a hunchback-interacting protein that functions in polycomb repression.

Early in Drosophila embryogenesis, gap gene products directly repress transcription of homeotic (HOX) genes and thereby delimit HOX expression domains. Subsequently, Polycomb-group proteins maintain this repression. Currently, there is no known molecular link between gap and Polycomb-group proteins. Here, dMi-2 is identified as a protein that binds to a domain in the gap protein Hunchback that is specifically required for the repression of HOX genes. Genetic analyses show that dMi-2 participates in both Hunchback and Polycomb repression in vivo. Hence, recruitment of dMi-2 may serve as a link between repression of HOX genes by Hunchback and Polycomb proteins.

Adenosine Triphosphatases↗

Transcriptional repression due to high levels of Wingless signalling.

Extracellular signals can act at different threshold levels to elicit distinct transcriptional and cellular responses. Here, we examine the transcriptional regulation of the Wingless target gene Ultrabithorax (Ubx) in the embryonic midgut of Drosophila. Our previous work showed that Ubx transcription is stimulated in this tissue by Dpp and by low levels of Wingless signalling. We now find that high levels of Wingless signalling can repress Ubx transcription. The response sequence within the Ubx midgut enhancer required for this repression coincides with a motif required for transcriptional stimulation of Dpp, namely a tandem of binding sites for the Dpp-transducing protein, Mad. Indeed, Wingless-mediated repression depends on low levels of Dpp, although apparently not on Mad itself. In contrast, high levels of Dpp signalling antagonize Wingless-mediated repression. This suggests that transcriptional activation of Ubx is subject to competition between Dpp-activated Mad and another Smad whose function as a transcriptional repressor depends on high Wg signalling. Finally, we show that Wingless can repress its own expression via an autorepressive feedback loop that results in a change of the Wingless signalling profile during development.

Armadillo Domain Proteins↗

Drosophila CBP represses the transcription factor TCF to antagonize Wingless signalling.

T-cell factor (TCF), a high-mobility-group domain protein, is the transcription factor activated by Wnt/Wingless signalling. When signalling occurs, TCF binds to its coactivator, beta-catenin/Armadillo, and stimulates the transcription of the target genes of Wnt/Wingless by binding to TCF-responsive enhancers. Inappropriate activation of TCF in the colon epithelium and other cells leads to cancer. It is therefore desirable for unstimulated cells to have a negative control mechanism to keep TCF inactive. Here we report that Drosophila CREB-binding protein (dCBP) binds to dTCF. dCBP mutants show mild Wingless overactivation phenotypes in various tissues. Consistent with this, dCBP loss-of-function suppresses the effects of armadillo mutation. Moreover, our data show that dCBP acetylates a conserved lysine in the Armadillo-binding domain of dTCF, and that this acetylation lowers the affinity of Armadillo binding to dTCF. Although CBP is a coactivator of other transcription factors, our data show that CBP represses TCF.

Animals↗

Functional intertwining of Dpp and EGFR signaling during Drosophila endoderm induction.

Endoderm induction in Drosophila is mediated by the extracellular signals Decapentaplegic (Dpp) and Wingless (Wg). We discovered a secondary signal with a permissive role in this process, namely Vein, a neuregulin-like ligand that stimulates the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and Ras signaling. Dpp and Wg up-regulate vein expression in the midgut mesoderm in two regions overlapping the Dpp sources. Experiments based on lack of function and ectopic stimulation of Dpp and EGFR signaling show that these two pathways are functionally interdependent and that they synergize with each other, revealing functional intertwining. The transcriptional response elements for the Dpp signal in midgut enhancers from homeotic target genes are bipartite, comprising CRE sites as well as binding sites for the Dpp signal-transducing protein Mad. Of these sites, the CRE seems to function primarily in the response to Ras, the secondary signal of Dpp. We discuss the potential significance of why an inductive process might use a secondary signal whose function is intertwined with that of the primary signal.

Animals↗

TCF: transcriptional activator or repressor?

T cell factor, or TCF, has been identified as the transcriptional response factor activated by Wnt-1 and Wingless signalling. TCF is thought to be a potent architectural factor which facilitates assembly of multiprotein enhancer complexes. Its deregulation in the colonic epithelium, and in other cells, leads to cancer. This raises the question of how TCF is kept inactive in unstimulated cells.

Animals↗

A CREB-binding site as a target for decapentaplegic signalling during Drosophila endoderm induction.

Decapentaplegic (Dpp) is an extracellular signal of the transforming growth factor-beta family with multiple functions during Drosophila development. For example, it plays a key role in the embryo during endoderm induction. During this process, Dpp stimulates transcription of the homeotic genes Ultrabithorax in the visceral mesoderm and labial in the subjacent endoderm. Here, we show that a cAMP response element (CRE) from an Ultrabithorax enhancer mediates Dpp-responsive transcription in the embryonic midgut, and that endoderm expression from a labial enhancer depends on multiple CREs. Furthermore, the Drosophila CRE-binding protein dCREB-B binds to the Ultrabithorax CRE, and ubiquitous expression of a dominant-negative form of dCREB-B suppresses CRE-mediated reporter gene expression and reduces labial expression in the endoderm. Therefore, a CREB protein may act as a nuclear target, or as a partner of a nuclear target, for Dpp signalling in the embryonic midgut.

Activating Transcription Factor 1↗

LEF-1, a nuclear factor coordinating signaling inputs from wingless and decapentaplegic.

wingless and decapentaplegic signal during endoderm induction in Drosophila to regulate expression of the homeotic gene Ultrabithorax. Here, we define a minimal wingless response sequence in the midgut enhancer of Ultrabithorax. We show that this sequence is recognized by the murine transcription factor LEF-1 (lymphocyte enhancer binding factor 1) in a ternary complex with armadillo protein, the cytoplasmic target of the wingless signaling pathway. In stable transformants, transcriptional stimulation of the Ultrabithorax enhancer by LEF-1 depends on armadillo. Furthermore, overexpression of LEF-1 bypasses the need for wingless signaling and causes phenotypes in the midgut, notum, and wing that mimic wingless hyperstimulation. Finally, efficient transcriptional stimulation by LEF-1 in the midgut depends also on the decapentaplegic response sequence and is limited spatially by decapentaplegic signaling. Thus, LEF-1 coordinates inputs from multiple positional signals, consistent with its architectural role in regulating the assembly of multiprotein enhancer complexes.

Animals↗

Antagonism between EGFR and Wingless signalling in the larval cuticle of Drosophila.

Signalling by the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) plays a critical role in the segmental patterning of the ventral larval cuticle in Drosophila: by expressing a dominant-negative EGFR molecule or Spitz, an activating ligand of EGFR, we show that EGFR signalling specifies the anterior denticles in each segment of the larval abdomen. We provide evidence that these denticles derive from a segmental zone of embryonic cells in which EGFR signalling activity is maximal. Within each segment, there is a competition between the denticle fate specified by EGFR signalling and the naked cuticle fate specified by Wingless signalling. The final pattern of the denticle belts is the product of this antagonism between the two signalling pathways. Finally, we show that the segmental zones of high EGFR signalling activity depend on bithorax gene function and that they account for the main difference in shape between abdominal and thoracic denticle belts.

Abdomen↗

D-Fos, a target gene of Decapentaplegic signalling with a critical role during Drosophila endoderm induction.

The Drosophila endoderm is patterned by the signals Decapentaplegic and Wingless secreted from the visceral mesoderm. This induction culminates in a precise pattern of spatially restricted expression of labial, a selector gene with a role in cell type specification in the larval midgut. Here, we show that Decapentaplegic signalling induces elevated expression of the Drosophila AP-1 transcription factor D-Fos in a slightly broader endodermal region than labial. This induction occurs in parallel to, and independently of, that of labial. Furthermore, we present evidence that D-Fos is required for labial induction in the embryo as well as for maintenance of labial expression through larval stages; and that D-Fos is critical for cellular differentiation in the larval gut. We propose that Decapentaplegic, by inducing D-Fos, broadly defines an endodermal region which thus becomes predisposed to express labial, and that D-Fos cooperates with signal-activated response factors to confer the precise pattern of labial expression in this region.

Animals↗

A test for cell autonomy, based on di-cistronic messenger translation.

We have devised a test for cell autonomy of a gene that is switched on ectopically in a clone of cells, allowing us to ask whether the wild-type activity of this gene can influence neighbouring cells. To switch on the test gene, we used the yeast FRT system, and marked the FRT-generated cell clone by co-expressing beta-galactosidase. Co-expression is achieved by a stretch of 5' untranslated mRNA from the homeotic gene Ultrabithorax (Ubx), which is inserted between the two coding sequences. We show that this Ubx sequence mediates efficient and reliable di-cistronic mRNA translation in wing imaginal discs of Drosophila. Applying our test to Ubx, we find that ectopic Ubx in wing discs strictly coincides with beta-galactosidase expression. Consequently, wing cells are transformed into cells that appear to be intermediates between wing and haltere cells, contesting the view that homeotic genes act as binary switches.

Animals↗

decapentaplegic, a target gene of the wingless signalling pathway in the Drosophila midgut.

dishevelled, shaggy/zeste-white 3 and armadillo are required for transmission of the wingless signal in the Drosophila epidermis. We show that these genes act in the same epistatic order in the embryonic midgut to transmit the wingless signal. In addition to mediating transcriptional stimulation of the homeotic genes Ultrabithorax and labial, they are also required for transcriptional repression of labial by high wingless levels. Efficient labial expression thus only occurs within a window of intermediate wingless pathway activity. Finally, the shaggy/zeste-white 3 mutants revealed that wingless signalling can stimulate decapentaplegic transcription in the absence of Ultrabithorax, identifying decapentaplegic as a target gene of wingless. As decapentaplegic itself is required for wingless expression in the midgut, this represents a positive feed-back loop between two cell groups signalling to each other to stimulate each other's signal production.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗

Two different thresholds of wingless signalling with distinct developmental consequences in the Drosophila midgut.

Drosophila wingless encodes a Wnt protein which mediates communication between cells. Although wingless protein is secreted from cells, there is debate as to what is the range of wingless action. We examined the function of wingless in the larval midgut, and found that wingless acts at two different thresholds to pattern this tissue. Low wingless levels are required to promote the development of copper cells, highly differentiated midgut cells of the larval midgut that are specified by the homeotic gene labial. High wingless levels repress copper cell development and allow differentiation of an alternative cell type, called large flat cells. These two developmental outcomes reflect labial expression, which is stimulated at low levels and repressed at high levels of wingless signalling. Thus, midgut cells respond differentially to distinct wingless thresholds in terms of both gene control and cellular differentiation.

Animals↗

Segmental expression of Hoxb-1 is controlled by a highly conserved autoregulatory loop dependent upon exd/pbx.

Comparison of Hoxb-1 regulatory regions from different vertebrates identified three related sequence motifs critical for rhombomere 4 (r4) expression in the hindbrain. Functional analysis in transgenic mice and Drosophila embryos demonstrated that the conserved elements are involved in a positive autoregulatory loop dependent on labial (lab) family members. Binding of Hoxb-1 to these elements in vitro requires cofactors, and the motifs closely resemble the consensus binding site for pbx1, a homolog of the Drosophila extradenticle (exd) homoedomain protein. In vitro exd/pbx serves as a Hoxb-1 cofactor in cooperative binding and in Drosophila expression mediated by the r4 enhancer is dependent on both lab and exd. This provides in vivo and in vitro evidence that r4 expression involves direct autoregulation dependent on cooperative interactions of Hoxb-1 with exd/pbx proteins as cofactors.

Animals↗

Transcriptional silencing of homeotic genes in Drosophila.

Homeotic genes are subject to transcriptional silencing, which prevents their expression in inappropriate body regions. Here, we shall focus on Drosophila, as little is known about this process in other organisms. Evidence is accumulating that silencing of Drosophila homeotic genes is conferred by two types of cis- regulatory sequences: initiation (SIL-1) and maintenance (SIL-M) elements. The former contain target sites for transient repressors with a highly localised distribution in the early embryo and the latter for constitutive repressors that are likely to be present in all cells. We discuss how SIL-1 elements may cooperate with SIL-M elements to promote formation of a silencing complex. We propose that this complex consists of specific non-histone proteins, the so-called Polycomb group proteins, and that it is anchored at SIL-M elements and at the promoter.

Animals↗

Specification of a single cell type by a Drosophila homeotic gene.

Homeotic genes function in blocks of cells along the body axis to specify diverse developmental pathways. Among the Drosophila homeotic genes, only one is known to be expressed in the endoderm. We show here that expression of this gene, labial (lab), coincides with copper cells, highly specialized cells of the larval midgut. lab is strictly required for copper cell formation, a requirement that starts in the embryo and extends through larval stages. This implies a function of lab not only in the determination and differentiation of copper cells, but also in the maintenance of their differentiated state. Ectopic expression of lab during embryogenesis reprograms other midgut cells within and outside the lab domain to become copper cell-like. Thus, lab functions in the larval midgut to specify a single cell type.

Animals↗

Homeotic genes and positional signalling in the Drosophila viscera.

Homeotic genes play a key regulatory role in the two innermost germ layers of Drosophila, the visceral mesoderm and the endoderm. Here, they control, and are controlled by, genes that encode extracellular proteins involved in signalling. Examples of these regulatory interactions are an inductive process between the two germ layers, and an indirect autoregulatory loop of a homeotic gene in the visceral mesoderm. Both these mechanisms define or redefine spatial domains of homeotic gene expression, by way of intercellular communication. The homeotic genes that are expressed in the viscera control morphogenesis and differentiation of the larval midgut.

Animals↗