H-2 compatibility requirements for T suppressor cell functions induced by Friend leukaemia virus.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to M Bennett.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Friend leukemia virus suppresses the proliferative responses of normal thymus-dependent (T) and bursa equivalent-dependent (B) lymphocytes from spleen, thymus, lymph node, and bone marrow to mitogens. The suppressive effect of Friend virus complex (FV) requires fully infectious virions. Friend erythroleukemic cells, washed to removed extracellular virus, fail to suppress concanavalin A (Con-A)-induced mitogenesis of normal spleen cells. This indicates that FV does not mediate its immunosuppressive effect via transformed erythropoietic cells. The in vitro suppressive effect of FV on lymphocyte mitogenesis is under host genetic control. Spleen, bone marrow, and thymus cells from strains of mice susceptible to FV-induced leukemogenesis in vivo were quite susceptible to the suppressive effects of FV in vitro. On the other hand, similar cells from strains of mice such as C57BL/6 resistant to Friend erythroleukemia, were quite resistant to in virto immunosuppression by FV. Mitogenesis of splenic T cells from resistant B6 mice, previously treated with 89Sr, became susceptible to suppression by FV. This indicated that the in vitro resistance of lymphocytes to FV-induced suppression is not an intrinsic property of T cells, but is controlled by marrow-dependent (M) cells which are selectively eliminated by treatment with 89Sr. M-cell function does not develop in mice less than 3-wk old. The Con A response by thymus cells from 2-wk-old B6 mice was susceptible to suppression by FV, further supporting the concept that M cells may regulate the genetic resistance to FV.
Friend leukemia virus (FV) suppressed the proliferative responses of spleen, lymph node, marrow, and thymus cell populations to various T- and B-cell mitogens. Cells taken from mice, e.g. BALB/c genetically susceptible to leukemogenesis in vivo were much more susceptible to suppression of mitogenesis in vitro than similar cells from genetically resistant mice, e.g., C57BL/6. Nylon wool-purified splenic T cells from BALB/c and C3H mice lost susceptibility to FV-induced suppression of mitogenesis but became suppressible by addition of 10% unfiltered spleen cell. Thus, FV mediates in vitro suppression of lymphocyte proliferation indirectly by "activating" a suppressor cell. The suppressor cell adhered to nylon wool but not to glass wool or rayon wool columns. Pretreatment of spleen cells with carbonyl iron and a magnet did not abrogate the suppressor cell function. Suppressor cells were not eliminated by treatment with rabbit antimouse immunoglobulin (7S) and complement (C). However, high concentrations of anti-Thy-1 plus C destroyed suppressor cells of the spleen; thymic suppressor cells were much more susceptible to anti-Thy-1 serum. Nude athymic mice were devoid of suppressor cells and their B-cell proliferation was relatively resistant to FV-induced suppression in vitro. The suppressor cells in the thymus (but not in the spleen) were eliminated by treatment of mice with cortisol. Thus, FV appears to mediate its suppressive effect on mitogen-responsive lymphocytes by affecting "T-suppressor cells." Spleen cells from C57BL/6 mice treated with 89Sr to destroy marrow-dependent (M) cells were much more suppressible by FV in virto than normal C57BL/6 spleen cells. However, nylon-filtered spleen cells of 89Sr-treated C57BL/6 mice were resistant to FV-induced suppression in vitro, indicating that the susceptibility of spleen cells from 89Sr-treated B6 mice is also mediated by suppressor cells. Normal B6 splenic T cells were rendered susceptible to FV-induced suppression of mitogenesis by addition of 10% spleen cells from 89Sr-treated B6 mice. Thus, M cells appear to regulate the numbers and/or functions of T-suppressor cells which in turn mediate the immunosuppressive effects of FV in vitro. Neither mitogen-responsive lymphocytes nor T-suppressor cells are genetically resistant or susceptible to FV. The genetic resistance to FV is apparently a function of M cells, both in vitro as well as in vivo.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
A cellfree extract prepared from the spleen cells of C3H mice is capable of suppressing antibody responses to SRBC when extract material is exposed to alloantigens. The observed immunosuppression was attributed to a soluble factor in the extract. This allogeneic suppressive factor (ASF) was detected in extracts prepared from the spleen cells of unirradiated mice as well as those of irradiated mice repopulated with thymocytes, provided that mice were previously immunized with SRBC. Donors of actively suppressive ASF preparations did not need to be previously exposed to alloantigens. Extracts from thymus and marrow cells of unirradiated mice and the spleen cells of irradiated mice repopulated with marrow cells (or no cells) did not contain ASF. C3H thymocytes stimulated with SRBC generated more ASF activity in spleens of C3BF1 hosts than in those of C3H hosts, indicating that alloantigenic stimulation enhances the production or activity of ASF. Once produced, C3H ASF was able to suppress antibody responses in cell transfer experiments only if exposed to C3BF alloantigens of either donor lymphoid cells or irradiated hosts. Once exposed to alloantigens, ASF appears to be capable of suppressing antibody responses of syngeneic C3H or semi-allogeneic C3BF cells. When both donor lymphoid cells and hosts were syngeneic with the donor of the ASF, there was enhancement of antibody formation in cell transfer experiments. C3H ASF did not interfere with education of C3BF thymocytes to SRBC or with the generation of precursors of anti-SRBC antibody-forming cells by C3BF1 marrow cells. ASF may interfere with cellular cooperative events necessary for humoral immune responses or with terminal differentiation of B cells. Production of ASF could partially account for the suppression of antibody responses observed during graft-vs-host reactions.
Mice were irradiated, infused with thymocytes and immunized with a variety of antigens, i.e., sheep or horse red blood cells (SRBC or HRBC), diphtheria toxoid (DT) or bovine gamma-globulin (BGG). The spleen cells (T.Spleen cells) were harvested 5 days later and cellfree extracts were prepared. The extracts contained an allogeneic suppressive factor (ASF) that was capable of inhibiting IgM antibody responses of allogeneic or semi-allogeneic unirradiated mice. ASF had to be injected within 24 hr of immunization to be effective and a single injection delayed, rather than abolished, the antibody response at the cellular level. However, daily injections of ASF resulted in persistent suppression of antibody response. ASF activity was antigen nonspecific, i.e., the antigen used to stimulate ASF production did not have to be the same as the antigen used to test for ASF activity. C3H T.Spleen extracts were even immunosuppressive when prepared by exposure to C3BF1 alloantigens only; such extracts suppressed antibody responses of C3BF1 and DBA/2 mice. C3H ASF was removed from extracts after incubation with C3BF1 spleen cells but not after incubation with C3H spleen cells. C3BF1 spleen cells which had been preincubated with C3H ASF were unable to generate antibody-forming cells upon transfer to irradiated C3BF1 host mice. This suggests that the ASF molecule may be or include receptors for alloantigens. The immunogenetic requirements for ASF activity were evaluated by injecting extracts from C3H, C57BL, C3BF and BALB/c T.Spleen cells into C3H, CBA, C57BL, BALB/c, DBA/2, A or C3H.A recipient mice. All extracts tested had ASF activity. However, all allogeneic recipients were not suppressed by the extract material. The suppressive activity of ASF seemed to require two (or more) antigenic differences between donors and recipients of extract material, an H-2K or I antigen difference and a second antigen difference, possibility Ig-1. In the limited numbers of strain combinations tested, T.Spleen extracts suppressed IgM antibody response only if exposed to H-2 and Ig-1 antigens, e.g., BALB/c (H-2d, Ig-1a) ASF suppressed A (H-2a, Ig-1e) but not C3H.A (H-2a, Ig-1a) or DBA/2 (H-2d, Ig-1c). Separate ASF molecules may react with separate antigens on the cell surface, i.e., with H-2 and gammaG2a. Alternatively, one ASF molecule may react with two structurally associated antigens. If the latter is correct, it is conceivable that the beta2-microglobulin which is non-covalently linked to the major component of H-2 molecules expresses allotypic antigens coded for by Ig-1 and beta2-microglobulin is one of the antigens recognized by ASF.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Erythropoiesis in spleens of lethally irradiated Lewis rats grafted with 4-35 X 10(6) syngeneic marrow cells was inhibited or delayed during the test period of 5 days; this was in marked contrast to observation in irradiated mice. The mechanism of this inhibition was the subject of this study. Pretreatment of recipients 9 days prior to irradiation with the cytotoxic drugs cyclophosphamide (CY), busulfan (BUS), or dimethylmyleran (DMM), or the induction of iron deficiency with anemia in recipients reversed this delayed erythropoiesis. However, neither iron-deficiency anemia nor pretreatment with BUS or DMM affected the ability of irradiated recipients to reject 20 to 50 X 10(6) allogeneic marrow cells. The administration of commercial preparations of erythropoietin to hosts stimulated erythropoiesis moderately. However, proliferation of syngeneic marrow cells was not enhanced when infused into lethally irradiated Spontaneous Hypertensive (SH) inbred-strain rats which have high levels of endogenous erythropoietin. Finally, plasma from irradiated rats treated with phenylhydrazine to produce severe anemia was rich in erythropoietin but failed to stimulate erythropoiesis in the cell transfer system. Two hypotheses are considered: (1) Irradiation inhibits the secretion of a factor (not erythropoietin) responsible for initiating early stages in differentiation of transplanted stem cells; iron-deficiency anemia and cytotoxic drugs stimulate the secretion of this factor. (2) Normal rats secrete a factor which suppresses erythropoiesis; iron-deficiency anemia and cytotoxic drugs inhibit the production or function of this factor. Cellular rather than humoral factors may by involved.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
To test the hypothesis that hemopoietic cells within a tissue graft are responsible for its immunogenicity, two experimental protocols were followed. LEW hearts were grafted into (LEW X BN)F-1 host rats and LEW or F-1 lymphocytes were injected into the apex of the grafted heart. The LEW but not the F-1 cells induced a local reaction, apparently because the circulating F-1 cells were the necessary immunogens. The second protocol took advantage of the knowledge that lethally irradiated LEW rats were able to reject WF Ag-B-incompatible hemopoietic cells (but not tissue allografts) within a few days. LEW rats were lethally irradiated and grafted with WF hearts on day 0. A mixture of LEW marrow, thymus, spleen and lymph node cells, or marrow cells only were infused either on day 0 or day 2. Cardiac allografts in hosts repopulated with the mixture of lymphoid cells survived a mean of 11.3 days in hosts infused on day 0, but survived indefinitely if the lymphoid cells were infused on day 2. The 2-day interval also prolonged the survival of allografts in rats infused with only marrow cells. The long-term recipients, without any further treatment, rejected WF skin grafts as first-set reactions 1 year later but did not reject second WF cardiac allografts. Lymphoid cells from long-term recipients imparied the rejection of WF cardiac allografts by LEW host rats. The lack of rejection of the original cardiac allograft supported the hypothesis tested. Certain hemopoietic cells responsible for the immunogenicity of cardiac allografts were probably eliminated in the 2-day interval at least in part by host effector cells capable of rejecting allogeneic hemopoietic cells. However, the mechanism of long-term "unresponsiveness" to WF hearts could have been caused by loss of accessory cells during the 2-day interval followed by infusion of immunocompetent cells. Skin rejections in these recipients may have been attributable to reactions against skin differentiation-specific antigens.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.