Biomedical subjects

M B Fennerty

Publications and source records attributed to M B Fennerty.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed2001

Nonerosive reflux disease--current concepts and dilemmas.

Nonerosive reflux disease is defined as the presence of typical symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease caused by intraesophageal acid in the absence of visible esophageal mucosal injury at endoscopy. Recent studies demonstrate that it is a chronic disease with a significant impact on quality of life, and it is very common in primary care settings. Treatment with acid inhibitory agents is effective, and proton pump inhibitors are the most effective form of therapy.

Costs and Cost Analysis↗

PubMed2001

Barrett's-related esophageal adenocarcinoma: is chemoprevention a potential option?

OBJECTIVE: Review the rationale behind secondary prevention of Barrett's related esophageal adenocarcinoma and critically appraise the emerging literature regarding prevention of neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus with antisecretory and/or cyclo-oxygenase inhibition therapy. METHODS: The existing English language literature regarding secondary cancer prevention in patients with Barrett's esophagus is reviewed and its potential clinical implications discussed. RESULTS: There is biologic plausibility to pursue "chemoprevention" trials with antisecretory and/or cyclo-oxygenase inhibition therapy in patients with Barrett's esophagus. CONCLUSION: Chemoprevention trials using potent antisecretory therapy coupled with cyclo-oxygenase 2 inhibition are warranted and may provide a means of decreasing the occurrence of cancer and cancer-related mortality in this disease.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed2001

Pathological documentation of complete elimination of Barrett's metaplasia following endoscopic multipolar electrocoagulation therapy.

The previous paradigm that Barrett's is an irreversible premalignant lesion has recently been challenged by a proliferation of reports documenting elimination of Barrett's by a variety of endoscopic techniques. Whether Barrett's is entirely eliminated is unknown as endoscopic biopsy samples the surface of the epithelium only. Numerous reports document underlying specialised columnar epithelium in many of these trials. Until now there have been no reports of pathological examination of the entire oesophagus as a specimen. This case documents complete elimination of intestinal metaplasia from the oesophagus and supports the biological plausibility of these research techniques.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

A randomized trial of lansoprazole, amoxycillin, and clarithromycin versus lansoprazole, bismuth, metronidazole and tetracycline in the retreatment of patients failing initial Helicobacter pylori therapy.

BACKGROUND/AIM: 10-30% of the patients treated for Helicobacter pylori fail to clear the infection after initial therapy. Little is known as to the efficacy of retreatment regimens in these patients. Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) -based triple and quadruple therapies demonstrate efficacies of 80-90% as initial therapy for H. pylori infection, but whether these regimens are as effective when used for retreatment is unknown. The efficacy of a metronidazole-containing regimen in this situation is also unknown. Our aim was to compare the efficacy of a nonmetronidazole-containing PPI-based triple versus a PPI-based quadruple therapy containing metronidazole in patients failing previous H. pylori therapy. METHODS: 48 patients were enrolled in this study at two sites after failure of previous H. pylori therapy as determined by a positive (14)C-urea breath test. Patients were stratified by prior treatment with a metronidazole-containing regimen and were then randomized to either lansoprazole (L) 30 mg twice daily, amoxycillin (A) 1,000 mg twice daily, and clarithromycin (C) 500 mg twice daily for 14 days (LAC) or L 30 mg four times daily, bismuth subsalicylate (B) 2 tablets four times daily, metronidazole (M) 250 mg four times daily and tetracycline (T) 250 mg four times daily for 14 days (LBMT). Side effects and compliance (pill count) were assessed at the completion of therapy. A repeat (14)C-urea breath test was performed 4 or more weeks after completion of therapy, and cure was defined as a negative test result. RESULTS: 48 patients (16 males and 32 females) were enrolled in this study. 20 patients received LAC (18 prior M), and 28 received LBMT (23 prior M). Per protocol and intention-to-treat efficacies were 82% (95% CI 64-100%) and 75% (95% CI 56-94%) for LAC and 80% (96% CI 64-96%) and 71% (95% CI 54-88%) for LBMT (p = 0.85 per protocol and p = 0.78 intention to treat between LAC and LBMT), respectively. The compliance (> or =80% of pills taken) was found to be 89% in both treatment groups. Side effects were noted in 84% for LAC and in 82% for LBMT, but were mild and did not cause discontinuation of therapy. CONCLUSIONS: PPI-based triple and quadruple therapy with both LAC and LBMT are effective in retreating patients failing initial metronidazole-based H. pylori therapies. LAC was not statistically superior to LBMT as a 'retreatment' regimen in this clinical situation, but the small sample size and wide confidence limits do not preclude the possibility of a smaller but significant difference in efficacy between the regimens. To determine whether LAC or LBMT is as effective for retreating patients failing non-metronidazole-containing regimens requires further study.

2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles↗

PubMed2001

NSAID-related gastrointestinal injury. Evidence-based approach to a preventable complication.

NSAID-induced gastrointestinal mucosal injury and its subsequent complications are a tremendously important clinical problem. Effective prophylactic and treatment strategies involve proton pump inhibitors, misoprostol, or selective COX-2 inhibitors. These agents are capable of dramatically decreasing or eliminating the risk of mucosal injury as well as the morbidity and mortality for this disorder. Identification of the at-risk patient and initiation of appropriate preventive therapy are the keys to minimizing the societal burden of this disease process.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal↗

PubMed2001

Is nonulcer dyspepsia related to Helicobacter pylori infection?

Dyspepsia, defined as pain or discomfort centered in the upper abdomen, is a common clinical problem. A variety of underlying disease states may result in dyspepsia, but commonly, diagnostic investigation will show no identifiable pathology, and the patient is diagnosed with nonulcer dyspepsia. Numerous hypothesis have been suggested as to the cause of symptoms in patients with nonulcer dyspepsia, including perturbations of gastroduodenal motility, hypersensitivity to physiologic stimuli including acid, and the effect(s) of infection within the gastric mucosa by Helicobacter pylori. Some epidemiological studies have suggested that patients with nonulcer dyspepsia may have a slightly higher prevalence of H. pylori infection. However, association does not prove causation. Causation of nonulcer dyspepsia by H. pylori could best be documented by resolution of symptoms following eradication of the infection. Early intervention studies indicated that there was a beneficial effect on symptoms of nonulcer dyspepsia with H. pylori eradication, but most of these studies had serious methodological flaws. In the last few years there have been a number of well-designed studies investigating the effect of H. pylori eradication on symptoms in patients with nonulcer dyspepsia. The results of these studies are inconsistent, but suggest that there is little, if any benefit from treatment. This case-based article on nonulcer dyspepsia discusses these studies in detail and provides a possible explanation for the differences in outcomes.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

The omeprazole test is as sensitive as 24-h oesophageal pH monitoring in diagnosing gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in symptomatic patients with erosive oesophagitis.

BACKGROUND: Ambulatory 24-h oesophageal pH monitoring and a short course of high dose omeprazole can be used as diagnostic modalities for GERD. However, comparative studies of the diagnostic accuracy and reliability of both strategies have not been performed. AIM: To compare the omeprazole test to ambulatory 24-h oesophageal pH monitoring in diagnosing GERD in symptomatic patients using endoscopically proven erosive oesophagitis as a gold standard. METHODS: Patients with heartburn underwent an upper endoscopy. Only those with erosive oesophagitis were included in the study. Subsequently, patients underwent ambulatory 24-h oesophageal pH monitoring and an 'omeprazole test.' Daily symptoms were recorded during the first week (baseline) and repeated during the second week on therapy (omeprazole 40 mg in the morning and 20 mg in the evening). RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were included in the study. The omeprazole test was significantly more sensitive in diagnosing GERD than total acid contact time on 24-h oesophageal pH monitoring (83% vs. 60%; P < 0.03). However, the sensitivity of the pH test increased to 80% after adding patients with a positive symptom index, and patients with abnormal acid exposure in the supine or erect positions despite normal total acid contact time. Patients with a normal pH test were significantly younger (49 +/- 2.6 years) than those with abnormal test (59 +/- 1.8; P=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: In this study an omeprazole test was at least as sensitive as ambulatory 24-h oesophageal pH monitoring in diagnosing GERD in patients with erosive oesophagitis.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Noninvasive tests as a substitute for histology in the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection.

BACKGROUND: Rapid urease tests for Helicobacter pylori have a sensitivity of 80% to 90%. Therefore histologic examination of gastric biopsies is recommended as a "backup" diagnostic test in rapid urease test-negative patients. However, noninvasive tests (urea breath test, serology, whole blood antibody tests) may provide a more rapid diagnosis and be less expensive but offer similar accuracy. METHODS: Sixty-seven patients (no prior treatment for H pylori, no proton pump inhibitors, antibiotics, or bismuth within 4 weeks) undergoing endoscopy for evaluation of dyspepsia symptoms and testing rapid urease test-negative by antral biopsy were enrolled. All had the following tests: gastric biopsies (2 antral, 1 fundus; H&E and Alcian Yellow stain) examined for gastritis and H pylori; (13)C-UBT; capillary blood for whole blood rapid antibody tests: FlexSure HP, QuickVue, AccuStat, and Stat-Simple Pylori; serum for FlexSure HP; HM-CAP enzyme-linked immunoassay. H pylori infection was diagnosed (reference standard) if chronic gastritis was present on histology and at least 2 of the 3 following tests were positive: urea breath test, H pylori organisms unequivocally demonstrated in biopsies on special stain, and/or enzyme-linked immunoassay. The test and treatment costs per patient were calculated. RESULTS: Of 67 patients with a negative rapid urease test, 4 were positive for H pylori. None had active peptic ulcer disease. Histology only identified 1 patient with organisms visible on special stain. Using chronic active gastritis (neutrophilic and mononuclear infiltrate) as a diagnostic criterion for H pylori, 6 patients would have been judged positive. However, only 2 of these were truly positive by the reference standard (positive predictive value 33%). Negative predictive value for presence of organisms and chronic active gastritis was 95% and 97%, respectively. All of the noninvasive tests identified all 4 truly positive patients correctly. Urea breath test and FlexSure whole blood assay yielded a substantial number of false-positive results (positive predictive value 31% and 36%, respectively); positive predictive value for the other tests ranged from 50% to 80%. All tests except histology had a negative predictive value of 100%. Histology was the most costly test (p < 0. 001 compared with all other tests), followed by urea breath test and HM-CAP serology (p < 0.001 compared with all rapid antibody tests). CONCLUSIONS: Whole blood or serum antibody testing is a rapid, accurate, and cost-effective means for establishing H pylori status in rapid urease test-negative patients. Whole blood or serology rapid antibody testing should substitute for histology when the patient has not been previously treated for H pylori.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Evaluation of rapid antibody tests for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the performance characteristics of one serum and four whole blood rapid antibody tests for Helicobacter pylori infection. METHODS: A total of 97 outpatients referred for endoscopic evaluation of dyspepsia were included. Antral biopsies were obtained for histology and rapid urease test. Serum was tested with an enzyme-linked immunoassay (HM-CAP) and a rapid serology test (FlexSure HP). A commercially available 13C-urea breath test was performed. Capillary blood obtained by fingerstick was tested with FlexSure HP, QuickVue, Accustat, and StatSimple pylori tests. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of each rapid test was calculated relative to a criterion standard of histological gastritis and at least two of the four following tests positive: identifiable organisms on specially stained slides, rapid urease test, urea breath test, or serum immunoassay. RESULTS: A total of 30 patients (31%) were infected. The FlexSure HP Serum, and FlexSure HP, QuickVue, Accustat, and StatSimple pylori whole blood tests had sensitivities of 90%, 87%, 83%, 76%, and 90%; specificities of 94%, 90%, 96%, 96%, and 98%, and accuracies of 93%, 88%, 92%, 87%, and 96%, respectively. Sensitivities were not statistically different. StatSimple pylori was more specific than FlexSure HP whole blood (p<0.03), and more accurate than FlexSure whole blood (p<0.024) and Accustat (p< 0.01). Serum immunoassay was significantly more sensitive (97%) than FlexSure whole blood, QuickVue, and Accustat (p<0.01), but its specificity (95%) was not statistically different from the rapid tests. CONCLUSION: Rapid antibody testing provides an accurate diagnosis of H. pylori infection. In general, these tests are less sensitive than, but as specific as, standard serology.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Survey of internal medicine residents' use of the fecal occult blood test and their understanding of colorectal cancer screening and surveillance.

OBJECTIVE: Primary care physicians have imperfect understanding of current colorectal cancer screening guidelines and recommendations. Furthermore, compliance with colorectal cancer screening by internal medicine residents has been demonstrated to be poor. We sought to identify whether current trainees in internal medicine had adequate understanding of colorectal cancer screening and surveillance and test utilization. METHODS: We applied a structured questionnaire about colorectal cancer screening and the use of fecal occult blood tests to 168 internal medicine residents at four accredited programs in the U.S. They were also asked for recommendations about six hypothetical patients who may have been candidates for screening or surveillance. RESULTS: Seventy-one percent identified 50 yr as the currently recommended age to commence screening in an average-risk individual; 64.3% would begin screening with fecal occult blood testing and flexible sigmoidoscopy and 4.8% with colonoscopy. Most perform fecal occult blood testing on stool obtained at digital rectal exam and without prior dietary restrictions. Many use fecal occult blood testing for indications other than colorectal cancer screening. Only 29% recommended colonoscopy to evaluate a positive fecal occult blood test. Most residents plan to be screened for colorectal neoplasia at the appropriate age; significantly more opted for colonoscopy than recommended it for their patients. CONCLUSIONS: Internal medicine residents have many misperceptions regarding colorectal cancer screening and the utility of the fecal occult blood test. Educational efforts should be directed at internal medicine residents, many of whom plan careers in primary care, where most colorectal cancer screening is currently performed.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Esomeprazole-based Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy and the effect of antibiotic resistance: results of three US multicenter, double-blind trials.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy of once-daily esomeprazole plus antibiotics for eradication of Helicobacter pylori, to assess the effect of antibiotic resistance on eradication rate, and to define the rate of emergent resistance. METHODS: Three separate randomized trials were performed in H. pylori-positive patients with a duodenal ulcer or history of documented duodenal ulcer within 5 yrs: 1) esomeprazole (40 mg once daily), amoxicillin (1 g b.i.d.), and clarithromycin (500 mg b.i.d.; this combination will be referred to as EAC) versus esomeprazole (40 mg once daily) plus clarithromycin (500 mg twice daily; this combination will be referred to as EC); 2) EAC versus esomeprazole (40 mg once daily; E); and 3) EC versus E. Therapy was given for 10 days. Endoscopy and biopsies for CLOtest, histology, and culture with susceptibility testing were done at baseline and 4 wk after completion of therapy. RESULTS: Per-protocol and intent-to-treat eradication rates, respectively, were as follows. For EAC versus EC in study 1 (N = 448), 84 versus 55% and 77 versus 52% (p < 0.001); for EAC versus E in study 2 (N = 98), 85 versus 5% and 78 versus 4% (p < 0.001); for EC versus E in study 3 (N = 66), 50% versus 0 and 46% versus 0 (p < 0.05). The 15% of patients in the combined studies with baseline clarithromycin resistance had significantly lower rates of eradication than those with susceptible strains (EAC: 45 vs. 89%; EC: 13 vs. 61%). Emergent resistance was less common after treatment with EAC [2/6 (33%)] than with EC (23/27 [85%]). CONCLUSIONS: Ten-day triple therapy with once-daily esomeprazole plus twice-daily amoxicillin and clarithromycin achieves an eradication rate virtually identical to that of the twice-daily proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapies. Baseline clarithromycin resistance, present in 15% of patients, predicts a markedly decreased rate. Use of an amoxicillin-containing regimen may decrease emergence of clarithromycin resistance.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Ablative therapies for Barrett's esophagus.

Most treatment of Barrett's esophagus (BE) has focused on normalization of the acidic esophageal environment in which the change from squamous to columnar epithelium takes place. In conjunction with creating a normal acid environment, several other therapies are under investigation. Although the data do not yet support the use of several reversal or ablative techniques in the general BE population, certain subgroups of BE patients may benefit from these techniques. Such therapies and the appropriate patients for these methods are reviewed.

Barrett Esophagus↗

PubMed1999

Clinical and economic assessment of the omeprazole test in patients with symptoms suggestive of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a trial of a high-dose proton pump inhibitor (the omeprazole test) in detecting gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in patients with heartburn symptoms. DESIGN: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial. PATIENTS AND SETTING: Forty-three consecutive patients with symptoms suggestive of GERD were enrolled at a Veterans Affairs medical center. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Symptom response to the omeprazole test vs placebo in GERD-positive and GERD-negative patients; sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the omeprazole test; and cost per correct diagnosis achieved with the omeprazole test compared with traditional diagnostic strategies. RESULTS: Of 42 patients (98%) who completed the study, 35 (83%) were classified as GERD positive and 7 (17%) as GERD negative. Twenty-eight GERD-positive and 3 GERD-negative patients responded to the omeprazole test, providing a sensitivity of 80.0% (95% confidence interval, 66.7%-93.3%) and a specificity of 57.1% (95% confidence interval, 20.5%-93.8%). Economic analysis revealed that the omeprazole test saves $348 per average patient evaluated, and results in a 64% reduction in the number of upper endoscopies performed and a 53% reduction in the use of pH testing. CONCLUSIONS: The omeprazole test is sensitive and fairly specific for diagnosing GERD in patients with typical GERD symptoms. This strategy could result in significant cost savings and decreased use of invasive diagnostic tests.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

Absence of benefit of eradicating Helicobacter pylori in patients with nonulcer dyspepsia.

BACKGROUND: The relation between Helicobacter pylori infection and nonulcer dyspepsia is uncertain. We tested the hypothesis that curing the infection will relieve symptoms of dyspepsia. METHODS: We randomly assigned 170 H. pylori-infected patients with nonulcer dyspepsia to receive twice-daily treatment with 20 mg of omeprazole, 1000 mg of amoxicillin, and 500 mg of clarithromycin for 14 days and 167 such patients to receive identical-appearing placebos; all patients were then followed through regular visits for 12 months. Symptoms were scored on diary cards for seven days before each visit. A carbon-13 urea breath test was performed at base line and repeated at 1 and 12 months, and endoscopic biopsy was performed at 12 months to determine H. pylori status. Treatment was considered successful if the patient had only mild pain or discomfort or none at all. RESULTS: The rate of eradication of H. pylori infection was 90 percent in the active-treatment group and 2 percent in the placebo group at four to six weeks (P<0.001). At 12 months, there was no significant difference between groups in the rate of successful treatment (46 percent in the active-treatment group and 50 percent in the placebo group; relative likelihood of success with active treatment, 0.93; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.73 to 1.18; P=0.56). There was also no significant difference in the rate of successful treatment at 12 months between patients who were H. pylori-negative and those who were H. pylori-positive (48 percent vs. 49 percent). The rates of successful treatment were also similar when patients were analyzed according to the type of dyspepsia (ulcer-like, reflux-like, or dysmotility-like) and changes in the quality of life. There was no significant association between treatment success and histologic improvement in chronic gastritis at 12 months (P=0.68). CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence that curing H. pylori infection in patients with nonulcer dyspepsia leads to relief of symptoms.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1999

Effectiveness of Helicobacter pylori therapies in a clinical practice setting.

BACKGROUND: Whether eradication rates for Helicobacter pylori treatment regimens obtained in controlled clinical trials (efficacy) can also be obtained in clinical practice (effectiveness) is unknown because no such trials have been reported in the United States. OBJECTIVES: To determine the eradication rates of H pylori in a community practice setting and the effects of practice variation in the choice of treatment regimen on patient outcome (H pylori infection cure) and cost. METHODS: Between February 1 and December 30, 1996, 38 community-based gastroenterologists in the Portland, Ore, metropolitan area enrolled a total of 250 patients infected with H pylori, as determined by endoscopic or noninvasive methods. Various therapeutic regimens aimed at eradicating H pylori were used by the gastroenterologists, and a posttreatment urea breath test was used to determine H pylori infection cure. Compliance and incidental effects were also measured and decision analysis was used to estimate the cost of treatment. RESULTS: The regimens used varied considerably. Patients receiving a 2- or 3-times-a-day treatment regimen were significantly more compliant (P=.01) than those receiving a 4-times-a-day regimen. Proton pump inhibitor-based triple-therapy regimens were significantly more effective than all other treatment regimens combined (87% vs 70%; P = .001) in eradicating H pylori. These proton pump inhibitor-based triple-therapy regimens were also more cost-effective by decision analysis for a hypothetical cohort of patients with duodenal ulcer disease. CONCLUSIONS: The considerable variation in the choice of treatment regimens affects the clinical and economic outcomes of patients undergoing therapy for H pylori infection. Whether these data reflect the outcome in other communities is unknown but should be determined. It will be necessary to determine if the dissemination of these data results in a reduction of practice variation and improvement in clinical and economic outcomes of patients being treated for H pylori infection in clinical practice.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

PubMed1999

Endoscopic ablation of Barrett's esophagus.

Barrett's esophagus is a premalignant lesion of the esophagus that arises as an abnormal tissue response to epithelial injury from gastroesophageal reflux. Barrett's esophagus has previously been considered an irreversible lesion that required life-long surveillance to prevent malignant transformation. Recently, combination therapy with pharmacologic or surgical control of acid reflux combined with endoscopic delivery of a mucosal injury appears to have the capability of reversing superficial Barrett's tissue, and perhaps deeper tissue as well. Whether Barrett's esophagus is cured and cancer/dysplasia prevented by these techniques will require long-term follow-up of these patients.

Barrett Esophagus↗

PubMed1999

Symptom status and the desire for Helicobacter pylori confirmatory testing after eradication therapy in patients with peptic ulcer disease.

BACKGROUND: There is consensus that individuals with Helicobacter pylori-associated peptic ulcer disease should receive a test to confirm H. pylori cure if symptoms recur after eradication therapy. It remains controversial whether individuals who are asymptomatic after therapy should undergo a confirmatory test to establish cure. Patients' desire to know whether their infection has been cured and symptom status after treatment are two important determinants of whether confirmatory H. pylori testing should be undertaken routinely. METHODS: We identified 87 patients with H. pylori-associated peptic ulcer disease scheduled to undergo urea breath testing 4 weeks after H. pylori eradication therapy. At the time of testing, willingness-to-pay methodology was used to estimate patients' desire for confirmatory testing in the absence of symptoms. At a follow-up visit after eradication therapy (mean follow-up, 297 days; range, 143 to 494 days), patients were surveyed to assess gastrointestinal symptom status. RESULTS: Of the 87 patients, 78 (90%) responded that they would prefer to undergo confirmatory testing if asymptomatic, as opposed to delaying testing until symptoms recurred. Patients' median willingness to pay for confirmatory testing in the absence of symptoms was greater than $50. On follow-up, 38% of patients in whom H. pylori was eradicated reported that their symptoms were completely resolved. There was no significant difference in the percentage of patients who reported complete symptom resolution by H. pylori status (H. pylori eradicated 38%, H. pylori infected 28%, P = 0.42, 95% confidence interval, -14% to 34%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients' desire for confirmation of cure, coupled with a frequent need for confirmatory testing as a result of recurrent symptoms after therapy, may justify routine confirmatory testing after H. pylori treatment.

Breath Tests↗

PubMed1999

The cost-effectiveness of the omeprazole test in patients with noncardiac chest pain.

PURPOSE: Recent evidence suggests that an empiric trial of omeprazole (the "omeprazole test") is sensitive and specific for diagnosing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) as the cause of noncardiac chest pain. Our objective was to examine the clinical, economic, and policy implications of alternative diagnostic strategies for patients with noncardiac chest pain. METHODS: Decision analysis was used to evaluate the clinical and economic outcomes of two diagnostic strategies that begin with the omeprazole test (60 mg daily for 7 days) followed sequentially by invasive testing utilizing endoscopy, ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring, and esophageal manometry as necessary, compared with two traditional strategies involving sequential invasive diagnostic tests. Cost estimates were based on Medicare reimbursement and the Red Book of average wholesale drug prices. Probability estimates were derived from a systematic review of the medical literature. RESULTS: The average cost per patient for the four diagnostic strategies varied from $1,859 to $2,313. Strategies utilizing the initial omeprazole test resulted in 84% of patients being symptom free at 1 year, compared with 73% to 74% for the strategies that began with invasive tests. The strategy of the omeprazole test, followed if necessary by ambulatory pH monitoring, then manometry, and then endoscopy, was both most effective and least expensive. It led to an 11% improvement in diagnostic accuracy and a 43% reduction in the use of invasive diagnostic tests, thus yielding an average cost savings of $454 per patient, compared with the strategy of beginning with endoscopy, then pH monitoring, and then manometry. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with noncardiac chest pain, diagnostic strategies that begin with the omeprazole test result in reduced costs, improved diagnostic certainty, and a greater proportion of symptom-free patients at 1 year than do traditional strategies that begin with invasive diagnostic tests.

Anti-Ulcer Agents↗