Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M B Bottorff

Publications and source records attributed to M B Bottorff.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of dilevalol.

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of dilevalol, the R,R stereoisomer of labetalol, were evaluated in nine subjects. Dilevalol was given as a single 50 mg intravenous dose and as a 400 mg daily oral dose for 7 days. To study the effects of hepatic enzyme inhibition, each subject received dilevalol in the presence of and absence of cimetidine. Cardiac beta-blockade was assessed by use of standardized treadmill tests for 48 hours after oral dilevalol. The three-compartment model analysis showed that systemic clearance (29.8 +/- 5.7 ml/min/kg), volume of distribution (16.6 +/- 4.1 L/kg), and terminal half-life (11.7 +/- 2.7 hours) were not altered by cimetidine. However, there was a 20% increase in the area under the curve (p less than 0.05) and an 11% increase in systemic bioavailability (p less than 0.05) after oral administration. Dilevalol caused significant cardiac beta-blockade for more than 24 hours, but these effects were not altered by cimetidine. The pharmacokinetic changes are consistent with a decrease in first-pass extraction of a high clearance drug.

Administration, Oral↗

The effect of diltiazem on the disposition of encainide and its active metabolites.

The disposition of encainide is under genetic control. In extensive metabolizers, the drug undergoes extensive first-pass metabolism to form the active metabolites O-desmethylencainide (ODE) and 3-methoxy-O-desmethylencainide (MODE). Because diltiazem is a known inhibitor of hepatic oxidative metabolism, the disposition of encainide and its metabolites was studied in eight extensive metabolizers and one poor metabolizer before and after administration of 90 mg diltiazem every 8 hours for 10 days. After diltiazem, the encainide serum AUC values increased in seven of the eight extensive metabolizers, and the percent recovery of encainide in urine increased by 69%. There were no apparent changes in the serum AUC values of the metabolites, suggesting that diltiazem may alter both the formation and the elimination clearances of the metabolites to a similar degree. In the poor metabolizer, encainide serum AUC increased 33% during treatment with diltiazem, but ODE and MODE could not be reliably quantitated. The subjects had no change in QRS, QTc, or JTc intervals after administration of diltiazem. Diltiazem inhibited the first-pass metabolism of encainide, resulting in increased bioavailability. This appeared to be caused by the inhibition of debrisoquin 4-hydroxylase and impairment of other unmeasured metabolic pathways for encainide. However, because no change occurs in the systemic exposure to the active metabolites, dosage adjustments in extensive metabolizers are probably not required for patients receiving combination encainide and diltiazem therapy.

Adult↗

A high-performance liquid chromatographic method for the determination of encainide and its major metabolites in urine and serum using solid-phase extraction.

A high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) procedure used to quantitate encainide and two of its active metabolites, O-desmethylencainide (ODE) and 3-methoxy-O-desmethylencainide (MODE), is described. All three compounds were simultaneously extracted from urine and serum using an octyl (C-8) solid-phase extraction column. The compounds were then separated by reverse-phase HPLC on a cyanopropylsilane column using ultraviolet detection at 260 nm. Serum samples were quantified over a concentration range of 25-400 ng/ml and urine over a range of 150-10,000 ng/ml. Total run time for the assay was less than 12 min. Within-day and between-day precision and relative error were less than 10% in serum and less than 13% in urine for all three compounds. The lower limit of quantitation was 10 ng/ml for encainide and ODE and 15 ng/ml for MODE. This HPLC procedure represents a quick and reliable method of measuring encainide and its major metabolites in both urine and serum, making the assay applicable as an aid for therapeutic drug monitoring of patients receiving encainide therapy.

Anilides↗

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of urapidil in severe hypertension.

The clinical response and pharmacokinetics of intravenous urapidil were studied in patients with uncontrolled severe hypertension. Six of nine patients achieved a diastolic blood pressure (DBP) of 100 mm Hg after initial administration of serial bolus doses and were then placed on maintenance infusions. Three of these six patients maintained a DBP 100 mm Hg or lower at infusion rates of 10 to 20 mg/hr, whereas the remaining three patients experienced a loss of DBP control despite rates of 40 mg/hr. Mean DBP was significantly reduced from 126 +/- 6 mm Hg (N = 9) to 105 +/- 15 mm Hg after the bolus phase (N = 9, P less than .05) and 99 +/- 18 mm Hg after the infusion phase (N = 6, P less than .05). Significant reductions in systolic blood pressure were also achieved after bolus and infusion phases. Adverse reactions included drowsiness, tachycardia, nausea and vomiting but were considered mild. Estimated pharmacokinetic parameters included Vz (0.80 +/- 0.20 L/kg), CL (2.53 +/- 0.99 mL/min/kg) and t1/2 (4.0 +/- 1.5 hr). Urapidil safely reduces blood pressure in patients with severe hypertension. An alternative dosing regimen is suggested.

Adolescent↗

The relative predictive performance of two theophylline pharmacokinetic dosing programs.

The predictive performance of 2 theophylline pharmacokinetic dosing programs (Abbott and Simkin) was evaluated using a group of 44 inpatients who had 2 serum concentrations (TSC) measured during hospitalization. Bias was assessed with the median prediction error (PE) and precision was assessed with the median absolute PE. The Abbott program was significantly less biased than the Simkin program in predicting the first TSC (PEs 0.1 and -1.3 micrograms/ml, respectively; p less than 0.05). No significant difference in bias was observed in predicting the second TSC, or in precision in predicting either the first or second TSC. Both programs exhibited small improvements in prediction precision when the first TSC was used to predict the second. Correlations of predicted versus measured TSC also improved with the second prediction. These programs may be useful in dosing theophylline; however, TSC monitoring and the application of sound clinical judgment are warranted.

Adult↗

Nonlinear accumulation of propranolol enantiomers.

The accumulation of (+)- and (-)-propranolol was investigated in nine subjects who received 160 mg of racemic propranolol as a single dose and then once daily for 7 days. The serum concentrations of propranolol enantiomers were measured by h.p.l.c. using a novel chiral stationary phase allowing direct resolution of underivatized propranolol. The (+)-propranolol AUC increased from 412 +/- 223 ng ml-1 h after single doses (0-infinity) to 584 +/- 279 ng ml-1 h at steady-state (0-24 h) (P less than 0.05). Similarly, (-)-propranolol AUC increased from 609 +/- 304 to 777 +/- 370 ng ml-1 h (P less than 0.05). The AUC ratio (-)/(+) was 1.52 +/- 0.36 and 1.32 +/- 0.17 after single doses and steady-state, respectively (P greater than 0.05). Therefore, nonlinear accumulation occurs with both enantiomers although there is a trend for the (-)/(+) ratio to decrease at steady-state.

Adult↗

Nonlinear pharmacokinetics of unbound propranolol after oral administration.

After multiple oral doses, propranolol has been reported to accumulate to a greater degree than expected based on its terminal elimination rate constant and dosage interval. To determine whether the decrease in presystemic elimination can be attributed solely to a decrease in unbound intrinsic clearance or possibly a decrease in unbound fraction, we studied the pharmacokinetics of unbound propranolol in nine healthy subjects who were given 160 mg of regular or sustained-release propranolol orally as single doses, and once daily for 7 d. Unbound propranolol concentrations were calculated by HPLC and equilibrium dialysis on each serum sample. With regular propranolol, the mean unbound oral clearance (CLoral) decreased 29%, from 503 +/- 281 after a single dose to 359 +/- 143 mL/min/kg at steady state (p less than 0.05). Similarly, CLoral decreased 33% with sustained-release propranolol from 1077 +/- 514 to 721 +/- 385 mL/min/kg (NS). The corresponding accumulation ratios for regular and sustained-release propranolol were 1.39 +/- 0.49 and 1.61 +/- 0.81, respectively (NS). Therefore, the mean bioavailability of sustained-release relative to that of regular propranolol was 0.52 +/- 0.23 and 0.54 +/- 0.17 for single doses and at steady-state, respectively. The percent unbound of propranolol ranged from 6.8 to 14.0 with an average of 10.1. Neither the percent unbound nor alpha 1-acid glycoprotein (AAG) serum concentrations were statistically different between single and multiple doses. The binding ratio was significantly correlated to AAG concentration (r = 0.776, p less than 0.05). The data support a decrease in unbound intrinsic clearance of propranolol with no change in unbound fraction, leading to an increase in bioavailability at steady state.

Administration, Oral↗

Lidocaine protein binding in preeclampsia.

The effect of preeclampsia on the binding of lidocaine to serum proteins was studied in 25 term parturients with severe preeclampsia and in 21 normal parturients serving as controls. There were no statistically significant differences in mean lidocaine free fraction, binding ratio, or serum AAG levels in the control vs preeclamptic patients, respectively. Binding ratio was strongly correlated with AAG concentration for the control (r = 0.91) and preeclamptic (r = 0.85) patients. A statistically significant difference was observed in the slopes of the lines relating binding ratio to AAG. Preeclampsia had little affect on serum AAG concentrations and lidocaine binding ratio. Preeclampsia may alter the interaction of lidocaine with binding sites on AAG without a significant change in lidocaine free fraction.

Blood Proteins↗

Propranolol pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics after single doses and at steady-state.

The duration and extent of cardiac beta-blockade and their relationship to propranolol pharmacokinetics were assessed in nine healthy volunteers. Each subject received 160 mg of regular propranolol (R), 160 mg of sustained-release propranolol (SR) and no drug (control), both as single doses and once daily for 7 days. After single doses and at steady-state, both products caused a decrease in exercise heart rate for at least 24 h, compared to control. The time course of effect was similar to the time course of serum propranolol concentration. The oral clearance of propranolol decreased from single doses to steady-state for both R and SR; however, the difference achieved statistical significance only for R. These changes were reflected in mean accumulation ratios (AUC steady-state 0-24 h/AUC single dose 0-infinity) of 1.49 and 1.68 for R and SR, respectively. The pharmacokinetic data are consistent with a decrease in intrinsic hepatic clearance of propranolol, leading to an increase in bioavailability at steady-state. Despite a two-fold difference in the bioavailability of R and SR, there was no difference in the area under the effect-time curve at steady-state.

Administration, Oral↗

Propranolol pharmacodynamic modeling using unbound and total concentrations in healthy volunteers.

In an attempt to evaluate the propranolol (P) concentration-effect relationship, percentage reduction in exercise heart rate was modeled as a function of unbound and total P concentrations using the linear, Emax, and sigmoid Emax models. Nine volunteers underwent repeated treadmill exercise tests over 48 hr during a control period, after receiving 160 mg of P orally and again after receiving 160 mg once daily for 7 days. Beta blockade was assessed as the percentage reduction in exercise heart rate compared to control. Total serum P concentrations were determined by HPLC and unbound fractions by equilibrium dialysis. Using nonlinear least-squares regression, the Emax model was best in describing the concentration-effect relationship in each subject. Mean parameters for combined single dose and steady state were Emax 33.6 +/- 4.5% and EC50 18.2 +/- 15.6 ng/ml for total P and Emax 33.5 +/- 4.3% and EC50 1.66 +/- 1.56 for unbound P. Model fits were not significantly better for unbound versus total P and EC50 values showed similar intersubject variability. The observed unbound EC50 values are consistent with reported receptor dissociation constants. Therefore the large intersubject variability in EC50 could not be accounted for by variability in P protein binding.

Adult↗

Effect of age and serum creatinine on endogenous digoxin-like substances in infants and children.

An apparent digoxin-like immunoreactive substance(s) (DLIS) was evaluated in 374 pediatric patients, 0 to 72 months of age, not receiving digoxin. The relationship between DLIS presence or concentration and age, weight, gender, race, and serum creatinine was investigated. Twenty-seven percent of patients had a positive apparent DLIS concentration (greater than or equal to 0.2 ng/ml). The mean +/- SD concentration of DLIS in the positive group was 0.39 +/- 0.18 ng/ml (range 0.2 to 1.37 ng/ml). Patients in the DLIS-positive group were younger than those in the negative group (P less than 0.01). Although a greater percentage of infants younger than 6 months of age had measurable DLIS, the mean DLIS concentrations, when present, were not significantly different for all age groups (P greater than 0.05). No significant relationship was found between race or gender and DLIS. A weakly positive correlation between serum creatinine concentration and DLIS was noted (r = 0.22, P less than 0.03), but elevated serum creatinine measurements (greater than 0.6 mg/dL) did not correlate with DLIS concentration. These results support the hypothesis that the presence of DLIS is age related, but DLIS appears to be present in a much larger and older population of pediatric patients than previously reported.

Aging↗

Liquid chromatography and fluorescence polarization immunoassay methods compared for measuring flecainide acetate in serum.

We analyzed 99 patients' serum samples for concentrations of a new antiarrhythmic agent, flecainide acetate, by fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA) and "high-performance" liquid chromatography (HPLC). Within-day and between-day coefficients of variation at concentrations in the low and high ends of the therapeutic range were less than 7% for HPLC and less than 9% for FPIA. There was no statistical difference in the mean (+/- SD) concentrations of the clinical serum samples measured by the two methods (607 +/- 334 micrograms/L by HPLC, 602 +/- 344 micrograms/L by FPIA), but results by each differed by a mean of 0.13%. FPIA and HPLC measurements correlated significantly (r = 0.98, P less than 0.05), and were linearly related (slope = 0.970, intercept = 13 micrograms/L) as assessed by orthogonal regression. Both assay methods produced similar concentration measurements and were sufficiently accurate and precise to be used in therapeutic drug monitoring.

Anti-Arrhythmia Agents↗

Fluorescence polarization immunoassay for ethosuximide evaluated and compared with two other immunoassay techniques.

We evaluated a new fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA) for ethosuximide in the Abbott TDx and compared results with those by two other ethosuximide immunoassays, EMIT (Syva Co.) and aca (DuPont). The FPIA assay produced within- and between-day CVs of less than 5% at the low, medium, and high ranges of the standard curve. For the ethosuximide FPIA assay the standard curve was stable during the 47 days of the study. By all three methods, we analyzed 100 serum and plasma samples from patients who were receiving ethosuximide. The coefficient of determination (r2) for TDx versus EMIT was 0.973 (slope, 0.96; intercept, -0.80); for TDx vs aca it was 0.985 (slope, 1.00; intercept, -2.44); both relationships were statistically significant (p less than 0.05). Values for patient's specimens were significantly lower by the TDx than by the aca or EMIT methods (p less than 0.05).

Ethosuximide↗

Comparison of high pressure liquid chromatography and fluorescence polarization immunoassay methods in a theophylline pharmacokinetic study.

High pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) and fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA) were compared in a theophylline pharmacokinetic study. Eight healthy subjects received single 600-mg oral doses of two different sustained-release theophylline formulations. Fourteen blood samples were collected over 57 h after each dose, and the serum was analyzed for theophylline using both HPLC and FPIA methods. In comparing the two formulations using HPLC, there was no statistical difference in the area under the curve (AUC), terminal rate constant (k), or time of peak. However, there was a 13% difference in peak theophylline concentration (p less than 0.05). The same statistical conclusions were made for all parameters when using FPIA. When comparing the kinetic parameters determined with each assay, the AUC was 12% greater and the k was 17% smaller with FPIA (p less than 0.05). Orthogonal regression of all serum theophylline concentrations showed that FPIA = 1.04 HPLC + 0.20; r = 0.987, p less than 0.001. Stratification of serum theophylline concentrations into different ranges showed that FPIA overestimated the HPLC results in each range, but the percentage of overestimation was greater at lower concentrations (p less than 0.05). The use of FPIA seems appropriate in comparative studies of theophylline pharmacokinetics; however, the calculated kinetic parameters may differ slightly from those obtained with HPLC.

Adult↗

Nifedipine stability in cardioplegic solution.

The stability of nifedipine in cardioplegic solution was studied. Cardioplegic solutions containing nifedipine at 275 and 500 micrograms/liter were stored in plastic bags covered in brown plastic wrappers (1) under normal room light at 25 degrees C and (2) in a dark refrigerator at 4 degrees C. Samples were removed periodically for 48 hours. Infusions of cardioplegic solution containing 275 micrograms/liter were simulated using tubing and flow rates of 100, 200, and 300 ml/min; bags were covered with aluminum foil, while tubing was exposed to normal room lighting or yellow lighting, which does not degrade nifedipine. Gas chromatography was used for nifedipine assays. Nifedipine degraded more rapidly at 25 degrees C than at 4 degrees C. However, even when protected from light and refrigerated, nifedipine concentrations declined to less than 90% of original potency by approximately six hours after preparation. There was no significant degradation during the simulated infusion regardless of light exposure or flow rate. Cardioplegic solutions containing nifedipine should be prepared immediately before the surgical procedure, refrigerated until use, and protected from light until administration.

Cardiovascular Agents↗