Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M Ansseau

Publications and source records attributed to M Ansseau.

At least 127 records · Page 7Linked to original sources
PubMed1991

The lack of relationship between DST nonsuppression in the dexamethasone suppression test and EEG abnormalities.

As a recent study suggested a relationship between cortisol escape following dexamethasone suppression test (DST) and electroencephalogram (EEG) abnormalities, we tried to replicate these findings in 52 major depressive inpatients. A total of 23 patients exhibited DST nonsuppression (44%) and 18 patients had EEG abnormalities (35%). No relationship existed between DST and EEG results.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

Controlled comparison of the efficacy and safety of four doses of suriclone, diazepam, and placebo in generalized anxiety disorder.

The anxiolytic activity and tolerance of four doses of suriclone (0.1, 0.2, 0.3 and 0.4 mg tid), diazepam (5 mg tid), and placebo were compared in six parallel groups of 54-59 outpatients with generalized anxiety disorder (DSM III-R). After a 1-week placebo run-in period, the patients were treated for 4 weeks, with assessments at baseline and after 1, 2, and 4 weeks by the Hamilton anxiety scale and the Clinical Global Impressions. Results showed better improvement with active drugs as compared to placebo, without significant differences among the four different doses of suriclone and diazepam. The number of adverse events, particularly drowsiness, was significantly higher with diazepam than with suriclone, particularly 0.1 and 0.2 mg tid which did not differ from placebo. These results demonstrate that suriclone at daily doses ranging from 0.1 to 0.4 mg tid is an effective anxiolytic, better tolerated than diazepam.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1991

Interest of a loading dose of milnacipran in endogenous depressive inpatients. Comparison with the standard regimen and with fluvoxamine.

A multicenter controlled study was designed to test the hypothesis that a loading dose of an antidepressant could shorten the latency of its clinical efficacy. Three parallel groups of about 40 endogenous depressive inpatients received either a loading dose of milnacipran (300 mg daily for 2 weeks and 150 mg daily during the 2 following weeks), the standard regimen of milnacipran in severe depression (200 mg daily for 4 weeks), or fluvoxamine (200 mg daily for 4 weeks). The duration of the study was 4 weeks, with assessments at baseline and after 4, 9, 14, 21, and 28 days of therapy by means of Montgomery and Asberg depression scale (MADS), the Hamilton depression scale, the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI), and a checklist of symptoms and side-effects. Results showed very similar evolution in the 3 treatment groups. In addition, the level of side-effects did not exhibit significant differences among the treatment groups, except for excitement-nervousness and akathisia which were more frequently reported with fluvoxamine. These results do not support the usefulness of a loading dose of an antidepressant such as milnacipran. They demonstrate however that milnacipran can be given at a 300 mg daily dose from the very first day of treatment with an excellent tolerance.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

Pilot study of PK 11195, a selective ligand for the peripheral-type benzodiazepine binding sites, in inpatients with anxious or depressive symptomatology.

PK 11195 is a selective ligand for the peripheral-type benzodiazepine binding sites which exhibits anti-conflict activity in animals. In a pilot open study, PK 11195 was administered to 10 psychiatric inpatients characterized by a rating of at least "moderate" for the item "felt loss of vitality" and a rating of at least "moderate" for the items "anxiety" and/or "inhibition of drive" from the psychopathological scale of the system developed by the Association for Methodology and Documentation in Psychiatry (AMDP). The duration of the study was two weeks, with an initial daily dose of 200 mg of PK 11195 which could be increased up to 400 mg. Patients were assessed weekly using the psychopathological and somatic AMDP scales and at days 0, 4, 7, and 14 using the Hamilton anxiety scale and a checklist of symptoms and side-effects. The results showed significant improvement in the AMDP factor scores related to somatic complaints, depression, anxiety, apathy-retardation, and psycho-organic symptoms. However, anxiolytic activity, confirmed on the Hamilton anxiety scale, remained moderate and reached maximum effect after one week. No side-effects, drowsiness in particular, were reported. This study therefore suggests a potential beneficial activity of PK 11195 on anxiety and inhibition, which merits further investigation in controlled studies.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1991

Comparison of adinazolam, amitriptyline, and diazepam in endogenous depressive inpatients exhibiting DST nonsuppression or abnormal contingent negative variation.

Adinazolam, a triazolobenzodiazepine that has an action similar to antidepressants in several pharmacological tests, was compared with amitriptyline and diazepam in endogenous depressive inpatients exhibiting dexamethasone suppression test non-suppression and/or abnormal contingent negative variation. Three parallel groups of 22 patients received in double-blind conditions either adinazolam (60-90 mg/day), amitriptyline (150-225 mg/day), or diazepam (30-45 mg/day) over a 4-week period, with weekly assessments by the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. Results showed significant superiority of amitriptyline over diazepam on total Hamilton depression scores. On the endogenomorphy subscale, amitriptyline induced significantly better improvement than both diazepam and adinazolam, whereas both amitriptyline and adinazolam exhibited significantly better antidepressant efficacy on the core symptoms of depression. Moreover, the dropout rate for inefficacy after 2 weeks of treatment was higher in the diazepam group. Taken together, these findings suggest that adinazolam has an antidepressant efficacy intermediate between amitriptyline and diazepam. Adinazolam was, however, much better tolerated than amitriptyline, and produced significantly fewer anticholinergic side effects.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

Pooling two controlled comparisons of milnacipran (F2207) and amitriptyline in endogenous inpatients. A new approach in dose ranging studies.

Milnacipran is a new potential antidepressant selected for its equipotent inhibition of noradrenaline and serotonin uptake and its lack of effect at any postsynaptic receptor. We recently compared milnacipran 100 and 50 mg/d and amitriptyline 150 mg/d in three parallel randomized groups of major depressive inpatients and found a statistically significant superiority of milnacipran 100 mg/d and amitriptyline over milnacipran 50 mg/d after 4 weeks of treatment. Later on we found similar improvement with milnacipran 200 mg and amitriptyline 150 mg but better tolerance with milnacipran. In order to compare the therapeutic activity of the three doses of milnacipran (50 mg/d, 100 mg/d, and 200 mg/d) we used the responses to amitriptyline as a reference against which to compare the 3 doses of the new drug using analysis of variance on the adjusted data. This approach reveals milnacipran 200 mg is more effective than milnacipran 50 and 100 mg and is the only dose which shows efficacy at least equivalent to that of amitriptyline 150 mg. The dose/efficacy relationship was linear.

Amitriptyline↗
PubMed1990

[Diagnostic criteria for research in psychiatry (RDC) and guide for the diagnosis of affective disorders and schizophrenia (SADS)].

The Research Diagnostic Criteria (RCD) and the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia (SADS) were developed in the mid-1970s by researchers at the New York State Psychiatric Institute and at Columbia University. This article shows their clinical and research interests. The authors of the french translations, compare them to the recent DSM-III. These criteria represent a widely used nosologic system for clinical research in psychiatry. The SADS was developed in an effort to provide research investigators with a clinical procedure which reduce information variance in both diagnostic and descriptive evaluations of subjects.

Depressive Disorder↗
PubMed1989

Controlled comparison of two doses of milnacipran (F 2207) and amitriptyline in major depressive inpatients.

A multicenter study compared the antidepressant efficacy and the tolerance of two doses of milnacipran (50 mg and 100 mg/day) and amitriptyline (150 mg/day) in three parallel groups of 45 major depressive inpatients defined by Research Diagnostic Criteria. After a wash-out period of 4-7 days on placebo with lorazepam and/or nitrazepam if necessary, patients were randomly assigned to a daily dose of milnacipran 50 mg, milnacipran 100 mg or amitriptyline 150 mg reached on the 5th day and then stable over a 4-week period, with weekly assessments by means of the Montgomery and Asberg depression scale, the Hamilton depression scale, the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) and the Target Emergent Signs and Symptoms. Results showed significant superiority of both milnacipran 100 mg/day and amitriptyline over milnacipran 50 mg/day at the end of the treatment period. However, amitriptyline induced a nonsignificant trend toward more rapid improvement after 2 weeks of treatment, mainly based on items related to insomnia, supporting more sedative properties of amitriptyline as compared to milnacipran. Anticholinergic side-effects were significantly lower with milnacipran than with amitriptyline, explaining why milnacipran 100 mg exhibited at the end of the treatment period, a nonsignificantly better efficacy index on the CGI. Moreover, in contrast to milnacipran, amitriptyline was responsible for a significant decrease in blood pressure and a significant weight gain.

Adult↗
PubMed1989

Latencies of REM sleep and awakening in major depression: possible indicators of cholinergic activity.

REM latency and awakening latency were analyzed in a sample of 26 major depressive inpatients and 8 male controls recorded for two consecutive nights. A significant inverse relationship appeared between REM latency and awakening latency in depressed patients. The relationship was more marked in male than in female patients. No significant correlation between REM latency and awakening latency was observed in male healthy volunteers. The hypothetical cholinergic supersensitivity in major depression is proposed to explain the present relationship. These results suggest that awakening latency might also be taken into account in the evaluation of sleep disturbances in depressive illness.

Acetylcholine↗
PubMed1989

Increased basal plasma vasopressin-neurophysin in mania.

Basal plasma vasopressin-neurophysin (hNpI) was estimated in 50 drug-free neuropsychiatric patients classified according to the Research Diagnostic Criteria. The hNpI concentration was higher in the 5 manics (0.76 +/- 0.15 ng/ml) than in the 16 schizophrenics (0.53 +/- 0.08), 12 minor depressed (0.54 +/- 0.06) and 17 major depressed (0.48 +/- 0.10; p less than 0.05). Thus, those results confirm our initial observation of an increased vasopressinergic function in the manic compared to the depressed phase in one bipolar patient. Whether this increase in the vasopressin release is a consequence of the neuropsychiatric disorders or initiates and/or participates in their pathophysiology remains to be elucidated. The hypothetic consequence on water metabolism of such an increase remains also to be defined.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1988

Inhibitory influence of oxytocin infusion on contingent negative variation and some memory tasks in normal men.

A double-blind study combining electrophysiological and psychometrical approaches was carried out to investigate the central effects of an intravenous oxytocin (OT) infusion in normal men. Contingent negative variation (CNV) was selected as the measure of central cognitive evoked potential, and the psychometric tests measured mood, vigilance and memory. OT infusion induced a significant decrease of CNV amplitude and an increase of post-imperative positive potentials in vertex derivations. A similar effect was still evidenced one week after treatment in frontal derivations, suggesting a long time effect of OT on human brain. No significant influence of OT on mood or vigilance tests was apparent; only one item of a memory test revealed a significant impairment of some mnesic performances. These observations provide new electrophysiological arguments supporting a central action of peripheral OT administration in man.

Adult↗