A comparison of the AAPM "Protocol for the determination of absorbed dose from high-energy photon and electron beams" (TG21) with currently used protocols for electron and photon dosimetry is presented. These protocols are the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements Report 21, "Radiation Dosimetry: Electrons with Initial Energies Between 1 and 50 MeV" (ICRU21), and the AAPM "Protocol for the Dosimetry of X- and Gamma Ray Beams with Maximum Energies Between 0.6 and 50 MeV" (SCRAD). Assuming a given radiation exposure and chamber parameters, doses to water at dmax for electron beams and at 5 g/cm2 for photon beams are calculated using the three protocols and then compared. The doses for photon beams calculated using the TG21 and SCRAD protocols are found to differ by 3% or less at energies below 10 MeV. The largest differences occur in photon doses at high energies where the dose calculated with the TG21 protocol is as much as 5.5% greater than that calculated with the SCRAD protocol for a typical thimble ionization chamber. For low electron beam energies, the doses calculated with the ICRU21 protocol are as much as 5% less than TG21 doses when using thimble chambers constructed of tissue-equivalent materials in a water phantom. If dosimetry measurements are performed in polystyrene, the dose calculated using TG21 may be greater than the ICRU21 dose, depending on chamber size and composition. An explanation for some of the differences between the protocols is presented emphasizing the dependence on chamber geometry, chamber composition, and phantom composition.

Electrons↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Electron backscatter corrections for parallel-plate chambers.

The wall of an ionization chamber is commonly assumed to have a negligible effect on chamber response in electron beams. For cylindrical chambers with thin walls this assumption is valid. However, parallel-plate chambers commonly possess large mechanical supports which may affect chamber response in a manner not accounted for in current dosimetry protocols. This is due to changes with energy in the relative backscattered electron fluence between chamber support and phantom materials. To investigate this effect, electron backscatter from low atomic number materials has been measured with electrons from 6 to 20 MeV. The effect of the diameter and thickness of the backscattering material has also been studied. Based on these data, Lucite and polystyrene chambers in water phantoms are expected to underrespond by 1% and 2% at 6 MeV. The expected underresponse decreases to 0.8% and 0.4% for polystyrene and Lucite at 12 MeV and is insignificant above 16 MeV. Two commercially available parallel-plate chambers were compared with a cylindrical chamber in electron beams from 6 to 20 MeV. Using the 20-MeV intercomparison, the expected chamber responses at the lower energies were calculated and compared with measurements. Both parallel-plate chambers underresponded by approximately 1% at 6 MeV and 0.5% at 9 MeV which is qualitatively consistent with the electron backscatter data. Recommendations for minimizing electron backscatter effects through chamber design are discussed.

Electrons↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Selective, unilateral cortical infarction increases striatal muscarinic receptor binding: potential evidence for cortical modulation of intrastriatal cholinergic transmission.

The effects of unilateral cortical infarction on subcortical (striatal) muscarinic receptors in rat brain were studied by means of in vitro receptor autoradiography using [3H]quinuclidinyl benzylate ([3H]QNB) and [3H]pirenzepine. The cortical lesions could be produced without compromising subcortical structures. A dramatic (20 to 59 per cent) increase in striatal [3H]QNB binding was observed ipsilateral to the damaged cortex. The increase in binding was greatest in the caudate-putamen, but was also noted in the nucleus accumbens. [3H]Pirenzepine binding (labeling M1 receptors) was also increased but to a lesser degree, as was [3H]QNB binding in the presence of 100 nM (unlabeled) pirenzepine (an indirect means of labeling M2 receptors). The results show that unilateral cortical infarction results in an upregulation of striatal muscarinic receptors, and suggest that both the M1 and M2 subtypes contribute to this effect. These findings provide evidence for cortical modulation of intrastriatal cholinergic transmission.

Animals↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Further evidence in support of the neurobiological bases of an attribute model of memory: role of the hippocampus.

With respect to the nature of information processing within the hippocampus, it can be concluded that the hippocampus codes spatial attributes, may or may not code sensory-perceptual attributes, appears to code temporal attributes based on spatial and sensory-perceptual cues, but does not code response attributes. The data provide some support for each theoretical view of hippocampal function, but appear to be most consistent with Kesner's views. With respect to how information is coded within the hippocampus, it can be concluded that there is good support for hippocampal involvement in a working or data-based memory system, but not a reference or expectancy-based memory system. These data support the Olton and Kesner views of hippocampal function. With respect to dynamic processes associated with maintaining information within the hippocampus, it appears that spatio-temporal information is processed in the hippocampus across the whole time domain including both short term and intermediate term memory. Even though some information appears to be processed only in an intermediate term memory (Rawlins, 1985), it seems that at least for spatio-temporal information the apparent residual short term memory capacity is a function of remaining hippocampal tissue.

Animals↗