Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M A Haynes

Publications and source records attributed to M A Haynes.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1998

Cancer rate differentials between blacks and whites in three metropolitan areas: a 10-year comparison.

This article compares cancer rate differentials for 1989-1993 and 1979-1981 between black and whites in Los Angeles, Nashville, and Atlanta, In Los Angeles and Atlanta, the black/white relative risk of lung cancer incidence has increased. While the relative risk for prostate cancer has decreased, blacks still show an excess incidence. White women still show a higher incidence of breast cancer, but the risk is closer to one. In all three cities, the excesses of black male lung cancer and female breast cancer mortalities have increased. The excess of black prostate cancer mortality increased in Atlanta and Nashville but decreased in Los Angeles. The excess of black cervical cancer mortality fell in Los Angeles and Atlanta but rose in Nashville. These results indicate a continuing need to develop and implement culturally sensitive interventions targeted at the black population.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Attitude of African-Americans regarding prostate cancer clinical trials.

The purpose of this study was to qualitatively assess attitudes associated with the willingness of African-Americans to participate in prostate cancer clinical trials. Fifty-six African-American males, 40 years of age and older, were recruited from South Central Los Angeles. Respondents were divided into lower or middle socio-economic groups based on education and occupation. Focus group discussions were conducted to assess their knowledge about prostate cancer and willingness to participate in prostate cancer clinical trials. In addition, information was obtained to identify their incentives and barriers towards participating in prostate cancer research. Middle socio-economic respondents expressed a greater willingness to participate in prostate cancer clinical trials than did men of lower socio-economic status. Many indicated that they would be more likely to participate if they were encouraged to do so by a physician or researcher who was viewed as being competent and compassionate. Barriers to participation in prostate cancer clinical trials included concerns about drug toxicity, medical experimentation and distrust of the medical establishment. Endeavors aimed at increasing minority representation in prostate cancer clinical studies should address these issues.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Attitudes of African Americans regarding screening for prostate cancer.

The purpose of this study was to identify attitudes associated with the willingness of African Americans to participate in prostate cancer screening. Subjects > or = 40 years were recruited from South Central Los Angeles. Fifty-six respondents were divided into low or middle socioeconomic groups based on education and occupation. Focus group discussions were conducted to assess knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about prostate cancer screening and treatment, willingness to participate in screening, incentives and barriers toward participating in screening, and source of medical care. The middle socioeconomic respondents expressed a greater willingness to participate in prostate screening. This difference was attributed to their greater knowledge about the disease and screening procedures, enhanced access to health promotion activities, being less fearful of discovering abnormal results, exposure to more aggressive behavior on the part of the provider with respect to screening, and receiving medical care in an environment that is more respectful toward the consumer. Efforts to increase minority participation in prostate cancer screening or prevention studies must take these findings into consideration.

Black or African American↗
PubMed1995

Determinants of black/white differences in colon cancer survival.

BACKGROUND: Blacks have lower survival rates for colon cancer than whites, possibly related to more advanced stages of disease at diagnosis and to socioeconomic differences between blacks and whites. While the black/white difference in colon cancer survival is well documented, the few studies that have investigated this difference have been limited by the modest number and type of explanatory factors that were considered. PURPOSE: We analyzed data from the National Cancer Institute Black/White Cancer Survival Study to determine 1) what characteristics might contribute to the racial difference in colon cancer survival and 2) if a survival disparity remained between black and white patients after adjustment was made for these characteristics. METHODS: This prospective study included 454 blacks and a stratified random sample of 521 whites, aged 20-79 years, with cancer of the colon diagnosed from January 1, 1985, through December 31, 1986, and who were residents of the metropolitan areas of Atlanta, New Orleans, and San Francisco/Oakland. Follow-up was truncated on December 31, 1990. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate the death rate among blacks relative to that among whites after adjustment for potential explanatory factors, including sociodemographic factors, concurrent (comorbid) medical conditions, stage at diagnosis, tumor characteristics, and treatment. All P values were calculated from two-tailed tests of statistical significance. RESULTS: After adjustment for age, sex, and geographic area, the black-to-white mortality hazard ratio (HR) was 1.5 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.2-1.9), indicating that the risk of death among black patients was 50% higher than that among white patients. Further adjustment for stage reduced the excess cancer mortality to 20% (HR = 1.2; 95% CI = 1.0-1.5), decreasing the overall racial difference in excess mortality from 50% to 20% or to a 60% reduction in excess mortality. Although adjustment for poverty reduced the excess mortality by 20%, adjusting for both stage and poverty did not further reduce the racial difference. Among patients with stages II and III disease, blacks had lower survival rates than whites (HR = 1.8; 95% CI = 1.0-3.1 and HR - 1.5; 95% CI = 1.0-2.3, respectively). Among those patients with metastatic disease (stage IV), survival was similar for whites and blacks. CONCLUSIONS: Stage at diagnosis accounted for more than half of the excess colon cancer mortality observed among blacks. Poverty and other socioeconomic conditions, general health status, tumor characteristics, and general patterns of treatment did not further explain the remaining survival disadvantage among blacks. IMPLICATIONS: Because the racial disparity was confined to earlier stages, future studies should investigate whether blacks have more advanced disease at diagnosis and whether less aggressive treatment is provided because of understanding.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Anatomic site distribution of colon cancer by race and other colon cancer risk factors.

PURPOSE: Black patients with colon cancer are more likely to have poorer survival from colon cancer than are white patients. To determine whether anatomic site differences might contribute to survival differences, we compared anatomic site distributions of black and white patients. METHODS: As part of the Black/White Cancer Survival Study, we collected medical record data for 1,045 patients from Atlanta, New Orleans, and San Francisco/Oakland, newly diagnosed in 1985 or 1986 and interviewed 745 of them. RESULTS: In polychotomous logistic regression analysis, site was related to stage, grade, and histologic type and among women with age, parity, and possibly smoking. However, it was not related to race, except perhaps among men age 65 and older, among whom blacks were somewhat likely to have more transverse and distal, not proximal, cancer. These relations were consistent across subgroups and were independent of other factors examined. CONCLUSION: Results suggest that site differences are unlikely to contribute to poorer survival commonly observed among black colon cancer patients in the United States.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Medunsa and the training of black doctors for South Africa.

Medunsa, the Medical University of Southern Africa, was founded in 1976 to address both the under-representation of blacks in the health professions and the lack of good health care in the homelands. The university trains most of the black physicians, dentists, veterinarians, and allied health professionals in South Africa, and it places a great emphasis on community service and preventive medicine. Medunsa also has programs to help socially and academically disadvantaged applicants. In some respects, the ongoing development of Medunsa mirrors that of historically black health professions schools in the United States, and Medunsa struggles with some of the same problems. Medunsa can learn from the histories of these American schools as it faces the challenges of the post-apartheid era; in turn, all U.S. schools can learn from Medunsa's history as they struggle with physician supply questions and health care reform issues.

Academies and Institutes↗
PubMed1989

Cancer rate differentials between blacks and whites of three metropolitan areas.

This article presents a comparison of the cancer incidence and mortality rates for the populations of the metropolitan areas of Los Angeles, Atlanta, and Nashville. The results reveal that cancer of the lung, prostate, breast, and cervix should be of major concern to all, but especially to blacks and residents of Nashville. The findings have specific implications for the prevention of cancer in the black population of the United States.

Black People↗
PubMed1986

Closing the gap.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Black or African American↗
PubMed1983

An innovation in physician training: the Clinical Scholars Program.

The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Clinical Scholars Program was developed to allow selected physician clinicians to acquire certain skills which are not part of the usual physician's repertoire. Begun in 1969 with support from the Carnegie Corporation and the Commonwealth Fund, funding has been provided since 1973 by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. By June 1981, 309 physicians had completed their training as clinical scholars, and a majority were pursuing careers in academic medicine. This paper recounts the factors and forces which led to the initiation and development of the program, its successes and failures, the problems faced, the achievements of clinical scholar alumni, and the program's current status.

Achievement↗