Biomedical subjects

M A Goodale

Publications and source records attributed to M A Goodale.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed1999

Active manual control of object views facilitates visual recognition.

Active exploration of large-scale environments leads to better learning of spatial layout than does passive observation [1] [2] [3]. But active exploration might also help us to remember the appearance of individual objects in a scene. In fact, when we encounter new objects, we often manipulate them so that they can be seen from a variety of perspectives. We present here the first evidence that active control of the visual input in this way facilitates later recognition of objects. Observers who actively rotated novel, three-dimensional objects on a computer screen later showed more efficient visual recognition than observers who passively viewed the exact same sequence of images of these virtual objects. During active exploration, the observers focused mainly on the 'side' or 'front' views of the objects (see also [4] [5] [6]). The results demonstrate that how an object is represented for later recognition is influenced by whether or not one controls the presentation of visual input during learning.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1999

Repetition priming and the time course of object recognition: an fMRI study.

We investigated the effects of repetition priming on the time course of recognition in several visual areas of the brain using fMRI. We slowed down recognition by gradually revealing the stimuli, in order to prolong the pre-recognition phase. Activation was lower for primed than for non-primed objects overall in both the occipitotemporal region (OTR) and the intraparietal region (IPR). A difference was found between primed and non-primed objects in the rate of increase of OTR activation. We concluded that the IPR, in addition to the OTR, was affected by repetition priming, and that this effect was different from that seen in the OTR.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

The role of visual feedback of hand position in the control of manual prehension.

Although it is obvious that vision plays a primary role in reaching and grasping objects, the sources of the visual information used in programming and controlling various aspects of these movements is still being investigated. One source of visual information is feedback relating to the characteristics of the reach itself for example, the speed and trajectory of the moving limb and the change in the posture of the hand and fingers. The present study selectively eliminated this source of visual information by blocking the subject's view of the reaching limb with an opaque barrier while still enabling subjects to view the goal object. Thus, a direct comparison was made between standard (closed-loop) and object-only (open-loop) visual-feedback conditions in a situation in which the light levels and contrast between an object and its surroundings were equivalent in both viewing conditions. Reach duration was longer with proportionate increases in both the acceleration and deceleration phases when visual feedback of the reaching limb was prevented. Maximum grip aperture and the proportion of movement time at which it occurred were the same in both conditions. Thus, in contrast to previous studies that did not employ constant light levels across closed- and open-loop reaching conditions, a dissociation was found between the spatial and temporal dimensions of grip formation. It appears that the posture of the hand can be programmed without visual feedback of the hand--presumably via a combination of visual information about the goal object and proprioceptive feedback (and/or efference copy). Nevertheless, maximum grip aperture (like the kinematic markers examined in the transport component) was also delayed when visual feedback of the reaching limb was selectively prevented. In other words, the relative timing of kinematic events was essentially unchanged, reflecting perhaps a tight coupling between the transport and grip components.

Acceleration↗

PubMed1999

The effects of delay on the kinematics of grasping.

We examined the effect on manual prehension of introducing a 5-s delay between viewing a target object and initiating a grasping movement. Subjects were tested in four conditions: three involved grasping the object and a fourth involved estimating its size. In the main experimental condition (Open Loop Delay), subjects viewed a target object for 300 ms, but did not initiate a grasping movement until an auditory signal was presented 5 s later. In this condition, subjects had to rely on stored visual information for guiding their grasp after the delay. In another condition (Open Loop), subjects initiated their grasping movement as soon as the target appeared. In both of these open-loop conditions, subjects reached out and grasped the object without seeing their hand. In the third grasping condition (Closed Loop), the target object and the hand were visible throughout the reach. In the three grasping conditions, subjects were instructed to pick up the object across its width using their index finger and thumb. In a final condition (Perceptual Estimation), subjects gave a manual estimate of the object's width with their index finger and thumb after viewing the object for 300 ms. In all four conditions, subjects were presented with a target object in which the height, length and width were independently varied from trial to trial. The results of the experiment indicated that reaching and grasping movements made in the Open-Loop and Closed-Loop conditions did not differ in any kinematic measures. In contrast, when subjects performed in the Open-Loop Delay condition, their reaches took significantly longer and achieved peak velocity proportionately earlier. As well, their maximum grip aperture was significantly larger. In addition, reaching movements in all three grasping conditions were affected by both the object's width (the 'relevant' dimension) and height. The manual estimates in the Perceptual-Estimation condition, however, reflected only the object's width. These results, together with evidence from other studies, suggest that motor actions performed after a delay use different transformations than those used for 'real-time' grasping. We argue that the stored visual information used to drive delayed actions arises from a perceptual rather than a visuomotor analysis of the target object.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed1999

Recovery of fMRI activation in motion area MT following storage of the motion aftereffect.

We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during storage of the motion aftereffect (MAE) to examine the relationship between motion perception and neural activity in the human cortical motion complex MT+ (including area MT and adjacent motion-selective cortex). MT+ responds not only to physical motion but also to illusory motion, as in the MAE when subjects who have adapted to continuous motion report that a subsequent stationary test stimulus appears to move in the opposite direction. In the phenomenon of storage, the total decay time of the MAE is extended by inserting a dark period between adaptation and test phases. That is, when the static test pattern is presented after a storage period equal in duration to the normal MAE, the illusory motion reappears for almost as long as the original effect despite the delay. We examined fMRI activation in MT+ during and after storage. Seven subjects viewed continuous motion, followed either by an undelayed stationary test (immediate MAE) or by a completely dark storage interval preceding the test (stored MAE). Like the perceptual effect, activity in MT+ dropped during the storage interval then rebounded to reach a level much higher than after the same delay without storage. Although MT+ activity was slightly enhanced during the storage period following adaptation to continuous motion (compared with a control sequence in which the adaptation grating oscillated and no MAE was perceived), this enhancement was much less than that observed during the perceptual phenomenon. These results indicate that following adaptation, activity in MT+ is pronounced only with the presentation of an appropriate visual stimulus, during which the MAE is perceived.

Figural Aftereffect↗

PubMed1998

Visuomotor control: where does vision end and action begin?

A new understanding of how visual information is transformed into motor acts has emerged from recent studies of the organization of the visuomotor pathways in the primate brain. This work suggests that it may no longer be useful, or even correct, to categorize different brain areas as sensory or motor.

Animals↗

PubMed1998

Vision for perception and vision for action in the primate brain.

Visual systems first evolved not to enable animals to see, but to provide distal sensory control of their movements. Vision as 'sight' is a relative newcomer to the evolutionary landscape, but its emergence has enabled animals to carry out complex cognitive operations on perceptual representations of the world. The two streams of visual processing that have been identified in the primate cerebral cortex are a reflection of these two functions of vision. The dorsal 'action' stream projecting from primary visual cortex to the posterior parietal cortex provides flexible control of more ancient subcortical visuomotor modules for the production of motor acts. The ventral 'perceptual' stream projecting from the primary visual cortex to the temporal lobe provides the rich and detailed representation of the world required for cognitive operations. Both streams process information about the structure of objects and about their spatial locations--and both are subject to the modulatory influences of attention. Each stream, however, uses visual information in different ways. Transformations carried out in the ventral stream permit the formation of perceptual representations that embody the enduring characteristics of objects and their relations; those carried out in the dorsal stream which utilize moment-to-moment information about objects within egocentric frames of reference, mediate the control of skilled actions. Both streams work together in the production of goal-directed behaviour.

Animals↗

PubMed1998

Probing unconscious visual processing with the McCollough effect.

The McCollough effect, an orientation-contingent color aftereffect, has been known for over 30 years and, like other aftereffects, has been taken as a means of probing the brain's operations psychophysically. In this paper, we review psychophysical, neuropsychological, and neuroimaging studies of the McCollough effect. Much of the evidence suggests that the McCollough effect depends on neural mechanisms that are located early in the cortical visual pathways, probably in V1. We also review evidence showing that the aftereffect can be induced without conscious perception of the induction patterns. Based on these two lines of evidence, it is argued that our conscious visual experience of the world arises in the cortical visual system beyond V1.

Consciousness↗

PubMed1998

Monocular and binocular control of human interceptive movements.

Previous work in our laboratory has demonstrated that binocular vision makes an important contribution to skilled reaching and grasping movements directed at static targets. In the present study we examine the contribution of binocular vision to interceptive reaching movements. We monitored such movements using a high-resolution, opto-electronic recording device (WATSMART), while subjects attempted to catch balls projected at them. No differences were found between monocular and binocular viewing conditions using this paradigm - either with respect to the velocity profiles or trajectories of the reaches. Moreover, the grasp was not affected by the type of vision available. It appears, then, that the moving targets provide adequate monocular depth and direction information (on the basis of optic flow) for the control of skilled interceptive movements directed at them. In addition, the time to achieve maximum grip aperture was constant across the trials - a finding consistent with the use of a time-to-contact variable derived from optic flow information. Finally, the transport component of prehension was found to be affected by certain variables that have, in the past, been thought to exclusively affect the grasp component of prehension, whereas the grasp component of prehension was affected by factors that have traditionally been thought to affect only the transport component.

Adult↗

PubMed1998

The role of head movements in the control of manual prehension.

Binocular information has been shown to be important for the programming and control of reaching and grasping. But even without binocular vision, people are still able to reach out and pick up objects accurately - albeit less efficiently. As part of a continuing investigation into the role that monocular cues play in visuomotor control, we examined whether or not subjects could use retinal motion information, derived from movements of the head, to help program and control reaching and grasping movements when binocular vision is denied. Subjects reached out in the dark to an illuminated sphere presented at eye-level, under both monocular and binocular viewing conditions with their head either free to move or restrained. When subjects viewed the display monocularly, they showed fewer on-line corrections when they were allowed to move their head. No such difference in performance was seen when subjects were allowed a full binocular view. This study, combined with previous work with neurological patients, confirms that the visuomotor system "prefers" to use binocular vision but, when this information is not available, can fall back on other monocular depth cues, such as information produced by motion of the object (and the scene) on the retina, to help program and control manual prehension.

Adult↗

PubMed1998

The role of learned pictorial cues in the programming and control of grasping.

Binocular information has been shown to be important for the programming and control of reaching and grasping. Even without binocular vision, people are still able to reach out and pick up objects accurately - albeit less efficiently. It remains unclear, which of the many available monocular depth cues humans use to calibrate manual prehension when binocular information is not available. In the present experiment, we examined whether or not subjects could use a learned relationship between the elevation of a goal object in the visual scene and its distance to help program and control the required grasp. The elevation of the goal object was systematically varied with distance in some blocks of trials by presenting the object at different positions along a horizontal plane 35 cm below eye level. In other blocks of trials, elevation did not vary with distance because the objects were always presented along the subject's line of sight. When subjects viewed these two displays monocularly, they showed fewer on-line adjustments in the trajectory of the limb and the aperture of the fingers when the elevation of the target object in the visual scene could be used to help program the required movements. No such difference between performance on the two arrays was seen when subjects were allowed a full binocular view. This study confirms that subjects are indeed able to use a learned relationship between the elevation of an object and its distance as a cue for programming grasping movements when binocular information is not available. Together with evidence from work with neurological patients who have difficulty perceiving pictorial cues, these findings suggest that the visuomotor system might normally "prefer" to use binocular cues, but can fall back on learned pictorial information when binocular vision is denied.

Adult↗

PubMed1998

The objects of action and perception.

Two major functions of the visual system are discussed and contrasted. One function of vision is the creation of an internal model or percept of the external world. Most research in object perception has concentrated on this aspect of vision. Vision also guides the control of object-directed action. In the latter case, vision directs our actions with respect to the world by transforming visual inputs into appropriate motor outputs. We argue that separate, but interactive, visual systems have evolved for the perception of objects on the one hand and the control of actions directed at those objects on the other. This 'duplex' approach to high-level vision suggests that Marrian or 'reconstructive' approaches and Gibsonian or 'purposive-animate-behaviorist' approaches need not be seen as mutually exclusive, but rather as complementary in their emphases on different aspects of visual function.

Animals↗

PubMed1998

Does a monocularly presented size-contrast illusion influence grip aperture?

The present study tested the idea that if subjects rely more on scene-based pictorial cues when binocular cues are not available, then both their perceptual judgements and their grasp might be influenced by pictorial illusions such as the Ebbinghaus (Titchener) Circles Illusion under monocular viewing conditions. Under binocular viewing conditions, subjects were always able to scale their grip accurately to the true size of the target disc and were unaffected by the illusion. Under monocular viewing, however, subjects appeared to be influenced by the illusion. Thus, when confronted with physically different target discs displayed on backgrounds that made them appear equivalent in size, subjects treated the two discs as equivalent--even when picking them up. These results, combined with earlier work from our laboratory suggests that binocular information plays a critical role in normal human prehension but when this information is not available the visuomotor system is able to "fall back" on the remaining monocular cues, which can cause the visuomotor system to be more susceptible to pictorial illusions.

Adult↗

PubMed1998

Frames of reference for perception and action in the human visual system.

A growing body of evidence demonstrates that vision for perception and vision for action are mediated by separate neural mechanisms. After briefly reviewing the neuropsychological evidence for this division of labor in the human visual system, we explore the evidence for a dissociation between perception and action in neurologically intact individuals. A number of studies have shown that unseen visual events can sometimes elicit movements of the hand and limb, despite the fact that subjects have no visual phenomenology of those events. Other work has shown that perceptual judgements about the location and size of objects can be quite different from the scaling of skilled actions directed at those objects. For example, size-contrast illusions, such as the Ebbinghaus illusion, have been shown to have little effect on the scaling of the grasp. Similar dissociations have been demonstrated in other studies in which psychophysical judgements about the dimensions of objects in the far peripheral field bear little relation to the calibration of grasping movements directed at those objects. Together with the neuropsychological work (and neurophysiological studies in the monkey), these findings provide compelling evidence for the operation of separate visual mechanisms in everyday life. In other words, what we think we see is not always what guides our actions.

Animals↗

PubMed1998

The effect of pictorial illusion on prehension and perception.

The present study examined the effect of a size-contrast illusion (Ebbinghaus or Titchener Circles Illusion) on visual perception and the visual control of grasping movements. Seventeen right-handed participants picked up and, on other trials, estimated the size of "poker-chip" disks, which functioned as the target circles in a three-dimensional version of the illusion. In the estimation condition, subjects indicated how big they thought the target was by separating their thumb and forefinger to match the target's size. After initial viewing, no visual feedback from the hand or the target was available. Scaling of grip aperture was found to be strongly correlated with the physical size of the disks, while manual estimations of disk size were biased in the direction of the illusion. Evidently, grip aperture is calibrated to the true size of an object, even when perception of object size is distorted by a pictorial illusion, a result that is consistent with recent suggestions that visually guided prehension and visual perception are mediated by separate visual pathways.

Adult↗

PubMed1997

Differences in perceived shape from shading correlate with activity in early visual areas.

The perception of shape from shading depends on the orientation of the shading gradient [1] [2] [3] [4]. Displays composed of elements with vertically oriented shading gradients of opposite polarity produce a strong and stable percept of 'concave' and 'convex' elements. If the shading gradients are rotated 90 degrees , the depth percept is reduced and appears much more ambiguous. Results from psychophysical [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6], neuropsychological [7] and computational studies [8] [9] suggest that the perception of shape from shading engages specific mechanisms in early cortical visual areas. In a three-dimensional functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study at 1.5 Tesla using a three-dimensional, interleaved-echoplanar imaging technique and a surface radio frequency (RF) coil placed under the visual cortex, we investigated the activity in these early visual areas associated with viewing shape from shading displays at two different orientations. We found significantly greater activation in area V1 and neighbouring low-level visual areas of cortex when subjects viewed displays that led to weak and unstable depth percepts than when they viewed displays that led to strong and stable depth percepts.

Adult↗

PubMed1997

The removal of binocular cues disrupts the calibration of grasping in patients with visual form agnosia.

The present study tested the idea that the visuomotor systems mediating prehension do not have independent access to pictorial cues processed by perceptual mechanisms. Individuals with visual form agnosia, whose perceptual systems are compromised but who have intact visuomotor control, were examined to determine whether they could use pictorial scene cues to calibrate manual prehension when binocular information was removed. The removal of binocular cues produced considerable disruptions in size-constancy of grip aperture, which, combined with earlier observations in normal subjects, suggests that binocular cues are of primary importance in calibration of grasping. In the absence of binocular vision, normal subjects can use pictorial information, information that is severely compromised in individuals with visual form agnosia, to compute the distance (and thus the size) of the goal object. Thus, individuals with visual form agnosia must rely on a retinal image that remains uncalibrated, leading to inaccurate calibrations of grip aperture. The fact that these individuals scaled their grasp much less accurately under the monocular viewing condition, despite showing normal binocular grasping, suggests that pictorial cues to depth, which are presumably processed by mechanisms mediating our perception of objects and events in the world, can be accessed by visuomotor mechanisms only indirectly. These results, together with others, suggest that the visuomotor system 'prefers' to use binocular information and uses pictorial cues only as a last resort.

Adult↗

PubMed1996

Obstacle avoidance during locomotion is unaffected in a patient with visual form agnosia.

A patient (D.F.) who developed visual form agnosia following carbon monoxide-induced anoxia was assessed on three tests designed to measure her sensitivity to obstacle height in a locomotor task. Although her verbal estimates of the height of the obstacles were correlated with their actual height, the slope of the line relating estimated and actual obstacle height was much shallower than for control subjects. Similarly, when asked to estimate the height of the obstacle by raising one leg while standing nearby, the slope of line relating toe elevation and obstacle height was shallower than in control subjects. In contrast, D.F. was able to negotiate the same obstacles during locomotion as well as control subjects: toe elevation increased linearly as a function of obstacle height with similar slopes and correlation for the line relating toe elevation and obstacle height. These results provide additional support for the proposal by Goodale and Milner that the cortical pathways mediating the required transformations for the visual control of skilled actions are separate from those mediating experiential perception of the visual world.

Adult↗