Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M A Gill

Publications and source records attributed to M A Gill.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1994

Stability of piperacillin sodium-tazobactam sodium and ranitidine hydrochloride in 0.9% sodium chloride injection during simulated Y-site administration.

The stability of piperacillin sodium plus tazobactam sodium and ranitidine hydrochloride in 0.9% sodium chloride injection during simulated Y-site administration was studied. Triplicate test solutions of piperacillin 40 mg/mL plus tazobactam 5 mg/mL (as the sodium salts) or piperacillin 80 mg/mL plus tazobactam 10 mg/mL (as the sodium salts) were mixed 1:1 with ranitidine 0.5 and 2.0 mg/mL (as the hydrochloride salt). The solutions were stored at 23 degrees C, and samples were removed at zero, one, two, and four hours for measurement of drug concentration by stability-indicating high-performance liquid chromatography. At the time of sampling and before any dilution, each sample was visually inspected for color and precipitation, and pH was determined. At all sampling times, the concentrations of piperacillin, tazobactam, and ranitidine were > 90% of initial concentrations. There were no substantial changes in pH or color. Tazobactam 5 mg/mL (as the sodium salt) and ranitidine 0.5 and 2 mg/mL (as the hydrochloride salt) in 0.9% sodium chloride injection were stable for up to four hours during simulated Y-site administration. Piperacillin 80 mg/mL plus tazobactam 10 mg/mL (as the sodium salts) and ranitidine 0.5 and 2 mg/mL (as the hydrochloride salt) were stable for up to four hours during simulated Y-site administration.

Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid↗
PubMed1994

Stability of paclitaxel with ondansetron hydrochloride or ranitidine hydrochloride during simulated Y-site administration.

The stability of paclitaxel with either ondansetron hydrochloride or ranitidine hydrochloride during simulated Y-site injection at room temperature was studied. Triplicate test solutions of paclitaxel 0.3 and 1.2 mg/mL were admixed 1:1 with ondansetron 0.03 and 0.3 mg/mL (as the hydrochloride salt) or ranitidine 0.5 and 2.0 mg/mL (as the hydrochloride salt). Also, paclitaxel 1.2 mg/mL was admixed 1:1:1 with ondansetron 0.3 mg/mL and ranitidine 2.0 mg/mL. The solutions were stored in glass containers at room temperature, and samples were removed at zero, one, two, and four hours for immediate assay. At the time of the assay and before any dilution, each sample was visually inspected for clarity, color, and precipitation, and the pH was determined. Drug concentrations were measured by stability-indicating high-performance liquid chromatographic procedures. Throughout the study, more than 90% of the initial concentrations of paclitaxel, ondansetron, and ranitidine remained in the solutions. No precipitates, color changes, or haziness was seen. The changes in pH were minor. Paclitaxel in concentrations of 0.3 and 1.2 mg/mL was stable when mixed with either ondansetron (0.03 or 0.3 mg/mL, as the hydrochloride salt) or ranitidine (0.5 or 2.0 mg/mL, as the hydrochloride salt) and stored in glass containers for four hours. Paclitaxel 1.2 mg/mL was also stable when mixed with both ondansetron 0.3 mg/mL and ranitidine 2.0 mg/mL and stored in glass containers for four hours.

Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid↗
PubMed1994

Cefepime: a new fourth-generation cephalosporin.

The chemistry, pharmacology, antimicrobial spectrum, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, adverse effects, and dosage of cefepime are reviewed. Fourth-generation cephalosporins, such as cefepime, have a quaternary nitrogen that is positively charged at the 3-position, providing the properties of a zwitterion. A 2-aminothiazolyl-acetamido group in the side chain at the 7-position with an alpha-oxyimino substitution may enhance stability against beta-lactamases by preventing the enzymes' approach to the main nucleus. Cefepime may exert its antimicrobial effect by attaching to specific penicillin-binding proteins, disrupting cell-wall synthesis. Cefepime has good activity against gram-positive organisms, such as Staphylococcus aureus, and gram-negative organisms, such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Cefepime is not active in vitro against Enterococcus faecalis, Clostridium difficile, and methicillin- and cefazolin-resistant Staph. aureus. Cefepime's activity against gram-negative organisms is similar to that of most third-generation cephalosporins. The agent has poor activity against Bacteroides species. The most common mechanism of resistance to cefepime is the excess production of beta-lactamases. Maximum peak plasma concentrations are two to three times higher after i.v. administration than after intramuscular administration. In healthy adults, the volume of distribution is 13-22 L and the elimination half-life is 2-2.3 hours. Clinical studies show that cefepime is as effective as cefotaxime or ceftazidime in patients with infections of the lower respiratory tract, skin and skin structures, urinary tract, or female reproductive system. Cefepime reduces fever as effectively as ceftazidime or piperacillin plus gentamicin in neutropenic patients. The most common adverse effects of cefepime are headache (2.4%), nausea (1.8%), rash (1.8%), and diarrhea (1.7%). Depending on creatinine clearance, the dosage of cefepime is 1000-2000 mg i.v. every 8-24 hours for life-threatening infections and 500-2000 mg i.v. every 12-24 hours for severe infections. Cefepime's clinical efficacy is comparable to that of ceftazidime and cefotaxime.

Animals↗
PubMed1994

Pharmacokinetics of meropenem in patients with intra-abdominal infections.

Noncompartmental and compartmental analyses of meropenem disposition in patients receiving 1-g intravenous intermittent infusions every 8 h were performed. Twelve patients (one woman and 11 men) participated in the meropenem pharmacokinetic analysis. Operative findings included perforated appendicitis (five patients), gangrenous appendicitis (five patients), peri-appendical abscess (one patient), and gunshot wound to the abdomen (one patient). The most common associated adverse drug reactions to meropenem were diarrhea and increased liver enzymes. The estimated noncompartmental pharmacokinetic parameters, mean +/- standard deviation, are as follows: maximum drug concentration in plasma, 47.58 +/- 17.59 micrograms/ml; half-life, 1.04 +/- 0.19 h; elimination rate constant, 0.68 +/- 0.12 h-1; area under the concentration-time curve from 0 h to infinity, 57.5 +/- 20.12 micrograms x ml/h; total plasma clearance, 315.40 +/- 71.94 ml/min; renal clearance, 136.7 +/- 89.20 ml/min; volume of distribution at steady state, 26.68 +/- 6.88 liters; and mean residence time, 1.47 +/- 0.28 h. The two-compartment model best described meropenem disposition in our patients. Our findings differed from estimates for healthy volunteers possibly because of the physiologic changes as a result of surgery. Our findings suggest that meropenem (1,000 mg) administered intravenously every 8 h provides adequate concentrations for most intra-abdominal infections.

Abdomen↗
PubMed1994

Comparison of aminoglycoside pharmacokinetics in Asian, Hispanic, and Caucasian patients by using population pharmacokinetic methods.

A population pharmacokinetic model for aminoglycosides was developed from 24 Hispanic, 16 Asian, and 22 Caucasian patients. A nonparametric expectation maximization algorithm for population modeling was used. With this one-compartment model, the parameters were the slope of the apparent volume of distribution versus weight (VS) and the slope of the elimination rate constant versus the creatinine clearance rate (KS). The mean VS (+/- standard deviation) was not different at 0.264 (+/- 0.05), 0.248 (+/- 0.055), and 0.260 (+/- 0.080) liter/kg of body weight for Asian, Hispanic, and Caucasian populations, respectively (P > 0.10). The KS means +/- standard deviations were 0.00424 +/- 0.00129, 0.00404 +/- 0.00160 and 0.00394 0.00103 [h(ml/min/1.73 m2)]-1 +/- for Hispanic, Asian, and Caucasian populations, respectively. Again, there was no statistical difference among the groups (P > 0.10). In conclusion, there are no differences in aminoglycoside pharmacokinetics among Asian, Hispanic, and Caucasian patients.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Effect of antihypertensive formulation on health service expenditures.

A major barrier to the management of hypertension is the extent to which patients comply with the treatment regimen. Herein we report the findings of a retrospective analysis designed to discern the relationship between antihypertensive formulation, regimen compliance and the utilization of health care services. Data for this analysis were derived from the state of South Carolina's Medicaid computer archive. The study population consisted of 1,000 randomly selected beneficiaries initially prescribed one of the following antihypertensive regimens as monotherapy: atenolol (daily); captopril (twice daily); oral clonidine (twice daily); transdermal clonidine (once a week); diltiazem (twice daily); enalapril (twice daily); metoprolol (twice daily); prazosin (twice daily); terazosin (daily); and verapamil-SR (daily). Multivariate regression analysis was used to determine the incremental influence of selected demographic characteristics, utilization of medical services prior to diagnosis for hypertension, initial antihypertensive medication, medication possession ratio for antihypertensive therapy, and the number of maintenance medications for disease state processes other than hypertension on post-period health care expenditure. Results indicate that patients initially prescribed antihypertensive medication requiring daily or weekly administration experience infrequent changes in their therapeutic regimen, far less use of concomitant therapy for blood pressure control, an increased utilization of antihypertensive medication, and a decrease in the use and cost of physician, hospital and laboratory services.

Aged↗
PubMed1993

A randomized study of cefepime versus the combination of gentamicin and mezlocillin as an adjunct to surgical treatment in patients with acute cholecystitis.

In patients with acute cholecystitis, antibiotics are used as an adjunct to cholecystectomy to reduce the incidence of postoperative septic complications thought to be related to bactibilia. Combinations of penicillins, or cephalosporins or aminoglycosides, or both, are often used. Cefepime is a fourth-generation cephalosporin with excellent activity against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, including Pseudomonas species. It has a prolonged serum half-life, allowing twice-daily dosing, and is not nephrotoxic. This study was undertaken to determine whether or not cefepime was as effective as the combination of gentamicin and mezlocillin in patients with acute cholecystitis. One hundred and forty-nine patients were randomized, two to one, to receive cefepime or gentamicin and mezlocillin. Cefepime was given intravenously at 2 grams every 12 hours; gentamicin, 1.0 to 1.5 milligrams per kilograms every eight hours, and mezlocillin, 3 to 4 grams every four to six hours. All patients underwent cholecystectomy. Bile cultures were obtained, and concentrations of cefepime in blood, bile, peritoneal fluid and gallbladder were determined in a subset of patients. There were 56 evaluable cefepime-treated and 34 evaluable gentamicin and mezlocillin-treated patients. Bactibilia was present in 17 of 56 cefepime-treated patients (30.4 percent) and ten of 34 gentamicin and mezlocillin-treated patients (29.4 percent). Enterococci were recovered in six cefepime-treated patients. Clinical and bacteriologic responses were similar for the cefepime-treated and gentamicin and mezlocillin-treated groups, with one failure in each group, a wound infection in a patient receiving cefepime and a subhepatic abscess in a patients receiving gentamicin and mezlocillin. Other measures of outcome, such as the number of days of fever, days nothing by mouth, days of hospitalization and days of antibiotic therapy were similar in both groups. Cefepime, with every 12 hour dosing, achieved extremely high concentrations in all tissues assayed at the time of the operation, a mean of eight hours after administration. Adverse clinical events were similar in both treatment groups. Cefepime is as effective as gentamicin and mezlocillin in preventing septic complications after cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Cefepime requires fewer doses, does not require drug monitoring, is not associated with nephrotoxicity and may therefore prove to be a cost-effective alternative to combination therapy that uses an aminoglycoside.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1993

A clinical comparison of cefepime and metronidazole versus gentamicin and clindamycin in the antibiotic management of surgically treated advanced appendicitis.

Many antibiotics and antibiotic combinations are used for the treatment of peritonitis because of advanced (gangrenous or perforated) appendicitis. An aminoglycoside combined with an antianaerobe antibiotic is one standard treatment, but there is concern about the potential nephrotoxicity of the aminoglycoside and the necessity for monitoring aminoglycoside blood levels. Cefepime, a new broad-spectrum cephalosporin with a prolonged serum half-life, has excellent activity against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Its spectrum of activity is similar to the aminoglycosides, but it has less potential for inducing renal injury. A double-blind, randomized study compared cefepime, 2 grams every 12 hours IVPB plus metronidazole 0.5 grams every eight hours IVPB (C/M) with gentamicin 1.5 milligrams per kilograms of IVPB plus clindamycin 0.9 grams q eight hours IVPB (G/C), administered up to 14 days, in 96 surgically treated patients with gangrenous or perforated appendicitis. Fifty patients had advanced appendicitis (nine gangrenous and 41 perforated) in the C/M group and 46 patients (six gangrenous and 40 perforated) in the G/C group. The mean number of days of postoperative fever (C/M, 4.4 +/- 2.7 versus G/C, 5.0 +/- 2.2), postoperative hospitalization (C/M, 2.0 +/- 1.9 versus G/C, 2.0 +/- 2.1) and antibiotic therapy (C/M, 6.3 +/- 1.9 versus G/C, 6.9 +/- 1.9) was similar in the two treatment groups. There were 11 treatment failures (C/M, three; G/C, eight; p = 0.13), six of which were probably a result of enterococci. No deaths occurred. Our study results show that the efficacy of cefepime plus metronidazole is equivalent to that of clindamycin plus gentamicin.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1992

Pharmacokinetic population parameters for aminoglycosides in cholecystitis patients.

We report the use of a new method to determine patient population pharmacokinetic parameters (nonparametric expected maximum or NPEM). Our purpose was to develop and then analyze the utility of these parameters, compared to a more traditional approach. Nineteen patients with acute cholecystitis made up the control group for defining the parameters via NPEM. The standard of practice was to use a model created from a different intraabdominal infection group (appendicitis), referred to as "surgical patient model." These two models were compared with a group of 23 patients receiving gentamicin for acute cholecystitis. We concluded that the NPEM model was superior to the surgical patient model in predicting gentamicin trough and peak levels with less bias and better precision.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Tissue concentrations of cefepime in acute cholecystitis patients.

Cefepime is a new broad-spectrum cephalosporin with activity against Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, Pseudomonas, and the Enterobacteriaceae. The purpose of this study was to measure cefepime concentrations in plasma, peritoneal fluid, bile fluid and appendix tissue in patients undergoing elective cholecystectomy. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either cefepime, 2 g intravenously in phosphate buffer (IVPB) q 12 h or gentamicin 1.5 mg/kg IVPB q 8 h plus mezlocillin 4 g IVPB q 6 h. During surgery, gall bladder tissue, plasma, peritoneal fluid, and bile fluid samples were obtained at approximately the same time. Thirty-three patients had data acceptable for analysis. Values are given as mean +/- standard deviation. The mean delta time (defined as the time between the administration of cefepime and the time the samples were obtained) was 8.58 +/- 3.53 h. The values for plasma, peritoneal fluid, bile fluid, and gall bladder tissue concentrations were 7.63 +/- 14.17 micrograms/ml, 5.66 +/- 6.80 micrograms/ml, 15.51 +/- 16.94 micrograms/ml, and 5.36 +/- 6.57 micrograms/gm, respectively. The peritoneal fluid/plasma ratio was 2.10 +/- 2.33, the bile fluid/plasma ratio was 14.44 +/- 31.99, and the gall bladder tissue/plasma ratio was 1.44 +/- 1.82. There was a significant correlation between peritoneal fluid and plasma concentration (r = 0.91, p less than 0.0005), and gall bladder tissue and plasma concentration (r = 0.90, p less than 0.0005). There was no correlation between bile fluid and plasma cefepime concentrations. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) data from previous in vitro studies indicate that cefepime concentrations achieved in this patient population would be adequate against typical biliary tract pathogens.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Acute Disease↗