Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M A Benninga

Publications and source records attributed to M A Benninga.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2004

Prognosis of constipation: clinical factors and colonic transit time.

BACKGROUND: Measurement of colonic transit time (CTT) is sometimes used in the evaluation of patients with chronic constipation. AIM: To investigate the relation between symptoms and CTT, and to assess the importance of symptoms and CTT in predicting outcome. METHODS: Between 1995 and 2000, 169 consecutive patients (median age 8.4 years, 65% boys) fulfilling the criteria for constipation were enrolled. During the intervention and follow up period, all kept a diary to record symptoms. CTT was measured at entry to the study. RESULTS: At entry, defecation frequency was lower in girls than in boys, while the frequency of encopresis episodes was higher in boys. CTT values were significantly higher in those with a low defecation frequency (< or =1/week) and a high frequency of encopresis (> or =2/day). However, 50% had CTT values within the normal range. Successful outcome occurred more often in those with a rectal impaction. CTT results <100 hours were not predictive of outcome. However, those with CTT >100 hours were less likely to have had a successful outcome. CONCLUSION: The presence of a rectal impaction at presentation is associated with a better outcome at one year. A CTT >100 hours is associated with a poor outcome at one year.

Child↗
PubMed2004

Colonic transit times and behaviour profiles in children with defecation disorders.

AIMS: To evaluate children referred for defecation disorders using the child behavioural checklist (CBCL). METHODS: A total of 215 patients were divided into three groups: 135 (5-14 years of age) with paediatric constipation (PC), 56 (5-17 years) with functional non-retentive faecal soiling (FNRFS), and 24 (5-16 years) with recurrent abdominal pain (RAP). Behavioural scores were correlated with colonic transit time (CTT) and anorectal function parameters (manometry and EMG). RESULTS: No significant differences in the mean CBCL scores were found among the three patient groups. However, children with PC and FNRFS had significantly more behavioural problems than the Dutch normative sample, while children with RAP had scores within the normal range. No significant differences were found between CTT in the patient groups, with respect to the CBCL. Similarly, no significant difference existed between children able or unable to relax their pelvic floor muscles during defecation attempts and their behaviour profiles. CONCLUSION: There seems to be no relation between colonic/anorectal function and specific behavioural profiles. On the other hand, children with defecation disorders show more behavioural problems than do controls.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

[Functional childhood gastrointestinal disorders. I. Chronic abdominal pain].

Chronic abdominal pain occurs in 17% of children aged 0-14 years with a peak of 33% at the age of 7 years. According to the Rome II criteria abdominal pain disorders can be classified as functional dyspepsia, irritable bowel syndrome, functional abdominal pain, abdominal migraine, and aerophagia. This new classification will hopefully lead to a more careful diagnosis of functional abdominal pain syndromes and to better treatment strategies. A thorough history taking and physical examination are the cornerstone of diagnostic workup in children with chronic abdominal pain. An extensive explanation and reassurance are the basis of an adequate treatment and in the majority of cases this is successful.

Abdominal Pain↗
PubMed2003

[Functional childhood gastrointestinal disorders. II. Constipation and solitary encopresis: physiology and pathophysiology].

The childhood prevalences of constipation and encopresis are 0.3-8% and 1-3% respectively. Following a recent stricter definition and classification, constipation and solitary encopresis are now recognised to be two separate entities. Constipation is characterised by infrequent defecation, often in combination with involuntary loss of faeces. Solitary encopresis most often occurs once a day after school hours. When there is no defecation, the frequency of encopresis increases, the abdominal pain becomes more severe and the appetite becomes less, until a large quantity of faeces is produced (often once per week). The physiology of the defecation and continence mechanism is complex and has only been unravelled in part. The multiple physiological mechanisms involved have a complementary and compensatory effect on each other. This makes it difficult to determine the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of these functional disorders.

Child↗
PubMed2003

[Functional childhood gastrointestinal disorders. III. Constipation and solitary encopresis; diagnostic work-up and therapy].

A detailed medical history in combination with a thorough physical examination, including rectal examination, form the cornerstone in the diagnostic work-up for children with functional defecation disorders. Additional investigations are often not informative and have only minor diagnostic or therapeutic implications. Medical therapy in children with functional constipation and solitary encopresis is primarily based on clinical experience. In both patient groups, the role of education, the use of diary cards and toilet training is important. In some patients behaviour interventions are important. Oral laxatives are the basis of treatment of children with functional constipation, whereas they are contra-indicated in children with solitary encopresis. In both groups, biofeedback training appears to be of little additional benefit. Long-term follow-up of children with functional defecation disorders shows that complaints continue far beyond puberty in many children.

Cathartics↗
PubMed2003

[Bladder control in 1-4 year old children in the the Eindhoven and Kempen region (The Netherlands) in 1996 and 1966].

OBJECTIVE: To determine the age at which children gain bladder control and to compare this with the data from 30 years ago. DESIGN: Questionnaires. METHOD: On the basis of the findings of a 1966 study into toilet training in the Eindhoven and de Kempen region, the Netherlands, a questionnaire was drawn up and distributed via 30 child-health clinics in this region to parents of children aged 12-59 months, during the period 1 March-30 June 1996. The results were compared with those of the earlier study. RESULTS: Data from 1176 children could be evaluated (response rate: 65%). In 1996, the median age for bladder control in boys during the day was 32.6 months and 40.5 months for night-time control. In 1996 boys achieved daytime bladder control 6.7 months earlier and night-time control 7.2 months earlier. In 1996, the median age for girls was 29.7 months for daytime control and 35.4 months for night-time bladder control: in 1966 girls achieved daytime and night-time bladder control 8.2 and 4.8 months earlier, respectively. Factors associated with earlier bladder control were: early age at which parents started toilet training, presence of other children in the family, early age at which the child attended a day-care centre, early age at which the child was able to walk. Other factors such as the presence of a complete family set, parental level of education and professional situation did not show a correlation with the age at which the child achieved bladder control. The type of diaper used was an additional factor for bladder control at all ages but was only statistically significant for 3-year-olds, both during the day and during the night. CONCLUSION: Children in the Eindhoven region achieved daytime and night-time bladder control at a significantly later age than 30 years ago. Various factors such as toilet-training age, day-care attendance, family size and type of diaper played a role in this phenomenon.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2003

Maturation of the rectoanal inhibitory reflex in very premature infants.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize anal sphincter function in very premature infants < or =30 weeks' postmenstrual age (PMA) and to evaluate the time of maturation of the rectoanal inhibitory reflex (RAIR) by using a sleeve catheter. STUDY DESIGN: Anorectal manometry was performed in 16 healthy neonates (nine girls) with a mean PMA of 29 weeks (range, 27-30 weeks) and a birth weight of 640 to 1590 g (median, 1220 g) with a micromanometric assembly (outer diameter, 2.0 mm). The assembly incorporated a 1.5-cm-long sleeve sensor for measurement of resting anal sphincter pressures and relaxation, and four side holes recorded anal and rectal pressures. Rectal distention was performed with direct air insufflation to elicit the RAIR. RESULTS: The mean anal sphincter pressure, rectal pressure, and anal sphincter oscillation frequency were 24.5+/-11.4 mm Hg, 6.5+/-4.8 mm Hg, and 11.1+/-2.3/min, respectively. A normal RAIR could be elicited in 13 (81%) infants studied. In two infants, the RAIR could not be elicited because of a low anal sphincter pressure of only 5 mm Hg. In the other child, no RAIR was seen despite the repeated insufflation of at least 5 mL of air. CONCLUSION: The majority (81%) of premature infants older than 26 weeks' PMA have normal anorectal pressures and a normal RAIR.

Anal Canal↗
PubMed2003

Pharmacokinetics of a single oral dose of baclofen in pediatric patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Transient relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter (TLESR) is the predominant mechanism of gastroesophageal reflux (GER) in adults and children. Baclofen [4-amino-3-(p-chlorophenyl)-butanoic acid], a gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-B receptor agonist used for the management of spasticity, has been recently shown to significantly inhibit GER in healthy adults without any relevant side effects. The objective of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of baclofen in a pediatric population with GER disease. In an open-label single-dose pharmacokinetic study, eight children with the diagnosis of GER made on clinical grounds received an oral dose of baclofen, 2.5 mg. Blood samples were drawn from an indwelling venous catheter, and urine was collected during a postdose period of 8 hours. The concentration of baclofen in these body fluids was determined using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method with electrochemical detection after OPA-sulfite derivatization. Pharmacokinetic data were analyzed using the nonlinear regression program Scientist. Serum concentration-time curves could be best described using a two-compartment open model with a lag time. Mean plasma clearance (Cl) was 315.9 mL/h/kg; volume of distribution (Vd) was 2.58 L/kg; and half-life (T(1/2)beta) was 5.10 hours. No side effects were noted. As half-lives were comparable with those found in adult studies, the risk for accumulation seems not greater in children than in adults. Body composition can have a strong influence on the Vd of baclofen and, therefore, on the dose needed to obtain therapeutic plasma levels. Dosing according to clearly defined age groups with the help of therapeutic drug monitoring seems preferable. In view of the negative correlation between body weight and Vd, dosing according to body weight using adult pharmacokinetic data does not seem an effective way for using baclofen in children.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2002

Mechanisms of gastro-oesophageal reflux in preterm and term infants with reflux disease.

BACKGROUND: Transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxation (TLOSR) is the predominant mechanism of gastro-oesophageal reflux (GOR) in healthy infants but the mechanisms of GOR in infants with GOR disease (GORD) are poorly understood. AIMS: To measure the occurrence of TLOSR, GOR, and gastric emptying (GE) rate in preterm and term infants with GORD. PATIENTS: Thirty six infants were studied and grouped as normals or GORD based on a routine clinical assessment and confirmation of an assessment of GORD by reflux symptom charts and oesophageal pH monitoring. METHODS: A micromanometric assembly incorporating a micro pH electrode recorded oesophageal motility and pH. GE rate was determined using the (13)C-octanoic acid breath test. RESULTS: TLOSR was the predominant mechanism of GOR, triggering 50-100% of GOR episodes (median 91.5%). Abdominothoracic straining significantly increased the occurrence of GOR in association with TLOSR. In infants with GORD, the number of TLOSRs overall was similar to normals but the proportion of TLOSRs accompanied by acid GOR was significantly higher than in normals (16.5% v 5.7%, respectively; p<0.001). Infants with GORD had a similar GE rate to normals. CONCLUSIONS: In infant GORD, acid reflux associated TLOSRs are abnormally common and likely to be a major contributing factor to the pathophysiology of GORD. Infants with GORD do not have delayed GE.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed2001

Alterations in rectal sensitivity and motility in childhood irritable bowel syndrome.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Children with chronic abdominal pain have a heterogeneous clinical presentation, but no organic cause can be identified in most of them. Some children present with symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). We hypothesized that visceral hypersensitivity and motor abnormalities may be underlying mechanisms in these children. METHODS: Rectal sensation and rectal contractile response to a meal were studied in 8 children with IBS and 8 children with functional abdominal pain (FAP) and were compared with those of 9 healthy volunteers (HVs). RESULTS: The threshold for pain, but not that for first sensation and urge to defecate, was significantly decreased in IBS patients (6 +/- 1 mm Hg) compared with FAP patients and HVs (17 +/- 1 and 22 +/- 2 mm Hg, respectively). In HVs and patients with FAP, ingestion of a meal induced a decrease in rectal volume with an early and late component. This motor pattern was absent in children with IBS. In IBS patients, no rapid volume waves were observed during fasting in contrast to FAP patients (2.7 +/- 0.3/10 min) and HVs (1.8 +/- 0.5/10 min). CONCLUSIONS: Children fulfilling the Rome II criteria for IBS have a significantly lowered threshold for pain and a disturbed contractile response to a meal. Comparable to results reported in adults, sensory and motor abnormalities might play a pathophysiologic role in childhood IBS.

Abdominal Pain↗
PubMed2001

Characterization of anorectal pressure and the anorectal inhibitory reflex in healthy preterm and term infants.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate anorectal motor function in healthy premature and term infants with the use of micromanometric techniques. STUDY DESIGN: Anorectal manometry was performed in 22 healthy neonates (9 female) with a mean postmenstrual age of 32 weeks (range, 30 to 38 weeks) with a micromanometric anorectal assembly (od 2.0 mm). The assembly incorporated a 2-cm-long sleeve sensor for measurement of resting anal sphincter pressures and relaxation, and 4 sideholes recorded anal and rectal pressures. Rectal distension was performed with a latex balloon or direct air insufflation to elicit the anorectal inhibitory reflex (AR). RESULTS: The mean anal sphincter pressure, rectal pressure, and rhythmic wave frequency were 40 mm Hg (range, 7 to 65 mm Hg), 11 mm Hg (range, 1 to 27 mm Hg), and 10/min (range, 8 to 14/min), respectively. A normal AR could be elicited in 21 of the 22 infants studied. CONCLUSION: An anorectal micromanometric sleeve catheter is suitable for use in evaluating anorectal pressures in preterm and term neonates. Insufflation of air without the use of a balloon to elicit the AR is reliable and suitable for use in infants <34 weeks. Premature infants older than 30 weeks' postmenstrual age have normal anorectal pressures and a normal AR.

Anal Canal↗
PubMed2001

The effect of anorectal manometry on the outcome of treatment in severe childhood constipation: a randomized, controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: Approximately 50% of constipated children contract rather than relax the external sphincter complex during a defecation attempt. Although biofeedback training (BF) is able to change this defecation behavior, there is no additional effect of BF to conventional treatment (CT) on clinical outcome compared with CT alone. It has been postulated that the absence of a significant difference between these 2 treatment options might be because of a therapeutic, "demystifying" effect of performing anorectal manometry in conventionally treated children, necessary to obtain basal manometric data. The objective of this prospective, controlled, randomized study was to evaluate the effect of CT with 2 anorectal manometry sessions compared with CT alone (dietary advice, diary, toilet training, oral laxatives, and enemas) on clinical outcome. METHODS: A total of 212 constipated children (143 boys) who were visiting a referral pediatric gastroenterologic practice were randomized prospectively to CT alone (115 patients) or to CT combined with 2 manometry sessions (CTM; 97 patients). Patients were included in the study when they fulfilled at least 2 of the 4 following criteria: stool frequency fewer than 3 per week, 2 or more soiling and/or encopresis episodes per week, periodic passage of very large amounts of stool every 7 to 30 days, or a palpable rectal or abdominal fecal mass. CT comprises dietary advice, a daily diary, toilet training, and oral laxative treatment preceded by rectal disimpaction with enemas on 3 consecutive days. During both manometries, the child and the parent could watch the tracing on the computer screen. No explanation was given to either the child or the parents during the procedure. When the procedure was finished, the tracings were clarified. Successful treatment was defined as a defecation frequency of 3 or more per week and fewer than 1 soiling/encopresis episode per 2 weeks and no use of laxatives. RESULTS: Only 4 and 2 children from the CT and CTM groups showed no soiling and/or encopresis, whereas 76% and 65%, respectively, reported the periodic passage of large stools. In 26% and 30% of the patients, a rectal scybalum was found on physical examination. The success rates at 6, 26, 52, and 104 weeks' follow-up were 4%, 24%, 32%, and 43% and 7%, 22%, 30%, and 35% in the CT and CTM group, respectively. No significant difference in success percentage was observed between the 2 groups at any time of follow-up with relative risks (CT/CTM) and 95% confidence intervals, respectively, of 0.55 (0.16-1.89), 1.13 (0.67-1.89), 1.07 (0.69-1.65), and 1.23 (0.81-1.85). A significant increase in defecation frequency was observed between the first (intake) and second visits, which was sustained at all subsequent visits and stages of follow-up in both groups (not significant). Also in relation to the first visit, a significant decrease in encopresis episodes was shown and a further slow but significant decrease at 52 weeks of follow-up in both groups. The manometric data obtained from the CTM group showed a low percentage of children with normal defecation dynamics, namely 28%, which (significantly) increased to 38% at the last manometry. CONCLUSIONS: Anorectal manometry combined with CT compared with CT alone did not result in higher success rates in chronically constipated children. Therefore, anorectal manometry has no additional demystifying or educational effect on clinical outcome in chronically constipated children. This observation together with the observation in the current and previous studies that no correlation was found between (achievement of) normal defecation dynamics and success and that no relation was observed between volume of urge or critical volume and success leaves no diagnostic or therapeutic role for anorectal manometry in chronic constipated children, except its use as a diagnostic test to exclude Hirschsprung's disease. A simple CT is successful in 30% of severely constipated children who are referred to a tertiary hospital, underscoring the importance of long-lasting and adequate laxative treatment.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Lack of benefit of laxatives as adjunctive therapy for functional nonretentive fecal soiling in children.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the combination of laxative treatment and biofeedback therapy (BF) is more effective for management of functional nonretentive fecal soiling than biofeedback therapy alone. STUDY DESIGN: In a prospective nonblinded study, 48 children were randomized in 2 groups: treatment with oral laxatives (LAX) and 5 sessions of BF (BF + LAX) or 5 sessions of BF alone (BF) during a treatment intervention period of 7 weeks. Biofeedback was performed with perfused manometry catheters and rectal balloon distension. Training focused on awareness of balloon distension and instruction in correct defecation dynamics. Successful treatment was defined as <1 encopresis episode per 2 weeks. RESULTS: At the end of the intervention period, the number of encopresis episodes was significantly decreased in both groups: from 7 (2 to 24) to 2 (0 to 17) in the BF group and from 7 (3 to 25) to 2 (0 to 14) in the BF + LAX group. However, children given BF alone had significantly higher success rates than children treated with BF and additional oral laxatives (44% to 11%). CONCLUSIONS: There is no additional effect of laxative treatment in functional nonretentive fecal soiling. Children treated with BF in combination with laxatives showed a significantly lower success percentage compared with those treated with BF alone. These results suggest that children with functional nonretentive fecal soiling should be treated differently from children with constipation and encopresis.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Megarectum in constipation.

BACKGROUND: Faecal impaction is frequently observed in children with chronic constipation. The term megarectum is often used to describe this finding. AIM: To evaluate rectal functioning and rectal measures in constipated children with a filled rectum, in order to define the terms faecal impaction, enlarged rectum, and megarectum. METHODS: All children underwent radiological investigation, colonic transit time study, anorectal manometry, and rectal volume and rectal wall compliance measurements. Patients with faecal impaction were compared with controls, who had an empty rectum on digital rectal examination. RESULTS: A total of 31 patients and six controls were included in the study. The mean duration of complaints was 4.2 years and all had faecal incontinence. The colonic transit times in the patients showed a distinct delay in the rectosigmoid segment. Anorectal manometry was not significantly different between patients and controls. The rectal width in patients was 0.68 and in controls 0.52 with an upper limit of 0.61. The pressure-volume curve in patients showed significant less relaxation at a distension of 50 ml. The slope of the curve (corresponding with rectal wall compliance) was comparable for patients and controls. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that faecal impaction is a filled rectum found on digital rectal examination; an enlarged rectum is defined by a rectopelvic ratio greater than 0.61; and megarectum is defined in those with significant abnormalities found with anorectal manometry, pressure-volume curves, or rectal compliance investigation. A diminished relaxation of the rectum on rectal distension could be the first sign of megarectum in children with chronic constipation.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Characterization of esophageal body and lower esophageal sphincter motor function in the very premature neonate.

OBJECTIVES: To characterize esophageal body and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) motor function in very premature infants. STUDY DESIGN: Esophageal manometry was performed in 12 very premature infants of 26 to 33 weeks' postmenstrual age (PMA) (body weights of 610-1360 g). Esophageal motor patterns were recorded for 30 minutes with a perfused micromanometric sleeve assembly (outer diameter, 2.0 mm). RESULTS: Esophageal pressure waves triggered by dry swallows were predominantly (84%) peristaltic in propagation sequence. All infants showed tonic LES contraction; the mean resting LES pressure (LESP) for individual infants ranged from 5.0 +/- 4.1 mm Hg to 20.0 +/- 4.8 mm Hg. In all infants the LES relaxed (duration, 5.8 +/- 3.0 seconds; nadir pressure, 1.8 +/- 2.6 mm Hg) in response to pharyngeal swallows. Transient LES relaxations (TLESRs) (duration, 21.7 +/- 8.7 seconds; nadir pressure, 0.1 +/- 1.8 mm Hg) occurred on average 2.6 +/- 1.6 times per study; 86% of these relaxations triggered esophageal body common cavity events known to be associated with gastroesophageal reflux. CONCLUSIONS: Esophageal motor function is well developed in very premature infants. Our data also suggest that TLESR is the predominant mechanism of reflux in these babies.

Esophagogastric Junction↗
PubMed1999

Lower esophageal sphincter position in premature infants cannot be correctly estimated with current formulas.

OBJECTIVES: Strobel's formula (Esophageal length = 5 + 0.252 x Height) is frequently used as a guide for determining the distance from the nares to the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) in term infants. The aim of this study was to examine this relationship in premature infants. STUDY DESIGN: The distance from nares to LES was manometrically determined in 156 premature infants (26-40 weeks' postmenstrual age; body weights of 610-3050 g). The ability of body weight, height (body length), head circumference, and postmenstrual age to predict the manometrically determined LES position was evaluated with linear and non-linear regression analyses. RESULTS: Body weight and body length were the most predictive of distance from nares to LES (r(2) = 0.848 and 0.802, respectively). These relationships were non-linear and, in the case of body length, deviated substantially from Strobel's model. CONCLUSIONS: In premature neonates, a different formula is needed for prediction of the distance between nares and LES than that applied to term infants and children.

Anthropometry↗
PubMed1997

How accurate is the recall of bowel habits in children with defaecation disorders?

The aim was to assess in children with defaecation disorders, the accuracy of recalled information as provided by the child and/or parents compared to diary information and to evaluate its effect on diagnostic grouping. In this prospective study, recalled information, obtained initially by a telephone interview, was compared with recorded information provided by a 4-week diary. Recalled and recorded data were compared using Kappa indices. Subsequently, children were assigned to three diagnostic groups: constipation, solitary encopresis and a rest group. Based on these diagnoses, the first two groups were allocated for laxative treatment. Analysis of recalled and recorded data was performed in 46 children (5-14 years). Most defaecation parameters showed fair agreement, only limited agreement occurred for frequency of soiling episodes. Identical clinical groups using the two methods were obtained in 63% of the children. Particularly, the assessment of large amounts of stool and the number of soiling episodes were responsible for the shift in the diagnostic groups. A total of 83% children were correctly allocated for treatment using recalled data.

Adolescent↗