Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Lynn D Devenport

Publications and source records attributed to Lynn D Devenport.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Dynamic averaging and foraging decisions in horses (Equus callabus).

The variability of most environments taxes foraging decisions by increasing the uncertainty of the information available. One solution to the problem is to use dynamic averaging, as do some granivores and carnivores. Arguably, the same strategy could be useful for grazing herbivores, even though their food renews and is more homogeneously distributed. Horses (Equus callabus) were given choices between variable patches after short or long delays. When patch information was current, horses returned to the patch that was recently best, whereas those without current information matched choices to the long-term average values of the patches. These results demonstrate that a grazing species uses dynamic averaging and indicate that, like granivores and carnivores, they can use temporal weighting to optimize foraging decisions.

Animals↗

Balancing variable patch quality with predation risk.

Patch choice is almost always under the influence of multiple factors. Patch quality and the threat of predation are two such factors that have been shown to influence the foraging decisions of animals. In addition, aspects of patch quality may also vary with time, and consequently animals should incorporate temporal information to reduce their uncertainty about current patch conditions. The temporal weighting rule (TWR), which has been validated in previous studies, describes how animals should choose among variable options with the passage of time. In this study, we varied an additional factor, predation risk, along with certainty about patch yields in a field experiment, utilizing individually marked, free-ranging least chipmunks, Tamias minimus. We gave the animals in each condition experience at our experimental patches and then recorded patch choices a few minutes or one to 2 days later. The results show that animals combined perceived predation risk with a progressively shifting assessment of patch quality to form estimates of overall patch value as modeled by TWR. Based on the information available, the animals' patch choices were, arguably, the most adaptive choices.

Animals↗