Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Luke Jones

Publications and source records attributed to Luke Jones.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Double standards: memory loading in temporal reference memory.

Three experiments compared human performance on temporal generalization tasks with either one or two different, and distinct, standard durations encoded. In the first two experiments participants received presentations of two different standards at the beginning of each trial block and were instructed to encode either one or both of them. When instructed to encode one standard they then had to judge whether each of a number of comparison stimuli was or was not that standard. When instructed to encode both they were then tested using just one of the standards but the participants were unaware, at the time of encoding, which standard would later be used as a reference. No marked effect of the number of temporal standards encoded was found. In Experiment 3 participants received either one or two temporal standards and had to use both when two were presented. This manipulation produced flatter generalization gradients when two standards were encoded than when just one was, and modelling attributed this difference mainly to an increase in reference memory variability in the double-standard case. This suggests that the variability of representation of durations in temporal reference memory can be systematically increased by increasing temporal reference memory load.

Adolescent↗

Inappropriate association of semantics and context to novel stimuli can give rise to the false recognition of unfamiliar people.

This paper reports further experiments with a patient (MR) who has a tendency to claim that unfamous people are familiar together with good ability at identifying truly famous people. The first experiment examines the role that the typicality of stimuli plays in his false recognition. Although, typicality may have some influence over false recognition (as it does for normal controls) there is little evidence to suggest that MR is over-reliant on such information. It is unlikely that perceptual fluency can entirely explain his deficit. This is bolstered by a further study using morphed images of famous and unfamous faces, suggesting that false recognition is associated with inappropriate retrieval of semantic-biographical information. It is argued that MR's judgement of 'fame' is subjectively appropriate, given the information that he retrieves. This information is thought to derive from currently activated, or recently activated, contextual information which becomes inappropriately bound to the novel stimulus, giving rise to a false sense of familiarity. These findings underscore the importance of viewing memory as an attributional process, whereby current mental constructions/processes are attributed to some event(s) in the past.

Case-Control Studies↗