Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Luigi Tesio

Publications and source records attributed to Luigi Tesio.

11 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2004

Assessing and adjusting for cross-cultural validity of impairment and activity limitation scales through differential item functioning within the framework of the Rasch model: the PRO-ESOR project.

INTRODUCTION: In Europe it is common for outcome measures to be translated for use in other languages. This adaptation may be complicated by culturally specific approaches to certain tasks; for example, bathing. In this context the issue of cross-cultural validity becomes paramount. OBJECTIVE: To facilitate the pooling of data in international studies, a project set out to evaluate the cross-cultural validity of impairment and activity limitation measures used in rehabilitation from the perspective of the Rasch measurement model. METHODS: Cross-cultural validity is assessed through an analysis of Differential Item Functioning (DIF) within the context of additive conjoint measurement expressed through the Rasch model. Data from patients undergoing rehabilitation for stroke was provided from 62 centers across Europe. Two commonly used outcome measures, the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) motor scale are used to illustrate the approach. RESULTS: Pooled data from 3 countries for the MMSE were shown to fit the Rasch model with only 1 item displaying DIF by country. In contrast, many items from the FIM expressed DIF and misfit to the model. Consequently they were allowed to be unique across countries, so resolving the lack of fit to the model. CONCLUSIONS: Where data are to be pooled for international studies, analysis of DIF by culture is essential. Where DIF is observed, adjustments can be made to allow for cultural differences in outcome measurement.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed2003

Behavioral assessment of unilateral neglect: study of the psychometric properties of the Catherine Bergego Scale.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the psychometric properties of a scale for spatial neglect in everyday life. DESIGN: Validation study. SETTING: A neurologic rehabilitation unit in a university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-three consecutive right-hemisphere stroke patients. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The Catherine Bergego Scale (CBS) was used to assess neglect behavior and anosognosia. Its sensitivity was compared with that of 3 conventional tests. The inner structure of the scale was studied by principal component analysis. In addition, linearity, unidimensionality, and reliability of the scale were tested through Rasch analysis. RESULTS: Behavioral assessment correlated significantly to, but was more sensitive than, conventional tests. Anosognosia correlated significantly with neglect severity, although individual dissociations occurred. Factorial analysis disclosed a single underlying factor, explaining 65.8% of total variance. Rasch analysis also revealed that the 10 items defined a common, single ability continuum with widespread measurement range and quite regular item distribution, and showed a satisfactory reliability. CONCLUSION: Behavioral assessment proved to be more sensitive than conventional paper and pencil tasks. Both conventional statistics and Rasch analysis suggest that the CBS is reliable and valid, and that the 10 items define a homogeneous construct.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Measuring behaviours and perceptions: Rasch analysis as a tool for rehabilitation research.

Variables present in an individual, for example, independence, pain, balance, fatigue, depression and knowledge, cannot be measured directly (hence the term "latent" variables). They are usually assessed by measuring related behaviours, defined by sets of standardized items. The homogeneity of the different items, and proportionality of raw counts to measure, can only be postulated. In 1960 Georg Rasch proposed a statistical model that complied with the fundamental assumptions made in measurements in physical sciences. It allowed for the transformation of the cumulative raw scores (achieved by a subject across items, or by an item across subjects) into linear continuous measures of ability (for subjects) and difficulty (for items). These 2 parameters, only, govern the probability that "pass" rather than "fail" occurs. The discrepancies between model-expected scores (continuous between 0 and 1) and observed scores (discrete, either 0 or 1) provide indexes of inconsistency of individual subjects, items and classes of subjects. In subsequent years the same principles were extended to rating scales, with items graded on more than 2 levels, and to "many-facet" contexts where, beyond items and subjects, multiple raters, times of administration, etc. converge in determining the observed scores. Rasch modelling has increasing application in rehabilitation medicine. New scales with unprecedented metric validity (including internal consistency and reliability) can be built. Existing scales can be improved or rejected on a sound theoretical basis. In clinical trials the consistency and the linearity of measures of either subjects or raters can be validly matched with those of physical and chemical measures. The stability of the item difficulties across time, cultures, diagnostic groups and time of administration can be estimated, thus making it possible to compare homogeneous measures or foster diagnostic procedures on the reasons for differential item functioning.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed2003

Psychometric properties of the Rivermead Mobility Index in Italian stroke rehabilitation inpatients.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the internal consistency, validity, responsiveness and test scalability of the Rivermead Mobility Index (RMI) in Italian rehabilitation inpatients recovering from stroke. DESIGN: Seventy-three stroke inpatients undergoing rehabilitation were assessed at admission (T0) and five weeks later (T1), using RMI, the motor (motFIM) and cognitive (cognFIM) subscales of the Functional Independence Measure, the 'leg' section of the Motricity Index and Trunk Control Test. RESULTS: Cronbach's alpha of the RMI was 0.92. The item-to-total correlation coefficients (r(rb)) ranged from 0.36 to 0.83, all p < 0.003. All correlations between RMI scores and the other instruments, both at T0 and T1, were statistically significant (r > or = 0.49, all p < 0.0001), except those with cognFIM. The difference in RMI scores over the testing period was statistically significant (sign test: z = 7.1, p < 0.0001) and the effect size was 0.89. The coefficient of reproducibility was 0.95 at T0 and 0.93 at T1, and both coefficients of scalability were 0.67. CONCLUSIONS: The study confirms the internal consistency, construct validity and responsiveness of the RMI, according to the classic psychometric indexes. However, some minor concerns arise regarding: (a) a floor effect of RMI in subacute rehabilitation stroke inpatients at admission and; (b) one item ('bathing') that seems sensitive to cultural and environmental factors. Moreover, even though RMI met the scaling criteria, the item hierarchy is not coincident with the one originally postulated. So, RMI should be considered only as a summated index with ordinal properties, and not a hierarchically ranked scale.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Satisfaction with hospital rehabilitation: is it related to life satisfaction, functional status, age or education?

Satisfaction with care, functional and cognitive status, life satisfaction, anxiety, and sociodemographic variables were correlated in 55 in-patients admitted to a rehabilitation unit after hip or knee surgery. The study aimed at investigating whether, as an index of care quality, patient satisfaction can be considered as a distinct domain or instead is subsidiary to other patient characteristics. Patient satisfaction with rehabilitation care was measured through a questionnaire, SAT-16. The SAT-16 scores were moderately correlated with a short form of the Life Satisfaction Index (LSI-11: rs = 0.41, p = 0.001), but did not correlate with either the Functional Independence Measure (FIM), the STAI form X (the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory), age or educational level. According to the "discrepancy model", the fair degree of correlation between SAT-16 and LSI-11 could be explained by connecting both expressions of satisfaction with personal background expectations and their perceived degree of fulfilment. The results confirm, also for rehabilitation care, that patient satisfaction should be considered as a valuable specific outcome, independent of most of the patient characteristics investigated (functional and cognitive status, anxiety, age, and education).

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed2002

The FIM instrument in the United States and Italy: a comparative study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare FIM instrument ratings between Italy and the United States. DESIGN: This study utilized 169,835 United States and 4,536 Italian FIM instrument records for stroke with the left side of the body affected, stroke with the right side of the body affected, and orthopedic conditions. RESULTS: Case-mix, patient age, and admission and discharge FIM instrument scores were similar. The delays between onset of disability and admission to rehabilitation and lengths of stay in rehabilitation were 2-4 times longer in Italy. In Italy, some 88-95% of the subjects were discharged to the community vs. 74-88% in the United States. Hierarchies of FIM instrument ratings across the motor and cognitive items were similar, but there were interesting differences. The hierarchical patterns showed that dressing, bathing, perineal hygiene, and tub or shower transfer were relatively more difficult in Italy compared with the Unites States, whereas walking was easier in Italy compared to the United States. CONCLUSION: The Italian health care payment system offers less incentive for early discharges from acute care and rehabilitation. In Italy, nursing homes are less accessible, whereas family support is more available. Apparently less intensive treatment is applied in Italy, where a minimum time per day for rehabilitation services is not mandatory for payment. Occupational therapy is not used in Italy and the focus is more on physical therapy.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed2002

Level of Activity in Profound/Severe Mental Retardation (LAPMER): a Rasch-derived scale of disability.

Classification of Mental Retardation (MR) into severe and profound is based on IQ threshold (<35 and 20% respectively) and on quite generic descriptions of deficits in adaptive behavior. The LAPMER scale (after Level of Activity in Profound/severe Mental Retardation) was developed as a measure of severity through observed behavior in adult patients. The Rasch analysis (RA, in its rating scale model) was adopted as a guide for selection of items, conceptualization of item levels, and validation of the overall instrument. The RA provides estimates on a continuum measure corresponding to the discrete cumulative score. A model prescribes the expected scores on each subject-item interaction. Discrepancies between observed and expected scores allow diagnostic procedures on coherence (fit) of both subjects and items. The final version included 8 items: Feeding, Sphincters, Communication, Manipulation, Dressing, Locomotion, Spatial Orientation and Praxiae, scored 0/1 or 0/1/2 (cumulative range for the total set of items was 0-13) the higher the score, the better the performance. The test can be administered in 15 minutes through observation or inquiry from proxies and personnel. A psychologist rated 146 permanent hosts of a large Institute for mentally retarded adults (51 profound and 95 severe, 91 male, age 18-63, median 36). Median score was 6/13, IQR 1-9, range 0-12, 19% of cases scored 0. Cronbach a for internal consistency was 0.90. Fifty-seven patients were also independently scored by another psychologist. Between-rater Cohen's k reliability index ranged from 0.77-0.96 across items. Median raw scores were 1 and 8 in profound and severe cases, respectively (p<0.001). Rasch person reliability coefficient, a 0 to 1 index of internal consistency analogous to Crohnbach a, was 0.92. For each item the standardized differences between observed and model-expected scores (residuals) were c2 tested (a level 0.05) across sub-groups of patients. These were: profound vs. severe cases, and classes of motor impairment (tetra-,hemi-,para-plegic and unimpaired), matched for overall ability measure. For 6 items some residuals were found to be statistically significant. Absolute differences ranged from 0 to 0.7 raw score points, with no systematic patterns. Gender, age group and rater did not bias the measure. Residuals did not correlate meaningfully across pairs of items (r<(0.5)), further supporting the unidimensionality of the measure. The scale seems a valid tool for classification of adult severe and profound MR cases.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed1997

A unidimensional pain/disability measure for low-back pain syndromes.

A new measure is presented, suitable for documenting severity and response to treatment in chronic low-back pain syndromes. It is self-administered and combines two pain and seven mobility items. These were selected from pre-existing validated instruments on the basis of their sensitivity to change after treatment. Their Italian validated translation was adopted. The measure was administered to 32 chronic low-back pain Italian patients, all refractory to previous conservative treatments. In most cases they presented with herniation or protrusion of 1-3 lumbar discs. Patients were treated with 3-6 sessions of autotraction over a 5- to 15-day period. Scores on the scale were recorded at admission, discharge and follow-up, 1-3 months after treatment. At discharge and at follow-up, patients were asked if, overall, they felt improved, the same or worse. At follow-up, 20 patients out of 32 reported overall improvement. Scalometric properties of the measure were tested using Rasch analysis. For admission and follow-up, items followed a consistent hierarchical relationship along a unidimensional pain/disability variable, which is being called back illness. The items were not redundant, in that they spread well along a wide range of difficulty/severity. The hierarchy matched well with the expected expression of the conditions of the patients. A study was conducted on 34 chronic back pain patients, showing satisfactory test-retest reliability. Depending on the various items, Cohen's unweighted K ranged from 0.27 to 0.78, with ten of the 11 items above the 0.45 level of acceptability, while intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.42 to 0.89. At follow-up, changes in BACKILL of plus 15% or more, with respect to admission, were consistent with patients' reports of improvement in 19 out of 20 cases. Changes in BACKILL of less than 15% were consistent with patients reports of being the same or worse in 11 out of 12 cases.

Adult↗