Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Lucas D Speakman

Publications and source records attributed to Lucas D Speakman.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Does GaH5 exist?

The existence or nonexistence of GaH(5) has been widely discussed [N. M. Mitzel, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 42, 3856 (2003)]. Seven possible structures for gallium pentahydride have been systematically investigated using ab initio electronic structure theory. Structures and vibrational frequencies have been determined employing self-consistent field, coupled cluster including all single and double excitations (CCSD), and CCSD with perturbative triples levels of theory, with at least three correlation-consistent polarized-valence-(cc-pVXZ and aug-cc-pVXZ) type basis sets. The X (1)A(') state for GaH(5) is predicted to be weakly bound complex 1 between gallane and molecular hydrogen, with C(s) symmetry. The dissociation energy corresponding to GaH(5)-->GaH(3)+H(2) is predicted to be D(e)=2.05 kcal mol(-1). The H-H stretching fundamental is predicted to be v=4060 cm(-1), compared to the tentatively assigned experimental feature of Wang and Andrews [J. Phys. Chem. A 107, 11371 (2003)] at 4087 cm(-1). A second C(s) structure 2 with nearly equal energy is predicted to be a transition state, corresponding to a 90 degrees rotation of the H(2) bond. Thus the rotation of the hydrogen molecule is essentially free. However, hydrogen scrambling through the C(2v) structure 3 seems unlikely, as the activation barrier for scrambling is at least 30 kcal mol(-1) higher in energy than that for the dissociation of GaH(5) to GaH(3) and H(2). Two additional structures consisting of GaH(3) with a dihydrogen bond perpendicular to gallane (C(3v) structure 4) and an in-plane dihydrogen bond [C(s)(III) structure 5] were also examined. A C(3v) symmetry second-order saddle point has nearly the same energy as the GaH(3)+H(2) dissociation limit, while the C(s)(III) structure 5 is a transition structure to the C(3v) structure. The C(4v) structure 6 and the D(3h) structure 7 are much higher in energy than GaH(3)+H(2) by 88 and 103 kcal mol(-1), respectively.

Journal Article↗

The microwave and infrared spectroscopy of benzaldehyde: conflict between theory and experimental deductions.

Recently, it has been proposed that ab initio calculations cannot accurately treat molecules comprised of a benzene ring with a pi-conjugated substituent, for example, benzaldehyde. Theoretical predictions of the benzaldehyde barrier to internal rotation are typically a factor of 2 too high in comparison to the experimental values of 4.67 (infared) and 4.90 (microwave) kcal mol(-1). However, both experiments use Pitzer's 1946 model to compute the reduced moment of inertia and employ the experimentally observed torsional frequency to deduce benzaldehyde's rotational barrier. When Pitzer's model is applied to a system with a nonconjugated functional group, such as phenol, the model and theoretical values are in close agreement. Therefore, we conclude the model may not account for conjugation between the substituent and the pi-system of benzene. The experimental values of the benzaldehyde rotational barrier are therefore misleading. The true rotational barrier lies closer to the theoretically extrapolated limit of 7.7 kcal mol(-1), based on coupled cluster theory.

Journal Article↗