Biomedical subjects

Luca Tommasi

Publications and source records attributed to Luca Tommasi.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2003

Representation of two geometric features of the environment in the domestic chick ( Gallus gallus).

We report experiments based on a novel test in domestic chicks ( Gallus gallus), designed to examine the encoding of two different geometric features of an enclosed environment: relative lengths of the walls and amplitude of the corners. Chicks were trained to search for a food reward located in one corner of a parallelogram-shaped enclosure. Between trials, chicks were passively disoriented and the enclosure was rotated, making reorientation possible only on the basis of the internal spatial structure of the enclosure. In order to reorient, chicks could rely on two sources of information: the relative lengths of the walls of the enclosure (associated to their left-right sense order) and the angles subtended by walls at corners. Chicks learned the task choosing equally often the reinforced corner and its rotational equivalent. Results of tests carried out in novel enclosures, the shapes of which were chosen ad hoc (1) to induce reorientation based only on the ratio of walls lengths plus sense (rectangular enclosure), or (2) to induce reorientation based only on corner angles (rhombus-shaped enclosure), suggested that chicks encoded both features of the environment. In a third test, in which chicks faced a conflict between these geometric features (mirror parallelogram-shaped enclosure), reorientation seemed to depend on the salience of corner angles. These results shed light on the elements of the environmental geometry which control spatial reorientation, and broaden the knowledge on the geometric representation of space in animals.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

Separate processing mechanisms for encoding of geometric and landmark information in the avian hippocampus.

Domestic chicks bilaterally or unilaterally lesioned to the hippocampus were trained to search for food hidden beneath sawdust by ground-scratching in the centre of a large enclosure, the correct position of food being indicated by a local landmark in the absence of any extra-enclosure visual cues. At test, the landmark was removed or displaced at a distance from its original position. Results showed that sham-operated chicks and chicks with a lesion of the left hippocampus searched in the centre, relying on large-scale geometric information provided by the enclosure, whereas chicks with a lesion of either the right hippocampus or both hippocampi were completely disoriented (landmark removed) or searched close to the landmark shifted from the centre (landmark displaced). These results indicate that encoding of geometric features of an enclosure occurs in the right hippocampus even when local information provided by a landmark would suffice to localize the goal; encoding based on local information, in contrast, seems to occur outside the hippocampus. These findings provide evidence that the left and right avian hippocampi play different roles in spatial cognition, a phenomenon which had been documented previously only for the human hippocampus.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

The side inside.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2002

The use of viewing posture to control visual processing by lateralised mechanisms.

Chicks were trained and tested to run to a dish and feed from it under one of four conditions. In three of these, the dish was covered by a light lid that the chicks readily learned to remove. The square lid (SL) had slightly protruding corners, so that it could be removed by a blow of the bill at a range of positions. A round lid (UL), which fitted snugly, could best be removed by inserting the bill into a medial U-shaped indentation. A round lid (STR), which fitted all the way round to the edge of the dish, could be removed by grasping and tugging a centrally placed piece of string. The final dish had no lid (NOL). The dish and the layout of the arena were otherwise identical under all conditions. Chicks trained and tested with lids predominantly fixated the dish during approach with the right eye and showed leftward deviation from the direct line of approach (which facilitated right eye use). NOL chicks fixated with the left eye and deviated rightwards. The right eye is thus used when a motor plan has to be set up and sustained. The use of the left eye is expected when topographical information has to be used. Here, the approach was so simple and practised that the assumption of left eye viewing is likely to be a default condition. It would facilitate detection of any change in layout. A standard set of head positions were used, particularly by SL and NOL chicks, showing that the head was aligned with some reference point, perhaps the centre of the dish. These fell into two series (used by both eyes), and in both the peaks of frequent use were 10 degrees apart. One (20 degrees, 10 degrees ) was probably generated by head saccades ending with the bill pointing directly at the dish (0 degrees ). The other (35 degrees, 25 degrees, 15 degrees ) is best explained by slight divergence of the optic axes. The 25 degrees right eye position was consistently used by STR chicks at the beginning of approach. The STR condition requires the most difficult manipulation, and the manipulandum is most obvious from a distance. This is consistent with right eye use during establishment of a motor plan. Head postures consistent with divergence were also used when close to the dish under conditions where choice between targets was necessary. This was clear in the NOL condition, where the chick could see the food grains as it approached. Here, it is likely that both eyes are used in independent search. If so, it may be that divergence is used as a strategy during establishment of a motor plan (as in STR chicks) to increase the independence of the right eye system.

Animals↗