Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Louise Morris

Publications and source records attributed to Louise Morris.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Molecular epidemiology of multiresistant Streptococcus pneumoniae with both erm(B)- and mef(A)-mediated macrolide resistance.

Of a total of 1043 macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates collected from 24 countries as part of PROTEKT 1999-2000, 71 isolates tested positive for both the mef(A) and erm(B) genes. Of 69 isolates subjected to further molecular investigations, all were resistant to tetracycline, 63 (91.3%) were resistant to penicillin, and 57 (82.6%) were resistant to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. One isolate was also fluoroquinolone resistant, and another was resistant to quinupristin-dalfopristin. The ketolide telithromycin retained activity against all of the isolates. Of the 69 of these 71 isolates viable for further testing, 46 were from South Korea, 13 were from the United States, 8 came from Japan, and 1 each came from Mexico and Hungary. One major clonal complex (59 [85.5%] of 69 isolates) was identified by serotyping (with 85.5% of the isolates being 19A or 19F), pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, and multilocus sequence typing. The remaining isolates were less clonal in nature. Representative isolates were shown to carry the mobile genetic elements Tn1545 and mega, were negative for Tn1207.1, had tetracycline resistance mediated by tet(M), and contained the mef(E) variant of mef(A). All isolates were positive for mel, a homologue of the msr(A) efflux gene. These clones are obviously very efficient at global dissemination, and hence it will be very important to monitor their progress through continued surveillance. Telithromycin demonstrated high levels of activity (MIC for 90% of the strains tested, 0.5 micro g/ml; MIC range, 0.06 to 1 micro g/ml) against all isolates.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

Clinical practice benchmarking: implications for tissue viability.

Healthcare provision has been described as a 'lottery', reflecting a deficiency in equity of care (Ellis, 2000). Recent Department of Health (DoH, 1998, 1999) attempt to overcome this disparity and assure quality care by quality assessment and continuous quality improvement (Ellis and Morris, 1997). These documents advocate clinical benchmarking as a means to supporting this practice. This article provides an overview of the benchmarking process, with particular focus being applied to the pressure ulcer element. It reflects on the coalescence that appears to exist between implementing clinical benchmarking and the characteristics of specialist practice. It also analyses the effects of establishing the process on an existing tissue viability service.

Benchmarking↗

Descriptive evaluation of Alione hydrocapillary dressing.

It is widely recognized that a moist wound environment enhances epithelial migration and resurfacing, as well as promoting autolytic debridement of necrotic tissue, reducing pain, infection and scarring (Russell, 2002). However, an imbalance in the level of moisture can lead to delayed healing, or even wound extension (Kindlen and Morison, 1999). The type of wound itself can be influential in relation to the level of exudate produced. With such a diverse array of wound management products now available, the healthcare professional faces a constant dilemma in deciding what dressing is suitable for maintaining an optimal level of humidity in the wound environment. Alione, a new hydrocapillary dressing, manufactured by Coloplast, appears to overcome this impasse by being sufficiently versatile to manage varying levels of exudate in all types of wounds.

Aged↗