Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Linda M Thienpont

Publications and source records attributed to Linda M Thienpont.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Use of frozen sera for FT4 standardization: investigation by equilibrium dialysis combined with isotope dilution-mass spectrometry and immunoassay.

BACKGROUND: Serum-free thyroxine (FT4) testing is recommended for diagnosis or monitoring of thyroid dysfunction, particularly in cases of hormone binding abnormalities. However, the poor intermethod agreement among commercial FT4 assays suggests a need for standardization with a hierarchically higher measurement procedure. To that purpose, we applied equilibrium dialysis (ED) in combination with isotope dilution-liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (ID-LC-tandem MS). METHODS: After ED, we collected dialysate into tubes containing [13C6]-T4 for ID and [13C9]-T4 as carrier, purified the samples by solid-phase extraction, and analyzed them with LC/tandem MS. We evaluated the procedure's analytical performance and tested its suitability for measurement of hypo-, eu-, and hyperthyroid serum FT4 concentrations. We conducted a pilot method comparison study with 3 commercial assays to investigate whether frozen sera could be used for the purpose of FT4 standardization. RESULTS: The within-run, between-run, and total CVs (inclusive ED) were 3.7%, 4.2%, and 5.6%, respectively (17.7 pmol/L; n = 20). The mean accuracy, estimated from recovery experiments with dialysate and dialysis buffer supplemented at 8.7, 18.7, and 33.5 pmol/L, and from analysis of certified sera gravimetrically diluted to 9.8, 19.2, and 34.8 pmol/L, was 98.0% to 102.8%. The procedure's limit of detection and limit of quantification were 0.5 and 1.3 pmol/L, respectively. The method comparison demonstrated the suitability of the selected sera for standardization of FT4 assays and confirmed the lack of assay comparability. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that the described ED-ID-LC/tandem MS procedure and the selected type of sera qualify for standardization of FT4 measurements.

Blood Proteins↗
PubMed2006

Feasibility of standardization of serum C-peptide immunoassays with isotope-dilution liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

BACKGROUND: Serum C-peptide concentrations reflect pancreatic function in different clinical and diagnostic settings; however, the utility of C-peptide testing is limited by the lack of standardized commercial immunoassays. Standardization can best be done by split-sample comparison with a hierarchically higher reference measurement procedure with a set of native sera. For serum peptides, isotope-dilution liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (ID-LC/MS) is recommended as a reference measurement procedure. METHODS: We evaluated the analytical performance characteristics of an ID-LC/tandem MS procedure for measurement of serum C-peptide after a 2-step solid-phase extraction. To investigate the feasibility of this procedure for use in standardization, we also performed a method comparison with 3 representative commercial assays. RESULTS: The ID-LC/tandem MS procedure showed maximum within-run, between-run, and total CVs on dedicated sera (C-peptide concentrations, 1.6 and 4.0 mug/L) of 2.1%, 2.5%, and 2.9%, respectively; an accuracy of 94.6%-104.1%; a minimum trueness of 98.1% (95% confidence interval, 96.2%-100.0%), and limits of quantification and detection of 0.15 and 0.03 mug/L, respectively. Deming linear regression analysis of the method-comparison data showed that the immunoassays correlated well with ID-MS and were specific, but lacked intercomparability and trueness. We propose that the deficiencies can be resolved by recalibration on the basis of the method comparison. CONCLUSIONS: The ID-LC/tandem MS procedure is suitable for specific and accurate measurement of basal and stimulated serum concentrations of proinsulin C-peptide fragment 33-63 and is suitable for use in standardization of C-peptide immunoassays.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Feasibility study of the use of frozen human sera in split-sample comparison of immunoassays with candidate reference measurement procedures for total thyroxine and total triiodothyronine measurements.

BACKGROUND: Diagnostic manufacturers must ensure/document metrologically traceable assays. We report on a feasibility study of a split-sample comparison for that purpose. Processed, frozen single-donation sera, assigned target values by candidate reference measurement procedures (cRMPs), were used with immunoassays for total thyroxine (TT(4)) and triiodothyronine (TT(3)) as models. METHODS: Two serum panels were quantified for TT(4) and TT(3) with validated cRMPs and measured in parallel with at least 14 immunoassays. The results were interpreted in terms of traceability of calibration (trueness) and of the individual measurement result (accuracy) by linear regression analysis and graphical representation against specifications. The commutability of the sera was investigated by parallel analysis of TT(4) in freshly collected but nonfiltered specimens. RESULTS: The TT(4) (TT(3)) concentrations in the sera (according to the cRMPs) were 64-269 nmol/L (0.88-13.7 nmol/L). The method comparison showed that for TT(4), on average, the immunoassays produced results in agreement with the cRMPs, whereas for TT(3), results were typically higher. It also demonstrated a considerable between-assay divergence in traceability of calibration and accuracy. The evidence of noncommutability of the sera attributable to processing, however, indicates that the interpretation should be treated with caution. CONCLUSIONS: Frozen sera can be used for documenting/validating traceability of total thyroid measurements. The way in which the sera are processed may jeopardize commutability, however, and therefore requires in-depth investigation.

Cryopreservation↗
PubMed2005

Creatinine measurement: state of the art in accuracy and interlaboratory harmonization.

CONTEXT: The National Kidney Disease Education Program recommends calculating glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine concentration. Accurate creatinine measurements are necessary for this calculation. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the state of the art in measuring serum creatinine, as well as the ability of a proficiency testing program to measure bias for individual laboratories and method peer groups. DESIGN: A fresh-frozen, off-the-clot pooled serum specimen plus 4 conventional specimens were sent to participants in the College of American Pathologists Chemistry Survey for assay of creatinine. Creatinine concentrations were assigned by isotope dilution mass spectrometry reference measurement procedures. PARTICIPANTS: Clinical laboratories with an acceptable result for all 5 survey specimens (n = 5624). RESULTS: The fresh frozen serum (FFS) specimen had a creatinine concentration of 0.902 mg/dL (79.7 micromol/L). Mean bias for 50 instrument-method peer groups varied from -0.06 to 0.31 mg/dL (-5.3 to 27.4 micromol/L), with 30 (60%) of 50 peer groups having significant bias (P < .001). The bias variability was related to instrument manufacturer (P < or = .001) rather than method type (P = .02) with 24 (63%) of 38 alkaline picric acid methods and with 6 (50%) of 12 enzymatic methods having significant biases. Two conventional specimens had creatinine concentrations of 0.795 and 2.205 mg/dL (70.3 and 194.9 micromol/L) and had apparent survey biases significantly different (P < .001) from that of the FFS specimen for 34 (68%) and 35 (70%) of 50 peer groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Thirty of 50 peer groups had significant bias for creatinine. Bias was primarily associated with instrument manufacturer, not with type of method used. Proficiency testing using a commutable specimen measured participant bias versus a reference measurement procedure and provided trueness surveillance of instrument-method peer groups.

Bacteriological Techniques↗
PubMed2005

Analytic bias of thyroid function tests: analysis of a College of American Pathologists fresh frozen serum pool by 3900 clinical laboratories.

CONTEXT: In proficiency testing surveys, there are differences in the values reported by users of various analytic methods. Two contributors to this variation are calibrator bias and matrix effects of proficiency testing materials. OBJECTIVES: (1) To quantify the biases of the analytic methods used to measure thyroid-stimulating hormone, thyroxine, triiodothyronine, free thyroxine, and free triiodothyronine levels; (2) to determine if these biases are within allowable limits; and (3) to ascertain if proficiency testing materials correctly identify these biases. DESIGN: A fresh frozen serum specimen was mailed as part of the 2003 College of American Pathologists Ligand and Chemistry surveys. The means and SDs for each analytic method were determined for this sample as well as for a proficiency testing sample from both surveys. In the fresh frozen serum sample, target values for thyroxine and triiodothyronine were determined by isotope dilution/liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. All other target values in the study were the median of the means obtained for the various analytic methods. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Calibration biases were calculated by comparing the mean of each analytic method with the appropriate target values. These biases were evaluated against limits based on intra- and interindividual biological variation. Matrix effects of proficiency testing materials were assessed by comparing the rank of highest to lowest analytic method means (Spearman rank test) for each analyte. PARTICIPANTS: Approximately 3900 clinical laboratories were enrolled in the College of American Pathologists Chemistry and Ligand surveys. RESULTS: The number of methods in the Ligand Survey that failed to meet the goals for bias was 7 of 17 for thyroid-stimulating hormone and 11 of 13 for free thyroxine. The failure rates were 12 of 16 methods for thyroxine, 8 of 11 for triiodothyronine, and 9 of 11 for free triiodothyronine. The means of the analytic method for the proficiency testing material correlated significantly (P < .05) only with the fresh frozen serum means for thyroxine and thyroid-stimulating hormone in the Chemistry Survey and free triiodothyronine in the Ligand Survey. CONCLUSIONS: A majority of the methods used in thyroid function testing have biases that limit their clinical utility. Traditional proficiency testing materials do not adequately reflect these biases.

Calibration↗
PubMed2004

Metrologic traceability of total thyroxine measurements in human serum: efforts to establish a network of reference measurement laboratories.

BACKGROUND: Assuring/demonstrating metrologic traceability of in vitro diagnostics necessitates the availability of measurand-specific reference measurement systems (RMSs) and the possibility for industry to work with competent reference measurement laboratories (RMLs). Here we report the results of a European project to investigate the feasibility of developing a RMS for serum total thyroxine. METHODS: Four candidate RMLs (cRMLs) developed/implemented variants of a candidate reference measurement procedure (cRMP) based on isotope dilution-liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. The sole constraint implemented was calibration with a common thyroxine primary calibrator. The RMPs were externally validated and assessed for comparability in round-robin trials using common samples, i.e., 5 lyophilized and 33 frozen native sera. At the same time, the performance of the cRMLs organized in a network was assessed. For uniform external quality assessment, common performance specifications were agreed on. RESULTS: All cRMLs performed the cRMPs with fulfillment of the predefined specifications: total and between-laboratory CVs < or =2.0% and 2.5%, respectively, and a systematic deviation < or =0.9%, estimated with a target assigned from the mean of means obtained by the cRMLs. The mean expanded uncertainty for value assignment to the native sera was 2.1%. CONCLUSIONS: A network of cRMLs, with externally conformed competence to properly perform RMPs, has been established. Performance specifications were defined and will form the basis for admittance of new network members. A serum panel, successfully targeted during the validation process, is available for split-sample measurements with commercial routine measurement procedures. The model can now be used for other measurands for which traceability to the Systeme International d'Unites is needed.

Chromatography, Liquid↗
PubMed2004

Evaluation of a candidate reference measurement procedure for serum free testosterone based on ultrafiltration and isotope dilution-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.

BACKGROUND: To assess the analytical validity of free testosterone (FTe) measurements, a reference measurement procedure (RMP) is required. For steroids, isotope dilution-mass spectrometry is accepted as state-of-the-art technology. Because FTe is defined as the hormone fraction in serum water in equilibrium with the protein-bound fraction, the RMP should include a physical separation step. The use of equilibrium dialysis (ED) or ultrafiltration (UF) is advocated. Our objective was to develop such a candidate RMP. METHODS: We selected UF combined with isotope dilution-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (ID-GC/MS) for direct measurement of Te in the ultrafiltrate. After optimization of the UF process, the complete procedure was validated by use of split-sample comparisons with indirect ED (iED) and symmetric dialysis (SyD). RESULTS: The candidate RMP gave maximum within-day, between-day, and total CVs of 3.0%, 3.1%, and 4.3%. The Deming regression equations for the respective method comparisons were: UF-ID-GC/MS = 0.98(iED) - 53 pmol/L (r = 0.94; S(y|x)= 42 pmol/L) and UF-ID-GC/MS = 0.92(SyD) + 21 pmol/L (r = 0.97; S(y|x)= 31 pmol/L). CONCLUSIONS: We achieved the objective of a state-of-the-art candidate RMP, which agreed well with iED and SyD. However, we also demonstrated that a degree of discordance remains, which may require a decision from an authoritative organization on the recommended procedure to measure free hormone concentrations.

Blood Proteins↗
PubMed2004

Metrological traceability of calibration in the estimation and use of common medical decision-making criteria.

This manuscript explains the establishment and validation of metrological traceability of calibration for routine measurement procedures using common medical decision-making criteria. Metrological traceability is considered the basis for achieving comparability of measurement results in laboratory medicine. This concept is supported by European legislation, which demands that manufacturers provide assurance and demonstrate metrological traceability of in vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices. The guidance to comply with these legislative requirements is available in different CEN/ISO standards and is used as a basis of this manuscript. The goals and accomplishments in metrological traceability of SI- and non-SI analytes is considered. Specific problems, such as non-availability of primary reference materials and measurement procedures, lack of official endorsement, and non-commutability of certain reference materials are discussed. With respect to non-commutability, the use of split-sample measurements is advocated. Also, the expression of measurement uncertainty associated with the application of the metrological traceability chain is discussed. In addition, the need for post-market vigilance assessment of traceable performance is considered. Finally, laboratory medicine scientific and professional societies, diagnostics manufacturers, and clinicians are urged to share responsibilities for understanding the implications of metrological traceability of routine measurements.

Calibration↗
PubMed2003

Application of a C-peptide electrospray ionization-isotope dilution-liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry measurement procedure for the evaluation of five C-peptide immunoassays for urine.

This study applied electrospray ionization-isotope dilution-liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry for the evaluation of five urinary C-peptide immunoassays via split-sample measurements. The immunoassays measured in duplicate in the same run, the comparison method in triplicate over different runs. From the data, the within-run imprecision and the method comparison total RSDs were calculated. Regression analysis revealed on the one hand systematic differences, on the other, an excellent correlation between the test and comparison methods. From the spread of the data around the regression line in comparison with the 95% prediction intervals from the total RSD, sample-related effects and/or specificity problems were apparent and investigated.

C-Peptide↗